Linguifex talk:Announcements - Revision history

Fauxlosophe at 00:02, 22 August 2013

2013-08-22T00:02:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:02, 22 August 2013
Line 5:		Line 5:

	I actually used it mainly as a joke, well aware of the subsequent English pronunciation! ^^ [[File:Waahlis.png\|35px\|link=Linguifex:Administrators]] '''[[User talk:Waahlis\|<span style="color: Orange;">Waahlis</span>]]''' 21:36, 21 August 2013 (CEST)		I actually used it mainly as a joke, well aware of the subsequent English pronunciation! ^^ [[File:Waahlis.png\|35px\|link=Linguifex:Administrators]] '''[[User talk:Waahlis\|<span style="color: Orange;">Waahlis</span>]]''' 21:36, 21 August 2013 (CEST)

			Fair enough, there's worse titles I suppose.-[[User:Fauxlosophe\|Fauxlosophe]] ([[User talk:Fauxlosophe\|talk]]) 02:02, 22 August 2013 (CEST)

Waahlis at 19:36, 21 August 2013

2013-08-21T19:36:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:36, 21 August 2013
Line 2:		Line 2:

	haha, true, it's not very friendly for illatinate; I believe the use of linguifices in English was a bit of a joke on our part ;) but in generais I think 'conlangers', 'conlangers on Linguifex' are fine enough :p --[[File:Admin.png\|35px\|link=Linguifex:Administrators]] '''[[User talk:Chrysophylax\|<span style="color: #3366BB ;">Chrysophylax</span>]]''' 21:04, 21 August 2013 (CEST)		haha, true, it's not very friendly for illatinate; I believe the use of linguifices in English was a bit of a joke on our part ;) but in generais I think 'conlangers', 'conlangers on Linguifex' are fine enough :p --[[File:Admin.png\|35px\|link=Linguifex:Administrators]] '''[[User talk:Chrysophylax\|<span style="color: #3366BB ;">Chrysophylax</span>]]''' 21:04, 21 August 2013 (CEST)


			I actually used it mainly as a joke, well aware of the subsequent English pronunciation! ^^ [[File:Waahlis.png\|35px\|link=Linguifex:Administrators]] '''[[User talk:Waahlis\|<span style="color: Orange;">Waahlis</span>]]''' 21:36, 21 August 2013 (CEST)

Chrysophylax at 19:04, 21 August 2013

2013-08-21T19:04:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:04, 21 August 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Am I the only one who second guesses linguifices as the best demonym for us? I mean I'm not going full Latin pronunciation here, but I sort of read it as liŋ.ɡwi.fiːsiːz, or at least similar enough to it. -[[User:Fauxlosophe\|Fauxlosophe]] ([[User talk:Fauxlosophe\|talk]]) 16:22, 21 August 2013 (CEST)		Am I the only one who second guesses linguifices as the best demonym for us? I mean I'm not going full Latin pronunciation here, but I sort of read it as liŋ.ɡwi.fiːsiːz, or at least similar enough to it. -[[User:Fauxlosophe\|Fauxlosophe]] ([[User talk:Fauxlosophe\|talk]]) 16:22, 21 August 2013 (CEST)

			haha, true, it's not very friendly for illatinate; I believe the use of linguifices in English was a bit of a joke on our part ;) but in generais I think 'conlangers', 'conlangers on Linguifex' are fine enough :p --[[File:Admin.png\|35px\|link=Linguifex:Administrators]] '''[[User talk:Chrysophylax\|<span style="color: #3366BB ;">Chrysophylax</span>]]''' 21:04, 21 August 2013 (CEST)

Fauxlosophe at 14:22, 21 August 2013

2013-08-21T14:22:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:22, 21 August 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Am I the only one who second guesses linguifices as the best demonym for us? I mean I'm not going full Latin pronunciation here, but I sort of read it as liŋ.ɡwi.fiːsiːz, or at least similar enough to it.		Am I the only one who second guesses linguifices as the best demonym for us? I mean I'm not going full Latin pronunciation here, but I sort of read it as liŋ.ɡwi.fiːsiːz, or at least similar enough to it. -[[User:Fauxlosophe\|Fauxlosophe]] ([[User talk:Fauxlosophe\|talk]]) 16:22, 21 August 2013 (CEST)

Fauxlosophe at 14:22, 21 August 2013

2013-08-21T14:22:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:22, 21 August 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Am I the only one who second guesses linguifices as the best demonym for us? I mean I'm not going full Latin pronunciation here, but I sort of read it as liŋ.ɡwi.fiːsiːz.		Am I the only one who second guesses linguifices as the best demonym for us? I mean I'm not going full Latin pronunciation here, but I sort of read it as liŋ.ɡwi.fiːsiːz, or at least similar enough to it.

Fauxlosophe: Created page with "Am I the only one who second guesses linguifices as the best demonym for us? I mean I'm not going full Latin pronunciation here, but I sort of read it as liŋ.ɡwi.fiːsiːz."

2013-08-21T14:18:30Z

Created page with "Am I the only one who second guesses linguifices as the best demonym for us? I mean I'm not going full Latin pronunciation here, but I sort of read it as liŋ.ɡwi.fiːsiːz."

New page

Am I the only one who second guesses linguifices as the best demonym for us? I mean I'm not going full Latin pronunciation here, but I sort of read it as liŋ.ɡwi.fiːsiːz.