Anbirese/Syntax: Difference between revisions

m
Line 142: Line 142:


===Syntactic pivots===
===Syntactic pivots===
Syntactic pivoting arises in a natural way from the split-ergative morphosyntax: to wit, if clause A is in an ''accusative tense'' (present, imperfect, or future, in any mood), a following clause B in an ''ergative tense'' (preterite in any mood) may take the subject of clause A as its own patient argument without explicitly stating it.
Syntactic pivoting arises in a natural way from the split-ergative morphosyntax: for example, if clause A is in an ''accusative tense'' (present, imperfect, or future, in any mood), a following clause B in an ''ergative tense'' (preterite in any mood) may take the subject of clause A as its own "subject" (patient) argument without explicitly stating it.


Or should pivoting be disallowed as in Irish?
Or should pivoting be disallowed as in Irish?


[[Category:Tíogall]]
[[Category:Tíogall]]
138,730

edits