Luthic: Difference between revisions

m
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 98: Line 98:
With a renewed close attention to the history and literature of ancient Rome in the 12th century, the mediaeval [[w:Aristocracy|aristocracy]] saw itself mirrored in the accounts of ancient Roman nobility. Some made doubtful claims to direct descent from Roman aristocracy. In the 19th century, German, Luth and French mediaevalists worried about the origins of the great mediaeval families. Did the great families descend from the aristocracy of the Roman Empire or from the barbarian chieftains who invaded the Roman Empire between 400 and 600? Did the families originate in the Latin or Germanic world? Both, it seems. Mediaeval Western Europe was an amalgam of Roman and ‘Barbarian’ bloodlines. The cultural and genetic influence of the Visigoths, Franks, et al. is readily apparent in the socio-cultural and political framework of Mediaeval Europe. In spite of this, the legacy of Rome, both social-cultural and genetic pervaded every aspect of Mediaeval society – this was of course greatly assisted by the mediaeval Church.
With a renewed close attention to the history and literature of ancient Rome in the 12th century, the mediaeval [[w:Aristocracy|aristocracy]] saw itself mirrored in the accounts of ancient Roman nobility. Some made doubtful claims to direct descent from Roman aristocracy. In the 19th century, German, Luth and French mediaevalists worried about the origins of the great mediaeval families. Did the great families descend from the aristocracy of the Roman Empire or from the barbarian chieftains who invaded the Roman Empire between 400 and 600? Did the families originate in the Latin or Germanic world? Both, it seems. Mediaeval Western Europe was an amalgam of Roman and ‘Barbarian’ bloodlines. The cultural and genetic influence of the Visigoths, Franks, et al. is readily apparent in the socio-cultural and political framework of Mediaeval Europe. In spite of this, the legacy of Rome, both social-cultural and genetic pervaded every aspect of Mediaeval society – this was of course greatly assisted by the mediaeval Church.


The initial trouble for the later Roman Empire came from East Germanic speakers, with various tribal groups such as the Vandals and Burgundians traversing Europe. However, it was the Goths who notably contributed to the linguistic record of the East Germanic languages. Originating from the lower [[w:Vistula|Vistula]], they migrated to present-day [[w:Ukraine|Ukraine]]. Later, facing pressure from the [[w:Huns|Huns]], they moved into the [[w:Balkans|Balkans]] and eventually into [[w:Western Europe|Western Europe]]. Among them, the Visigoths settled in [[w:Spain|Spain]], shaping its post-Roman state, while the Ostrogoths became custodians of the last Roman emperors in Italy. By the eighth century, linguistic assimilation into Romance-speaking populations had largely absorbed the Goths of Spain and Italy. Wulfila, a prominent Christian missionary and later bishop of the Visigoths, translated the Bible into Gothic while they resided in the northeast Balkans, providing a significant linguistic record of Gothic and East Germanic. A small group of Ostrogoths left in [[w:Crimea|Crimea]] resurfaced in the sixteenth century through a wordlist compiled by [[w:Ogier Ghiselin de Busbecq|Ogier de Busbecq]], the [[w:Holy Roman Emperor|Holy Roman Emperor’s]] ambassador to the [[w:Sublime Porte|Sublime Porte]]. However, these [[w:Crimean Gothic|Crimean Gothic]] speakers disappeared linguistically shortly after Busbecq documented their vocabulary.
The initial trouble for the later Roman Empire came from East Germanic speakers, with various tribal groups such as the Vandals and Burgundians traversing Europe. However, it was the Goths who notably contributed to the linguistic record of the East Germanic languages. Originating from the lower [[w:Vistula|Vistula]], they migrated to present-day [[w:Ukraine|Ukraine]]. Later, facing pressure from the [[w:Huns|Huns]], they moved into the [[w:Balkans|Balkans]] and eventually into [[w:Western Europe|Western Europe]]. Among them, the Visigoths settled in [[w:Spain|Spain]], shaping its post-Roman state, while the Ostrogoths became custodians of the last Roman emperors in Italy. By the eighth century, linguistic assimilation into Romance-speaking populations had largely absorbed the Goths of Spain and Italy. [[w:Ulfilas|Ulfilas]], a prominent Christian missionary and later bishop of the Visigoths, translated the Bible into Gothic while they resided in the northeast Balkans, providing a significant linguistic record of Gothic and East Germanic. A small group of Ostrogoths left in [[w:Crimea|Crimea]] resurfaced in the sixteenth century through a wordlist compiled by [[w:Ogier Ghiselin de Busbecq|Ogier de Busbecq]], the [[w:Holy Roman Emperor|Holy Roman Emperor’s]] ambassador to the [[w:Sublime Porte|Sublime Porte]]. However, these [[w:Crimean Gothic|Crimean Gothic]] speakers disappeared linguistically shortly after Busbecq documented their vocabulary.


===Gothic Luthic===
===Gothic Luthic===
Line 105: Line 105:
Only a few documents in Gothic Luthic have survived – not enough for a complete reconstruction of the language. Most Gothic Luthic-language sources are translations or glosses of other languages (namely, [[w:Koine Greek|Greek]] and [[w:Latin language|Latin]]), so foreign linguistic elements most certainly influenced the texts. Nevertheless, Gothic Luthic was probably very close to Gothic (it is known primarily from the [[w:Codex Argenteus|Codex Argenteus]], a 6th-century copy of a 4th-century [[w:Bible|Bible]] translation, and is the only East Germanic language with a sizeable [[w:Text corpus|text corpus]]). These are the primary sources:
Only a few documents in Gothic Luthic have survived – not enough for a complete reconstruction of the language. Most Gothic Luthic-language sources are translations or glosses of other languages (namely, [[w:Koine Greek|Greek]] and [[w:Latin language|Latin]]), so foreign linguistic elements most certainly influenced the texts. Nevertheless, Gothic Luthic was probably very close to Gothic (it is known primarily from the [[w:Codex Argenteus|Codex Argenteus]], a 6th-century copy of a 4th-century [[w:Bible|Bible]] translation, and is the only East Germanic language with a sizeable [[w:Text corpus|text corpus]]). These are the primary sources:
:* ''Codex Luthicus'' (Ravenna), two parts: 87 leaves
:* ''Codex Luthicus'' (Ravenna), two parts: 87 leaves
::It contains scattered passages from the New Testament (including parts of the gospels and the Epistles), from the Old Testament (Nehemiah), and some commentaries. The text likely had been somewhat modified by copyists. It was written using the [[w:Gothic alphabet|Gothic alphabet]], an alphabet used for writing the Gothic language. It was developed in the 4th century AD by [[w:Ulfilas|Ulfilas]] (or ''Wulfila''), a Gothic preacher of [[w:Cappadocian Greeks|Cappadocian Greek]] descent, for the purpose of [[w:Gothic Bible|translating the Bible]].
::It contains scattered passages from the New Testament (including parts of the gospels and the Epistles), from the Old Testament (Nehemiah), and some commentaries. The text likely had been somewhat modified by copyists. It was written using the [[w:Gothic alphabet|Gothic alphabet]], an alphabet used for writing the Gothic language. It was developed in the 4th century AD by Ulfilas (or [[wikt:Reconstruction:Gothic/𐍅𐌿𐌻𐍆𐌹𐌻𐌰|*𐍅𐌿𐌻𐍆𐌹𐌻𐌰]] (''Wulfila'')), a Gothic preacher of [[w:Cappadocian Greeks|Cappadocian Greek]] descent, for the purpose of [[w:Gothic Bible|translating the Bible]].
[[File:Luthiks.png|thumb|Detail of the ''Codex Luthicus'', the word ''Luþiks'' is attested, referring to the Luths]]
[[File:Luthiks.png|thumb|Detail of the ''Codex Luthicus'', the word ''Luþiks'' is attested, referring to the Luths]]


Line 283: Line 283:


===Phonology===
===Phonology===
There is a maximum of 8 oral vowels, 5 nasal vowels, 2 semivowels and 31 consonants; though some varieties of the language have fewer phonemes. Gothic, Frankish, [[w:Suebi|northern Suebi]], Langobardic, [[w:Lepontic language|Lepontic]] and [[w:Cisalpine Gaulish|Cisalpine Gaulish]] ([[w:Roman Gaul|Roman Gaul]]) influences were highly absorbed into the local Vulgar Latin dialect. An early form of Luthic was already spoken in the Ostrogothic Kingdom during Theodoric’s reign and by the year 600 Luthic had already become the [[w:Vernacular|vernacular]] of Ravenna. Luthic developed in the region of the former Ostrogothic capital of Ravenna, from Late Latin dialects and Vulgar Latin. As Theodoric emerged as the new ruler of Italy, he upheld a Roman legal administration and scholarly culture while promoting a major building program across Italy, his cultural and architectural attention to Ravenna led to a most conserved dialect, resulting in modern Luthic.
There is a maximum of 8 oral vowels, 5 nasal vowels, 2 semivowels and 31 consonants; though some varieties of the language have fewer phonemes. [[w:Gothic language|Gothic]], [[w:Frankish language|Frankish]], [[w:Suebi|northern Suebi]], [[w:Lombardic language|Langobardic]], [[w:Lepontic language|Lepontic]] and [[w:Cisalpine Gaulish|Cisalpine Gaulish]] ([[w:Roman Gaul|Roman Gaul]]) influences were highly absorbed into the local Vulgar Latin dialect. An early form of Luthic was already spoken in the Ostrogothic Kingdom during Theodoric’s reign and by the year 600 Luthic had already become the [[w:Vernacular|vernacular]] of Ravenna. Luthic developed in the region of the former Ostrogothic capital of Ravenna, from Late Latin dialects and Vulgar Latin. As Theodoric emerged as the new ruler of Italy, he upheld a Roman legal administration and scholarly culture while promoting a major building program across Italy, his cultural and architectural attention to Ravenna led to a most conserved dialect, resulting in modern Luthic.


====Vowels====
====Vowels====
Line 352: Line 352:


====Diphthongs and triphthongs====
====Diphthongs and triphthongs====
{| border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" class="wikitable" style="width: 350px; "style="width: 350px; "
{|
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
|
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align: center"
|+Diphthongs
! colspan="2" rowspan="2" |
! colspan="2" |Endpoint
|-
|-
|+ '''Rising diphthongs of Standard Luthic'''
!<small>/j/</small>
!<small>/w/</small>
|-
|-
! rowspan="2" style="text-align: center; "|Rising
! rowspan="8" |Start point
| style="text-align: center;"|je
!<small>/a/</small>
| style="text-align: center;"|
|aj
|colspan="2" style="text-align: center;"|jɔ
|aw
| style="text-align: center;"|jɐ
| style="text-align: center;"|ju
|-
|-
| style="text-align: center;"|we
!<small>/ɐ/</small>
| style="text-align: center;"|wɛ
|ɐj
| style="text-align: center;"|wo
|ɐw
| style="text-align: center;"|wɔ
|-
| style="text-align: center;"|wɐ
!<small>/ɛ/</small>
| style="text-align: center;"|wi
|ɛj
|}
|ɛw
{| border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" class="wikitable" style="width: 350px; "
|-
|-
|+ '''Falling diphthongs of Standard Luthic'''
!<small>/e/</small>
|ej
|ew
|-
|-
! rowspan="2" style="text-align: center; "|Falling
!<small>/i/</small>
| style="text-align: center;"|ej
| style="background:gray" |
| style="text-align: center;"|ɛj
|iw
| style="text-align: center;"|oj
| style="text-align: center;"|ɔj
| style="text-align: center;"|ɐj
|-
|-
| style="text-align: center;"|ew
!<small>/ɔ/</small>
| style="text-align: center;"|ɛw
|ɔj
| style="text-align: center;"|ow
| style="background:gray" |
| style="text-align: center;"|ɔw
| style="text-align: center;"|ɐw
|}
{| border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" class="wikitable" style="width: 350px; "style="width: 350px; "
|-
|-
|+ '''Rising triphthongs of Standard Luthic'''
!<small>/o/</small>
|oj
|ow
|-
|-
! style="text-align: center; "|Rising
!<small>/u/</small>
| style="text-align: center;"|jwo
|uj
| style="background:gray" |
|}
|}
{| border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" class="wikitable" style="width: 350px; "
|
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align: center"
|+Triphthongs
! colspan="2" rowspan="2" |
! colspan="4" |Endpoint
|-
|-
|+ '''Falling triphthongs of Standard Luthic'''
! colspan="3" |<small>/j/</small>
!<small>/o/</small>
|-
|-
! rowspan="2" style="text-align: center; "|Falling
! rowspan="2" |Start point
| style="text-align: center;"|jɛj
!<small>/j/</small>
| style="text-align: center;"|jɔj
|jɐj
| style="text-align: center;"|jɐj
|jɛj
|jɔj
|jwo
|-
|-
| style="text-align: center;"|wɛj
!<small>/w/</small>
| style="text-align: center;"|wɔj
|wɐj
| style="text-align: center;"|wɐj
|wɛj
|wɔj
| style="background:gray" |
|}
|}
|}


Line 681: Line 693:


====Phonotactics====
====Phonotactics====
Luthic allows up to three consonants in syllable-initial position, though there are limitations. The syllable structure of Luthic is (C)(C)(C)(G)V(G)(C)(C). As with English, there exist many words that begin with three consonants. Luthic lacks bimoraic (diphthongs and long vowels), as the so-called diphthongs are composed of one semiconsonantal (glide) sound [j] or [w].
Luthic allows up to three consonants in syllable-initial position, though there are limitations. The syllable structure of Luthic is (C)(C)(C)(G)V(G)(C)(C). As with English, there exist many words that begin with three consonants. Luthic lacks bimoraic (diphthongs and long vowels), as the so-called diphthongs are composed of one semiconsonantal ([[w:Semivowel|glide]]) sound [[w:Voiced palatal approximant|[j]]] or [[w:Voiced labial–velar approximant|[w]]].


{| class="wikitable"  style="text-align: center;"
{| class="wikitable"  style="text-align: center;"
Line 689: Line 701:
|+ '''Onset'''
|+ '''Onset'''
|-
|-
| f ~ ɸ v ~ β p b t d k ɡ || r || j w
| [[IPA for Luthic|f ~ ɸ v ~ β p b t d k ɡ]] || [[IPA for Luthic|r]] || [[IPA for Luthic|j w]]
|-
|-
| s || p k || r l
| [[IPA for Luthic|s]] || [[IPA for Luthic|p k]] || [[IPA for Luthic|r l]]
|-
|-
| s || f ~ ɸ t || r
| [[IPA for Luthic|s]] || [[IPA for Luthic|f ~ ɸ t]] || [[IPA for Luthic|r]]
|-
|-
| z || b || l
| [[IPA for Luthic|z]] || [[IPA for Luthic|b]] || [[IPA for Luthic|l]]
|-
|-
| z || d ɡ || r
| [[IPA for Luthic|z]] || [[IPA for Luthic|d ɡ]] || [[IPA for Luthic|r]]
|-
|-
| z || m n v ~ β d͡ʒ r l || —
| [[IPA for Luthic|z]] || [[IPA for Luthic|m n v ~ β d͡ʒ r l]] || —
|-
|-
| p b f ~ ɸ v ~ β k ɡ || r l || —
| [[IPA for Luthic|p b f ~ ɸ v ~ β k ɡ]] || [[IPA for Luthic|r l]] || —
|-
|-
| ɡ || n l || —
| [[IPA for Luthic]] || [[IPA for Luthic|n l]] || —
|-
|-
| p t k d || r || —
| [[IPA for Luthic|p t k d]] || [[IPA for Luthic|r]] || —
|-
|-
| θ ð || v ~ β r || —
| [[IPA for Luthic|θ ð]] || [[IPA for Luthic|v ~ β r]] || —
|-
|-
| t || v ~ β || —
| [[IPA for Luthic|t]] || [[IPA for Luthic|v ~ β]] || —
|-
|-
| kʷ ɡʷ t͡s t͡ʃ d͡ʒ ʃ r ɲ l ʎ || — || —  
| [[IPA for Luthic|kʷ ɡʷ t͡s t͡ʃ d͡ʒ ʃ r ɲ l ʎ]] || — || —  
|}
|}


'''CC'''
'''CC'''


* /s/ + any voiceless stop or /f ~ ɸ/;
* [[IPA for Luthic|/s/]] + any voiceless stop or [[IPA for Luthic|/f ~ ɸ/]];
* /z/ + any voiced stop, /v ~ β d͡ʒ m n l r/;
* [[IPA for Luthic|/z/]] + any voiced stop, [[IPA for Luthic|/v ~ β d͡ʒ m n l r/]];
* /f ~ ɸ v ~ β/, or any stop + /r/;
* [[IPA for Luthic|/f ~ ɸ v ~ β/]], or any stop + [[IPA for Luthic|/r/]];
* /f ~ ɸ v ~ β/, or any stop except /t d/ + /l/;
* [[IPA for Luthic|/f ~ ɸ v ~ β/]], or any stop except [[IPA for Luthic|/t d/]] + [[IPA for Luthic|/l/]];
* f ~ ɸ v ~ β s z/, or any stop or nasal + /j w/;
* [[IPA for Luthic|f ~ ɸ v ~ β s z/]], or any stop or nasal + [[IPA for Luthic|/j w/]];
* In Graeco-Roman words origin which are only partially assimilated, other combinations such as /pn/ (e.g. ''pneumaticu''), /mn/ (e.g. ''mnemonicu''), /tm/ (e.g. ''tmesi''), and /ps/ (e.g. ''pseudo-'') occur.
* In Graeco-Roman words origin which are only partially assimilated, other combinations such as [[IPA for Luthic|/pn/]] (e.g. ''pneumaticu''), [[IPA for Luthic|/mn/]] (e.g. ''mnemonicu''), [[IPA for Luthic|/tm/]] (e.g. ''tmesi''), and [[IPA for Luthic|/ps/]] (e.g. ''pseudo-'') occur.


As an onset, the cluster /s/ + voiceless consonant is inherently unstable. Phonetically, word-internal s+C normally syllabifies as [s.C]. A competing analysis accepts that while the syllabification /s.C/ is accurate historically, modern retreat of i-[[w:Prothesis (linguistics)|prosthesis]] before word initial /s/+C (e.g. ''miþ isforzȧ'' “with effort” has generally given way to ''miþ sforza'') suggests that the structure is now underdetermined, with occurrence of /s.C/ or /.sC/ variable “according to the context and the idiosyncratic behaviour of the speakers.”
As an onset, the cluster [[IPA for Luthic|/s/]] + voiceless consonant is inherently unstable. Phonetically, word-internal s+C normally syllabifies as [s.C]. A competing analysis accepts that while the syllabification /s.C/ is accurate historically, modern retreat of i-[[w:Prothesis (linguistics)|prosthesis]] before word initial /s/+C (e.g. ''miþ isforzȧ'' “with effort” has generally given way to ''miþ sforza'') suggests that the structure is now underdetermined, with occurrence of /s.C/ or /.sC/ variable “according to the context and the idiosyncratic behaviour of the speakers.”


'''CCC'''
'''CCC'''


* /s/ + voiceless stop or /f ~ ɸ/ + /r/;
* [[IPA for Luthic|/s/]] + voiceless stop or [[IPA for Luthic|/f ~ ɸ/]] + [[IPA for Luthic|/r/]];
* /z/ + voiced stop + /r/;
* [[IPA for Luthic|/z/]] + voiced stop + [[IPA for Luthic|/r/]];
* /s/ + /p k/ + /l/;
* [[IPA for Luthic|/s/]] + [[IPA for Luthic|/p k/]] + [[IPA for Luthic|/l/]];
* /z/ + /b/ + /l/;
* [[IPA for Luthic|/z/]] + [[IPA for Luthic|/b/]] + [[IPA for Luthic|/l/]];
* /f ~ ɸ v ~ β/ or any stop + /r/ + /j w/.
* [[IPA for Luthic|/f ~ ɸ v ~ β/]] or any stop + [[IPA for Luthic|/r/]] + [[IPA for Luthic|/j w/]].


{| class="wikitable"  style="text-align: center;"
{| class="wikitable"  style="text-align: center;"
Line 739: Line 751:
|+ '''Nucleus'''
|+ '''Nucleus'''
|-
|-
| a ɐ e ɛ || i [j] u [w] || —
| [[IPA for Luthic|a ɐ e ɛ]] || i [j] u [w] || —
|-
|-
| o ɔ || i [j]|| —
| [[IPA for Luthic|o ɔ]] || [[IPA for Luthic|i [j]]]|| —
|-
|-
| i [j] || e o || —
| [[IPA for Luthic|i [j]]] || [[IPA for Luthic|e o]] || —
|-
|-
| i [j] || ɐ ɛ ɔ || i [j]
| [[IPA for Luthic|i [j]]] || [[IPA for Luthic|ɐ ɛ ɔ]] || [[IPA for Luthic|i [j]]]
|-
|-
| i [j] || u [w] || o
| [[IPA for Luthic|i [j]]] || [[IPA for Luthic|u [w]]] || [[IPA for Luthic|o]]
|-
|-
| u [w] || ɐ ɛ ɔ || i [j]
| [[IPA for Luthic|u [w]]] || [[IPA for Luthic|ɐ ɛ ɔ]] || [[IPA for Luthic|i [j]]]
|-
|-
| u [w] || e o || —
| [[IPA for Luthic|u [w]]] || [[IPA for Luthic|e o]] || —
|-
|-
| u [w] || i || —
| [[IPA for Luthic|u [w]]] || [[IPA for Luthic|i]] || —
|}
|}


The nucleus is the only mandatory part of a syllable and must be a vowel or a diphthong. In a falling diphthong the most common second elements are /i̯/ or /u̯/. Combinations of /j w/ with vowels are often labelled diphthongs, allowing for combinations of /j w/ with falling diphthongs to be called triphthongs. One view holds that it is more accurate to label /j w/ as consonants and /jV wV/ as consonant-vowel sequences rather than rising diphthongs. In that interpretation, Luthic has only falling diphthongs (phonemically at least, cf. [[w:Synaeresis|Synaeresis]]) and no triphthongs.
The nucleus is the only mandatory part of a syllable and must be a vowel or a diphthong. In a falling diphthong the most common second elements are [[w:Help:IPA|/i̯/]] or [[w:Help:IPA|/u̯/]]. Combinations of [[IPA for Luthic|/j w/]] with vowels are often labelled diphthongs, allowing for combinations of /j w/ with falling diphthongs to be called triphthongs. One view holds that it is more accurate to label [[IPA for Luthic|/j w/]] as consonants and /jV wV/ as consonant-vowel sequences rather than rising diphthongs. In that interpretation, Luthic has only falling diphthongs (phonemically at least, cf. [[w:Synaeresis|synaeresis]]) and no triphthongs.


{| class="wikitable"  style="text-align: center;"
{| class="wikitable"  style="text-align: center;"
Line 763: Line 775:
|+ '''Coda'''
|+ '''Coda'''
|-
|-
| m n l r || Cₓ
| [[IPA for Luthic|m n l r]] || Cₓ
|-
|-
| Cₓ || —
| Cₓ || —
Line 771: Line 783:


* The first element of any geminate.
* The first element of any geminate.
* A nasal consonant that is either /n/ (word-finally) or one that is homorganic to a following consonant.
* A nasal consonant that is either [[IPA for Luthic|/n/]] (word-finally) or one that is homorganic to a following consonant.
* /r/ and /l/.
* [[IPA for Luthic|/r/]] and [[IPA for Luthic|/l/]].
* /s/ (though not before fricatives).
* [[IPA for Luthic|/s/]] (though not before fricatives).


=====Prosody=====
=====Prosody=====
Luthic is quasi-[[w:Paroxytone|paroxytonic]], meaning that most words receive stress on their penultimate (second-to-last) syllable. Monosyllabic words tend to lack stress in their only syllable, unless emphasised or accentuated. Enclitic and other unstressed personal pronouns do not affect stress patterns. Some monosyllabic words may have natural stress (even if not emphasised), but it is weaker than those in polysyllabic words.
Luthic is quasi-[[w:Paroxytone|paroxytonic]], meaning that most words receive stress on their penultimate (second-to-last) syllable. Monosyllabic words tend to lack stress in their only syllable, unless emphasised or accentuated. Enclitic and other unstressed personal pronouns do not affect stress patterns. Some monosyllabic words may have natural stress (even if not emphasised), but it is weaker than those in polysyllabic words.


* ''rasda'' (ʀᴀ-sda ~ ʀᴀs-da) /ˈra.zdɐ ~ ˈraz.dɐ/;
* ''rasda'' (ʀᴀ-sda ~ ʀᴀs-da) [[IPA for Luthic|[ˈra.zdɐ ~ ˈraz.dɐ]]];
* ''Italia'' (i-ᴛᴀ-lia) /iˈta.ljɐ/;
* ''Italia'' (i-ᴛᴀ-lia) [[IPA for Luthic|[iˈta.ljɐ]]];
* ''approssimativamente'' (ap-pros-si-ma-ti-va-ᴍᴇɴ-te) /ɐp.pros.si.mɐ.θi.βɐˈmen.te/.
* ''approssimativamente'' (ap-pros-si-ma-ti-va-ᴍᴇɴ-te) [[IPA for Luthic|[ɐp.pros.si.mɐ.θi.βɐˈmen.te]]].


Compound words have secondary stress on their penultimate syllable. Some suffixes also maintain the suffixed word secondary stress.
Compound words have secondary stress on their penultimate syllable. Some suffixes also maintain the suffixed word secondary stress.


* ''panzar'' + ''campo'' + ''vagnu'' > ''panzarcampovagnu'' (ᴘᴀɴ-zar-ᴄᴀᴍ-po-ᴠᴀ-ġnu) /ˌpan.t͡sɐrˌkam.poˈβaɲ.ɲu/;
* ''panzar'' + ''campo'' + ''vagnu'' > ''panzarcampovagnu'' (ᴘᴀɴ-zar-ᴄᴀᴍ-po-ᴠᴀ-gnu) [[IPA for Luthic|ˌpan.t͡sɐrˌkam.poˈβaɲ.ɲu]]];
* ''broþar'' + ''-scape'' > ''broþarscape'' (ʙʀᴏ-þar-sᴄᴀ-pe) /ˌbro.θɐrˈska.ɸe/.
* ''broþar'' + ''-scape'' > ''broþarscape'' (ʙʀᴏ-þar-sᴄᴀ-pe) [[IPA for Luthic|ˌbro.θɐrˈska.ɸe]]].


Secondary stress is however often omitted by Italian influence. Tetrasyllabic (and beyond) words may have a very weak secondary stress in the fourth-to-last syllable (i.e. two syllables before the main or primary stress).
Secondary stress is however often omitted by Italian influence. Tetrasyllabic (and beyond) words may have a very weak secondary stress in the fourth-to-last syllable (i.e. two syllables before the main or primary stress).
Line 791: Line 803:
==Research==
==Research==
[[File:Ravenna University's arms.png|thumb|Ravenna University’s arms]]
[[File:Ravenna University's arms.png|thumb|Ravenna University’s arms]]
Luthic is a well-studied language, and multiple universities in Italy have departments devoted to Luthic or linguistics with active research projects on the language, mainly in Ravenna, such as the '''Linguistic Circle of Ravenna''' (Luthic: ''Creizzo Rasdavitascapetico Ravennae''; Italian: ''Circolo Linguistico di Ravenna'') at '''Ravenna University''', and there are many dictionaries and technological resources on the language. The language council ''Gafaurdu faul·la Rasda Lûthica'' also publishes research on the language both nationally and internationally. Academic descriptions of the language are published both in Luthic, Italian and English. The most complete grammar is the ''Grammatica gli Lûthicae Rasdae'' (Grammar of the Luthic Language) by Alessandro Fiscar & Luca Vagnar, and it is written in Luthic and contains over 800 pages. Multiple corpora of Luthic language data are available. The ''Luthic Online Dictionary project'' provides a curated corpus of 35,000 words.
Luthic is a well-studied language, and multiple universities in Italy have departments devoted to Luthic or linguistics with active research projects on the language, mainly in Ravenna, such as the '''Linguistic Circle of Ravenna''' (Luthic: ''Creizzo Rasdavitascapetico Ravennae''; Italian: ''Circolo Linguistico di Ravenna'') at '''Ravenna University''', and there are many dictionaries and technological resources on the language. The language council ''Gafaurdu faul·la Rasda Lûthica'' also publishes research on the language both nationally and internationally. Academic descriptions of the language are published both in Luthic, Italian and English. The most complete grammar is the ''Grammatica gli Lûthicae Rasdae'' (Grammar of the Luthic Language) by Alessandru Fiscar & Luca Vagnar, and it is written in Luthic and contains over 800 pages. Multiple corpora of Luthic language data are available. The ''Luthic Online Dictionary project'' provides a curated corpus of 35,000 words.


===History===
===History===
The Ravenna School of Linguistics evolved around Giuvanni Laggobardi and his developing theory of language in [[w:Structural linguistics|linguistic structuralism]]. Together with Soġnafreþo Rossi he founded the Circle of Linguistics of Ravenna in 1964, a group of linguists based on the model of the [[w:Prague Linguistic Circle|Prague Linguistic Circle]]. From 1970, Ravenna University offered courses in languages and philosophy but the students were unable to finish their studies without going to [[w:Accademia della Crusca|Accademia della Crusca]] for their final examinations.
The Ravenna School of Linguistics evolved around Giuvanni Laggobardi and his developing theory of language in [[w:Structural linguistics|linguistic structuralism]]. Together with Soġnafreþo Rossi he founded the Circle of Linguistics of Ravenna in 1964, a group of linguists based on the model of the [[w:Prague Linguistic Circle|Prague Linguistic Circle]]. From 1970, Ravenna University offered courses in languages and philosophy but the students were unable to finish their studies without going to [[w:Accademia della Crusca|Accademia della Crusca]] for their final examinations.


* '''Ravenna University Circle of [[w:Phonological Development|Phonological Development]]''' (Luthic: ''Creizzo Sviluppi Phonologici gia Accademia Ravenna'') was developed in 1990, however very little research has been done on the earliest stages of phonological development in Luthic.
* '''Ravenna University Circle of [[w:Phonological Development|Phonological Development]]''' (Luthic: ''Creizzo Sviluppi Phonologici gi’Accademia Ravenna'') was developed in 1990, however very little research has been done on the earliest stages of phonological development in Luthic.
* '''Ravenna University Circle of [[w:Theology|Theology]]''' (Luthic: ''Creizzo Theologiae gia Accademia Ravenna'') was developed in 2000 in association with the [[w:Ravenna Cathedral|Ravenna Cathedral or Metropolitan Cathedral of the Resurrection of Our Lord Jesus Christ]] (Luthic: ''Cathedrale metropolitana deï Osstassi Unsari Signori Gesusi Christi''; Italian: ''Cattedrale metropolitana della Risurrezione di Nostro Signore Gesù Cristo; Duomo di Ravenna'').
* '''Ravenna University Circle of [[w:Theology|Theology]]''' (Luthic: ''Creizzo Theologiae gi’Accademia Ravenna'') was developed in 2000 in association with the [[w:Ravenna Cathedral|Ravenna Cathedral or Metropolitan Cathedral of the Resurrection of Our Lord Jesus Christ]] (Luthic: ''Cathedrale metropolitana deï Osstassi Unsari Signori Gesusi Christi''; Italian: ''Cattedrale metropolitana della Risurrezione di Nostro Signore Gesù Cristo; Duomo di Ravenna'').


===Phonological development===
===Phonological development===
1,096

edits