1,096
edits
Luthic: Difference between revisions
m
→Alphabet
Lëtzelúcia (talk | contribs) m (→Sample text) |
Lëtzelúcia (talk | contribs) m (→Alphabet) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 228: | Line 228: | ||
** Similarly, the letter ⟨z⟩ can symbolise voiced or voiceless consonants. ⟨z⟩ symbolises [[w:Voiceless alveolar affricate|/t͡s/]] onset before a vowel, when clustered with a voiceless consonant (⟨p, f, c, q⟩), and when doubled (geminate); it symbolises [[w:Voiced alveolar affricate|/d͡z/]] when between vowels (except in ''-zione'' suffixed nouns) and when clustered with voiced consonants. However, ⟨zz⟩ stands for both [[w:Gemination|/tt͡s/]] and [[w:Gemination|/dd͡z/]]. | ** Similarly, the letter ⟨z⟩ can symbolise voiced or voiceless consonants. ⟨z⟩ symbolises [[w:Voiceless alveolar affricate|/t͡s/]] onset before a vowel, when clustered with a voiceless consonant (⟨p, f, c, q⟩), and when doubled (geminate); it symbolises [[w:Voiced alveolar affricate|/d͡z/]] when between vowels (except in ''-zione'' suffixed nouns) and when clustered with voiced consonants. However, ⟨zz⟩ stands for both [[w:Gemination|/tt͡s/]] and [[w:Gemination|/dd͡z/]]. | ||
* The letter ⟨þ⟩ can symbolise voiced or voiceless consonants. ⟨þ⟩ symbolises [[w:Voiceless dental fricative|/θ/]] in all cases, except when clustered with a voiced consonant, standing for [[w:Voiced dental fricative|/ð/]]. | * The letter ⟨þ⟩ can symbolise voiced or voiceless consonants. ⟨þ⟩ symbolises [[w:Voiceless dental fricative|/θ/]] in all cases, except when clustered with a voiced consonant, standing for [[w:Voiced dental fricative|/ð/]]. | ||
* The status of the letter ⟨ð⟩ is debatable, and is one of the main reasons for common misspellings in Luthic, however, it is only used for etymological reasons, or when [[w:Voiced dental fricative|/ð/]] is needed in a position where [[w:Tuscan gorgia|Gorgia tuscana]] can not affect [[w:Voiced dental and alveolar plosives|/d/]] (vide [[Luthic#Lenition|§ Lenition]]). Nevertheless, many writers and scholars just ignore the existence of it. | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" | {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" | ||
| Line 7,010: | Line 7,011: | ||
* Gamillscheg, Ernst (2017) [First published 1935]. ''Die Ostgoten. Die Langobarden. Die altgermanischen Bestandteile des Ostromanischen. Altgermanisches im Alpenromanischen''. Romania Germanica. Vol. 2. Berlin: De Gruyter. | * Gamillscheg, Ernst (2017) [First published 1935]. ''Die Ostgoten. Die Langobarden. Die altgermanischen Bestandteile des Ostromanischen. Altgermanisches im Alpenromanischen''. Romania Germanica. Vol. 2. Berlin: De Gruyter. | ||
* Guitel, Geneviève (1975). ''Histoire comparée des numérations écrites''. Paris: Flammarion. | * Guitel, Geneviève (1975). ''Histoire comparée des numérations écrites''. Paris: Flammarion. | ||
* | * Gvozdanović, Jadranka (1991). ''Indo-European Numerals''. Berlin: De Gruyter. | ||
* Hoff, Erika (2009). ''Language development''. Boston, MA: Wadsworth/Cengage Learning. | * Hoff, Erika (2009). ''Language development''. Boston, MA: Wadsworth/Cengage Learning. | ||
* Goebl, H., ed. (1984). ''Dialectology. Quantitative Linguistics, Vol. 21''. Bochum: Brockmeyer. | * Goebl, H., ed. (1984). ''Dialectology. Quantitative Linguistics, Vol. 21''. Bochum: Brockmeyer. | ||