Verse:Irta/Judeo-Mandarin/Filichdiș: Difference between revisions

From Linguifex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Learăgüsiș forms are extremely marked: they're considered archaic and poetic at best, and deliberately "overusing" them is used for evoking certain Ăn Yidiș literary work...")
 
mNo edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 1: Line 1:
Learăgüsiș forms are extremely marked: they're considered archaic and poetic at best, and deliberately "overusing" them is used for evoking certain Ăn Yidiș literary works, or e.g. in neopagan/new-religious-movement material.
Learăgüsiș forms are extremely marked: they're considered archaic and poetic at best, and deliberately "overusing" them is used for evoking certain Ăn Yidiș literary works, or e.g. in neopagan/new-religious-movement material. These forms, including synthetic verb forms, are best preserved in Munster Irish, and Ăn Yidiș writers created these forms by cognatizing older Irish or Munster Irish forms.

Revision as of 01:31, 3 December 2021

Learăgüsiș forms are extremely marked: they're considered archaic and poetic at best, and deliberately "overusing" them is used for evoking certain Ăn Yidiș literary works, or e.g. in neopagan/new-religious-movement material. These forms, including synthetic verb forms, are best preserved in Munster Irish, and Ăn Yidiș writers created these forms by cognatizing older Irish or Munster Irish forms.