Linguifex

Czecklish conjugation: Difference between revisions

Page Discussion

Czecklish conjugation (view source)

Revision as of 23:37, 13 October 2014

418 bytes added ,  13 October 2014
no edit summary
No edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
|-
|-
! style="" | Ablative
! style="" | Ablative
| bon-
|  
|-
|-
! style="" | Allative
! style="" | Allative
| ben-
|  
|-
|-
! style="" | Delative
! style="" | Delative
| bin-
|  
|-
|-
! style="" | Illative
! style="" | Illative
| bín-
|  
|-
|-
! style="" | Instrumental
! style="" | Instrumental
| vaik-
|  
|-
|-
! style="" | Juxtapositive
! style="" | Juxtapositive
| vek-
|  
|-
|-
! style="" | Locative
! style="" | Locative
| vak-
|  
|-
|-
! style="" | Perlative
! style="" | Perlative
| ban-
|  
|-
|-
! style="" | Orientative
! style="" | Orientative
| sol-
|  
|-
|-
! style="" | Revertive
! style="" | Revertive
| sul-
|  
|-
|-
! style="" | Sublative
! style="" | Sublative
| tív-
|  
|-
|-
! style="" | Temporal
! style="" | Temporal
| jil-
|  
|-
|-
|}
|}
Line 54: Line 54:
|-
|-
! style="" |First
! style="" |First
| a-
|  
| -u
|  
|-
|-
! style="" |Second
! style="" |Second
| a-
|  
| -i
|  
|-
|-
! style="" |Third
! style="" |Third
| o-
|  
| -u
|  
|-
|-
! style="" |Fourth
! style="" |Fourth
| u-
|  
| -e
|  
|-
|-
! style="" |Fifth
! style="" |Fifth
| i-
|  
| -o
|  
|-
|-
! style="" |Sixth
! style="" |Sixth
| e-
|  
| -i
|  
|-
|-
|}<br />
|}<br />
Line 88: Line 88:
|-
|-
! style="" |First
! style="" |First
| a-
|  
| -u
|  
|-
|-
! style="" |Second
! style="" |Second
| a-
|  
| -i
|  
|-
|-
! style="" |Third
! style="" |Third
| o-
|  
| -u
|  
|-
|-
! style="" |Fourth
! style="" |Fourth
| u-
|
| -e
|  
|-
|-
! style="" |Fifth
! style="" |Fifth
| i-
|  
| -o
|  
|-
|-
! style="" |Sixth
! style="" |Sixth
| e-
|  
| -i
|  
|-
|-
|}<br />
|}<br />
Line 121: Line 121:
|-
|-
! style="" |Infinitive
! style="" |Infinitive
| -n
|  
|-
|-
! style="" |Gerund
! style="" |Gerund
| -ne
|  
|-
|-
! style="" |Gerundive
! style="" |Gerundive
| -na
|  
|-
|-
! style="" |Supine
! style="" |Supine
| -no
|  
|-
|-
! style="" |Participle
! style="" |Participle
| -num
|  
|-
|-
|}<br />
|}<br />
Line 330: Line 330:
! style="width: 40px; " |Suffix
! style="width: 40px; " |Suffix
|-
|-
! style="" |
! style="" | Avalent
|
|-
! style="" | Monovalent
| -∅
|-
! style="" | Divalent
|
|
|-
|-
! style="" |
! style="" | Trivalent
|
|-
! style="" |
|  
|  
|-
|-
Line 370: Line 373:
! style="width: 40px; " |Suffix
! style="width: 40px; " |Suffix
|-
|-
! style="" |
! style="" | Volitional
|
|  
|-
|-
! style="" |
! style="" | Ambivolitional
|  
| -∅
|-
|-
! style="" |
! style="" | Nonvolitional
|  
|  
|-
|-
Line 404: Line 407:
! style="width: 40px; " |Suffix
! style="width: 40px; " |Suffix
|-
|-
! style="" |
! style="" | Mirative
|
|  
|-
|-
! style="" |
! style="" | Ambimirative
|  
| -∅
|-
|-
! style="" |
! style="" | Nonmirative
|  
|  
|-
|-
Line 434: Line 437:
==Evidentiality==
==Evidentiality==
In Czecklish, Evidentiality is the indication of the nature of evidence for a given statement; that is, whether evidence exists for the statement and/or what kind of evidence exists. An evidential is the particular grammatical element (affix, clitic, or particle) that indicates evidentiality. Czecklish uses suffixes to indicate both Direct and Indirect Evidentiality. Indirect Evidentiality can be divided into four separate degrees of Evidentiality: First Reportative, Second Reportative, Inferential, and Assumed. The unmarked Evidential is the Direct Evidential, as most evidence is likely to have been witnessed firsthand.<br />
In Czecklish, Evidentiality is the indication of the nature of evidence for a given statement; that is, whether evidence exists for the statement and/or what kind of evidence exists. An evidential is the particular grammatical element (affix, clitic, or particle) that indicates evidentiality. Czecklish uses suffixes to indicate both Direct and Indirect Evidentiality. Indirect Evidentiality can be divided into four separate degrees of Evidentiality: First Reportative, Second Reportative, Inferential, and Assumed. The unmarked Evidential is the Direct Evidential, as most evidence is likely to have been witnessed firsthand.<br />
{| border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" class="bluetable lightbluebg" style="width: 150px; text-align:center;"
{| border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" class="bluetable lightbluebg" style="width: 300px; text-align:center;"
! style="width: 40px; "|
! style="width: 40px; "|
! style="width: 40px; " |Suffix
! style="width: 40px; " |Suffix
|-
|-
! style="" |
! style="" | Direct
|
| -∅
|-
! style="" | Indirect
|
|-
! style="" | First Reportative
|
|-
! style="" | Second Reportative
|  
|-
|-
! style="" |
! styele="" | Inferential
|  
|  
|-
|-
! style="" |
! style="" | Assumptive
|  
|  
|-
|-
Line 486: Line 498:
==Comparison==
==Comparison==
Czecklish only has one degree of comparison, and as such does not make a distinction between -er and -est. In other words, the superlative form of a noun is indistinguishable from the comparative form in both meaning and affixation.<br />
Czecklish only has one degree of comparison, and as such does not make a distinction between -er and -est. In other words, the superlative form of a noun is indistinguishable from the comparative form in both meaning and affixation.<br />
{| border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" class="bluetable lightbluebg" style="width: 150px; text-align:center;"
! style="width: 40px; "|
! style="width: 40px; " |Suffix
|-
! style="" | Positive
| -∅
|-
! style="" | Comparative
|
|-
|}<br />


'''Positive'''<br />
'''Positive'''<br />
Mcmisher96
171

edits

Retrieved from "https://linguifex.com/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/26361...26726"