1,102
edits
Luthic: Difference between revisions
m
→Vowel system
Lëtzelúcia (talk | contribs) |
Lëtzelúcia (talk | contribs) m (→Vowel system) |
||
| Line 619: | Line 619: | ||
* Classical Latin [[wikt:vindemia#Latin|''vī̆ndēmia'']] [[wikt:AP:pron:la|[u̯i(ː)n̪.ˈd̪eː.mi.ä]]] > Vulgar Latin *[[w:Proto-Romance_language#Phonology|[benˈde.mja]]] > Spanish [[wikt:vendimia#Spanish|''vendimia'']] [[wikt:AP:pron:es|[bẽn̪ˈd̪i.mja]]], but the Luthic cognate ''vendemia'' [[IPA for Luthic#Standard_Ravennese_Luthic|[venˈde.mjɐ]]] | * Classical Latin [[wikt:vindemia#Latin|''vī̆ndēmia'']] [[wikt:AP:pron:la|[u̯i(ː)n̪.ˈd̪eː.mi.ä]]] > Vulgar Latin *[[w:Proto-Romance_language#Phonology|[benˈde.mja]]] > Spanish [[wikt:vendimia#Spanish|''vendimia'']] [[wikt:AP:pron:es|[bẽn̪ˈd̪i.mja]]], but the Luthic cognate ''vendemia'' [[IPA for Luthic#Standard_Ravennese_Luthic|[venˈde.mjɐ]]] | ||
Luthic also diphthongises ō̆ to [[IPA for Luthic#Standard_Ravennese_Luthic|/wɔ/]] in the following environments: | |||
* mō̆- > muo- | |||
** Latin [[wikt:moveo#Latin|''movēre'']] > Luthic ''muovere'' [[IPA for Luthic#Standard_Ravennese_Luthic|[mwɔˈβe.re]]] | |||
** Latin [[wikt:mobilia#Latin|''mōbilia'']] > Luthic ''muobigla'' [[IPA for Luthic#Standard_Ravennese_Luthic|[mwɔˈbiʎ.ʎɐ]]] | |||
* bō̆- > buo- | |||
** Proto-Germanic [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Germanic/bōks|''*bōks'']] [[w:Proto-Germanic_language#Phonology|/bɔːks/]] > Luthic ''buocu'' [[IPA for Luthic#Standard_Ravennese_Luthic|[ˈbwɔ.xu]]] | |||
** Latin [[wikt:bos#Latin|''bovem'']] [[wikt:AP:pron:la|[ˈbo.u̯ẽː]]] > Luthic ''buove'' [[IPA for Luthic#Standard_Ravennese_Luthic|[ˈbwɔ.βe]]] | |||
* (Ⓒ)ō̆v- > (Ⓒ)uov- | |||
** Latin [[wikt:novus#Latin|''novus'']] [[wikt:AP:pron:la|[ˈno.u̯us̠ ~ ˈno.u̯ʊs̠]]] > Luthic ''nuovu'' [[IPA for Luthic#Standard_Ravennese_Luthic|[ˈnwɔ.βu]]] | |||
** Latin [[wikt:ovum#Latin|''ōvum'']] [[wikt:AP:pron:la|[ˈoː.u̯ũː]] > Luthic ''uovo'' [[IPA for Luthic#Standard_Ravennese_Luthic|[ˈwɔ.βo]]] | |||
In addition to monophthongs, Luthic has diphthongs, which, however, are both phonemically and phonetically simply combinations of the other vowels. None of the diphthongs are, however, considered to have distinct phonemic status since their constituents do not behave differently from how they occur in isolation, unlike the diphthongs in other languages like English and German. Grammatical tradition distinguishes “falling” from “rising” diphthongs, but since rising diphthongs are composed of one semiconsonantal sound [[w:Voiced palatal approximant|[j]]] or [[w:Voiced labial–velar approximant|[w]]] and one vowel sound, they are not actually diphthongs. The practice of referring to them as “diphthongs” has been criticised by phoneticians like Alareicu Villavolfu. | In addition to monophthongs, Luthic has diphthongs, which, however, are both phonemically and phonetically simply combinations of the other vowels. None of the diphthongs are, however, considered to have distinct phonemic status since their constituents do not behave differently from how they occur in isolation, unlike the diphthongs in other languages like English and German. Grammatical tradition distinguishes “falling” from “rising” diphthongs, but since rising diphthongs are composed of one semiconsonantal sound [[w:Voiced palatal approximant|[j]]] or [[w:Voiced labial–velar approximant|[w]]] and one vowel sound, they are not actually diphthongs. The practice of referring to them as “diphthongs” has been criticised by phoneticians like Alareicu Villavolfu. | ||