Bright languages: Difference between revisions
| Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
*Language rich in intersegmentals and no metasegmentals | *Language rich in intersegmentals and no metasegmentals | ||
''wl̥krꜣn'' /w̥l̩krħn̥/, '' | ''wl̥krꜣn'' /w̥l̩krħn̥/, ''kl̥x'' /kl̩ks/, ''wr̥l'' /w̥r̩l/, ''kr̥kt'' /kr̩kt/, ''tn̥c'' /tn̩ts/, ''tn̥k'' /tn̩k/ ''nẙx'' /n̥ĭks/, ''lw̥kwky'' /l̥ŭkʷkʲ/, ''sꜣ̥t'' /sʕ̩t/. | ||
| Line 80: | Line 80: | ||
gog yoguguluk dash /ɠɔɠ ɥoɠuɠuɠuluk daʃ/ [Mixed Breed Dark Tongue] | gog yoguguluk dash /ɠɔɠ ɥoɠuɠuɠuluk daʃ/ [Mixed Breed Dark Tongue] | ||
kw̥k yw̥kwkwlwk tꜣ̥sh / | kw̥k yw̥kwkwlwk tꜣ̥sh /ƙŭƙ ɥŭƙʷƙʷlʷƙ tʕ̩ʃ/ [Pure Breed Dark Tongue] | ||
Revision as of 13:07, 30 December 2024
This article is a construction site. This project is currently undergoing significant construction and/or revamp. By all means, take a look around, thank you. |
Bright languages are constructed languages often intended to be aesthetically pleasing, predictable, and phonologically stable. Examples are the elvish languages from J R. R. Tolkien's Middle-earth.
Introduction
Bright Tongue vs Dark Tongue
- lack of gutturals vs lack of labials
- synthesis vs agglutination
- words don't repeat vs words repeat
- diphthongs allowed vs diphthongs forbidden
- only sonorants as coda vs anything as coda except sonorants
- constraints
The catch is that no Bright or Dark Tongue is fully understood. The former is far too complicated (though steady) to be learned by Men, while the latter is easily taught in vain, as its dialects change rapidly compared to a human's life span.
Dark tongues may access /ɥ/
K [associated with choking
P [associated with kissing
In Veno's Dark Tongue
gog yoguguluk "the man speaks to me about them"
yo- "speak" + -gu- [first person] + -g- [epenthetic particle] +-ul- [third person] + -uk [generic person]
sebeze paddaen adres nirdasbar vs zhogodosh kaktatona atrosh nurtaskara
ídrā naiaris "I was bitten by a serpent", siverae aebidis "I was bitten by a mosquito" ...
nazil "flower", naevalla "sword"
belep (nom) bellī (pl) albā (col)
bel (acc) parabel (pl) ambī (col)
elbī (gen) il (pl) pasadarvā (col)
vs
gog, gog-nagog
gogash, gog-nagogash
gogu, gog-nagogu
- Belep vs gog
- Balardemea vs kalaradunga
Vocabulary drawn from the Lovecraft Mythos, Tolkien's Legendarium ...
rleh "city", kthullu "god", galrog "demon", nazg "ring", gul "ghost", shug "goat", nugurath "black",
Laiberim
Ungrauzuru
Trizandir
Naevalla
If without D-equilibrium:
- Language rich in consonants and no vowels
- Language rich in vowels and no consonants
- Language rich in intersegmentals and no metasegmentals
wl̥krꜣn /w̥l̩krħn̥/, kl̥x /kl̩ks/, wr̥l /w̥r̩l/, kr̥kt /kr̩kt/, tn̥c /tn̩ts/, tn̥k /tn̩k/ nẙx /n̥ĭks/, lw̥kwky /l̥ŭkʷkʲ/, sꜣ̥t /sʕ̩t/.
A pure anathetic language would rather focus on the combinations of words than the words themselves (meaningless individually in this case): In Veno's Dark Tongue, associations strike as grammatical in zodrak hu "dog" versus hu zodrak "cat".
A pure magis-synthetic language focuses instead on words of a variety of meanings. In Veno's Bright Tongue, elbī is a genitive of "person".
gog yoguguluk dash /ɠɔɠ ɥoɠuɠuɠuluk daʃ/ [Mixed Breed Dark Tongue]
kw̥k yw̥kwkwlwk tꜣ̥sh /ƙŭƙ ɥŭƙʷƙʷlʷƙ tʕ̩ʃ/ [Pure Breed Dark Tongue]
Anathesis: In Portuguese, ca alone means nothing, as does sa, yet casa means "house". Synthesis: In Latin, the particle -orum means not only [genitive], but also [plural] and [masculine]/[neuter]. Agglutination, on the other hand, is the neutral morphological nature.
degrees of purity
important remark: anathesis is not that the components don't have meaning, but that the composition has a novel meaning because of them