Suwáá/Classical: Difference between revisions

m
IlL moved page Suwaa/Classical to Suwáá/Classical without leaving a redirect
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
m (IlL moved page Suwaa/Classical to Suwáá/Classical without leaving a redirect)
 
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
==Phonology==
==Phonology==
===Consonants===
===Consonants===
Identical to Modern Sjowaázh
Identical to Modern Sjowaázh except it had syllabic resonants: '''m mm n nn nr nnr l ll r rr''' (ḿ ń ĺ ŕ m̀ ǹ l̀ r̀)
 
Syllabic resonants: '''m mm n nn nr nnr l ll r rr''' (ḿ ń ĺ ŕ m̀ ǹ l̀ r̀)


===Vowels===
===Vowels===
Line 42: Line 40:
==Grammar==
==Grammar==
Classical Sowaár was optimized for poetic meters (like Marathi) – word order was relatively free and affixes used both long and short syllables. Vowel length was relatively free in affixes (obeying some constraints) and fixed in roots. As a corollary tones were also flexible and there were also fewer (phonemic) tonal distinctions in affixes than in roots. [TODO: rules]
Classical Sowaár was optimized for poetic meters (like Marathi) – word order was relatively free and affixes used both long and short syllables. Vowel length was relatively free in affixes (obeying some constraints) and fixed in roots. As a corollary tones were also flexible and there were also fewer (phonemic) tonal distinctions in affixes than in roots. [TODO: rules]
===Nouns===
Like Modern Sowaár, Classical Sowaár had singular, dual and plural numbers.


Number prefixes for nouns existed but were optional.
Number prefixes for nouns existed but were optional.


More fusional and less agglutinative than Modern Sjowaázh?
===Verbs===
Verbs had more complex ablaut patterns than in modern Sowaár varieties. Affixes, on the other hand, were less fused with each other than in Modern High Sowaár.
138,759

edits