Luthic: Difference between revisions

m
Line 538: Line 538:


=====Vowel system=====
=====Vowel system=====
The most sonorous elements of the [[w:Syllable|syllable]] are [[w:Vowel|vowels]], which occupy the [[w:Nucleus (syllable)|nuclear]] position. They are prototypical [[w:Mora (linguistics)|mora]]-bearing elements, with simple vowels monomoraic, and long vowels bimoraic. Latin vowels occurred with one of five qualities and one of two weights, that is short and long /i e a o u/. At first, weight was realised by means of longer or shorter duration, and any articulatory differences were negligible, with the short:long opposition stable. Subtle articulatory differences eventually grow and lead to the abandonment of length, and reanalysis of vocal contrast is shifted solely to quality rather than both quality and quantity; specifically, the manifestation of weight as length came to include differences in tongue [[w:Vowel height|height]] and tenseness, and quite early on, /ī, ū/ began to differ from /ĭ, ŭ/ articulatorily, as did /ē, ō/ from /ĕ, ŏ/. The long vowels were stable, but the short vowels came to be realised lower and laxer, with the result that /ĭ, ŭ/ opened to [ɪ, ʊ], and /ĕ, ŏ/ opened to [ε, ɔ]. The result is the merger of Latin /ĭ, ŭ/ and /ē, ō/, since their contrast is now realised sufficiently be their distinct vowel quality, which would be easier to articulate and perceive than vowel duration.
The most sonorous elements of the [[w:Syllable|syllable]] are [[w:Vowel|vowels]], which occupy the [[w:Nucleus (syllable)|nuclear]] position. They are prototypical [[w:Mora (linguistics)|mora]]-bearing elements, with simple vowels monomoraic, and long vowels bimoraic. Latin vowels occurred with one of five qualities and one of two weights, that is short and long [[w:Help:IPA|/i e a o u/]]. At first, weight was realised by means of longer or shorter duration, and any articulatory differences were negligible, with the short:long opposition stable. Subtle articulatory differences eventually grow and lead to the abandonment of length, and reanalysis of vocal contrast is shifted solely to quality rather than both quality and quantity; specifically, the manifestation of weight as length came to include differences in tongue [[w:Vowel height|height]] and tenseness, and quite early on, /ī, ū/ began to differ from /ĭ, ŭ/ articulatorily, as did /ē, ō/ from /ĕ, ŏ/. The long vowels were stable, but the short vowels came to be realised lower and laxer, with the result that /ĭ, ŭ/ opened to [[w:Near-close near-front unrounded vowel|
]], [[w:Near-close near-back rounded vowel|ʊ]​]], and /ĕ, ŏ/ opened to [[w:Open-mid front unrounded vowel|]], [[w:Open-mid back rounded vowel|ɔ]​]]. The result is the merger of Latin /ĭ, ŭ/ and /ē, ō/, since their contrast is now realised sufficiently be their distinct vowel quality, which would be easier to articulate and perceive than vowel duration.
[[File:Vowel changes in Luthic.png|thumb|Gotho-Romance vowel changes from Latin.]]
[[File:Vowel changes in Luthic.png|thumb|Gotho-Romance vowel changes from Latin.]]


Line 550: Line 551:
|-
|-
! [[w:Close vowel|Close]]
! [[w:Close vowel|Close]]
| i iː ĩː
| [[w:Close front unrounded vowel|i]] [[w:Length (phonetics)|]] [[w:Nasal vowel|ĩː]]
|
|
| u uː ũː
| [[w:Close back rounded vowel|u]] [[w:Length (phonetics)|]] [[w:Nasal vowel|ũː]]
|-
|-
! [[w:Mid vowel|Mid]]
! [[w:Mid vowel|Mid]]
| e eː ẽː
| [[w:Close-mid front unrounded vowel|e]] [[w:Length (phonetics)|]] [[w:Nasal vowel|ẽː]]
|
|
| o oː õː
| [[w:Close-mid back rounded vowel|o]] [[w:Length (phonetics)|]] [[w:Nasal vowel|õː]]
|-
|-
! [[w:Open vowel|Open]]
! [[w:Open vowel|Open]]
|
|
| ä äː ä̃ː
| [[w:Open central unrounded vowel]] [[w:Length (phonetics)|äː]] [[w:Nasal vowel|ä̃ː]]
|
|
|}
|}
Line 574: Line 575:
|-
|-
! [[w:Close vowel|Close]]
! [[w:Close vowel|Close]]
| ɪ iː ĩː
| [[w:Near-close near-front unrounded vowel]] [[w:Length (phonetics)|]] [[w:Nasal vowel|ĩː]]
|
|
| ʊ uː ũː
| [[w:Near-close near-back rounded vowel]] [[w:Length (phonetics)|]] [[w:Nasal vowel|ũː]]
|-
|-
! [[w:Mid vowel|Mid]]
! [[w:Mid vowel|Mid]]
| ε eː ẽː
| [[w:Open-mid front unrounded vowel|ɛ]] [[w:Length (phonetics)|]] [[w:Nasal vowel|ẽː]]
|
|
| ɔ oː õː
| [[w:Open-mid_back_rounded_vowel]] [[w:Length (phonetics)|]] [[w:Nasal vowel|õː]]
|-
|-
! [[w:Open vowel|Open]]
! [[w:Open vowel|Open]]
|
|
| ä äː ä̃ː
| [[w:Open central unrounded vowel]] [[w:Length (phonetics)|äː]] [[w:Nasal vowel|ä̃ː]]
|
|
|}
|}


Unstressed a resulted in a slightly raised a [ɐ]. In hiatus, unstressed front vowels become /j/, while unstressed back vowels become /w/. Unlike other Romance languages, the Luthic vowel system was not so affected by [[w:Metaphony|metaphony]], such as /e/ raising to /i/ or /ɛ/ raising to /e/:
Unstressed a resulted in a slightly raised a [[w:Near-open central vowel|]]]. In hiatus, unstressed front vowels become [[w:Voiced palatal approximant|/j/]], while unstressed back vowels become [[w:Voiced labial–velar approximant|/w/]]. Unlike other Romance languages, the Luthic vowel system was not so affected by [[w:Metaphony|metaphony]], such as [[w:Close-mid front unrounded vowel|/e/]] raising to [[w:Close front unrounded vowel|/i/]] or [[w:Open-mid front unrounded vowel|/ɛ/]] raising to [[w:Close-mid front unrounded vowel|/e/]]:


* Latin [[wikt:vindemia#Latin|''vī̆ndēmia'']] [[wikt:AP:pron:la|[u̯i(ː)n̪.ˈd̪eː.mi.ä]]] > Vulgar Latin *[[w:Proto-Romance_language#Phonology|[benˈde.mja]]] > Spanish [[wikt:vendimia#Spanish|''vendimia'']] [[wikt:AP:pron:es|[bẽn̪ˈd̪i.mja]]], but the Luthic cognate ''vendemia'' [[IPA for Luthic|[venˈde.mjɐ]]]
* Classical Latin [[wikt:vindemia#Latin|''vī̆ndēmia'']] [[wikt:AP:pron:la|[u̯i(ː)n̪.ˈd̪eː.mi.ä]]] > Vulgar Latin *[[w:Proto-Romance_language#Phonology|[benˈde.mja]]] > Spanish [[wikt:vendimia#Spanish|''vendimia'']] [[wikt:AP:pron:es|[bẽn̪ˈd̪i.mja]]], but the Luthic cognate ''vendemia'' [[IPA for Luthic|[venˈde.mjɐ]]]


In addition to monophthongs, Luthic has diphthongs, which, however, are both phonemically and phonetically simply combinations of the other vowels. None of the diphthongs are, however, considered to have distinct phonemic status since their constituents do not behave differently from how they occur in isolation, unlike the diphthongs in other languages like English and German. Grammatical tradition distinguishes “falling” from “rising” diphthongs, but since rising diphthongs are composed of one semiconsonantal sound [j] or [w] and one vowel sound, they are not actually diphthongs. The practice of referring to them as “diphthongs” has been criticised by phoneticians like Alareicu Villavolfu.
In addition to monophthongs, Luthic has diphthongs, which, however, are both phonemically and phonetically simply combinations of the other vowels. None of the diphthongs are, however, considered to have distinct phonemic status since their constituents do not behave differently from how they occur in isolation, unlike the diphthongs in other languages like English and German. Grammatical tradition distinguishes “falling” from “rising” diphthongs, but since rising diphthongs are composed of one semiconsonantal sound [[w:Voiced palatal approximant|[j]]] or [[w:Voiced labial–velar approximant|[w]]] and one vowel sound, they are not actually diphthongs. The practice of referring to them as “diphthongs” has been criticised by phoneticians like Alareicu Villavolfu.


=====Cluster smoothing=====
=====Cluster smoothing=====
1,096

edits