From Linguifex
Jump to: navigation, search

Gutish is an East Germanic language descended from a language that was probably mutually intelligible with Gothic, though much of its corpus cannot have been inherited from the language of Wulfilas. It is likely, however, that the speakers of the ancestor of Gutish did consider themselves Goths, as reflected in its name. (It is likely similar in development to Modern High German – Deutsch – which is not directly descended from Old High German, but rather a similar dialect spoken by a group who also considered themselves “Diutisk.”) While it shares many of the areal changes of the Northwest Germanic languages, it is also marked by distinctive changes in palatalization, which, while similar to those of Old English, are most likely influenced by contact with Slavic languages.


Writing System

Alphabet & Pronunciation

Here I give the traditional Gutish letters followed by the Romanization I use for them in the second row. The Romanization is used throughout this article.


Non-Alphabetic Variants


Though the seven long vowels of the Non-Alphabetic Variants have individual names, they are not considered to be part of the standard alphabet or alphabetical order. Instead, each long vowel is considered alphabetically to be the equivalent of its doubled short counterpart. That is, ‹ā› is equivalent to ‹aa›, ‹ē› to ‹ee›, ‹ī› to ‹ii›, and so on. (The long vowels ‹ǣ› and ‹ǭ› are included in the standard alphabetical order, and do not have short forms, though they are written with macrons in their Romanized forms.)

(NB: The Gutish alphabet, while mainly latin- and cyrillic-based, contains several characters which are not readily representable using the standard Unicode characters. The forms presented in this wiki are a Romanization of the letters shown in the table above.)


The orthography of Gutish is quite regular to its phonology; indeed, there are very few exceptions:

  1. The letter ‹n› is used before ‹g› or ‹k› to indicate the velar nasal [ŋ]. Specifically, ‹ng› is [ŋg] and ‹nk› is [ŋk]. (E.g. drinkna [driŋ] ‘to drink’.)
  2. In combinations where ‹ng› is followed by another nasal consonant, [g] is elided in speech: ‹ngm› is [ŋm] and ‹ngn› is [ŋn]. (E.g. gangna [gaŋ.na] ‘to go’; not **[gaŋ].) In rapid speech this may also occur to the other nasal-stop combinations ‹mbn›, ‹mbm›, ‹ndm›, and ‹ndn›; sometimes the stop may also become glottal.
  3. The combination ‹rju› is realized as [rɛu̯] (rather than the expected [rju]). (E.g. frjusna [frɛu̯] ‘to freeze’.)
  4. The diphthong ‹eu› is realized as [ɛu̯] (rather than the expected [e̞u̯]). (E.g. sneugna [snɛu̯] ‘to snow’.)
  5. The diphthong ‹øu› is realized as [œy̑] (rather than the expected [ø̞u̯]).

Stress is indicated in the standard orthography with an acute accent only if:

  1. The stress is not on the first syllable, and
  2. the stressed syllable is a short vowel. (Long vowels cannot be unstressed, though they may sometimes take secondary stress.)

For example, fergúne ‘mountain’, but garǣts ‘correct’.

Ligatures & Liaisons

When two like vowels of equal value come together, the words may form a ligature. This is most common with the articles ( + a-, + u-, etc.) and particles (e.g + i-).

  • Articles
    • Mandatory:
      • sā, hwā, twā + a-, ā- → s’ā-, hw’ā-, tw’ā-
        • sā aplass’āplas, ‘the apple’
        • twā aðnatw’āðna ‘two seasons’
      • sō, þō, hō + u-, ō- → s’ō-, þ’ō-, h’ō-
        • sō uréčas’ōréča, ‘the persuit’
        • sō ōss’ōs, ‘the ewe’
      • þǣ, twǣ + e-, ǣ- → þ’ǣ-, tw’ǣ-
        • þǣ ǣjusþ’ǣjus ‘the horses’
        • twǣ elistw’ǣlis ‘two others’
      • nī, þrī, hī + i-, ī- → n’ī-, þr’ī-, h’ī-
        • nī istn’īst, ‘isn’t’
        • hī īsranh’īsran ‘this iron’
    • Optional:
      • sō, þō + V- → sw’V-, þw’V-
        • sō akuže, sw’akuže ‘the axe’
        • þō ī, þw’ī ‘those which’

Alternative Writing Systems


Coming soon...



Short Vowels Long Vowels Diphthongs
Front Central Back Front Central Back Front Central Back
Closed i · y
[i · y]
ī · ȳ
[iː · yː]
Mid e · œ
[e̞ · ø̞]
ǣ · œ̄
[e̞ː · ø̞ː]
Mid-to- ē · œu
[e̞i̯ · œy̑]
eu · ō
[ɛu̯ · o̞u̯]
Open a


Bilabial Labio-
Dental Alveolar Palato-
Velar Glottal
Plosive p · b
[p~pʰ · b]
t · d
[t~tʰ · d]
k · g
[k~kʰ · g]
Affricate č · ǧ
[ʧ · ʤ]
Nasal · m
· n
· n1
Fricative f · v
[f · v]
ð · þ
[ð · θ]
s ·
š · ž
[ʃ · ʒ]
h ·
Tap or Trill · r
Approximant · j
· w
Lateral approximant · l

1Before ‹g› or ‹k›.


This is a persistent rule that does not have much effect on declensions within the language, but does have some effect on the development of certain words. This rule is described in the Rules chapter of this document in Assimilation of [ɾ]. Specifically, /r/ is deleted when immediately followed by /ž/. For example, the possessive adjective inkur ‘your’, from earlier igqar /inkwar/ has the genitive plural form inkuža from earlier igqaraizō /inkwarɛ̄zō/ rather than the otherwise expected **inkurža. Similarly, marzjan ‘to offend’ and baurza /bɔrza/ ‘perch, bass’ → mežin, boža.

Voicing Alternation

This rule is inherited from Proto-Germanic. The rule is not persistent, but the variation in forms still affects the inflections of nouns, verbs, and adjectives in Gutish. (A similar v/f alternation rule exists in English, for example in singular knife and plural knives, or the noun strife and the verb strive.) The Gothic version of this rule caused alternation between ‹f› or ‹þ›, used only at the end of a word or before an unvoiced consonant, and ‹b› or ‹d›, used elsewhere, e.g. giban, ‘to give’, gaf, ‘gave’. There are three main realizations of this rule in Gutish:

  • v → f
  • ð → þ } at the end of a word, or before an unvoiced consonant.
  • ž → s

The implications of this rule for Gutish are:

  • ‹f› or ‹þ› occur before ‹s› in the nominative singular of masculine or some feminine strong nouns, e.g. þlǣfs ‘loaf of bread’, but genitive þlǣvis.
  • ‹f› or ‹þ› occur when word-final in the accusative of masculine or some feminine strong nouns, and the nominative and accusative of neuter strong nouns, e.g. blōþ ‘blood’, but genitive blōðis.
  • ‹f› occurs when word-final or before ‹t› in the preterit singular and the second person imperative singular of strong verbs, e.g. gaf, gaft, ‘gave’, but infinitive givna.
  • ‹þ› also occurs when word-final in the preterit singular and imperative, but is assimilated to ‹s› before ‹t› in the second person preterit (see Coronal Consonant Assimilation below), e.g. biǧin ‘to bid’ has the first- and third-person preterit baþ but second-person bast.
  • The implications for ‹s› and ‹ž› can be a little trickier, because this split was not uniform in Gothic, and intervocalic /s/ was not later voiced (as it was in many other Germanic languages, leveling out this particular conundrum), so many words retain ‹s› throughout the paradigm. These are noted in the lexicon.

Please note that because this rule is not persistent, there are several words which later developed an intervocalic ‹f› or ‹þ› from earlier ‹h› which is not affected by this rule.


Palatalization is another historic rule that is no longer persistent in Gutish, but has wide-ranging implications for inflections in Gutish. There are actually several types of palatalization that occur in Gutish, but they can all be boiled down into the following rules:

  • Masculine and feminine nouns whose roots end in ‹d› or ‹g› become palatalized before ‹s› in the nominative singular of a-, i-, and u-stems (but not feminine ō-stems). E.g. Gothic dags ‘day’, gards ‘yard’ become daǧ, garǧ. This type of palatalization only occurs when there was a /dz/ or /gz/ present in the language at some point historically (from Gothic /ds/ or /gs/).
  • A much more common form of palatalization, however, is that which occurs whenever the ending of a noun, verb, or adjective begins with ‹j›, e.g. strong masculine ja-stem nouns or adjectives or class 1 weak verbs. In these cases, the following occurs:
    • d or g + j → ǧ
    • t or k + j → č
    • s or h + j → š
    • z + j → ž (Actually, all instances of ‹z› eventually became ‹ž›, but that’s not applicable to this section.)

Palatalization of the latter type often goes hand in hand with Umlaut, below.

[b]/[v] Alternation

A less common alternation is that of ‹b› and ‹v›. This occurs in the same environment as the second type of palatalization (above), but instead of a true palatalization, instead there is a shift of ‹v› to ‹b›; or, more accurately, some paradigms without an original ‹j› are able to shift from ‹b› to ‹v› when intervocalic, but those with ‹j› are blocked from spirantizing.

For example, the adjective drœ̄vis ‘muddy’ (from Gothic drōbeis) has the dative singular form drœ̄bia (from drōbja).


Umlaut is another of those sound laws that no longer happens actively in the language, but it has become indicative of specific tenses or cases in the language.

  • The accusative singular of nouns with palatalization are not umlauted. All other forms of nouns with palatalization are umlauted.
  • The past subjunctive of verbs is umlauted (except for the 3rd person singular in formal speech). (First person singular is palatalized and umlauted.)
  • Most class 1 weak verbs and strong verbs ending in –jan in Gothic have umlaut in the present and imperative. These verbs all end with –in in Gutish.

Umlaut in Gutish initiates the following changes in the stressed vowel of a word:

  • a → e - satjan ‘to set’ → sečin
  • ā → ǣ - hlahjan ‘to laugh’ → þlǣn
  • ǭ (Got. ‹áu›) → œ̄ - hausjan ‘to hear’ → hœ̄šin
  • o (Got. ‹aú›) → œ - þaursjan ‘to thirst’ → þœršin
  • ō → œ̄ - hwōtjan ‘to threaten’ → hwœ̄čin
  • u → y - hugjan ‘to think’ → hyǧin
  • ū → ȳ - hrūkjan ‘to crow’ → þrȳčin

NB: The word “Umlaut” can refer to several different types of vowel change in Germanic languages – i/j-umlaut, u/w-umlaut, and a-umlaut most commonly – but only one type is present in Gutish: Umlaut here is used to refer specifically to i/j-umlaut, also known as i-umlaut, or front umlaut.

Coronal Consonant Assimilation

This rule has a formidable name, but is actually common to all Germanic languages. This rule states that whenever a coronal consonant (namely, d, t, or þ) is directly followed by ‹t› or ‹st›, the coronal consonant becomes s. This accounts for the English word best, from earlier betst, from *batest. This applies mainly to second person preterit strong verbs, e.g. ǧutna ‘to pour’ and biǧin ‘to bid’ have a second person preterit of gǭst ‘you poured’ and bast ‘you bade’, rather than the otherwise expected **gǭtt and **baþt.

Syncope of Unstressed Non-High Middle Vowel, working on it. I'll get back to you on this one...

Blocking of Metathetical Unpacking

Another formidable name, but what this means is that at various times historically, sound changes caused unstressed /a/ to disappear before sonorants (/l/, /r/, /m/, or /n/), turning them into syllabics. This happened at least once before the Gothic era, giving rise to words like bagms and aþn, and again before Gutish, most notably collapsing the infinitive -an to -n. Later on, syllabics were “unpacked;” that is, they regained the /a/ that had been lost, but it now appeared after the sonorant instead of before it. For example, brōþar ‘brother’ became brōðra via an intermediate */brōðr̩/. However, there are a few instances where this unpacking didn’t happen because the ‹a› before the sonorant could not be deleted; if it were, the word would have been unpronounceable. This metathesis (which, in reality, is not really metathesis, but that’s what I’m calling it for now) is also blocked after any non-intervocalic voiced continuant; that is, V[v/ð]S shifts as expected (e.g. widan > wiðn̩ > wiðna), but VC[v/ð]S does not (e.g. haldan > halðan, not **halðna).

The practicality of this rule as it applies to modern Gutish is that:

  • Dative plural a-stem nouns whose roots end in ‹–m› have the ending of ‹–am› rather than ‹–ma›, e.g. worms ‘worm’ has the dative plural of wormam rather than **wormma.
  • Masculine accusative plural strong a-stem nouns ending in ‹–n› have the ending of ‹–ans› rather than ‹–nas›, e.g. ǭns ‘oven’ has the accusative plural of ǭnans rather than **ǭnnas.
  • Infinitives of strong verbs and weak class 3 verbs whose roots end with ‹lð›, ‹lv›, ‹rð›, or ‹rv› have ‹–an› instead of ‹–na›, e.g. Gothic þaurban becomes þorvan rather than the otherwise expected **þorvna.
  • The third person plural indicative of strong verbs and weak class 3 verbs end in -anþ rather than **naþ.

Assimilation of [r] and [s]

Historically, this is a sound change that occurred in the transition from Proto-Germanic to Gothic and is no longer persistent, but it has specific reflexes that affect Gutish paradigms.

The change initially applies to "light"-syllable nouns with stems ending in ‹-s› or ‹-r› in the masculine and feminine classes that take a final ‹-z› in the nominative singular. E.g. PGmc. *weraz, *drusiz → (Mora Loss: Short Unstressed Vowel Deletion) → *werz, *drusz → (Final Obstruent Devoicing) → wers, druss → (r/s-Assimilation) → Gothic waír /wer/, drus.

Later, beginning around the time of Middle Gutish, this change was expanded analogously to other nouns and adjectives which had "heavy" syllables, and eventually the rule emerged that nouns and adjectives ending in ‹-r› and ‹-s› do not take an (additional) ‹-s› in the nominative singular, though they otherwise follow the paradigm of their particular stem. (E.g. bērsbēr ‘boar’, stiursčur ‘steer’. One notable example of this phenomenon is the Germanic tersaz (mentula) which became tairs in Gothic, but was then reanalyzed as an exception to the original r-rule (instead of the s-rule that it actually is), and eventually it became ter in Gutish. It remains, however, an unkind word.)

Phonemic Inventory


Personal Pronouns

Nom. Gen. Dat. Acc.
1sg ik mīn mis mik I, my, (to) me, me
2sg þū þīn þis þik thou, thy, (to) thee, thee
3sg.masc is is itma in he, his, (to) him, him
3sg.neu it is itma it it, its, (to) it, it
3sg.fem ižas iža ī, īja she, her, (to) her, her
3sg.ind sist is itma sist they, their, (to) them, them
1du wit unkar unkis unk we two, our, (to) us, us
2du jut inkur inkus ink you/ye two, your, (to) you, you
1pl wīs unsar unsis uns we all, our, (to) us, us
2pl jūs ižur ižus ižus you/ye all, your, (to) you, you
3pl.masc īs iža im ins they, their, (to) them, them
3pl.neu ī, īja iža im ī, īja they, their, (to) them, them
3pl.fem ījas iža im ījas they, their, (to) them, them

Relative Pronouns

There are two types of relative pronouns in Gutish, and although they are used interchangeably, I present them here in two separate tables: The first (more common) forms are with the Gothic clitic particle ei- having separated from the pronouns (see Clitic Separation), and the second, more “traditional” forms where the clitic is still attached to the word.

Nom. Gen. Dat. Acc. Nom. Gen. Dat. Acc.
sg.masc is ī þis ī þatm’ī þan ī iži þiži þetmi þeni
sg.neu þat ī þis ī þatm’ī þat ī þī, þeti þiži þetmi þī, þeti
sg.fem sō ī, sw’ī þižas ī þiž’ī þō ī, þw’ī þižaži þiži þī
pl.masc īs ī, þǣ ī þiž’ī þǣm ī þans ī iži þiži þǣmi þenǧi
pl.neu þō ī, þw’ī þiž’ī þǣm ī þō ī, þw’ī þœ̄gi þiži þǣmi þœ̄gi
pl.fem þōs ī þiž’ī þǣm ī þōs ī þœ̄ži þiži þǣmi þœ̄ži

Indefinite Pronouns

Nom. Gen. Dat. Acc.
inter.masc hwas hwis hwatma hwan who, whose, to whom, whom
inter.neu hwā hwis hwatma hwat what, &c
inter.fem hwō hwižas hwiža hwō who, &c
gen. sist is itma sist one, one’s, &c
neg. nima hun nimis hun nimin hun nimna hun noöne, noöne’s, &c
refl. - sīn sis sik himself, herself, itself, &c


Declinable Numerals

Singular (‘one, a, an’)

Nom. Gen. Dat. Acc.
masc. ǣns ǣnis ǣnatma ǣnan
neu. ǣn(at) ǣnis ǣnatma ǣn(at)
fem. ǣna ǣnažas ǣna ǣna

Dual (‘two, both’)

Numeral Distributive (short) Distributive (long)
Nom. Gen. Dat. Acc. Nom. Gen. Dat. Acc. Nom. Gen. Dat. Acc.
masc. twǣ twǣǧa twǣm twans bǣža bǣm bans bījaþs bīðiža bīðum bīðans
neu. twā twǣǧa twǣm twā bǣža bǣm bījaþ bīðiža bīðum bījaþ
fem. twōs twǣǧa twǣm twōs bījas bǣža bǣm bījas bīðas bīðiža bīðum bīðas

Trial (‘three, all three’)

Numeral Distributive
Nom. Gen. Dat. Acc. Nom. Gen. Dat. Acc.
masc. þrīs þrīja þrim þrins þrǣ þrǣža þrǣm þrans
neu. þrī þrīja þrim þrī þrā þrǣža þrǣm þrā
fem. þrīs þrīja þrim þrins þrījas þrǣža þrǣm þrījas

Undeclinable Numerals

# 1# 2# #0 #00 #000 #000
0 (nǣns) tǣjun, tǣn twǣtiǧis -tiǧis tēhund þūsunde -ljǭn
1 (ǣns) ǣnlif twǣtiǧis ǣns tǣjun ǣn hund ǣna þūsunde miljǭn
2 (twǣ) twalif twǣtiǧi twǣ twǣtiǧis twā hunda tōs þūsunǧis biljǭn
3 (þrīs) þrījatǣn twǣtiǧi þrīs þrīstiǧis þrī hunda þrī þūsunǧis þriljǭn
4 fiður, fiðra fiðratǣn twǣtiǧi fiður fiðratiǧis fiður hunda fiður þūsunǧis friljǭn
5 fim fimtǣn twǣtiǧi fim fimtiǧis fim hunda fim þūsunǧis fimfiljǭn
6 sǣs sǣstǣn twǣtiǧi sǣs sǣstiǧis sǣs hunda sǣs þūsunǧis sǣsiljǭn
7 sivun, sivna sivnatǣn twǣtiǧi sivun sivnatiǧis sivun hunda sivun þūsunǧis sivniljǭn
8 āta ātatǣn twǣtiǧis āta ātatiǧis āta hunda āta þūsunǧis ātatiljǭn
9 njun njuntǣn twǣtiǧi njun njuntiǧis njun hunda njun þūsunǧis njuniljǭn

The numbers in Gutish – as in most languages – have gone through more phonological change than other words, and as a result, there are some irregularities. Four numbers have two forms (some of which may be optional). There is also an innovated trial distributive (‘all three’), probably by assimilation from the dual (‘both’). The number ‘one’, usually alternating with the indefinite article in most languages, is used merely for counting purposes, as an indefinite article is not used in Gutish.

The number ‘four’ is fiður, where we would normally expect **fidur through regular sound change (specifically, the change of /d/ to /ð/ would normally be blocked by the following /w/ in fidwōr). There is also a further lenited form of fiðra, which is optional when it stands alone, but required in compounds. (Gothic also had two versions of ‘four’: fidwōr and a compound form fidur.)

The number ‘seven’ has the expected form of sivun, but also a lenited form of sivna, again, required in compounds but otherwise optional. ‘Eight’ is āta, but may optionally be lenited to āt. (This is a newer innovation, and is not considered to be correct in writing.) Finally ‘ten’ is tǣjun or lenited tǣn, the latter being used exclusively in the “teen” numbers, the former being preferred elsewhere, though still optional.

For compounding numbers, Gothic separated each of the number’s components with the word jah (‘and’, now ), but Gutish has dispensed with this and now uses i – believed to be a shortened form of – only before the last component. For numbers ending with –tiǧis, a further contraction has become standard, and it is shortened to –tiǧi, e.g. þrīstiǧi fim ‘thirty-five’. Hund becomes hundi and hunda is also contracted to hund’i, þūsunde to þūsund’i, and þūsunǧis to þūsunǧi. (Note the lack of apostrophe in -tiǧi, hundi, and þūsunǧi.) No -i- is added before numbers beginning with a vowel, i.e. ǣn- and āta.

Number terms higher than ‘thousand’ are ostensibly borrowed from Latin, though they contain their own Germanic innovations, e.g. þriljǭn ‘trillion’, fiðriljǭn ‘quadrillion’, fimfiljǭn ‘quintillion’, instead of the expected **triljǭn, **kwaðriljǭn, and **kwintiljǭn.

Another note concerning the higher numbers: Gutish follows the short scale for higher numbers (whereas most European countries currently use the long scale); that is, each new number term is one thousand times larger than the previous term (whereas in the long scale, each new term is one million times larger). This is further confused by the now-standard European “hybrid” model where intermediate terms in the long scale are applied to the “thousands” with the suffix ‘-ard’. The following table is applicable to most modern standards:

N⁰ Numerals Gutish Short Hybrid Long Metric
10³ 1,000 þūsunde thousand thousand thousand kilo
10⁶ 1,000,000 miljǭn million million million Mega
10⁹ 1,000,000,000 biljǭn billion milliard thousand million Giga
10¹² 1,000,000,000,000 þriljǭn trillion billion billion Tera
10¹⁵ 1,000,000,000,000,000 fiðriljǭn quadrillion billiard thousand billion Peta
10¹⁸ 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 fimfiljǭn quintillion trillion trillion Exa
10²¹ 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 sǣsiljǭn sextillion trilliard thousand trillion Zetta
10²⁴ 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 sivniljǭn septillion quadrillion quadrillion Yotta
10²⁷ 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 ātatiljǭn octillion quadrilliard thousand quadrillion -
10³⁰ 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 njuniljǭn nonillion quintillion quintillion -

Ordinal Numbers

Ordinal numbers are usually formed by adding a dental suffix to the end of a number, though there is some suppletion for the first and second ordinals, and the third is irregular (just as is the case in English).

In Proto-Germanic and Gothic, all of the ordinals except for first and second used only the weak declension, but all ordinals now use both strong and weak declensions according to standard rules. As with the cardinal numbers, there are two acceptable forms for ‘fourth’, ‘seventh’, and ‘tenth,’ following the same lenition as the cardinals, though there is only one form of ‘eighth’. An alternate form of ‘third’, þrīǧas is sometimes used, but it is not always considered correct.

1 frumist, frums first
2 anðras second
3 þriǧas, þrīǧas third
4 fiðraþs fourth
5 fimft fifth
6 sǣst sixth
7 sivunǧ seventh
8 ātuþs eighth
9 njunǧ ninth
10 tǣjunǧ, tǣnǧ tenth
11 ǣnlift eleventh
12 twālift twelfth
13 þrītǣnǧ thirteenth
20 twǣtiǧist twentieth
100 hundaþs hundredth
1,000 þūsundiþs thousandth
1,000,000 miljǭnǧ millionth

Alternative Numbers

The Gothic number system, modeled after the Greek system, which used the letters of the alphabet instead of separate unique characters, continued to be used well into the middle ages (Middle Gutish), and certain taboo numbers came to be called by their character representation rather than their numeric form. Primarily among these numbers was '13', which was written in Gothic as ·ig·. This also occurred with the numbers '113' (rig), '213' (sig), '313' (tig), '413' (wig), and '513' (fig). (This was not mirrored in the higher numbers of the hundreds, because most of those combinations would have been unpronounceable.)

The number '19' is also sometimes called by the same formulation.

Certain slang terms have also developed out of this system, in reverse, as it were. For example, a 'road' or 'highway' is sometimes referred to as a '413' (fiðrahunda þrījatǣn or fiðra-þrītǣn), written wig (the accusative singular of wiǧ ('road').

A much more recent slang term that has evolved from this system is the use of the number '843' to represent the (unpronounceable) letter combination ·omg·.

Articles & Determiners

Gutish has two definite articles, and his, both of which are equivalent to ‘the,’ but may also be translated as ‘that’ and ‘this’, respectively. Where there is a lack of clear proximity-based dichotomy, is usually preferred.

There is no indefinite article in Gutish.

Nom. Gen. Dat. Acc. Nom. Gen. Dat. Acc. þis þatma þan his his hitma hin þat þis þatma þat hit his hitma hit þižas þiža þō hīja hižas hiža hī, hīja þǣ þiža þǣm þans hīs hiža him hins þō þiža þǣm þō hī, hīja hiža him hī, hīja þōs þiža þǣm þōs hījas hiža him hījas


Noun classes differ by suffix vowel class and by gender. They may also differ by glides (/j/ or /w/) suffixed to the stem and/or the presence of infixive /n/. The main classes are those stems in /a/ or /ō/, in /i/, in /u/, or in /n/ (as described below: See A Note on Strong and Weak Nouns). There are also a few minor classes in consonant stems (a.k.a. Ø-stem), in /r/ (a very small class having to do with familial relations), and in /nd/ (based on the nominalization of the present participle). These minor classes will be discussed here, but for the learner who is new to Germanic languages, these should be treated as irregular declensions and learned by rote. Many of these have also been regularized in Gutish through the process of paradigmatic levelling, and their declensions have been assimilated into other classes.

Every noun in Gutish (and most Germanic languages) has eight possible forms. These are the singular and plural forms of the nominative (those nouns which comprise the subject of the sentence), genitive (those used to indicate possession or relation), dative (the indirect object), and accusative (the direct object).

Masculine and feminine strong nouns usually take an ending of –s for the nominative singular, while neuter nouns take no ending. The genitive is almost universally indicated by –is (this is equivalent to the “ ’s ” of the English possessive). The dative usually takes –a. The accusative usually does not take any ending.

In the plural, Masculine and feminine nouns usually take –as as an ending; neuter takes –a. The genitive plural also takes –a. The dative plural takes –am, but in most cases this ending undergoes a process of metathesis, rendering it –ma. Finally, the accusative plural of masculine and feminine nouns is usually –ans, but again may metathesize to –nas; neuter accusative plurals generally take –a.

Most of the actual declensions of nouns are fairly standard – much more standardized, in fact, than Gothic – however, the various phonological rules governing the language create a great deal of variation (See Phonology). It is important to be familiar with the rules set forth in the Phonology section of this document in order to fully understand some of the otherwise unexpected variants that emerge.

A Note on Strong and Weak Nouns

In most Germanic languages, nouns, verbs, and adjectives tend to be broken into categories considered “strong” and “weak.” In nouns and adjectives, “weak” means that the words cling to their determiner endings inherited from Proto-Indo-European, which usually have an /n/ inserted between the root and the ending. For the purposes of this text, I will dispense with the traditional strong and weak categories as relates to nouns and simply relate the various categories into which nouns can be classified, based on their inherited Proto-Germanic endings (which include the /n/ infix where applicable). Since these endings can be irregular and each class must be learned by rote anyway, there is no need in the context of the Gutish language to add this additional arbitrary distinction.

a- and ō-stems

By far the most common type of noun in all of the Germanic languages, a- and ō-stems become the basis of several sub-classes of nouns. Masculine and neuter nouns took and ending of -a (from Proto-Indo-European -o), while feminine nouns took -ō (from PIE -ā).

a- and ō-stems

Strong Masculine a-Stems

This is the most common type of noun class in Gutish as well as in most Germanic languages. As such, it is also the most varied in terms of declension.

Nom.Sg. Gen.Sg. Dat.Sg. Acc.Sg. Nom.Pl. Gen.Pl. Dat.Pl. Acc.Pl.  
PGmc: slǣpaz slǣpis slǣpai slǣpą slǣpōz slǣpǫ̂ slǣpamaz slǣpanz ‘sleep’
Gothic: slēps slēpis slēpa slēp slēpōs slēpē slēpam slēpans
Gutish: slēps slēpis slēpa slēp slēpas slēpa slēpma slēpnas
This is the default declension of the a-stem paradigm. Variations are demonstrated below.
Syllabics: bagmas bagmis bagma bagma bagmas bagma bagmam bagmans ‘tree’
Nouns with roots ending in a syllabic sonorant (i.e. an obstruent followed by a sonorant consonant) have a slightly different paradigm. There is an epenthetic /a/ in the nominative and accusative singular, and lack of metathesis in the dative and accusative plural.
Clusters: ast_ astis asta ast astas asta astma astnas ‘branch’
fiš_ fišis fiša fiš fišas fiša fišma fišnas ‘fish’
wer_ weris wera wer weras wera werma wernas ‘man’
ams_ amsis amsa ams amsas amsa amsma amsnas ‘shoulder’
This category deals with three different types of changes, but because the results are the same, I’ve combined them here. In all of these examples, the final /s/ is deleted (or assimilated) from the nominative. In the first example, this is the result of a cluster simplification rule (sps, sts, sks, fts → sp, st, sk, ft, respectively). The second is the same, but a later change also caused the cluster /sk/ to shift to /š/ in certain environments. The last two examples are the result of much early (pre-Gothic) assimilation of /s/. In Gothic, this only applied to certain short syllables, but it became universal by the time of Gutish.
Voicing Alternation: þlǣfs þlǣvis þlǣva þlǣf þlǣvas þlǣva þlǣvma þlǣvnas ‘bread’
ǭþs ǭðis ǭða ǭþ ǭðas ǭða ǭðma ǭðnas ‘fortune’
s_ žis ža s žas ža žma žnas ‘spear’
In the Voicing Alternation category, the final consonant of nouns in the nominative and accusative singular are devoiced. This is a rule inherited from Gothic times, but it has changed slightly in application. Note that in the last example, the s of the nominative singular is also assimilated as per the rules of root-final s in Clusters (above) This now also applies to nouns in -f# and -þ# which go through a post-Gothic voicing rather than a pre-Gothic devoicing. (Voicing alternation is shown with devoiced consonants in blue and voiced in green.)
Affrication: daǧ dagis daga dag dagas daga dagma dagnas ‘day’
winǧ windis winda wind windas winda windma windnas ‘wind’
Roots ending in /g/ or /d/ undergo affrication in the nominative singular. They are otherwise declined normally. Furthermore, nouns traditionally classified as “nd-stems” in Proto-Germanic and Gothic have been assimilated into this class.
Continuant Clusters: hwerbs hwervis hwerva hwerb hwervas hwerva hwervam hwervans ‘planet’
barǧ bais baa bard baas baa baam baans ‘beard’
Roots ending in a cluster of a liquid followed by a voiced fricative (i.e /lv, rv, lð, rð, lž/), similar to the Syllabics group, blocks metathesis in the Dative and Accusative Plural declensions. Other phonological considerations from other groups may also apply (indicated in blue).

Strong Neuter a-Stems

The strong neuter a-stems are just like the masculine, except that the neuter does not take an ‹-s› on the nominative singular (i.e. the nominative is the same as the accusative), and the nominative and accusative plurals are identical to the dative singular. In other words, any of the irregularities discussed above that have to do with these categories will no longer apply for neuter a-stem nouns.

Nom.Sg. Gen.Sg. Dat.Sg. Acc.Sg. Nom.Pl. Gen.Pl. Dat.Pl. Acc.Pl.  
PGmc: barną barnis barnai barną barnō barnǫ̂ barnamaz barnō ‘child’
Gothic: barn barnis barna barn barna barnē barnam barna
Gutish: barn barnis barna barn barna barna barnma barnnas
  This is the default declension of the a-stem paradigm. Note the metathesis in the endings on the dative and accusative plural. The variations for this class of nouns are similar to those of the masculine, though not as plentiful.
Syllabics: bragna bragnis bragna bragna bragna bragna bragnam bragna ‘brain’
Nouns with roots ending in a syllabic sonorant (i.e. an obstruent followed by a sonorant consonant) have a slightly different paradigm. There is an epenthetic /a/ in the nominative and accusative singular, and lack of metathesis in the dative and accusative plural.
Voicing Alternation: þrōf þrōvis þrōva þrōf þrōva þrōva þrōvma þrōva ‘bread’
hǭviþ hǭviðis hǭviða hǭviþ hǭviða hǭviða hǭviðma hǭviða ‘head’
bjus bjužis bjuža bjus bjuža bjuža bjužma bjuža ‘beer’
In the Voicing Alternation category, the final consonant of nouns in the nominative and accusative singular are devoiced. This is a rule inherited from Gothic times, but now also applies to neuter nouns in -f# and -þ# which go through a post-Gothic voicing rather than a pre-Gothic devoicing.
Continuant Clusters: kalb kalvis kalva kalb kalva kalva kalvam kalva ‘calf’
bord borðis borða bord borða borða borðam borða ‘table’
Roots ending in a cluster of a liquid followed by a voiced fricative (i.e /lv, rv, lð, rð, lž/), similar to the Syllabics group, blocks metathesis in the Dative and Accusative Plural declensions. Other phonological considerations from other groups may also apply (indicated in blue).

Strong Feminine ō-Stems

The simplest noun class by far is the strong feminine ō-stem. There are mercifully no variations.

Nom.Sg. Gen.Sg. Dat.Sg. Acc.Sg. Nom.Pl. Gen.Pl. Dat.Pl. Acc.Pl.  
PGmc: erþō erþōz erþōi erþǭ erþôz erþǫ̂ erþōmaz erþôz ‘earth’
Gothic: aírþa aírþais aírþai aírþa aírþōs aírþō aírþōm aírþōs
Gutish: erða erðis erða erða erðas erða erðam erðas
  This is the default declension of the ō-stem paradigm. Note the assimilation of the genitive singular (from the expected “-as”).

ja- and jō-stems

While traditionally listed as sub-classes of a- and ō-stems, the j-stem nouns differ from these in two important ways: Umlaut and Palatalization. In the examples below, an asterisk (*) by a form indicates that Umlaut applies to that form. A dagger (†) indicates that palatalization and umlaut both apply. (Umlaut can be triggered without palatalization, but wherever palatalization occurs, umlaut does as well.)

Umlaut: If the stressed vowel of the stem is a back vowel (a, ā, o, ǭ, ō, u, or ū), there is umlaut in this form. (Note: Umlaut does not occur if any unstressed syllables intercede between the stressed vowel and the ending; for example, þūsunde ‘thousand’ is a feminine ijō-stem noun, but there is no umlaut in the dative or genitive (þūsunǧis, þūsunǧa) because of the unstressed /a/ between the /ū/ and the ending.)

Palatalization: If the stem ends in d, g, t, k, s, or v there is palatalization in this form. (In this case, b/v alternation will be considered a type of palatalization, because it occurs in the same environment.)

Strong Masculine ja-Stems

Nom.Sg. Gen.Sg. Dat.Sg. Acc.Sg. Nom.Pl. Gen.Pl. Dat.Pl. Acc.Pl.  
PGmc: harjaz harjis harjai har harjōz harjǫ̂ harjamaz harjanz ‘army’
Gothic: harjis harjis harja hari harjōs har harjam harjans
Gutish: heris heris heria hare heris heria herim herins
  Note that the accusative singular is the only form which does not have umlaut or palatalization.

Strong Neuter ja-Stems

Nom.Sg. Gen.Sg. Dat.Sg. Acc.Sg. Nom.Pl. Gen.Pl. Dat.Pl. Acc.Pl.  
PGmc: fergun fergunjis fergunjai fergun fergun fergunjǫ̂ fergunjamaz fergun ‘mountain’
Gothic: faírguni faírgunjis faírgunja faírguni faírgunja faírgun faírgunjam faírgunja
Gutish: fergúne fergýnis fergýnia fergúne fergýnia fergýnia fergýnim fergýnia
  Like the masculine form, but the nominative singular is the same as the accusative, and the nominative and accusative plural are the same as the dative singular (just as with the a-stems).

Strong Feminine jō-Stems

Nom.Sg. Gen.Sg. Dat.Sg. Acc.Sg. Nom.Pl. Gen.Pl. Dat.Pl. Acc.Pl.  
PGmc: ban banjōz banjōi ban banjôz banjǫ̂ banjōmaz banjôz ‘wound’
Gothic: banja banjōs banjai banja banjōs ban banjōm banjōs
Gutish: benia benis benia benia benis benia benim benis
  Because all feminine jō-stem nouns are subject to umlaut and palatalization, there is no perceived change in form, so these have ostensibly become regular.

ija- and ijō-stems

These nouns are very similar to the previous category, but in Proto-Germanic an extra syllable was added after a “long stem” – a phenomenon known as Siever’s Law – which caused the discrepancy seen in Gothic between nouns with -jis and those with -eis. In Gutish, the main remnant of these long stem nouns is that umlaut applies, but not palatalization.

Strong Masculine ija-Stems

Nom.Sg. Gen.Sg. Dat.Sg. Acc.Sg. Nom.Pl. Gen.Pl. Dat.Pl. Acc.Pl.  
PGmc: blōstrijaz blōstrijis blōstrijai blōstriją blōstrijōz blōstrijǫ̂ blōstrijamaz blōstrijanz ‘worshipper’
Gothic: blōstrjis blōstrjis blōstrja blōstri blōstrjōs blōstr blōstrjam blōstrjans
Gutish: blœ̄stris* blœ̄stris* blœ̄stria blōstre blœ̄stris blœ̄stria blœ̄strim blœ̄strins

Strong Neuter ija-Stems

Nom.Sg. Gen.Sg. Dat.Sg. Acc.Sg. Nom.Pl. Gen.Pl. Dat.Pl. Acc.Pl.  
PGmc: anþiją anþīs anþijai anþiją anþijō anþijǫ̂ anþijamaz anþijō ‘forehead’
Gothic: anþi anþjis anþja anþi anþja anþ anþjam anþja
Gutish: anþe enþis* enþia anþe enþia enþia enþim enþia
  Note: In Gothic, neuter ija-stems were assimilated into the neuter ja-stems, so -jis appears in the genitive instead of the expected -eis. This assimilation did not take place for the ancestor of Gutish.

Strong Feminine ijō-Stems

(This is also sometimes referred to as ī-stem or ī/jō-stem because of the form of the nominative singular.)

Nom.Sg. Gen.Sg. Dat.Sg. Acc.Sg. Nom.Pl. Gen.Pl. Dat.Pl. Acc.Pl.  
PGmc: aurī aurijōz aurijōi aurijǭ aurijôz aurijǫ̂ aurijōmaz aurijôz ‘riverbank’
Gothic: auri aurjōs aurjai aurja aurjōs aur aurjōm aurjōs
Gutish: ǭre œ̄ris œ̄ria œ̄ria œ̄ris œ̄ria œ̄rim œ̄ris

wa- and wō-stems

Nouns in these classes are fairly rare, but a large number of them are also fairly irregular; namely those nouns whose roots end with a vowel or h-, which causes some rather unexpected things to happen to the w. (These will be treated separately.)

Strong Masculine wa-Stems

Nom.Sg. Gen.Sg. Dat.Sg. Acc.Sg. Nom.Pl. Gen.Pl. Dat.Pl. Acc.Pl.  
PGmc: sparwaz sparwis sparwai spar sparwōz sparwǫ̂ sparwamaz sparwanz ‘shadow’
Gothic: sparws sparwis sparwa sparw sparwōs spar sparwam sparwans
Gutish: sparus sparis sparua sparo sparus sparua sparum sparuns

Strong Neuter wa-Stems

Nom.Sg. Gen.Sg. Dat.Sg. Acc.Sg. Nom.Pl. Gen.Pl. Dat.Pl. Acc.Pl.  
PGmc: mel melwis melwai mel mel melwǫ̂ melwamaz mel ‘flour, meal’
Gothic: milu milwis milwa milu milwa mil milwam milwa
Gutish: milo milus milua milo milua milua milum milua
Vwa-stems: strǭ straugis strauga strǭ strauga strauga straugma strauga ‘straw’
knio knjugis knjuga knio knjuga knjuga knjugma knjuga ‘knee’
  When the /-wa/ ending was immediately preceded by a vowel, the paradigm was altered by the second expansion of East Germanic umlaut; /g/ was inserted into the paradigm, and when preceded by /i/, it changes to /j/ in the same environment where /g/ is inserted. When this happens, the process that normally causes the dative ending of wa-stem nouns to avoid metathesis is interrupted.

Strong Feminine wō-Stems

Nom.Sg. Gen.Sg. Dat.Sg. Acc.Sg. Nom.Pl. Gen.Pl. Dat.Pl. Acc.Pl.  
PGmc: wul wulwōz wulwōi wul wulwôz wulwǫ̂ wulwōmaz wulwôz ‘robbery’
Gothic: wulwa wulwōs wulwai wulwa wulwōs wul wulwōm wulwōs
Gutish: wulua wulus wulua wulua wulus wulua wulum wulus

wja- and wjō-stems

Um... stay tuned. These are a little bit too "varsity-level" for what I want to include on this page right now.


The feminine i-stem paradigm is identical to that of the masculine. There is no neuter i-stem in Gutish.

Nom.Sg. Gen.Sg. Dat.Sg. Acc.Sg. Nom.Pl. Gen.Pl. Dat.Pl. Acc.Pl.  
PGmc: matiz matīz matī matį matīz matjǫ̂ matimaz matinz ‘food’
Gothic: mats matis mata mat mateis matē matim matins
Gutish: mats matis mata mat metis* mata matim matins


Proto-Germanic and Gothic consonant-stems don't really belong here under i-stem nouns, but these were all assimilated into the i-stem class in Gutish. (Neuter consonant stems are... more complicated.)


Strong Masculine & Feminine u-Stems

The feminine u-stem paradigm is identical to that of the masculine.

Nom.Sg. Gen.Sg. Dat.Sg. Acc.Sg. Nom.Pl. Gen.Pl. Dat.Pl. Acc.Pl.  
PGmc: sunuz sunauz suniwi sunų suniwiz suniwǫ̂ sunumaz sununz ‘son’
Gothic: sunus sunaus sunau sunu sunjus suniwē sunum sununs
Gutish: sunus sunis suna suno synis synjuga sunum sununs

Strong Neuter u-Stems

Nom.Sg. Gen.Sg. Dat.Sg. Acc.Sg. Nom.Pl. Gen.Pl. Dat.Pl. Acc.Pl.  
PGmc: līþu līþauz līþiwi līþu līþū līþiwǫ̂ līþumaz līþū ‘cider’
Gothic: leiþu leiþaus leiþau leiþu leiþu leiþiwē leiþum leiþu
Gutish: līðo līðus līða līðo līðo līǧuga līðum līðo

Strong Masculine & Feminine ju-Stems

Nom.Sg. Gen.Sg. Dat.Sg. Acc.Sg. Nom.Pl. Gen.Pl. Dat.Pl. Acc.Pl.  
PGmc: stubjuz stubjauz stubjiwi stub stubjiwiz stubjiwǫ̂ stubjumaz stubjunz ‘dust’
Gothic: stubjus stubjaus stubjau stubju stubjus stubjiwē stubjum stubjuns
Gutish: stybis stybis stybia stybio stybis stybjuga stybim stybins


This is a small class of masculine and feminine nouns that make up some of the oldest words in the Proto-Indo-European lexicon. There are six extant examples of this category in Gutish (only four were attested in Gothic), all consisting of immediate family members. Rather than expound on a formula to remember them, here: Just memorize them all!

Nom.Sg. Gen.Sg. Dat.Sg. Acc.Sg. Nom.Pl. Gen.Pl. Dat.Pl. Acc.Pl.  
PGmc: -ēr -urz -ri -erų -riz -rǫ̂ -rumaz -runz  
Gothic: -ar -rs -r -ar -rjus - -rum -runs
Gutish: -ra -ris -ra -ra -ris* -ra -rum -runs
brōþēr - brōþar brōðra brōðris brōðra brōðra brœ̄ðris* brōðra brōðrum brōðruns ‘brother’
fadēr - fadar faðra faðris faðra faðra feðris* faðra faðrum faðruns ‘father’
mōþēr – [mōþar] mōðra mōðris mōðra mōðra mœ̄ðris* mōðra mōðrum mōðruns ‘mother’
swestēr - swistar swistra swistris swistra swistra swistris* swistra swistrum swistruns ‘sister’
duhtēr - dauhtar dǭtra dǭtris dǭtra dǭtra dœ̄tris* dǭtra dǭtrum dǭtruns ‘daughter’
þeuhtēr – [þiuhtar] þjūtra þjūtris þjūtra þjūtra þjūtris* þjūtra þjūtrum þjūtruns ‘grandson’

an- and ōn-stems

Weak Masculine an-Stems

Nom.Sg. Gen.Sg. Dat.Sg. Acc.Sg. Nom.Pl. Gen.Pl. Dat.Pl. Acc.Pl.  
PGmc: uhsô uhsiniz uhsini uhsanų uhsaniz uhsanǫ̂ uhsammaz uhsanunz ‘ox’
Gothic: auhsa auhsins auhsin auhsan auhsans auhsanē auhsam auhsans
Gutish: ǭsa ǭsins ǭsin ǭsna ǭsnas ǭsana ǭsma ǭsnas

Weak Neuter an-Stems

Nom.Sg. Gen.Sg. Dat.Sg. Acc.Sg. Nom.Pl. Gen.Pl. Dat.Pl. Acc.Pl.  
PGmc: hertô hertiniz hertini hertô hertōnō hertanǫ̂ hertammaz hertōnō ‘heart’
Gothic: hairtō hairtins hairtin hairtō hairtōna hairtanē hairtam hairtōna
Gutish: herta hertins hertin herta hertana hertana hertma hertana

Weak Feminine ōn-Stems

Nom.Sg. Gen.Sg. Dat.Sg. Acc.Sg. Nom.Pl. Gen.Pl. Dat.Pl. Acc.Pl.  
PGmc: kwenǭ kwenōniz kwenōni kwenōnų kwenōniz kwenōnǫ̂ kwenōmaz kwenōnunz ‘woman’
Gothic: qinō qinōns qinōn qinōn qinōns qinōnō qinōm qinōns
Gutish: kwina kwinans kwinan kwinan kwinans kwinana kwinam kwinans

(i)jan- and (i)jōn-stems

I will treat the –ja- and –ija- stems together, since they are identical in Gothic and Gutish. Note that paltalization (and, by extension, umlaut) applies in all declensions.

Weak Masculine (i)jan-Stems

Nom.Sg. Gen.Sg. Dat.Sg. Acc.Sg. Nom.Pl. Gen.Pl. Dat.Pl. Acc.Pl.  
PGmc: wil wiljiniz wiljini wiljanų wiljaniz wiljanǫ̂ wiljammaz wiljanunz ‘will, desire’
Gothic: wilja wiljins wiljin wiljan wiljans wiljanē wiljam wiljans
Gutish: wilia wilins wilin wilin wilins wilina wilim wilins

Weak Neuter (i)jan-Stems

Nom.Sg. Gen.Sg. Dat.Sg. Acc.Sg. Nom.Pl. Gen.Pl. Dat.Pl. Acc.Pl.  
PGmc: ‡sigli ‡siglijiniz ‡siglijini ‡sigli ‡siglijōnō ‡siglijanǫ̂ ‡siglijammaz ‡siglijōnō ‘sigil, seal’
Gothic: sigl sigljins sigljin sigl sigljōna sigljanē sigljam sigljōna
Gutish: siglia siglins siglin siglia siglina siglina siglim siglina
  ‡ This noun was borrowed into Gothic from Latin; the Proto-Germanic here is extrapolated. The –(i)- in the Proto-Germanic form would have appeared in this declension (had it existed), but I leave it in parentheses here because there is still a difference between –jô and –ijô stems in Proto-Germanic.

Weak Feminine (i)jōn-Stems

Nom.Sg. Gen.Sg. Dat.Sg. Acc.Sg. Nom.Pl. Gen.Pl. Dat.Pl. Acc.Pl.  
PGmc: brun brunjōniz brunjōni brunjōnų brunjōniz brunjōnǫ̂ brunjōmaz brunjōnunz ‘breastplate’
Gothic: brun brunjōns brunjōn brunjōn brunjōns brunjōnō brunjōm brunjōns
Gutish: brynia brynins brynin brynin brynins brynina brynim brynins

wan- and wōn-stems

Weak Masculine wan-Stems

Weak Neuter wan-Stems

Weak Feminine wōn-Stems


This is a highly productive class of exclusively feminine nouns.

Weak Feminine īn-Stems

Nom.Sg. Gen.Sg. Dat.Sg. Acc.Sg. Nom.Pl. Gen.Pl. Dat.Pl. Acc.Pl.  
PGmc: aiþį̄ aiþīniz aiþīni aiþīnų aiþīniz aiþīnǫ̂ aiþīmaz aiþīnunz ‘mother’
Gothic: aiþei aiþeins aiþein aiþein aiþeins aiþeinō aiþeim aiþeins
Gutish: ǣði* ǣðins* ǣðin* ǣðin* ǣðins* ǣðina* ǣðim* ǣðins*


Strong Verbs

Strong Verbs: Class I (ī – ǣ – i – i)

Non-finite Past Ind. Past Sbj. Pres. Ind. Pres. Sbj. Imperative
Infinitive: ik grǣp gripia grīpa grīpa  
grīpna þū grǣft gripis grīpis gripas grīp
Gerund: is/sī/it grǣp gripe gripiþ gripa gripaða
grīpnaǧ wit/wīs gripum gripim grīpma grīpam grīpma
Part.: jut/jūs gripuþ gripiþ grīpiþ grīpaþ grīpiþ
gripnas īs/ījas/ī gripun gripin grīpnaþ grīpan grīnaða

Strong Verbs: Class II (ju – ǭ – u – u)

Non-finite Past Ind. Past Sbj. Pres. Ind. Pres. Sbj. Imperative
Infinitive: ik strǭp strupia strjupa strjupa  
strjupna þū strǭft strypis* strjupis strjupas strjup
Gerund: is/sī/it strǭp strupe strjupiþ strjupa strjupaða
strjupnaǧ wit/wīs strupum strypim* strjupma strjupam strjupma
Part.: jut/jūs strupuþ strypiþ* strjupiþ strjupaþ strjupiþ
strupnas īs/ījas/ī strupun strypin* strjupnaþ strjupan strjupnaða

Strong Verbs: Class III (i – a – u – u)

Non-finite Past Ind. Past Sbj. Pres. Ind. Pres. Sbj. Imperative
Infinitive: ik band bynǧa binda binda  
bindna þū banst byndis* bindis bindas bind
Gerund: is/sī/it band bunde bindiþ binda bindaða
bindnaǧ wit/wīs bundum byndim* bindma bindam bindma
Part.: jut/jūs bunduþ byndiþ* bindiþ bindaþ bindiþ
bundnas īs/ījas/ī bundun byndin* bindnaþ bindan bindnaða
Non-finite Past Ind. Past Sbj. Pres. Ind. Pres. Sbj. Imperative
Infinitive: ik barg bœrǧa berga berga  
bergna þū bart bœrgis* bergis bergas berg
Gerund: is/sī/it barg borge bergiþ berga bergaða
bergnaǧ wit/wīs borgum bœrgim* bergma bergam bergma
Part.: jut/jūs borguþ bœrgiþ* bergiþ bergaþ bergiþ
borgnas īs/ījas/ī borgun bœrgin* bergnaþ bergan bergnaða

Strong Verbs: Class IV (i – a – ē – u)

Non-finite Past Ind. Past Sbj. Pres. Ind. Pres. Sbj. Imperative
Infinitive: ik kwam kwēmia kwima kwima  
kwimna þū kwamt kwēmis* kwimis kwimas kwim
Gerund: is/sī/it kwam kwēme kwimiþ kwima kwimaða
kwmnaǧ wit/wīs kwēmum kwēmim* kwimam kwimam kwimam
Part.: jut/jūs kwēmuþ kwēmiþ* kwimiþ kwimaþ kwimiþ
kwmnas īs/ījas/ī kwēmun kwēmin* kwimnaþ kwiman kwimnaða
Non-finite Past Ind. Past Sbj. Pres. Ind. Pres. Sbj. Imperative
Infinitive: ik bar bœria bera bera  
berna þū bart bœris* beris beras ber
Gerund: is/sī/it bar bore beriþ bera beraða
bernaǧ wit/wīs borum bœrim* berma beram berma
Part.: jut/jūs boruþ bœriþ* beriþ beraþ beriþ
bornas īs/ījas/ī borun bœrin* bernaþ beran bernaða

Strong Verbs: Class V (i – a – ē – i)

Non-finite Past Ind. Past Sbj. Pres. Ind. Pres. Sbj. Imperative
Infinitive: ik kwaþ kwēþia kwiða kwiþia  
kwiðna þū kwast kwēðis* kwiðis kwiðas kwiþ
Gerund: is/sī/it kwaþ kwēðe kwiðiþ kwiða kwiðaða
kwiðnaǧ wit/wīs kwēðum kwēðim* kwiðma kwiðam kwiðma
Part.: jut/jūs kwēðuþ kwēðiþ* kwiðiþ kwiðaþ kwiðiþ
kwiðnas īs/ījas/ī kwēðun kwēðin* kwiðnaþ kwiðan kwiðnaða

Strong Verbs: Class VI (a – ō – ō – a)

Non-finite Past Ind. Past Sbj. Pres. Ind. Pres. Sbj. Imperative
Infinitive: ik drōg drœ̄ǧa draga draga  
drgna þū drōft drœ̄gis* dragis dragas drag
Gerund: is/sī/it drōg drōge dragiþ draga dragaða
dragnaǧ wit/wīs drōgum drœ̄gim* dragma dragam dragma
Part.: jut/jūs drōguþ drœ̄giþ* dragiþ dragaþ dragiþ
dragnas īs/ījas/ī drōgun drœ̄gin* dragnaþ dragan dragnaða

Strong Verbs: Class VII (reduplication)

Weak Verbs

Weak Verbs: Class Ia (-janą)

Weak Verbs: Class Ib (-ijaną)

Weak Verbs: Class II (-ōną)

Weak Verbs: Class III (-āną)

Weak Verbs: Class IV (-naną)

Weak Verbs: Class V (-ną)

Preterite-Present Verbs

Anomalous Verbs