Czecklish conjugation - Revision history

Mcmisher96 at 23:37, 13 October 2014

2014-10-13T23:37:55Z

Mcmisher96: /* Valency */

2014-09-16T23:46:25Z

Valency

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:46, 16 September 2014
Line 330:		Line 330:
	! style="width: 40px; " \|Suffix		! style="width: 40px; " \|Suffix
	\|-		\|-
	! style="" \|		! style="" \| Avalent
	\|		\| -mir
	\|-		\|-
	! style="" \|		! style="" \| Monovalent
	\|		\| -∅
	\|-		\|-
	! style="" \|		! style="" \| Divalent
	\|		\| -mar
			\|-
			! style="" \| Trivalent
			\| -můr
	\|-		\|-
	\|}		\|}

Mcmisher96: /* Mirativity */

2014-09-16T23:44:37Z

Mirativity

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:44, 16 September 2014
Line 404:		Line 404:
	! style="width: 40px; " \|Suffix		! style="width: 40px; " \|Suffix
	\|-		\|-
	! style="" \| ~~Ambimirative~~		! style="" \| Mirative
	\| -var		\| -var
	\|-		\|-
	! style="" \| ~~Mirative~~		! style="" \| Ambimirative
	\| -∅		\| -∅
	\|-		\|-

Mcmisher96: /* Volition */

2014-09-16T23:43:53Z

Volition

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:43, 16 September 2014
Line 370:		Line 370:
	! style="width: 40px; " \|Suffix		! style="width: 40px; " \|Suffix
	\|-		\|-
	! style="" \|		! style="" \| Volitional
	\|		\| -lar
	\|-		\|-
	! style="" \|		! style="" \| Ambivolitional
	\|		\| -∅
	\|-		\|-
	! style="" \|		! style="" \| Nonvolitional
	\|		\| -lěr
	\|-		\|-
	\|}<br />		\|}<br />

Mcmisher96: /* Mirativity */

2014-09-16T23:42:39Z

Mirativity

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:42, 16 September 2014
Line 404:		Line 404:
	! style="width: 40px; " \|Suffix		! style="width: 40px; " \|Suffix
	\|-		\|-
	! style="" \|		! style="" \| Ambimirative
	\|		\| -var
	\|-		\|-
	! style="" \|		! style="" \| Mirative
	\|		\| -∅
	\|-		\|-
	! style="" \|		! style="" \| Nonmirative
	\|		\| -vĕr
	\|-		\|-
	\|}<br />		\|}<br />

Mcmisher96: /* Evidentiality */

2014-09-16T23:36:38Z

Evidentiality

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:36, 16 September 2014
Line 434:		Line 434:
	==Evidentiality==		==Evidentiality==
	In Czecklish, Evidentiality is the indication of the nature of evidence for a given statement; that is, whether evidence exists for the statement and/or what kind of evidence exists. An evidential is the particular grammatical element (affix, clitic, or particle) that indicates evidentiality. Czecklish uses suffixes to indicate both Direct and Indirect Evidentiality. Indirect Evidentiality can be divided into four separate degrees of Evidentiality: First Reportative, Second Reportative, Inferential, and Assumed. The unmarked Evidential is the Direct Evidential, as most evidence is likely to have been witnessed firsthand.<br />		In Czecklish, Evidentiality is the indication of the nature of evidence for a given statement; that is, whether evidence exists for the statement and/or what kind of evidence exists. An evidential is the particular grammatical element (affix, clitic, or particle) that indicates evidentiality. Czecklish uses suffixes to indicate both Direct and Indirect Evidentiality. Indirect Evidentiality can be divided into four separate degrees of Evidentiality: First Reportative, Second Reportative, Inferential, and Assumed. The unmarked Evidential is the Direct Evidential, as most evidence is likely to have been witnessed firsthand.<br />
	{\| border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" class="bluetable lightbluebg" style="width: ~~150px~~; text-align:center;"		{\| border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" class="bluetable lightbluebg" style="width: 300px; text-align:center;"
	! style="width: 40px; "\|		! style="width: 40px; "\|
	! style="width: 40px; " \|Suffix		! style="width: 40px; " \|Suffix

Mcmisher96: /* Evidentiality */

2014-09-16T23:36:10Z

Evidentiality

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:36, 16 September 2014
Line 438:		Line 438:
	! style="width: 40px; " \|Suffix		! style="width: 40px; " \|Suffix
	\|-		\|-
	! style="" \|		! style="" \| Direct
	\|		\| -∅
	\|-		\|-
	! style="" \|		! style="" \| Indirect
	\|		\| -di
	\|-		\|-
	! style="" \|		! style="" \| First Reportative
	\|		\| -da
			\|-
			! style="" \| Second Reportative
			\| -do
			\|-
			! styele="" \| Inferential
			\| -dĕ
			\|-
			! style="" \| Assumptive
			\| -dů
	\|-		\|-
	\|}<br />		\|}<br />

Mcmisher96: /* Comparison */

2014-09-16T23:33:05Z

Comparison

@@ Line 486: / Line 486: @@
 ==Comparison==
 Czecklish only has one degree of comparison, and as such does not make a distinction between -er and -est. In other words, the superlative form of a noun is indistinguishable from the comparative form in both meaning and affixation.<br />
 '''Positive'''<br />

Mcmisher96: /* Evidentiality */

2014-09-16T23:31:34Z

Evidentiality

@@ Line 434: / Line 434: @@
 ==Evidentiality==
 In Czecklish, Evidentiality is the indication of the nature of evidence for a given statement; that is, whether evidence exists for the statement and/or what kind of evidence exists. An evidential is the particular grammatical element (affix, clitic, or particle) that indicates evidentiality. Czecklish uses suffixes to indicate both Direct and Indirect Evidentiality. Indirect Evidentiality can be divided into four separate degrees of Evidentiality: First Reportative, Second Reportative, Inferential, and Assumed. The unmarked Evidential is the Direct Evidential, as most evidence is likely to have been witnessed firsthand.<br />
 '''Direct Evidentiality'''<br />
@@ Line 469: / Line 483: @@
 Expresses that the action is assumed to occur by the speaker. The knowledge is assumed to have occurred, because it usually does under similar circumstances. There is a certain degree of confidence when the Assumptive is used. The Assumptive is equivalent to the English modal verb “must” in regards to usage.
 *E.g.	She must have bought flowers<br />
 ==Comparison==

Mcmisher96: /* Mirativity */

2014-09-16T23:31:08Z

Mirativity

@@ Line 400: / Line 400: @@
 ==Mirativity==
 Czecklish morphologically marks Mirativity. Mirativity is a grammatical category independent of Evidentiality, which indicates the speaker's surprise or the unpreparedness of their mind. Evidentiality is used separately to indicate the speaker’s evidence for a given statement. There are three degrees of Mirativity, as with Volition: a positive degree, a neutral degree, and a negative degree.<br />
 '''Mirative'''<br />
@@ Line 417: / Line 431: @@
 Expresses that an action was expected by the subject. The Nonmirative is used to indicate indifference or preparedness of the speaker.
 *E.g.	She brought flowers (expectedly)<br />
 ==Evidentiality==