Kämpya - Revision history

Учхљёная: Categories.

2019-12-05T14:20:17Z

Categories.

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:20, 5 December 2019
Line 1,885:		Line 1,885:

	Dogs are faster than lizards (literally "Dogs are fast above lizards").		Dogs are faster than lizards (literally "Dogs are fast above lizards").
			[[Category:Languages]]
			[[Category:{{PAGENAME}}]]

Linguist Wannabe: /* Verb Subordination */ Direct Reported Speech

2017-05-24T08:35:30Z

Verb Subordination: Direct Reported Speech

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:35, 24 May 2017
Line 1,771:		Line 1,771:
	And another example using a postposition:		And another example using a postposition:

	/múˈhḛ̂=ɾù ˈnòʔ=ɾí péiʔk kʰḭ̂d ˈdô̰k=zù ˈbíʔ ˈlḭ̂zàd/		/múˈhḛ̂=ɾù ˈnòʔ=ɾá péiʔk kʰḭ̂d ˈdô̰k=zù ˈbíʔ ˈlḭ̂zàd/

	mother=ERG SBRD.ACC.EMP=SEC speak child dog=ERG bite lizard		mother=ERG SBRD.ACC.EMP=SEC speak child dog=ERG bite lizard
Line 1,780:		Line 1,780:
	And as before, the absolutive argument of the superordinate clause can be the topic of the subordinate clause e.g.		And as before, the absolutive argument of the superordinate clause can be the topic of the subordinate clause e.g.

	/múˈhḛ̂=ɾù ˈnòʔ=ɾí péiʔk kʰḭ̂d wá=bàṵn=tá gá=gḭ̂p dô̰k/		/múˈhḛ̂=ɾù ˈnòʔ=ɾá péiʔk kʰḭ̂d wá=bàṵn=tá gá=gḭ̂p dô̰k/

	mother=ERG SBRD.ACC.EMP=SEC speak child INDEF=bone=SEC NEC=give dog		mother=ERG SBRD.ACC.EMP=SEC speak child INDEF=bone=SEC NEC=give dog
Line 1,787:		Line 1,787:


	/múˈhḛ̂ ˈnòʔ=ɾí ˈkʰḭ̀d=gó θú=péiʔk wá=bàṵn=tá gá=gḭ̂p dô̰k/		/múˈhḛ̂ ˈnòʔ=ɾá ˈkʰḭ̀d=gó θú=péiʔk wá=bàṵn=tá gá=gḭ̂p dô̰k/

	mother SBRD.ACC.EMP=SEC child=DAT ANTIP=speak INDEF=bone=SEC NEC=give dog		mother SBRD.ACC.EMP=SEC child=DAT ANTIP=speak INDEF=bone=SEC NEC=give dog
Line 1,797:		Line 1,797:


	/múˈhḛ̂ ˈnòʔ=ɾí ˈkʰḭ̀d=gó θú=péiʔk wá=bàṵn=tá gḭ̂p dô̰k/		/múˈhḛ̂ ˈnòʔ=ɾá ˈkʰḭ̀d=gó θú=péiʔk tí=bàṵn=tá gḭ̂p dô̰k/

	mother SBRD.ACC.EMP=SEC child=DAT ANTIP=speak INDEF=bone=SEC give dog		mother SBRD.ACC.EMP=SEC child=DAT ANTIP=speak INDEF=bone=SEC give dog
Line 1,804:		Line 1,804:


	/múˈhḛ̂ ˈnòʔ=ɾí ˈkʰḭ̀d=gó θú=péiʔk wá=bàṵn=tá sʰái=gḭ̂p dô̰k/		/múˈhḛ̂ ˈnòʔ=ɾá ˈkʰḭ̀d=gó θú=péiʔk tí=bàṵn=tá sʰái=gḭ̂p dô̰k/

	mother SBRD.ACC.EMP=SEC child=DAT ANTIP=speak INDEF=bone=SEC REP=give dog		mother SBRD.ACC.EMP=SEC child=DAT ANTIP=speak INDEF=bone=SEC REP=give dog

	The mother told the child that she (the mother) ~~must give~~ the dog a bone (the speaker didn't see the act of giving, but heard about it).		The mother told the child that she (the mother) gave the dog a bone (the speaker didn't see the act of giving, but heard about it).


Line 1,817:		Line 1,817:
	So if the above 2 sentences take ðjíʔ, then they become:		So if the above 2 sentences take ðjíʔ, then they become:

	/múˈhḛ̂=ɾù ˈnòʔ=ɾá péiʔk ˈkʰḭ̂d ðjíʔ wá=bàṵn=tá gḭ̂p dô̰k/		/múˈhḛ̂=ɾù ˈnòʔ=ɾá péiʔk ˈkʰḭ̂d ðjíʔ tí=bàṵn=tá gḭ̂p dô̰k/

	mother=ERG SBRD.ACC.EMP=SEC speak child 3PS.OBV.ERG INDEF=bone=SEC give dog		mother=ERG SBRD.ACC.EMP=SEC speak child 3PS.OBV.ERG INDEF=bone=SEC give dog
Line 1,824:		Line 1,824:


	/múˈhḛ̂ ˈnòʔ=ɾá ˈkʰḭ̀d=gó θú=ˈpéiʔkðjíʔ wá=bàṵn=tá gḭ̂p dô̰k/		/múˈhḛ̂ ˈnòʔ=ɾá ˈkʰḭ̀d=gó θú=ˈpéiʔkðjíʔ tí=bàṵn=tá gḭ̂p dô̰k/

	mother SBRD.ACC.EMP=SEC child=DAT ANTIP=speak 3PS.OBV.ERG INDEF=bone=SEC give dog		mother SBRD.ACC.EMP=SEC child=DAT ANTIP=speak 3PS.OBV.ERG INDEF=bone=SEC give dog
Line 1,832:		Line 1,832:
	===Evidentials and Reported Speech===		===Evidentials and Reported Speech===

	~~When reporting what someone else has said, both clauses need to marked for evidentiality, both from the point of view of the speaker e.g.~~		====Indirect Reported Speech====

			In this case, when reporting what someone else has said, both clauses need to marked for evidentiality, both from the point of view of the speaker e.g.

	~~/ˈkʰḭ̂d ˈnòʔ=ɾí mí=ˈpéiʔk ˈḛ̂nèm déˈpʰáʔɾ/~~

	~~child SBRD.ACC 1PS.EXCL.ACC~~=~~speak enemy depart~~		/ˈkʰḭ̂d ˈnòʔ=ɾá mí=ˈpéiʔk ˈḛ̂nèm déˈpʰáʔɾ/

	The child told me the enemy departed (and I saw it happen too).		child SBRD.ACC.EMP=SEC 1PS.EXCL.ACC=speak enemy depart

			The child told me the enemy had departed (and I saw it happen too).


Line 1,845:		Line 1,847:


	/ˈkʰḭ̂d ˈnòʔ=ɾí mí=ˈpéiʔk ˈḛ̂nèm sái=déˈpʰáʔɾ/		/ˈkʰḭ̂d ˈnòʔ=ɾá mí=ˈpéiʔk ˈḛ̂nèm sái=déˈpʰáʔɾ/

			child SBRD.ACC.EMP=SEC 1PS.EXCL.ACC=speak enemy REP=depart

			The child told me the enemy had departed (but I didn't see it, I just heard about it).


			====Direct Reported Speech====

			In this case, there is no superordinate verb marking. The quoted speech is places at the end of the sentence, preceded by the particle /ðéʔ/ and followed by the particle /tḛ̂/ e.g.

			/ˈkʰḭ̂d mí=ˈpéiʔk ðéʔ ˈḛ̂nèm déˈpʰáʔɾ tḛ̂/

			child 1PS.EXCL.ACC=speak QUOTE enemy depart QUOTE

			The child told me that the enemy had departed


			In the above sentence, the speaker is saying the the child had used the direct evidential when reporting the enemy's departure, meaning that the speaker is reporting that the child implied that they had witnessed it themselves. This sentence conveys no information about whether or not the speaker had also seen the departure.


			Compare:

			/ˈkʰḭ̂d mí=ˈpéiʔk ðéʔ ˈḛ̂nèm sái=déˈpʰáʔɾ tḛ̂/

	child ~~SBRD.ACC~~ 1PS.EXCL.ACC=speak enemy REP=depart		child 1PS.EXCL.ACC=speak QUOTE enemy REP=depart QUOTE

	The child told me the enemy departed (~~but I didn't see it, I just heard about~~ it).		The child told me that he had heard that the enemy had departed (and not witnessed it himself).

	==Comparative Constructions==		==Comparative Constructions==

Linguist Wannabe: /* Antipassive Voice */

2017-05-24T07:48:16Z

Antipassive Voice

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:48, 24 May 2017
Line 674:		Line 674:
	/dô̰k ˈlḭ̀zád=gó θú=ˈbíʔ áˈwâḭ/		/dô̰k ˈlḭ̀zád=gó θú=ˈbíʔ áˈwâḭ/

	dog lizard=DAT ANTIP=bite ~~lizard=DAT~~ flee		dog lizard=DAT ANTIP=bite flee

	The dog bit the lizard and (the dog) ran away.		The dog bit the lizard and (the dog) ran away.

Linguist Wannabe: /* Verb Subordination */

2017-04-09T11:33:42Z

Verb Subordination

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:33, 9 April 2017
Line 1,787:		Line 1,787:


	/múˈhḛ̂ ˈnòʔ=ɾí θú=~~ˈdè̤sì ˈkʰḭ̂d=àuŋ~~ wá=bàṵn=tá gá=gḭ̂p dô̰k/		/múˈhḛ̂ ˈnòʔ=ɾí ˈkʰḭ̀d=gó θú=péiʔk wá=bàṵn=tá gá=gḭ̂p dô̰k/

	mother SBRD.ACC.EMP=SEC ANTIP=speak ~~child=DAT~~ INDEF=bone=SEC NEC=give dog		mother SBRD.ACC.EMP=SEC child=DAT ANTIP=speak INDEF=bone=SEC NEC=give dog

	The mother told the child that she (the mother) must give the dog a bone.		The mother told the child that she (the mother) must give the dog a bone.
Line 1,797:		Line 1,797:


	/múˈhḛ̂ ˈnòʔ=ɾí θú=péiʔk ~~ˈkʰḭ̂d=àuŋ~~ wá=bàṵn=tá gḭ̂p dô̰k/		/múˈhḛ̂ ˈnòʔ=ɾí ˈkʰḭ̀d=gó θú=péiʔk wá=bàṵn=tá gḭ̂p dô̰k/

	mother SBRD.ACC.EMP=SEC ~~ANTIP=speak~~ child=DAT INDEF=bone=SEC give dog		mother SBRD.ACC.EMP=SEC child=DAT ANTIP=speak INDEF=bone=SEC give dog

	The mother told the child that she (the mother) gave the dog a bone (the speaker saw the act of giving).		The mother told the child that she (the mother) gave the dog a bone (the speaker saw the act of giving).


	/múˈhḛ̂ ˈnòʔ=ɾí θú=péiʔk ~~ˈkʰḭ̂d=àuŋ~~ wá=bàṵn=tá sʰái=gḭ̂p dô̰k/		/múˈhḛ̂ ˈnòʔ=ɾí ˈkʰḭ̀d=gó θú=péiʔk wá=bàṵn=tá sʰái=gḭ̂p dô̰k/

	mother SBRD.ACC.EMP=SEC ANTIP=speak ~~child=DAT~~ INDEF=bone=SEC REP=give dog		mother SBRD.ACC.EMP=SEC child=DAT ANTIP=speak INDEF=bone=SEC REP=give dog

	The mother told the child that she (the mother) must give the dog a bone (the speaker didn't see the act of giving, but heard about it).		The mother told the child that she (the mother) must give the dog a bone (the speaker didn't see the act of giving, but heard about it).
Line 1,824:		Line 1,824:


	/múˈhḛ̂ ˈnòʔ=ɾá θú=~~ˈpéiʔk ˈkʰḭ̂d=àuŋ ðjíʔ~~ wá=bàṵn=tá gḭ̂p dô̰k/		/múˈhḛ̂ ˈnòʔ=ɾá ˈkʰḭ̀d=gó θú=ˈpéiʔkðjíʔ wá=bàṵn=tá gḭ̂p dô̰k/

	mother SBRD.ACC.EMP=SEC ANTIP=speak ~~child=DAT~~ 3PS.OBV.ERG INDEF=bone=SEC give dog		mother SBRD.ACC.EMP=SEC child=DAT ANTIP=speak 3PS.OBV.ERG INDEF=bone=SEC give dog

	The mother told the child that he / she (someone other than the mother, either the child or someone else) gave the dog a bone.		The mother told the child that he / she (someone other than the mother, either the child or someone else) gave the dog a bone.

Linguist Wannabe: /* Wh-Questions */

2017-04-09T11:31:15Z

Wh-Questions

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:31, 9 April 2017
Line 1,626:		Line 1,626:


	/ˈsʰíʔtà ˈkèʔ=ɾí θú=gḭ̂p ~~dô̰k=àuŋ~~/		/ˈsʰíʔtà ˈkèʔ=ɾí dò̰k=gó θú=gḭ̂p/

	guardian Q.ACC=SEC ANTIP=give ~~dog=DAT~~		guardian Q.ACC=SEC dog=DAT ANTIP=give

	Who / What did the guardian give to the dog?		Who / What did the guardian give to the dog?
Line 1,676:		Line 1,676:
	or		or

	/θú=ˈbíʔ dô̰k ~~ˈlḭ̂zàd=àuŋ~~ éi=ˈhḛ̂b/		/ˈlḭ̀zád=gó θú=ˈbíʔ dô̰k éi=ˈhḛ̂b/

	ANTIP=bite dog ~~lizard=DAT~~ Q.ERG=have		lizard=DAT ANTIP=bite dog Q.ERG=have

	Whose dog bit the lizard? (literally "Who has the dog that bit the lizard?")		Whose dog bit the lizard? (literally "Who has the dog that bit the lizard?")


	===Other Interrogatives that modify noun phrases===		===Other Interrogatives that modify noun phrases===
Line 1,695:		Line 1,696:
	However, bá- can only attach to a noun in the absolutive case. To ask about the subject of a transitive verb, it is necessary to antipassivise the verb. e.g.		However, bá- can only attach to a noun in the absolutive case. To ask about the subject of a transitive verb, it is necessary to antipassivise the verb. e.g.

	/θú=ˈbíʔ bá=dô̰k ~~ˈlḭ̂zàd=àuŋ~~/		/ˈlḭ̀zád=gó θú=ˈbíʔ bá=dô̰k/

	ANTIP=bite Q.INTR=dog lizard=DAT		ANTIP=bite Q.INTR=dog lizard=DAT
Line 1,702:		Line 1,703:


	Attaching the clitic to a noun in the ergative case is ungrammatical e.g. /bá=dô̰k=zù ˈbíʔ lḭ̂zàd/. Also the clitic cannot attach to a topicalised noun e.g. /bá=dô̰k θú=ˈbíʔ ~~ˈlḭ̂zàd=àuŋ~~/.		Attaching the clitic to a noun in the ergative case is ungrammatical e.g. /bá=dô̰k=zù ˈbíʔ lḭ̂zàd/. Also the clitic cannot attach to a topicalised noun e.g. /bá=dô̰k ˈlḭ̀zád=gó θú=ˈbíʔ/.


	To ask about the object of a postposition, an applicative construction is needed e.g.		To ask about the object of a postposition, an applicative construction is needed e.g.

	/ˈlḭ̂zàd=zù ˈbíʔ=kà bá=pʰò̤wè ~~ˈdô̰k=àuŋ~~/		/ˈlḭ̂zàd=zù dò̰k=gó ˈbíʔ=kà bá=pʰò̤wè /

	lizard=ERG bite=LOC forest ~~dog=DAT which~~		lizard=ERG dog=DAT bite=LOC which=forest

	Which forest did the lizard bite the dog in?		Which forest did the lizard bite the dog in?

Linguist Wannabe: /* Relative Clauses */

2017-04-09T11:27:26Z

Relative Clauses

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:27, 9 April 2017
Line 1,110:		Line 1,110:

	The forest, which the lizard bit it in, is small.		The forest, which the lizard bit it in, is small.


	~~====Internal Heads====~~

	It must be noted that Kämpya restrictive relative clauses are strictly speaking internally headed [http://wals.info/chapter/90]. We can only see this in antipassives and applicatives where the noun (that used to be in the absolutive case) is re-introduced as a dative argument, it follows the head noun e.g.


	~~/θú=bíʔ ˈlḭ̂zàd dô̰k=àuŋ áˈwâḭ/~~

	~~ANTIP=bite lizard dog=DAT flee~~

	~~The lizard that had bitten the dog fled. (not */θú=bíʔ dô̰g=àuŋ ˈlḭ̂zàd áˈwâḭ/)~~


	~~Or in an applicative construction:~~


	~~/ˈlḭ̂zàd=zù bíʔ=kà pʰò̤wè dô̰k=àuŋ m̥ôṵ/~~

	~~lizard=ERG bite=LOC forest dog=DAT small~~

	~~The forest that the lizard bit the dog in is small. (not */ˈlḭ̂zàd=zù bíʔ=kà dô̰g=àuŋ pʰò̤wè m̥ôṵ/)~~


	==Mood/Evidentiality==		==Mood/Evidentiality==

Linguist Wannabe: /* Applicative Voice */

2017-04-09T11:26:47Z

Applicative Voice

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:26, 9 April 2017
Line 825:		Line 825:
	===Applicative Voice===		===Applicative Voice===

	To topicalise a noun in a postpositional phrase, Kämpya uses applicative constructions [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Applicative_voice]. These are formed by first shifting the noun in the absolutive case to the ~~end of~~ the sentence (and marking it with the dative clitic /~~-àuŋ~~/). In turn, the noun that the postposition was attached to goes into the absolutive case (and changes to Tone Class 1), and the postposition is placed after the verb as a clitic e.g. from the sentence:		To topicalise a noun in a postpositional phrase, Kämpya uses applicative constructions [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Applicative_voice]. These are formed by first shifting the noun in the absolutive case to the postpositonal object "slot" in the sentence (and marking it with the dative clitic /=gó/). In turn, the noun that the postposition was attached to goes into the absolutive case (and changes to Tone Class 1), and the postposition is placed after the verb as a clitic e.g. from the sentence:

	/ˈdô̰k=zù pʰò̤wé=ká ˈbíʔ ˈlḭ̂zàd/		/ˈdô̰k=zù pʰò̤wé=ká ˈbíʔ ˈlḭ̂zàd/
Line 836:		Line 836:
	we can apply an applicative transformation to get:		we can apply an applicative transformation to get:

	/pʰò̤wè ˈdô̰k=zù ~~ˈbíʔ~~=kà ~~ˈlḭ̂zàd=àuŋ~~/		/pʰò̤wè ˈdô̰k=zù lḭ̀zád=góˈbíʔ=kà/

	forest dog=ERG bite=LOC ~~lizard=DAT~~		forest dog=ERG lizard=DAT bite=LOC

	In the forest, the dog bit the lizard.		In the forest, the dog bit the lizard.
Line 854:		Line 854:
	becomes the following:		becomes the following:

	/ˈbwḛ̂lì déˈpáʔɾ=hwàm ~~ˈḛ̂nèm=àuŋ~~/		/ˈbwḛ̂lì ˈè̤ném=gó déˈpáʔɾ=hwàm/

	valley depart=from ~~enemy=DAT~~		valley enemy=DAT depart=from

	From the valley, the enemy departed.		From the valley, the enemy departed.
Line 875:		Line 875:
	becomes		becomes

	/bâṵn ˈsʰíʔtà=zù ~~ˈgḭ̂p~~=tá ~~ˈdô̰k=àuŋ~~/		/bâṵn ˈsʰíʔtà=zù dò̰k=góˈgḭ̂p=tá/

	bone guardian=ERG give=SEC ~~dog=DAT~~		bone guardian=ERG dog=DAT give=SEC

	The bone was given to the dog by the guardian.		The bone was given to the dog by the guardian.
Line 893:		Line 893:
	we get		we get

	/pʰò̤wè té=ˈbíʔ=kà ~~dô̰k=àuŋ~~/		/pʰò̤wè dò̰k=gó té=ˈbíʔ=kà/

	forest 2PS.ACC=bite=LOC ~~dog=DAT~~		forest dog=DAT 2PS.ACC=bite=LOC

	In the forest, the dog bit you.		In the forest, the dog bit you.
Line 904:		Line 904:
	This is clearly a cliticisation process, since adverbs can come before the particle but after the verb e.g.		This is clearly a cliticisation process, since adverbs can come before the particle but after the verb e.g.

	/pʰò̤wè ˈdô̰k=zù bíʔ ˈˈjě̤tài=kà ~~ˈlḭ̂zàd=àuŋ~~/		/pʰò̤wè ˈdô̰k=zù lḭ̀zád=gó bíʔ ˈˈjě̤tài=kà/

	forest dog=ERG bite yesterday.ADV=LOC ~~lizard=DAT~~		forest dog=ERG lizard=DAT bite yesterday.ADV=LOC

	In the forest, the dog bit the lizard.		In the forest, the dog bit the lizard.

Linguist Wannabe: /* Allomorphy */

2017-04-09T11:22:03Z

Allomorphy

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:22, 9 April 2017
Line 749:		Line 749:
	Immediately after a monophthong with harsh voice, /t/ also lenites to /ɾ/. However, it also triggers a phonation shift on the vowel from harsh to glottalised e.g. the noun meaning "snare" is /n̥ḛ̀/ in Tone Class 2. It normally has harsh voice, but it combines with the secundative clitic to form /n̥èʔ=ɾá/, as in:		Immediately after a monophthong with harsh voice, /t/ also lenites to /ɾ/. However, it also triggers a phonation shift on the vowel from harsh to glottalised e.g. the noun meaning "snare" is /n̥ḛ̀/ in Tone Class 2. It normally has harsh voice, but it combines with the secundative clitic to form /n̥èʔ=ɾá/, as in:

	/ˈsʰíʔtà n̥ḛ̀=ɾá θú=gḭ̂p ~~dô̰k=àuŋ~~/		/ˈsʰíʔtà n̥ḛ̀=ɾá dò̰k=gó θú=gḭ̂p/

	guardian snare=SEC ANTIP=give ~~dog=DAT~~		guardian snare=SEC dog=DAT ANTIP=give

	Literally "the guardian gave the snare to the dog", but "give a snare" could also be translated as "use a snare to catch".		Literally "the guardian gave the snare to the dog", but "give a snare" could also be translated as "use a snare to catch".
Line 782:		Line 782:

	The /k/ here lenits to /h/ and triggers deaspiration in exactly the same way as /g/. However, if the monophthong had harsh voice, it changes to be glottalised e.g. from /n̥ḛ̀/ - "snare", if we add the locative clitic /-ka/, the result is /nèʔ=há/ - "at the snare".		The /k/ here lenits to /h/ and triggers deaspiration in exactly the same way as /g/. However, if the monophthong had harsh voice, it changes to be glottalised e.g. from /n̥ḛ̀/ - "snare", if we add the locative clitic /-ka/, the result is /nèʔ=há/ - "at the snare".


	====With Pronouns====		====With Pronouns====

Linguist Wannabe: /* Allophones of /h/ */

2017-04-09T11:21:06Z

Allophones of /h/

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:21, 9 April 2017
Line 142:		Line 142:
	If /h/ occurs after vowels with harsh phonation, it is pronounced as a voiced epiglottal fricative [ʢ] e.g. /zwéˈmâ̰h/ - "to report", is pronounced [zwéˈmâ̰ʢ].		If /h/ occurs after vowels with harsh phonation, it is pronounced as a voiced epiglottal fricative [ʢ] e.g. /zwéˈmâ̰h/ - "to report", is pronounced [zwéˈmâ̰ʢ].

	Of course, if a process such a cliticisation (e.g. with the genitive clitic /ji~~/ or the dative clitic /auŋ~~/), means that the /h/ is no longer in coda position, then these processes do not occur e.g.		Of course, if a process such a cliticisation (e.g. with the genitive clitic /ji/), means that the /h/ is no longer in coda position, then these processes do not occur e.g.

	/à̤h=jì/ - "of the question (alienable)" is pronounced [ˈà̤çì] (/hj/ assimilates to [ç]).		/à̤h=jì/ - "of the question (alienable)" is pronounced [ˈà̤çì] (/hj/ assimilates to [ç]).

	/dáʔh=jì/ - "of the darkness (alienable)" is pronounced [ˈdáʔçì].		/dáʔh=jì/ - "of the darkness (alienable)" is pronounced [ˈdáʔçì].

	~~/à̤h=àuŋ/ - "to the question" is pronounced [ˈà̤ɦàuⁿ].~~

	~~/dáʔh=àuŋ/ - "to the darkness" is pronounced [ˈdáʔhàuⁿ].~~

Linguist Wannabe: /* Consonant Neutralisations */

2017-04-09T11:20:33Z

Consonant Neutralisations

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:20, 9 April 2017
Line 124:		Line 124:
	In colloquial speech, stops in the codas of unstressed syllables are debuccalised to glottal stops e.g. the city named /ˈkʰóʔnàt/ is often pronounced [ˈkʰóʔnàʔ], /ˈpʰḛ̂jòd/ - "fjord" is pronounced [ˈpʰḛ̂ːjòʔ].		In colloquial speech, stops in the codas of unstressed syllables are debuccalised to glottal stops e.g. the city named /ˈkʰóʔnàt/ is often pronounced [ˈkʰóʔnàʔ], /ˈpʰḛ̂jòd/ - "fjord" is pronounced [ˈpʰḛ̂ːjòʔ].

	If a nasal coda occurs before /h/, an approximant, or at the end of a word, it is often pronounced as nasalisation of the preceding vowel e.g. /nâḭm/ - "name" is pronounced [nâḭⁿ]. But likewise it is still present underlyingly, as can be seen when combined with the genitive clitic /ì/ to form /nâḭm=ì/ - "of the name", which is pronounced [~~nâḭmì~~].		If a nasal coda occurs before /h/, an approximant, or at the end of a word, it is often pronounced as nasalisation of the preceding vowel e.g. /nâḭm/ - "name" is pronounced [nâḭⁿ]. But likewise it is still present underlyingly, as can be seen when combined with the alienable genitive clitic /jì/ to form /nâḭm=jì/ - "of the name", which is pronounced [nâḭmjì].

	===Stress and Phonation===		===Stress and Phonation===