138,726
edits
Naeng/Classical: Difference between revisions
m
→Sandhi
m (→Sandhi) |
m (→Sandhi) |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
Old Windermere had a complex sandhi system (somewhere between Biblical Hebrew and Sanskrit) which was no longer productive in Classical Windermere; most notably it affected plurals and verb forms, making them less predictable. | Old Windermere had a complex sandhi system (somewhere between Biblical Hebrew and Sanskrit) which was no longer productive in Classical Windermere; most notably it affected plurals and verb forms, making them less predictable. | ||
*f + fric | |||
*th + fric -> fric + t | *th + fric -> fric + t | ||
**ths -> st, as in ''sehf'' 'go' -> *''thsehf'' -> ''stehf'' 'to drive' (Modern ''binsteaf'' 'energy', ''sămteaf'' 'to energize') | **ths -> st, as in ''sehf'' 'go' -> *''thsehf'' -> ''stehf'' 'to drive' (Modern ''binsteaf'' 'energy', ''sămteaf'' 'to energize') | ||
| Line 32: | Line 33: | ||
**thch -> cht, e.g. Proto-Lakovic ''*ṛ-'' nonvolitional + ''*tka'' 'to go' > Proto-Windermere ''àrθχa'' > ''răchta'' 'to die' | **thch -> cht, e.g. Proto-Lakovic ''*ṛ-'' nonvolitional + ''*tka'' 'to go' > Proto-Windermere ''àrθχa'' > ''răchta'' 'to die' | ||
**thł, thș | **thł, thș | ||
*ch + fric | |||
*s + f, th, ch > sp, st, sc | |||
*rC, lC > Cr, Cl | *rC, lC > Cr, Cl | ||
*ps pt pn png > sp pr fn fng | *ps pt pn png > sp pr fn fng | ||