Eta-Talmic: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
mNo edit summary |
||
(24 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:[[{{FULLPAGENAME}}/Lexicon]] | :[[{{FULLPAGENAME}}/Lexicon]] | ||
:[[{{FULLPAGENAME}}/Swadesh list]] | :[[{{FULLPAGENAME}}/Swadesh list]] | ||
The '''Talmic languages''' (/ˈtɑːlmɪk/ ''TAHL-mik'') are a subfamily of the [[Quame languages]], originally spoken chiefly in the [[ | The '''Talmic languages''' (/ˈtɑːlmɪk/ ''TAHL-mik'') are a subfamily of the [[Quame languages]], originally spoken chiefly in the [[Bitaleta]] region in the planet of [[Verse:Tricin|Tricin]]. | ||
* | * PET | ||
** | ** Talmic | ||
*** [[ | *** [[Tigol]] | ||
**** [[Eevo]] | |||
**** [[Anbirese]] | |||
**** Ciètian | |||
== Syntax == | == Syntax == | ||
Although all present-day Talmic languages are rigidly head-initial, Proto-Talmic was much less so; we know this because different constructions and function words (such as prepositions and verbal morphology) fossilized in each Talmic subbranch. | Although all present-day Talmic languages are rigidly head-initial, like Irish, Welsh and Southeast Asian languages, Proto-Talmic was much less so; we know this because different constructions and function words (such as prepositions and verbal morphology) fossilized in each Talmic subbranch. | ||
== Morphology == | == Morphology == | ||
Pre-Tigol should keep the most inflections out of the Quame branches, so it was the worst language to Old Irishify | Pre-Tigol should keep the most inflections out of the Quame branches, so it was the worst language to Old Irishify | ||
Line 100: | Line 94: | ||
| *s | | *s | ||
| | | | ||
| [x] | |||
| | | | ||
| | | [χ] | ||
| | | | ||
| *h | | *h | ||
Line 113: | Line 107: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|rowspan="2"| * | |rowspan="2"| *γ | ||
|rowspan="2"| * | |rowspan="2"| *γʷ | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 133: | Line 127: | ||
Diphthongs: | Diphthongs: | ||
ai ei oi ui | ai ei oi ui au eu iu ou | ||
==Derivational morphology== | ==Derivational morphology== | ||
Line 152: | Line 146: | ||
The emphatic particle {{recon|''-is''}} was commonly suffixed to the verb. | The emphatic particle {{recon|''-is''}} was commonly suffixed to the verb. | ||
== Gibberish == | == Gibberish == | ||
φīxs φaro | φīxs kʷēmos φaro δlanγeweti δe srībou γʷnāmesor δe φīna qrādomāxtim. γonyanθis wli nayesi, smā-deuφrimor briqennās bakū kardasweis wli φasminō. Sθām lugyeθais wli bosqōr kʷisδalābis, kas φaxθīm φar woltāyessis-do, bar Bouγʷātlom wli qaswīqis. Nai brāyos δe nenmōrus skʷedoxtānis! φirwōd φēs-naxθitor qetibāti meudyūs! Φosnīdyōr daγʷāi δe nosθenqʷētās qʷlāwītor. | ||
[[Category:Tricin]][[Category:Talmic languages|*]] | [[Category:Tricin]][[Category:Talmic languages|*]] |
Latest revision as of 00:46, 9 August 2022
This article is a construction site. This project is currently undergoing significant construction and/or revamp. By all means, take a look around, thank you. |
The Talmic languages (/ˈtɑːlmɪk/ TAHL-mik) are a subfamily of the Quame languages, originally spoken chiefly in the Bitaleta region in the planet of Tricin.
Syntax
Although all present-day Talmic languages are rigidly head-initial, like Irish, Welsh and Southeast Asian languages, Proto-Talmic was much less so; we know this because different constructions and function words (such as prepositions and verbal morphology) fossilized in each Talmic subbranch.
Morphology
Pre-Tigol should keep the most inflections out of the Quame branches, so it was the worst language to Old Irishify
Proto-Talmic also had no inclusive vs exclusive we distinction; Tigolic and Qazhric gained the distinction under the influence of Lakovic.
History of Talmic studies
History of the term
The Talmic family was referred to as the "Kwēm languages" (Scellan: brits Cłeem) in earlier Talman works, after the Thensarian word cēm for "one" inherited in all known Talmic languages at the time. Since contact with other Quihum languages such as Naquian, the term Quame is used for the family that includes Talmic and Naquian.
Todo
- -nəm = patientive
- sθan- = gather
- sθannəm = gathering
- Skellan sdann = (mathematics) set
- ~ sta- in stāmom?
- sθannəm = gathering
- add 0 grade, lengthened grade.
- -ssōs = another noun suffix
- 0 grade often > ə-grade but Cl, Cr > Cli-, Cri-
- lengthened grades: ā ī ū > ó ī ū
Change 1pl.ex from m to b
Phonology
Proto-Celtic gibberish with some added consonants and vowels
Consonants
Labial | Dental | Alveolar | Palatal | Velar | Labiovelar | Uvular | Labiouvular | Glottal | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nasal | *m | *n | ||||||||
Plosive | voiceless | *θ | *t | *k | *kʷ | *q | *qʷ | |||
voiced | *b | *δ | *d | *g | *gʷ | |||||
Fricative | voiceless | *ɸ | *s | [x] | [χ] | *h | ||||
voiced | *γ | *γʷ | ||||||||
Resonant | *l | *r | *y | *w |
The Talman dialects, which eventually became Tigol and Qazhrian, merged alveolar stops into dental stops and completely lost *φ, but Nurian and Roshterian keep the sounds distinct to this day under Idavic influence.
Vowels
a e i o u ā ē ī ō ū
Diphthongs:
ai ei oi ui au eu iu ou
Derivational morphology
Affixes
Some derivational affixes are:
- -nam (n.) = patient suffix
- -ā- = verbalizer (from *-əx̌-; just for the Proto-Celtic gibbiness)
- What if *-əx̌- meant something else in PQuih?
- Roshterian -ia-/-i- - fossilized suffix in many verbs
- -ākos (n.) = verbal noun (from *-əx̌- verbalizer + *-kas = older VN suffix)
- Roshterian -iac
- -akt(V)- = adjectivizer
- Roshterian -ait
Ablaut patterns
Syntax
The emphatic particle *-is was commonly suffixed to the verb.
Gibberish
φīxs kʷēmos φaro δlanγeweti δe srībou γʷnāmesor δe φīna qrādomāxtim. γonyanθis wli nayesi, smā-deuφrimor briqennās bakū kardasweis wli φasminō. Sθām lugyeθais wli bosqōr kʷisδalābis, kas φaxθīm φar woltāyessis-do, bar Bouγʷātlom wli qaswīqis. Nai brāyos δe nenmōrus skʷedoxtānis! φirwōd φēs-naxθitor qetibāti meudyūs! Φosnīdyōr daγʷāi δe nosθenqʷētās qʷlāwītor.