Modern Windermere: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→Syntax) |
m (→Auxiliaries) |
||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
!|present tense | !|present tense | ||
|''mor''||''moł''||''mon''||''mos''||''mot''||''mots''||''mob''||''mong''||''mam'' | |''mor''||''moł''||''mon''||''mos''||''mot''||''mots''||''mob''||''mong''||''mam'' | ||
|- | |||
!|past tense | |||
|''cher''||''cheł''||''chen''||''ches''||''chet''||''chets''||''cheb''||''cheng''||''chem'' | |||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 03:50, 11 January 2018
Modern Windermere is the sole modern descendant of Classical Windermere.
Diachronics
Phonological history
Grammatical history
- Aspect and trigger largely become derivational devices, cf. the development of PIE aspects and Semitic binyanim.
- Grammaticalization of conjugated auxiliaries, leading to a tense system.
Phonology
ə > 0 after aspirated consonants
r > ɹ
Consonants
Vowels
Stress
Stress is almost always final, but can be non-final in function words.
Morphology
Praveen's last idea for Tigal: auxiliary-based
Auxiliaries
I | thou | he | she | it | we (exc.) | we (inc.) | you (pl.) | they | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
present tense | mor | moł | mon | mos | mot | mots | mob | mong | mam |
past tense | cher | cheł | chen | ches | chet | chets | cheb | cheng | chem |
Syntax
AuxSVO or maybe AuxAVE if ergative
- Mor brits cde clăbüh te tsăgtsog.
- PRES-1SG speak about love and hate
- I speak of love and hate.'