Category:Borchennymendi singulare tantum nouns - Revision history

EnricoGalea at 06:47, 28 December 2025

2025-12-28T06:47:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:47, 28 December 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Singulare tantum nouns can’t be plural through morphology, but not through syntax. Agreement-mismatched nouns can be singulare tantum if a word appears only in the singular but has plural meaning, thus interfering indirectly in the rest if the morphology. For example: Are the woods red? > ''bearhmhighr''iaidhanesh''em'' rhoeish:. {{term\|bearhmhighr}} can’t receive the plural marker, but always has a plural meaning. This affects the pronominal suffix {{term\|-es}} that turns plural: {{term\|-eshem}}.		Singulare tantum nouns can’t be plural through morphology, but not through syntax. Agreement-mismatched nouns can be singulare tantum if a word appears only in the singular but has dual or plural meaning, thus interfering indirectly in the rest if the morphology. For example: Are the woods red? > ''bearhmhighr''iaidhanesh''em'' rhoeish:. {{term\|bearhmhighr}} can’t receive the plural marker, but always has a plural meaning. This affects the pronominal suffix {{term\|-es}} that turns plural: {{term\|-eshem}}.
	[[Category:Borchennymendi irregular nouns]]		[[Category:Borchennymendi irregular nouns]]

EnricoGalea at 04:16, 28 December 2025

2025-12-28T04:16:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:16, 28 December 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Singulare tantum nouns can’t be plural through morphology, but not through syntax. Agreement-mismatched nouns can be singulare tantum if a word appears only in the singular but has plural meaning, thus interfering indirectly in the rest if the morphology. For example: Are the woods red? > ''bearhmhighr''iaidhanesh''em'' rhoeish:. {{term\|bearhmhighr}} can’t receive the plural marker, but always has a plural meaning. This affects the pronominal suffix {{term\|-es}} that turns plural: {{term\|-eshem}}.		Singulare tantum nouns can’t be plural through morphology, but not through syntax. Agreement-mismatched nouns can be singulare tantum if a word appears only in the singular but has plural meaning, thus interfering indirectly in the rest if the morphology. For example: Are the woods red? > ''bearhmhighr''iaidhanesh''em'' rhoeish:. {{term\|bearhmhighr}} can’t receive the plural marker, but always has a plural meaning. This affects the pronominal suffix {{term\|-es}} that turns plural: {{term\|-eshem}}.
	~~[[Category:Borchennymendi nouns]]~~ [[Category:Borchennymendi irregular nouns]]		[[Category:Borchennymendi irregular nouns]]

EnricoGalea at 04:04, 28 December 2025

2025-12-28T04:04:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:04, 28 December 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Singulare tantum nouns can’t be plural through morphology, but not through syntax. Agreement-mismatched nouns can be singulare tantum if a word appears only in the singular but has plural meaning, thus interfering indirectly in the rest if the morphology. For example: Are the woods red? > ''bearhmhighr''iaidhanesh''em'' rhoeish:. {{term\|bearhmhighr}} can’t receive the plural marker, but always has a plural meaning. This affects the pronominal suffix {{term\|-es}} that turns plural: {{term\|-eshem}}.		Singulare tantum nouns can’t be plural through morphology, but not through syntax. Agreement-mismatched nouns can be singulare tantum if a word appears only in the singular but has plural meaning, thus interfering indirectly in the rest if the morphology. For example: Are the woods red? > ''bearhmhighr''iaidhanesh''em'' rhoeish:. {{term\|bearhmhighr}} can’t receive the plural marker, but always has a plural meaning. This affects the pronominal suffix {{term\|-es}} that turns plural: {{term\|-eshem}}.
	[[Category:Borchennymendi nouns]]		[[Category:Borchennymendi nouns]] [[Category:Borchennymendi irregular nouns]]

EnricoGalea: Created page with "Singulare tantum nouns can’t be plural through morphology, but not through syntax. Agreement-mismatched nouns can be singulare tantum if a word appears only in the singular but has plural meaning, thus interfering indirectly in the rest if the morphology. For example: Are the woods red? > ''bearhmhighr''iaidhanesh''em'' rhoeish:. {{term|bearhmhighr}} can’t receive the plural marker, but always has a plural meaning. This affects the pronominal suffix {{term|-es}} that..."

2025-12-28T03:46:33Z

Created page with "Singulare tantum nouns can’t be plural through morphology, but not through syntax. Agreement-mismatched nouns can be singulare tantum if a word appears only in the singular but has plural meaning, thus interfering indirectly in the rest if the morphology. For example: Are the woods red? > ''bearhmhighr''iaidhanesh''em'' rhoeish:. {{term|bearhmhighr}} can’t receive the plural marker, but always has a plural meaning. This affects the pronominal suffix {{term|-es}} that..."

New page

Singulare tantum nouns can’t be plural through morphology, but not through syntax. Agreement-mismatched nouns can be singulare tantum if a word appears only in the singular but has plural meaning, thus interfering indirectly in the rest if the morphology. For example: Are the woods red? > ''bearhmhighr''iaidhanesh''em'' rhoeish:. {{term|bearhmhighr}} can’t receive the plural marker, but always has a plural meaning. This affects the pronominal suffix {{term|-es}} that turns plural: {{term|-eshem}}.
[[Category:Borchennymendi nouns]]