640
edits
(Prohibitives done) |
(Changed pronoun alignment to tripartite, but fused ergative and genitive) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Brief Description== | ==Brief Description== | ||
Kämpya has topic comment syntax with isolating morphology. The syntactic alignment is | Kämpya has topic comment syntax with isolating morphology. The syntactic alignment is basically ergative, except that there is a tripartite system on pronouns. However, genitive (alienable) and ergative pronouns are identical. Possessors are marked for alienability [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alienable_possession] using tone, and come before the nouns they modify. Kämpya (at least in the standard dialect) uses postpositions rather than prepositions, and adjectives can come either before or after the nouns they modify if they are restrictive or non-restrictive respectively [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Restrictiveness]. | ||
In terms of phonology, the most notable thing is a 3-way vowel phonation contrast on stressed syllables (which is not present on unstressed syllables). Kämpya distinguishes words with harsh voice (marked with a tilde e.g. /a̰/), from breathy voice (marked with a pair of dots either above or below the vowel e.g. /a̤/ or /ä/), from glottalisation (marked with a glottal stop after the vowel e.g. /aʔ/. | In terms of phonology, the most notable thing is a 3-way vowel phonation contrast on stressed syllables (which is not present on unstressed syllables). Kämpya distinguishes words with harsh voice (marked with a tilde e.g. /a̰/), from breathy voice (marked with a pair of dots either above or below the vowel e.g. /a̤/ or /ä/), from glottalisation (marked with a glottal stop after the vowel e.g. /aʔ/. | ||
Line 197: | Line 197: | ||
=== | ===Intransitive Pronouns=== | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
Line 229: | Line 229: | ||
=== | ===Genitive / Ergative Pronouns=== | ||
Kämpya's genitive pronouns inflect for alienable vs. inalienable possession, however, in the emphatic form, these are not distinguished. The alienable (and emphatic) forms of the genitive pronouns are also used as ergative pronouns (i.e. the subjects of transitive verbs). | |||
There is also a proximate vs. obviative distinction on 3rd person genitive pronouns. The proximate pronouns are used when the possessor was the last noun that was in the absolutive case (i.e. unmarked). The obviative pronouns are used in other cases. To mark a 3rd person subject of a transitive verb, only the obviative form is used, never the proximate. | |||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
Line 242: | Line 244: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Alienable || môṵ || ˈḛ̂wà || jô̰ || dḛ̂- || ðjíʔ | | Alienable || môṵ || ˈḛ̂wà || jô̰ || dḛ̂- || ðjíʔ | ||
|- | |||
| Ergative || môṵ || ˈḛ̂wà || jô̰ || N/A || ðjíʔ | |||
|- | |- | ||
| Emphatic || mòṵ || ˈḛ̀wá || bwò̤ || swḭ̀ || sḛ̀ | | Emphatic || mòṵ || ˈḛ̀wá || bwò̤ || swḭ̀ || sḛ̀ | ||
Line 266: | Line 270: | ||
/jéi ˈsíʔtà/ phonetically [jéiˈsíʔtà] | /jéi ˈsíʔtà/ phonetically [jéiˈsíʔtà] | ||
2PS guardian | 2PS.INTR guardian | ||
You are / were / will be the guardian(s). | You are / were / will be the guardian(s). | ||
Line 276: | Line 280: | ||
/jéw ˈḛ̂nèmì/ phonetically [jéˈwḛ̂nèmì] | /jéw ˈḛ̂nèmì/ phonetically [jéˈwḛ̂nèmì] | ||
2PS enemy | 2PS.INTR enemy | ||
You are / were / will be the enemy. | You are / were / will be the enemy. | ||
Line 286: | Line 290: | ||
/jèḭ ˈḛ̂nèmì/ phonetically [jèḭ ˈḛ̂nèmì] | /jèḭ ˈḛ̂nèmì/ phonetically [jèḭ ˈḛ̂nèmì] | ||
2PS. | 2PS.INT.EMP enemy | ||
'''You''' are the enemy. | '''You''' are the enemy. | ||
Line 430: | Line 434: | ||
====With Pronouns==== | ====With Pronouns==== | ||
The | The (alienable) genitive pronouns discussed earlier can also be the subject of transitive verbs e.g. | ||
/jô̰ káiʔk gáʔɾ/ | |||
2PS.ERG bite lizard | |||
You are biting the lizard. | |||
You are biting the lizard | |||
Line 477: | Line 446: | ||
As before, the object can be fronted as a topic e.g. | As before, the object can be fronted as a topic e.g. | ||
/gáʔɾ | /gáʔɾ jô̰ káiʔk/ | ||
lizard 2PS. | lizard 2PS.ERG bite | ||
You are biting the lizard. | You are biting the lizard. | ||
However, the subject pronoun still come immediately before the verb, so sentences like */ | However, the subject pronoun still come immediately before the verb, so sentences like */jô̰ gáʔɾ káiʔk/ are ungrammatical. | ||
Line 506: | Line 475: | ||
When both the subject and the object of a verb are pronouns, the subject comes first | When both the subject and the object of a verb are pronouns, the subject comes first and is in the intransitive case e.g. | ||
jéi=swí=káiʔk | jéi=swí=káiʔk | ||
2PS. | 2PS.INTR=3PS.ACC=bite | ||
You are biting him. | You are biting him. | ||
It would be ungrammatical to say */jô̰ swí=káiʔk/. | |||
Line 1,076: | Line 1,047: | ||
/jéi=áˈlòṵn nâ̰/ | /jéi=áˈlòṵn nâ̰/ | ||
2PS. | 2PS.INTR=alone.CMPD PROH | ||
Don't be alone. | Don't be alone. | ||
Line 1,083: | Line 1,054: | ||
This pattern can also be used for transitive verbs | This pattern can also be used for transitive verbs | ||
/ | /jô̰ kàiʔk nâ̰ kʰwèi̤/ | ||
2PS. | 2PS.ERG bite.CMPD PROH dog | ||
Don't bite the dog. | Don't bite the dog. | ||
o | |||
It is also perfectly possible to front the argument of /nâ̰/ e.g. | It is also perfectly possible to front the argument of /nâ̰/ e.g. | ||
/kʰwèi̤ | /kʰwèi̤ jô̰ kàiʔk nâ̰/ | ||
dog 2PS. | dog 2PS.ERG bite.CMPD PROH | ||
The dog must not be bitten. | The dog must not be bitten. | ||
Other nouns can be used apart from the 2nd person pronouns e.g. | |||
/ˈsíʔtà=zù kàiʔk nâ̰ kʰwèi̤/ | /ˈsíʔtà=zù kàiʔk nâ̰ kʰwèi̤/ |
edits