Thank you very much for your interest in Standard Average Indo-European. I began this project on June 10th, 2024, without the intention of taking it particularly seriously. A few months and much research later have transformed the project into something that has exceeded my expectations at every stage. So, it is with great pleasure that I present the following document for public viewing.
-----
<span class="c12"></span>
The major principle of SAvIE is its adherence to the features of Standard Average European as set out by Martin Haspelmath (2001). This essentially projects a set of features shared by many modern Indo-European languages onto Proto-Indo-European. The result is a language which appears and sounds as though it were a proto-language, but operates with much more modern features, especially those confined to western Indo-European.
Given my choice to use Proto-Indo-European as the basis for this language, I have both had to make specific choices in reconstruction based on preexisting academic work (chiefly Leiden etymological dictionaries), and ensure a wide range of vocabulary within the language in order to be representative of vocabulary in modern languages. This becomes very clear with the examples above, which are remodeled from Latin, Greek, Sanskrit, and multiple Slavic and Germanic varieties, as well as examples of internally-constructed vocabulary.
The result is an extraordinary and rich language with features and words that should fundamentally be instinctive or familiar to speakers of many families outlined in Haspelmath (2001). Ultimately, however, this was an artistic project above all, and has given me so much more pleasure than I ever expected.
I would like to recognise the important work of Indo-Europeanists in making this project possible, and the contributions made by individuals in the ''Celtic Tearooms'' and ''IE Conlangs'' Discord servers.
Both consonants can be syllabic resonants, written ⟨l̥⟩ and ⟨r̥⟩ or ⟨ḷ⟩ and ⟨ṛ⟩. When ⟨r⟩ appears as the syllabic resonant ⟨r̥⟩ or ⟨ṛ⟩, it should avoid being pronounced as [ɾ], and a sonorant sound should be used instead.
This appears as ⟨s⟩ [s], but following the evidence of daughter languages, it can be pronounced [z] in the cluster /sd/ or /sdʰ/, in which case it can optionally be written as ⟨z⟩ [z], such as '''nizdós''' "nest" for '''''nisdós'''''''' '''or '''sízdō''' "I am sitting" for '''''sísdō'''''. In addition to [s] it can be pronounced [s̱], [θ], or even [ɕ], [ʃ] when adjacent to the sounds ⟨y⟩ [j] or ⟨i⟩ [i].
<span class="c15 c27">[[#h.tmq8zrnfthnk|3 Further SAE-aligned features 16]]</span>
The realisation of dorsal consonants is very complex and hotly debated by Indo-Europeanists. This document will present the traditional reconstruction of these sounds, but the reader should feel free to apply any other realisations with which they agree more, if that should be the case.
<span class="c15">[[#h.w55u3od4ie17|3.1 Verb fronting in polar interrogatives 16]]</span>
<span class="c15">[[#h.l0s5mylmfuqr|3.2 Comparative marking of adjectives 16]]</span>
These appear as plain consonants, not labialised or palatalised, as ⟨k⟩ [k], ⟨g⟩ [g], and ⟨gh⟩ [gʰ]. In alternative reconstructions they may be pronounced as [q], [ɢ], and [ɢʰ] (per Kümmel); [k], [ˀk], and [kʰ] (per Beekes); and [kː], [k'], and [k] (per Kortlandt), among others.
<span class="c15">[[#h.mpapi1a96ctb|4.1 Personal pronouns 17]]</span>
===== 1.1.5.2 *ḱ, *ǵ, *ǵʰ =====
<span class="c15">[[#h.i1ldaces8rl6|4.2 Personal correlative and relative 19]]</span>
These are palatalised consonants, and appear as ⟨ḱ⟩ [kʲ], ⟨ǵ⟩ [gʲ], and ⟨ǵh⟩ [gʲʰ]. The alternative reconstructions above have corresponding palatalised forms.
<span class="c15">[[#h.rufo2immy9w|4.3 Proximal pronoun and determiner, and article 20]]</span>
<span class="c15">[[#h.bf0thym6spy6|4.4 Distal pronoun and determiner 21]]</span>
===== 1.1.5.3 *kʷ, *gʷ, *gʷʰ =====
<span class="c15">[[#h.m4gvyxozl951|4.5 Nouns and noun declension 22]]</span>
These are labialised versions of the plain velars. They appear as ⟨q⟩ [kʷ], ⟨c⟩ [gʷ], and ⟨ch⟩ [gʷʰ]. The alternative reconstructions above have corresponding labialised forms.
Since the pronunciation of laryngeals is so uncertain, they either colour vowels or disappear entirely. /*eh₁/ becomes [eː], /*eh₂/ becomes [aː], and /*eh₃/ becomes [oː]. Similarly, ''/*h₁e/'' becomes [e], ''/*h₂e/'' becomes [a], and ''/*h₃e/'' becomes [o]. Laryngeals do colour inherently long vowels as though they were short.
When any laryngeal begins a word before another consonant, it can become [a] or [ə]. Any laryngeal between consonants can also become [a ~ ə].
<span class="c15">[[#h.yt759dav5697|4.5.A Combination of suffixes 28]]</span>
An alternative and fanciful pronunciation collapses all three laryngeals into one to allow them to be pronounced, as in Anatolian and Persian languages, in addition to being deleted entirely. This can be written as ⟨H⟩ and pronounced [h], [ħ], or similar. This pronunciation must shorten long vowels.
For the laryngeal which does not colour a vowel, it can also be pronounced as a syllabic consonant, and be written as ⟨H⟩ as expected, or as ⟨H̥⟩ or ⟨Ḥ⟩ to make it absolutely clear that it is a syllabic consonant.
<span class="c15">[[#h.gmxsmolw3xv0|4.6.3 Pertinence to a quality: -wénts 30]]</span>
''*h₄'' and ''*hₐ'' are not frequently included in this document as they appear only within certain analyses of Proto-Indo-European. However, if they should appear, or if speakers should choose to project words on to SAvIE using analyses where these laryngeal values are present, they should be treated exactly the same as ''*h₂'', including all the same vowel colouring of that laryngeal value.
<span class="c15">[[#h.f6bwri77rdig|4.6.4 Characteristic or typical of: -ískos, -ānos 30]]</span>
''*H'', also notated ''*hₓ'', indicates an unknown laryngeal. Often this is done because the actual value is contested, or possibly unknowable. SAvIE treats such a laryngeal as though it were ''/*h₁/''. ''/*eH/ ''gives ⟨ē⟩, lengthening the vowel without colouring it, while ''/*oH/'' and ''/*uH/'' also lengthen the previous vowel giving ⟨ō⟩ and ⟨ū⟩. ''/*He/'' does not colour /e/ at all, giving ⟨He⟩.
<span class="c15">[[#h.lkjbvuluvxy5|4.6.5 Possession of a thing or quality, or having undergone an action: -ātos 31]]</span>
<span class="c15">[[#h.gphom0lkqp9c|4.6.6 Material or consistency: -īnós 31]]</span>
==== 1.1.10 Laryngeals at morpheme boundaries ====
Using the rules defined above for the levelling of Proto-Indo-European laryngeals, the same phonological processes are expected to apply to laryngeals when they could colour vowels at morpheme boundaries. For example, given the root '''céjHₒ-''' (from ''*gʷeyh₃-'') and its thematic suffix '''-eti''', the original '''-h₃-e-''' crossing a morpheme boundary colours as expected, with the resulting verb being '''céjHoti''' “he/she/it lives”.
Firstly a speaker may choose to pronounce unvoiced stops in order to match a neighbouring unvoiced stop, such as producing the opposite of Bartholomae's law: *bʰewdʰ → *bʰudʰ-tós → (with application of Grassmann's law) *bʰud-dʰós → SAvIE ⟨bhuddhós⟩ [pʰuˈtʰːos].
<span class="c15">[[#h.gln7jdw6n0ou|4.6.10.2 Past participle 33]]</span>
Otherwise, a speaker (such as an avid student of Ancient Greek, or perhaps Sanskrit) can choose to pronounce unvoiced stops throughout their speech simply because they wish to match pronunciations of their respective daughter languages of interest.
The basic short vowels of Proto-Indo-European appear as ⟨e⟩ and ⟨o⟩, and can be pronounced in a variety of ways, such as [e] and [o] or [ɛ] and [ɔ]. Their long counterparts appear as ⟨ē⟩ and ⟨ō⟩, and are pronounced as before, but audibly longer.
<span class="c15">[[#h.k7owlq7ru627|5.1 Non-finite forms, and infinitive 36]]</span>
These vowels appear as ⟨a⟩ [a] and ⟨ā⟩ [aː]. They are not basic vowels of Proto-Indo-European; ⟨a⟩ appears most often as a realisation of laryngeals between medial or before initial consonants, and ⟨ā⟩ appears as a contraction of /*eh₂/. Rarely /*a/ can appear in root words, but these reconstructions are often debated.
<span class="c15">[[#h.d2nhmdsul9go|5.2 Conjugated forms 36]]</span>
A final vowel [ə], the schwa, can be pronounced in SAvIE but ought not to be written. In cases where syllabic sonorants (l̥ r̥ m̥ n̥ H̥) form a cluster with another consonant (such as in the word wl̥qós which is expected to be pronounced [wl̩ˈkʷos]), an epenthetic schwa can be added before the syllabic consonant to aid in pronunciation, thus giving [wəlˈkʷos] for wl̥qós.
If somebody wants to write the pronounced schwa explicitly, they should use the letters ⟨y⟩, ⟨ə⟩, or the symbol ⟨°⟩, giving ⟨wylqós⟩, ⟨wəlqós⟩, or ⟨w°lqós⟩.
SAvIE follows Proto-Indo-European stress rules and it is mandatory to mark stress with an acute accent (á é í ó ú ĺ̥ ŕ̥ ḿ̥ ń̥ H̥́) at all times. When writing using ⟨ə⟩, that letter receives the acute instead, giving ⟨ý ~ ə́⟩.
In addition, SAvIE has rules relating to the stress of compounds. These can be either ''close'' or ''loose''. Close compounds are written as one word, using a stem form of one word and a full form of another. Loose compounds are written as two separate words with the first word in the genitive case without displaying declension, and the second word being fully declinable.
In close compounds, often the first element is stressed, but the second may receive stress in some words, and receives the only stress in the word. In loose compounds, the second element is stressed, and the first can optionally be written without stress marking. Often, words can be written as either type of compound, but they usually appear as only one; for example, '''ghóstipotis''' “lord” is a close compound, and can be written, following the correct conventions of stress, as a loose compound '''ghostejs pótis''', specifically avoiding stress marking on the first element.
Optionally, rather than refraining from marking stress entirely, a grave accent ⟨ ̀⟩ can be used on the first word to indicate secondary stress, such as '''ghostèjs pótis'''.
SAvIE can use the word '''kápes''', a derivative of''' '''''*kap-'' "to seize, hold" (which gives Latin ''capiō'' and English ''have''), to form a perfect tense with the participle '''-tós'''/'''-tâ'''/'''-tóm''' of a verb.
Instead of using dative constructions, there can either be a nominative-active-accusative or nominative-deponent-ablative use of the word '''bhrūgéti''''' to enjoy, to like'' (from ''*bʰruHg-e-ti'') with a semantic patient.
Instead of using a conjugated passive, the periphrastic passive is formed with the verb H'''ésti''' "to be" and a passive participle ending in '''-(o)mHnos'''/'''-(o)mHnā'''/'''-(o)mHnom'''.
Verbs can be implicitly anticausative if a transitive verb is used in anF intransitive sense, with its patient as its subject; for example '''éǵ bhrêgsm̥ íd '''"I broke it", but '''íd bhrêgst''' "it broke". Optionally the reflexive particle can be used on either side of the salient verb, giving '''íd bhrêgst s(w)é '''or '''íd s(w)é bhrêgst'''.
<span class="c15">[[#h.cs9lheo3yfxg|7.1 Determiner and pronoun 59]]</span>
=== 2.7 Dative external possessors ===
<span class="c15">[[#h.ttzo0n6qwmyg|7.2 Interrogative and relative forms 59]]</span>
The dative can be used to indicate the possessor of the object of an action instead of using a genitive phrase: '''î léwHeti ésyās sūnéwej tód ǵónu '''"she washes her son's knee", though literally "she washes ''to her son'' the knee".
In phrasing e.g. "nobody comes", English-like phraseology should be used: there should be a negative pronoun with no negation of the verb, giving '''neqís cémt '''"nobody came".
Either of the particles '''Hapó''' or '''Hánti''' should be used to compare against a referent in the accusative: '''ís Hesti mājoteros Hapó/Hánti (H)mé''' "he is bigger than me".
<span class="c15">[[#h.1zqy4x6tml8u|8.5 11 to 19 63]]</span>
The adjective '''sokós'''/'''sokâ'''/'''tokóm''' is used for "as" or "such" (giving '''sokós méǵHs''' "so large"). The comparative element is introduced with '''ḱom''' "with" with the predicate in the accusative, resulting in '''ís ésti sokós méǵHs ḱom îm̥''' "he is as large as her".
<span class="c15">[[#h.snsmje72lwua|8.6 20 to 90 64]]</span>
<span class="c15">[[#h.x2ksqgngvzja|8.7 Prefix forms 64]]</span>
=== 2.11 Subject person affixes as strict agreement markers ===
This feature refers to obligatory subject-pronoun agreement with a conjugated verb. It is not widespread so it is unclear why this is included as a SAE feature. So, in SAvIE, this is an optional feature; both '''Hésmi''' and '''éǵH Hésmi''' are equivalent terms for "I am".
<span class="c15">[[#h.ntsuwqr6t2zg|8.9 Multiplicative forms 65]]</span>
<span class="c15">[[#h.x8pmwxrv30m7|8.11 Collective forms 66]]</span>
SAvIE distinguishes between an intensifying adjectives '''somHós'''/'''-â'''/'''-óm''' or '''sélbhos'''/'''-â'''/'''-óm''', and the true reflexive particle '''s(w)é'''; the former does not necessarily indicate reflexive action, but intensifies a previous nominal, while the latter is explicitly reflexive or reciprocal.
<span class="c15">[[#h.u7ca51bkqqmd|8.12 Case agreement 66]]</span>
As seen above in the comparative adjective '''māyóteros'''/'''-ā'''/'''-om''', the suffix '''-teros'''/'''-ā'''/'''-om '''is the comparative (as well as contrastive) adjectival suffix.
In this feature there is no difference between "with" in the comitative ("in the company of") sense, and in the instrumental ("using, by means of") sense. Both of the words '''me''' and '''ḱóm''' can be used to mean "with" in either sense.
They are declined in two numbers, the '''singular '''and '''plural'''; six cases, the '''nominative''', '''vocative''', '''accusative''', '''genitive''', '''dative''', and '''locative'''; and in one of three genders, '''masculine''', '''feminine''', or '''neuter'''.
<span class="c15">[[#h.rda484yssqri|10.8 Politeness and formality 71]]</span>
<span class="c15">[[#h.b8ig8p3udeax|10.8.2 Third person verb constructions 72]]</span>
These decline in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd persons singular and plural in all cases except the locative. They also have dedicated adjectival forms, which are used for the possessive.
<span class="c15">[[#h.beetq9fphejx|10.8.2.1 Praising the listener 72]]</span>
<span class="c12">Thank you very much for your interest in Standard Average Indo-European. I began this project on June 10th, 2024, without the intention of taking it particularly seriously. A few months and much research later have transformed the project into something that has exceeded my expectations at every stage. So, it is with great pleasure that I present the following document for public viewing.</span>
/-â
<span class="c12"></span>
/-óm
<span class="c12">The major principle of SAvIE is its adherence to the features of Standard Average European as set out by Martin Haspelmath (2001). This essentially projects a set of features shared by many modern Indo-European languages onto Proto-Indo-European. The result is a language which appears and sounds as though it were a proto-language, but operates with much more modern features, especially those confined to western Indo-European.</span>
)
<span class="c12"></span>
|-
| 3rd singular neuter
| íd
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| 3rd singular feminine
| î
| îm̥
| ésjās
<span class="c12">Given my choice to use Proto-Indo-European as the basis for this language, I have both had to make specific choices in reconstruction based on preexisting academic work (chiefly Leiden etymological dictionaries), and ensure a wide range of vocabulary within the language in order to be representative of vocabulary in modern languages. This becomes very clear with the examples above, which are remodeled from Latin, Greek, Sanskrit, and multiple Slavic and Germanic varieties, as well as examples of internally-constructed vocabulary.</span>
<span class="c12"></span>
<span class="c12">The result is an extraordinary and rich language with features and words that should fundamentally be instinctive or familiar to speakers of many families outlined in Haspelmath (2001). Ultimately, however, this was an artistic project above all, and has given me so much more pleasure than I ever expected.</span>
| (H)ésjāi
| (H)ésjā(i)
|
|-
| 1st plural
| wéj
| n̥smé
| nos
| n̥sméj
<span class="c12"></span>
n̥s
<span>I would like to recognise the important work of Indo-Europeanists in making this project possible, and the contributions made by individuals in the </span><span class="c20">Celtic Tearooms</span><span> and </span><span class="c20">IE Conlangs</span><span class="c12"> Discord servers.</span>
<span class="c12">These appear as ⟨m⟩ [m] and ⟨n⟩ [n].</span>
éjsōm
<span class="c12">⟨n⟩ before velar consonants can be pronounced as [ŋ].</span>
Hésom
<span class="c12">Both consonants can be syllabic resonants, written ⟨m̥⟩ and ⟨n̥⟩ or ⟨ṃ⟩ and ⟨ṇ⟩.</span>
| (H)éjmos
<span id="h.xnffu6necjm1"></span>
éjbhos
=== <span class="c63">1.1.2 *r, *l</span> ===
<span class="c12">⟨r⟩ can be pronounced as any rhotic sound, including but not limited to [ɾ], [r] and [ɹ].</span>
| (H)éjsu
|
|-
| 3rd plural neuter
| î
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| 3rd plural feminine
| îes
| îm̥s
<span class="c12">⟨l⟩ is pronounced as [l].</span>
în̥s
<span class="c12">Both consonants can be syllabic resonants, written ⟨l̥⟩ and ⟨r̥⟩ or ⟨ḷ⟩ and ⟨ṛ⟩. When ⟨r⟩ appears as the syllabic resonant ⟨r̥⟩ or ⟨ṛ⟩, it should avoid being pronounced as [ɾ], and a sonorant sound should be used instead.</span>
| îsōm
<span id="h.xelpsjf3soxx"></span>
éjsom
=== <span class="c63">1.1.3 *s</span> ===
<span>This appears as ⟨s⟩ [s], but following the evidence of daughter languages, it can be pronounced [z] in the cluster /sd/ or /sdʰ/, in which case it can optionally be written as ⟨z⟩ [z], such as </span><span class="c27">nizdós</span><span> "nest" for </span><span class="c20 c27">nisdós</span><span class="c27"> </span><span>or </span><span class="c27">sízdō</span><span> "I am sitting" for </span><span class="c20 c27">sísdō</span><span class="c12">. In addition to [s] it can be pronounced [s̱], [θ], or even [ɕ], [ʃ] when adjacent to the sounds ⟨y⟩ [j] or ⟨i⟩ [i].</span>
Hésom
<span>The </span><span class="c27">s-mobile</span><span> is written ⟨S⟩, such as in the word </span><span class="c27">Stégos</span><span class="c12"> "roof", and may be pronounced [s] or be entirely silent.</span>
| îmos
<span id="h.6b30ef8psgp0"></span>
(H)éjmos
=== <span class="c63">1.1.4 *j, *w</span> ===
<span>These appear as ⟨j⟩ [j] and ⟨w⟩ [w].</span>
éjbhos
| îsu
-----
(H)éjsu
<span id="h.6i0zqqefnp80"></span>
|
=== <span class="c63">1.1.5 Dorsals</span> ===
|}
<span class="c12">The realisation of dorsal consonants is very complex and hotly debated by Indo-Europeanists. This document will present the traditional reconstruction of these sounds, but the reader should feel free to apply any other realisations with which they agree more, if that should be the case.</span>
<span class="c12">These appear as plain consonants, not labialised or palatalised, as ⟨k⟩ [k], ⟨g⟩ [g], and ⟨gh⟩ [gʰ]. In alternative reconstructions they may be pronounced as [q], [ɢ], and [ɢʰ] (per Kümmel); [k], [ˀk], and [kʰ] (per Beekes); and [kː], [k'], and [k] (per Kortlandt), among others.</span>
In addition to the above possessive adjectives '''mós''', '''tós''', etc. alternative forms from daughter languages can be used, including '''(H)méjnos ~ -ā ~ -om''' (as in Proto-Germanic ''*mīnaz''), '''mójos ~ -ā ~ -om''' (as Proto-Slavic ''*mojь''), and '''méjos ~ -ā ~ -om''' (assuming potentially that the Latin form ''meus'' represents the dative '''méj''' with adjectival ending). Internally constructed forms include '''méwos ~ -ā ~ -om''', formed using the oblique stem with adjectival ending, or the indeclinable genitive '''(H)méne'''.
<span class="c12">These are palatalised consonants, and appear as ⟨ḱ⟩ [kʲ], ⟨ǵ⟩ [gʲ], and ⟨ǵh⟩ [gʲʰ]. The alternative reconstructions above have corresponding palatalised forms.</span>
<span class="c12">These are labialised versions of the plain velars. They appear as ⟨q⟩ [kʷ], ⟨c⟩ [gʷ], and ⟨ch⟩ [gʷʰ]. The alternative reconstructions above have corresponding labialised forms.</span>
<span>Since the pronunciation of laryngeals is so uncertain, they either colour vowels or disappear entirely. </span><span>/*eh₁/ becomes [eː], /*eh₂/ becomes [aː], and /*eh₃/ becomes [oː]. Similarly, </span><span class="c20">/*h₁e/</span><span> becomes [e], </span><span class="c20">/*h₂e/</span><span> becomes [a], and </span><span class="c20">/*h₃e/</span><span class="c12"> becomes [o]. Laryngeals do colour inherently long vowels as though they were short.</span>
In other contexts it can be used as a relative pronoun, such as in '''kápmi Hábōl qim bhrûghō '''"I have an apple which I like".
<span class="c12">When any laryngeal begins a word before another consonant, it can become [a] or [ə]. Any laryngeal between consonants can also become [a ~ ə].</span>
The difference between the two is that the pronoun form is stressed, but the relative form is not.
<span class="c12">An alternative and fanciful pronunciation collapses all three laryngeals into one to allow them to be pronounced, as in Anatolian and Persian languages, in addition to being deleted entirely. This can be written as ⟨H⟩ and pronounced [h], [ħ], or similar. This pronunciation must shorten long vowels.</span>
<span class="c12">For the laryngeal which does not colour a vowel, it can also be pronounced as a syllabic consonant, and be written as ⟨H⟩ as expected, or as ⟨H̥⟩ or ⟨Ḥ⟩ to make it absolutely clear that it is a syllabic consonant.</span>
=== 4.3 Proximal pronoun and determiner, and article ===
<span class="c20">*h₄</span><span> and </span><span class="c20">*hₐ</span><span> are not frequently included in this document as they appear only within certain analyses of Proto-Indo-European. However, if they should appear, or if speakers should choose to project words on to SAvIE using analyses where these laryngeal values are present, they should be treated exactly the same as </span><span class="c20">*</span><span class="c20">h₂</span><span class="c12">, including all the same vowel colouring of that laryngeal value.</span>
<span class="c20">*H</span><span>, also notated </span><span class="c20">*hₓ</span><span>, indicates an unknown laryngeal. Often this is done because the actual value is contested, or possibly unknowable. SAvIE treats such a laryngeal as though it were </span><span class="c20">/*h₁/</span><span>. </span><span class="c20">/*eH/ </span><span>gives ⟨ē⟩, lengthening the vowel without colouring it, while </span><span class="c20">/*oH/</span><span> and </span><span class="c20">/*uH/</span><span> also lengthen the previous vowel giving ⟨ō⟩ and ⟨ū⟩. </span><span class="c20">/*He/</span><span class="c12"> does not colour /e/ at all, giving ⟨He⟩.</span>
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!
!
!
!
!
!
|-
|
| Nominative
| Accusative
| Genitive
| Dative
| Locative
|-
| masc. sg.
| só
| tóm
| tósjo
| tósmej
| tósmi
|-
| neut. sg.
| tód
|
|
|
|
|-
| fem. sg.
| sā
| tâm
| tósjās
| tósjāj
| tósjā
|-
| masc. pl.
| tój
| tóms
| tójsōm
| tójmos
<span id="h.lh7z0ixv4ak8"></span>
tójbhos
=== <span class="c63">1.1.10 Laryngeals at morpheme boundaries</span> ===
<span>Using the rules defined above for the levelling of Proto-Indo-European laryngeals, the same phonological processes are expected to apply to laryngeals when they could colour vowels at morpheme boundaries. For example, given the root </span><span class="c27">céjHₒ-</span><span> (from </span><span class="c20">*gʷeyh₃-</span><span>) and its thematic suffix </span><span class="c27">-eti</span><span>, the original </span><span class="c27">-h₃-e-</span><span> crossing a morpheme boundary colours as expected, with the resulting verb being </span><span class="c27">céjHoti</span><span> “he/she/it lives”.</span>
| tójsu
|-
| neut. pl.
| tâ
|
|
|
|
|-
| fem. pl.
| tâs
| tâm̥s
| tâsōm
| tâmos
tâbhos
-----
| tâsu
|}
<span id="h.gkjmnquxlx5i"></span>
=== <span class="c63">1.1.11 Alteration of aspirated stops</span> ===
<span class="c12">The aspirated stops ⟨bh⟩ ⟨dh⟩ ⟨gh⟩ ⟨ǵh⟩ ⟨ch⟩ can be devoiced to [pʰ] [tʰ] [kʰ] [kʲʰ] [kʷʰ] for one of two reasons.</span>
<span class="c12">Firstly a speaker may choose to pronounce unvoiced stops in order to match a neighbouring unvoiced stop, such as producing the opposite of Bartholomae's law: *bʰewdʰ → *bʰudʰ-tós → (with application of Grassmann's law) *bʰud-dʰós → SAvIE ⟨bhuddhós⟩ [pʰuˈtʰːos]. </span>
The above are used as both determiners for other nouns; when in need of a pronoun the form '''ḱíd''' is used instead: '''ḱíd Hésti Hwésu''' "this is good", and '''só Hnêr Hésti Hwésus''' "this man is good". '''só''' can also be used as an article, and so the latter sentence can be translated as "''the'' man is good".
<span>Otherwise, a speaker (such as an avid student of Ancient Greek, or perhaps Sanskrit) can choose to pronounce unvoiced stops throughout their speech simply because they wish to match pronunciations of their respective daughter languages of interest.</span>
<span class="c12">The basic short vowels of Proto-Indo-European appear as ⟨e⟩ and ⟨o⟩, and can be pronounced in a variety of ways, such as [e] and [o] or [ɛ] and [ɔ]. Their long counterparts appear as ⟨ē⟩ and ⟨ō⟩, and are pronounced as before, but audibly longer.</span>
Hónos
<span class="c12">There is no real restriction on how they should be pronounced, but my personal preference is ⟨e⟩ as [ɛ], ⟨ē⟩ as [eː], ⟨o⟩ as [ɔ], and ⟨ō⟩ as [oː].</span>
Hnós
<span id="h.te0h5wlolx5v"></span>
| Hénom
=== <span class="c63">1.2.2 *a, *ā</span> ===
| Hénosjo
| Hénosmej
| Hénosmi
|-
| neut. sg.
| Hénod
|
|
|
|
|-
| fem. sg.
| Hénā
| Hénām
| Hénosjās
| Hénosjāej
| Hénosjā
|-
| masc. pl.
| Hénoj
| Hénoms
| Hénojsōm
| Hénojmos
<span class="c12">These vowels appear as ⟨a⟩ [a] and ⟨ā⟩ [aː]. They are not basic vowels of Proto-Indo-European; ⟨a⟩ appears most often as a realisation of laryngeals between medial or before initial consonants, and ⟨ā⟩ appears as a contraction of /*eh₂/. Rarely /*a/ can appear in root words, but these reconstructions are often debated.</span>
<span class="c12">Only ⟨i⟩ [i] and ⟨u⟩ [u] are inherited from Proto-Indo-European. ⟨ī⟩ [iː] and ⟨ū⟩ [uː] appear as contractions of /*iH/ and /*uH/.</span>
/-bhos
<span id="h.ne0xrt6jsbsy"></span>
| Hénāsu
=== <span class="c63">1.2.4 [ə]</span> ===
|}
<span class="c12">A final vowel [ə], the schwa, can be pronounced in SAvIE but ought not to be written. In cases where syllabic sonorants (l̥ r̥ m̥ n̥ H̥) form a cluster with another consonant (such as in the word wl̥qós which is expected to be pronounced [wl̩ˈkʷos]), an epenthetic schwa can be added before the syllabic consonant to aid in pronunciation, thus giving [wəlˈkʷos] for wl̥qós.</span>
<span class="c12">If somebody wants to write the pronounced schwa explicitly, they should use the letters ⟨y⟩, ⟨ə⟩, or the symbol ⟨°⟩, giving ⟨wylqós⟩, ⟨wəlqós⟩, or ⟨w°lqós⟩.</span>
<span id="h.7b1lvacq8dyd"></span>
There are multiple forms given in the first cell because the root can be reconstructed in each of those forms, all of which can be used as the basis for this demonstrative.
== <span class="c41 c16">1.3 Stress</span> ==
<span class="c12">SAvIE follows Proto-Indo-European stress rules and it is mandatory to mark stress with an acute accent (á é í ó ú ĺ̥ ŕ̥ ḿ̥ ń̥ H̥́) at all times. When writing using ⟨ə⟩, that letter receives the acute instead, giving ⟨ý ~ ə́⟩.</span>
As with '''so''', '''Hénos''' is used as a determiner, with its independent pronominal form being '''ḱênos''': '''ḱênod Hésti Hwésu '''"that is good", and '''Hénos Hnêr Hésti Hwésus''' "that man is good".
<span>Long vowels, indicated with a macron, are instead written with a circumflex ⟨â ê î ô û⟩ when stressed.</span>
=== 4.5 Nouns and noun declension ===
-----
Proto-Indo-European had somewhat complex noun declensions, which are carried over to SAvIE. As with pronouns, common nouns decline in the singular and plural, but also in the vocative to give six cases.
<span>In addition, SAvIE has rules relating to the stress of compounds. These can be either </span><span class="c20">close</span><span> or </span><span class="c20">loose</span><span class="c12">. Close compounds are written as one word, using a stem form of one word and a full form of another. Loose compounds are written as two separate words with the first word in the genitive case without displaying declension, and the second word being fully declinable.</span>
The pattern which is seen in many noun declensions is given below.
<span>In close compounds, often the first element is stressed, but the second may receive stress in some words, and receives the only stress in the word. In loose compounds, the second element is stressed, and the first can optionally be written without stress marking. Often, words can be written as either type of compound, but they usually appear as only one; for example, </span><span class="c27">ghóstipotis</span><span> “lord” is a close compound, and can be written, following the correct conventions of stress, as a loose compound </span><span class="c27">ghostejs pótis</span><span class="c12">, specifically avoiding stress marking on the first element.</span>
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!
!
!
!
!
|-
| Athematic
| Masculine sg.
| Neuter sg.
| Masculine pl.
| Neuter pl.
|-
| Nominative
| -s ~ -∅
| -∅
| -es
| *-h₂
|-
| Vocative
| -∅
|
|
|
|-
| Accusative
| -m̥
| -m̥s
|
|
|-
| Genitive
| -s ~ -(e/o)s
| -ōm
|
|
|-
| Dative
| -ej
| -bhos
<span>Optionally, rather than refraining from marking stress entirely, a grave accent ⟨ ̀⟩ can be used on the first word to indicate secondary stress, such as </span><span class="c27">ghostèjs pótis</span><span>.</span>
-mos
|
|
|-
| Locative
| -i, -∅
| -su
|
|
|}
-----
<span id="h.n8ma65fq4kqv"></span>
= <span class="c89 c109">2 Major features of SAE</span> =
<span>The definite article is </span><span class="c27">so</span><span>. The indefinite article is </span><span class="c27">Hójwos</span><span>, a variant of </span><span class="c27">Hójnos</span><span> "one" (from </span><span class="c20">*h₁óynos)</span><span class="c12">.</span>
-ī<sup><ref>-ī is seen in Italic and Celtic </ref></sup>
<span class="c12"></span>
| -ōm
|
|
|-
| Dative
| -ōj (← -oej)
| -o(j)bhos
<span id="h.2kj0ufj26kkt"></span>
-o(j)mos
== <span>2</span><span>.2 Relative clauses with relative pronouns</span> ==
<span>The pronoun </span><span class="c27">jos</span><span class="c12"> can be used to introduce relative clauses, but alternatively any correlative word can be used in a relative sense.</span>
<span>SAvIE can use the word </span><span class="c27">kápes</span><span>, a derivative of</span><span class="c27"> </span><span class="c20">*kap-</span><span> "to seize, hold" (which gives Latin </span><span class="c20">capiō</span><span> and English </span><span class="c20">have</span><span>), to form a perfect tense with the participle </span><span class="c27">-tós</span><span>/</span><span class="c27">-tâ</span><span>/</span><span class="c27">-tóm</span><span class="c12"> of a verb.</span>
This only applies to masculine and neuter nouns, as noted in the tables above. Feminine nouns usually conform to the following:
<span>Instead of using dative constructions, there can either be a nominative-active-accusative or nominative-deponent-ablative use of the word </span><span class="c27">bhrūgéti</span><span class="c20"> to enjoy, to like</span><span> (from </span><span class="c20">*bʰruHg-e-ti</span><span class="c12">) with a semantic patient.</span>
<span>Instead of using a conjugated passive, the periphrastic passive is formed with the verb H</span><span class="c27">ésti</span><span> "to be" and a passive participle ending in </span><span class="c27">-(o)mHnos</span><span>/</span><span class="c27">-(o)mHnā</span><span>/</span><span class="c27">-(o)mHnom</span><span>.</span>
<span>Verbs can be implicitly anticausative if a transitive verb is used in anF intransitive sense, with its patient as its subject; for example </span><span class="c27">éǵ bhrêgsm̥ íd </span><span>"I broke it", but </span><span class="c27">íd bhrêgst</span><span> "it broke". Optionally the reflexive particle can be used on either side of the salient verb, giving </span><span class="c27">íd bhrêgst s(w)é </span><span>or </span><span class="c27">íd s(w)é bhrêgst</span><span class="c12">.</span>
<span id="h.or9fr0p9pai8"></span>
ī-type nouns retain a fixed stress-ablaut pattern, whereas ā-type nouns are much more flexible; these can be o-grade with stress on the ending, e-grade with shifting stress, or zero-grade with stress on the ending.
<span>The dative can be used to indicate the possessor of the object of an action instead of using a genitive phrase: </span><span class="c27">î léwHeti ésyās sūnéwej tód ǵónu </span><span>"she washes her son's knee", though literally "she washes </span><span class="c20">to her son</span><span class="c12"> the knee".</span>
<span id="h.rx85ai3kp8ts"></span>
== <span class="c41 c16">2.8 Negative pronouns and lack of negation</span> ==
<span>In phrasing e.g. "nobody comes", English-like phraseology should be used: there should be a negative pronoun with no negation of the verb, giving </span><span class="c27">neqís cémt </span><span class="c12">"nobody came".</span>
Many noun declensions are a variation on the above patterns. Some common variations are as follows.
<span id="h.slozp63i4vt1"></span>
== <span class="c41 c16">2.9 Particles in comparative constructions</span> ==
<span>Either of the particles </span><span class="c27">Hapó</span><span> or </span><span class="c27">Hánti</span><span> should be used to compare against a referent in the accusative: </span><span class="c27">ís Hesti mājoteros Hapó/Hánti (H)mé</span><span class="c12"> "he is bigger than me".</span>
==== 4.5.1 -mn̥, -mō, -mên ====
<span id="h.4c51oqnhjhsq"></span>
These endings all look very similar to each other, and fulfil relatively similar functions. '''-mn̥''' creates neuter result nouns, while '''-mō''' and '''-mên''' create masculine agent nouns. There is no appreciable difference in meaning between '''-mō''' and '''-mên'''; they are both included to use freely when they appear in cognates among daughter languages.
<span>The adjective </span><span class="c27">sokós</span><span>/</span><span class="c27">sokâ</span><span>/</span><span class="c27">tokóm</span><span> is used for "as" or "such" (giving </span><span class="c27">sokós méǵHs</span><span> "so large"). The comparative element is introduced with </span><span class="c27">ḱom</span><span> "with" with the predicate in the accusative, resulting in </span><span class="c27">ís ésti sokós méǵHs ḱom îm̥</span><span class="c12"> "he is as large as her".</span>
<span id="h.hdt0cyj1sj23"></span>
== <span class="c41 c16">2.11 Subject person affixes as strict agreement markers</span> ==
<span>This feature refers to obligatory subject-pronoun agreement with a conjugated verb. It is not widespread so it is unclear why this is included as a SAE feature. So, in SAvIE, this is an optional feature; both </span><span class="c27">Hésmi</span><span> and </span><span class="c27">éǵH Hésmi</span><span> are equivalent terms for "I am".</span>
<span>SAvIE distinguishes between an intensifying adjectives </span><span class="c27">somHós</span><span>/</span><span class="c27">-â</span><span>/</span><span class="c27">-óm</span><span> or </span><span class="c27">sélbhos</span><span>/</span><span class="c27">-â</span><span>/</span><span class="c27">-óm</span><span>, and the true reflexive particle </span><span class="c27">s(w)é</span><span class="c12">; the former does not necessarily indicate reflexive action, but intensifies a previous nominal, while the latter is explicitly reflexive or reciprocal.</span>
==== 4.5.2 -tōr, -têr, -trī ====
<span id="h.tmq8zrnfthnk"></span>
These endings derived masculine, masculine, and feminine agent noun endings.
= <span class="c89 c109">3 Further SAE-aligned features</span> =
<span>The features below appear in some members of SAE, so can be used optionally in SAvIE too.</span>
<span id="h.w55u3od4ie17"></span>
== <span class="c41 c16">3.1 Verb fronting in polar interrogatives</span> ==
<span>SAvIE polar yes/no questions can front the questioning verb, so </span><span class="c27">éǵH Hésmi</span><span> can become </span><span class="c27">Hésmi éǵH?</span>
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!
!
!
!
|-
|
| -tōr
| -têr
| -trī
|-
| Nominative sg.
| (é)-tōr
| (∅)-têr
| (é)-trī
|-
| '''Genitive sg.'''
| (∅)-trés
| (∅)-tr̥jâs
|
|-
| Nominative pl.
| (é)-tores
| (∅)-téres
| (é)-trīs
|-
| '''Genitive pl.'''
| (∅)-trôm
| (∅)-tr̥jâōm
|
|}
<span id="h.l0s5mylmfuqr"></span>
== <span class="c41 c16">3.2 Comparative marking of adjectives</span> ==
<span>As seen above in the comparative adjective </span><span class="c27">māyóteros</span><span>/</span><span class="c27">-ā</span><span>/</span><span class="c27">-om</span><span>, the suffix </span><span class="c27">-teros</span><span>/</span><span class="c27">-ā</span><span>/</span><span class="c27">-om </span><span class="c12">is the comparative (as well as contrastive) adjectival suffix.</span>
<span>In this feature there is no difference between "with" in the comitative ("in the company of") sense, and in the instrumental ("using, by means of") sense. Both of the words </span><span class="c27">me</span><span> and </span><span class="c27">ḱóm</span><span> can be used to mean "with" in either sense.</span>
==== 4.5.3 -trom, -tlom, -dhrom, -dhlom ====
This is a variation of 4.5.2, all of which produce neuter nouns of tools or instruments. There is no difference between forms with '''-r-''' and forms with '''-l-'''; however, the forms beginning '''-dh-''' are used after roots ending in a laryngeal, whether deleted or not, and '''-t-''' is used otherwise. They are all conjugated in the exact same way, so only the conjugation for '''-trom''' is given below.
-----
<span id="h.l6hpotz4rjnm"></span>
= <span class="c89 c109">4 Nominals</span> =
<span class="c12">This category includes nouns and pronouns, both of which are declined in much the same way.</span>
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!
!
|-
|
| -trom
|-
| Nominative sg.
| (é)-trom
|-
| '''Genitive sg.'''
| (é)-trosyo
<span>They are declined in two numbers, the </span><span class="c27">singular </span><span>and </span><span class="c27">plural</span><span>; six cases, the </span><span class="c27">nominative</span><span>, </span><span class="c27">vocative</span><span>, </span><span class="c27">accusative</span><span>, </span><span class="c27">genitive</span><span>, </span><span class="c27">dative</span><span>, and </span><span class="c27">locative</span><span>; and in one of three genders, </span><span class="c27">masculine</span><span>, </span><span class="c27">feminine</span><span>, or </span><span class="c27">neuter</span><span class="c12">.</span>
(é)-trī
<span id="h.mpapi1a96ctb"></span>
|-
== <span class="c41 c16">4.1 Personal pronouns</span> ==
| Nominative pl.
| (é)-trā
|-
| '''Genitive pl.'''
| (é)-trōm
|}
<span class="c12">These decline in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd persons singular and plural in all cases except the locative. They also have dedicated adjectival forms, which are used for the possessive.</span>
<span class="c12"></span>
<span class="c12">Nominative</span>
<span class="c122 c120">Accusative</span>
==== 4.5.4 -ō, -Hₒō ====
<span class="c22 c120">Genitive</span>
These are called ''nasal'' suffixes, because in each case but the nominative, ⟨n⟩ appears in the suffix. '''-ō''' creates masculine ''participant'' nouns; these are ones which indicate a person or thing which does something, or exists as the result of an action, such as '''skérō '''"meat" from ''*(s)kér-'' "to cut", with the resulting meaning being "something cut". A derivative of those, '''-Honos / -ā / -om''', is used to create augmentative nouns.
<span class="c102 c120">Dative</span>
-Hō is similar; it produces nouns and adjectives of all genders to create words which indicate possession of a certain quality, or a responsibility for carrying out or responsibility to carry out a certain action, like '''pl̥tHús''' "wide, broad" becoming '''Pĺ̥tHō '''"Plato", originally meaning "wide/broad one". It is assumed to be formed from Proto-Indo-European ''*-h₃en(h₂)-'', and colours vowels accordingly (by -h₃-).
<span class="c119 c142">Locative</span>
<span class="c123 c120 c99 c142">Adjective</span>
<span class="c15 c16">1st singular</span>
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!
!
!
!
!
|-
|
| ō masculine
| Hₒō masculine
| Hₒō neuter
| Hₒō feminine
|-
| -ō
| -Hₒō
| -Hₒon
| -Hₒónī
|
|-
| Nominative sg.
| (é)-ō
| ( ́)-Hō
| ( ́)-Hon
| (∅)-Hónī
|-
| '''Genitive sg.'''
| (∅)-nés
| (∅)-Hnés
| (∅)-Honjâs
|
|-
| Nominative pl.
| (é)-ones
| ( ́)-Hones
| ( ́)-Hō
| (∅)-Hónīs
|-
| '''Genitive pl.'''
| (∅)-nôm
| (∅)-Hnôm
| (∅)-Hn̥jâōm
|
|}
<span class="c12">éǵ</span>
<span class="c12">eǵóm</span>
<span class="c12">éǵō</span>
<span class="c12">mé</span>
==== 4.5.5 -r̥, -mr̥, -sr̥, -tr̥, -wr̥ ====
<span class="c12">méne</span>
These all belong to and are declined exactly as the basic ending '''-r̥''', which is rare and unproductive. It produces very few basic neuter nouns.
<span class="c12">mój</span>
<span class="c12">méǵhjo</span>
<span class="c12">mój</span>
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!
!
|-
|
| -r̥
|-
| Nominative sg.
| (ó)-r̥
|-
| '''Genitive sg.'''
| (é)-n̥s
|-
| Nominative pl.
| (ó)-r̥H
|-
| '''Genitive pl.'''
| (é)-nōm
|-
| Nominative coll.
| (é)-ōr
|-
| '''Genitive coll.'''
| (∅)-nés
|}
<span class="c12">(H)mós</span>
<span class="c12">/-â</span>
<span class="c12">/-óm</span>
This ending is exceptional in having a collective number, which is grammatically plural. So, '''tâ wédōr '''means “the collective of all waters”, whereas '''tâ wódr̥H''' means “the (particular, definite, definable, countable) waters”.
<span class="c15 c16">2nd singular</span>
<span class="c12">tû</span>
==== 4.5.6 -tus ====
<span class="c12">twé</span>
This suffix produces masculine action nouns from verb roots.
<span class="c12">téwe</span>
<span class="c12">tój</span>
<span class="c12">tébhi</span>
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!
!
|-
|
| -tus
|-
| Nominative sg.
| (é)-tus
|-
| '''Genitive sg.'''
| (∅)-téws
|-
| Nominative pl.
| (é)-tewes
|-
| '''Genitive pl.'''
| (∅)-téwōm
|}
<span class="c12">tébhjo</span>
<span class="c12">tój</span>
<span class="c12">twós</span>
<span class="c12">/-â</span>
==== 4.5.7 -is, -tis ====
<span class="c12">/-óm</span>
'''-is''' produces ''common gender'' nouns, that is, those which can be either masculine or feminine. It is not shown with an ablaut pattern because it can be used with multiple, including '''(é)-is''' or '''(ó)-is'''. It also has the neuter form '''-i'''. '''-tis''' produces exclusively feminine action or abstract nouns.
<span class="c15 c16">3rd singular</span>
<span class="c15 c16">masculine</span>
<span class="c12">ís</span>
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!
!
!
|-
|
| -is
| -tis
|-
| Nominative sg.
| -is, -i
| (é)-tis
|-
| '''Genitive sg.'''
| -ejs
| (∅)-téjs
|-
| Nominative pl.
| -ejes, -ejH
| (é)-tejes
|-
| '''Genitive pl.'''
| -ejōm
| (∅)-téjōm
|}
<span class="c12">éj</span>
<span class="c12">Hé</span>
==== 4.5.8 Agentive and resultative -os ====
<span class="c12">ím</span>
Nouns with the pattern (o)-ós create masculine agent nouns denoting someone or something which performs a related action, such as '''tomHós '''"cutter, slicer", from the verb '''tm̥nês''' (← ''tm̥-né-h₁-es'') "to slice, to section, to cut up". When the stress shifts on to the root vowel, this produces a related result noun, '''tómHos '''"a cut, a slice". Both of these noun patterns do not shift stress or ablaut within their own paradigm (giving '''tomHósjo''' "of a/the cutter" and '''tómHosjo''' "of a/the slice").
<span class="c12">ésjo</span>
<span class="c12">Héso</span>
==== 4.5.9 -snā ====
<span class="c12">ésmej</span>
The ending '''-snā''' is attached usually to verb stems to indicate either a result noun or a noun indicating the a summary of a category, for example converting '''tétḱes''' "to create, produce" into '''tétḱsnā''' "art, craft".
<span class="c12">Hésmōj</span>
<span class="c12">(H)ésmi</span>
<span class="c12">(</span>
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!
!
|-
|
| -snā
|-
| Nominative sg.
| (é)-snā
|-
| '''Genitive sg.'''
| (é)-snās
|-
| Nominative pl.
| (é)-snās
|-
| '''Genitive pl.'''
| (é)-snāōm
|}
<span class="c12">swós</span>
<span class="c12">/-â</span>
==== 4.5.10 -sōr ====
<span class="c12">/-óm</span>
'''-sōr''' is similar to '''-trī''' in that it produces feminine gender agentive nouns.
The pattern '''(o)-â''' creates collective or mass nouns, or abstract or action nouns. This conjugates exactly as the thematic ''ā''-type is expected to. This can also appear as '''(∅)-â''', with the exact same meaning.
<span class="c12">ésjās</span>
A slight extension of this is the pattern '''(o)-nâ''' also creating a deverbal abstract noun.
<span class="c12"></span>
<span class="c12">(H)ésjāi</span>
==== 4.5.12 -iā ====
<span class="c12">(H)ésjā(i)</span>
This is a variation of the feminine ending -ā augmented with -i-, used to create feminine abstract nouns.
<span class="c15 c16">1st plural</span>
<span class="c12">wéj</span>
==== 4.5.A Combination of suffixes ====
<span class="c12">n̥smé</span>
Evidence suggests that some of the above suffixes were combined for various purposes. One example is 4.5.7 with 4.5.4: where '''-tis''' could be combined with '''-Hō''' to give '''-tīō''', giving Latin ''-tiō'' and Proto-Celtic ''-tiyū''; '''-tīō '''for example can be used to produce nouns of action or result.
<span class="c12">nos</span>
<span class="c12">n̥sméj</span>
=== 4.6 Adjectives ===
<span class="c12">n̥s</span>
Adjectives decline in all three genders, two numbers, and six cases. Their deeclensions follow many of the same patterns that nouns do. In particular, they follow athematic ('''méǵHs ~ m̥ǵHés''', '''méǵHī ~ méǵHīs''', '''méǵH ~ méǵH''' "great, large") or thematic ('''néwos ~ néwes''', '''néwā ~ néwās''',''' néwom ~ néwā''' "new") paradigms using a mixture of the basic masculine-, feminine- and neuter-gender endings given above.
<span class="c12">n̥smi</span>
Other adjectival formations are as follows.
<span class="c12">n̥sós</span>
<span class="c12">/-â</span>
<span class="c12">/-óm</span>
<span class="c15 c16">2nd plural</span>
==== 4.6.1 Caland system: -onts, -us ====
<span class="c12">jû</span>
The Caland system defines reproducible adjectival paradigms and their root forms for creating basic adjectives. Two common endings are -onts and -us, which ablaut as follows.
<span class="c12">usmé</span>
<span class="c12">wôs</span>
<span class="c12">wos</span>
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
|-
|
| Masc. sg.
| Neut. sg.
| Fem. sg.
| Masc. pl.
| Neut. pl.
| Fem. pl.
|-
| -onts
<span class="c12">usméj</span>
Nominative
<span class="c12">usmi</span>
| (é)-onts
| (é)-ont
| (∅)-éntī
| (é)-ontes
| (é)-ontH
| (∅)-éntīs
|-
| -onts
<span class="c12">usós</span>
Genitive
<span class="c12">/-â</span>
| (∅)-n̥tés
| (∅)-n̥tjâs
| (∅)-n̥tôm
| (∅)-n̥tjâōm
|
|
|-
| -us
<span class="c12">/-óm</span>
Nominative
<span class="c15 c16">3rd plural masculine</span>
| (é)-us
| (é)-u
| (∅)-éwī
| (é)-ewes
| (é)-ū
| (∅)-éwīs
|-
| -us
<span class="c12">éjes</span>
Genitive
<span class="c12">íns</span>
| (∅)-éws
| (∅)-ujâs
| (∅)-éwōm
| (∅)-ujâōm
|
|
|}
<span class="c12">éjsom</span>
<span class="c12">éjsōm</span>
<span class="c12">Hésom</span>
Although displaying somewhat idiosyncratic ablaut, these declensions are identical to the athematic endings given in '''4.5'''.
<span class="c12">(H)éjmos</span>
<span class="c12">éjbhos</span>
==== 4.6.2 ''Bahuvrihis'': -ēs ====
<span class="c12">(H)éjsu</span>
A ''bahuvrihi'' is a compound word formation indicating possession of a certain quality, or execution of a certain action. These can either be adjectives or nouns in all genders. Its underlying form is ''*-es-s'', due to which it also follows the athematic pattern.
<span class="c12"></span>
The gendered forms are combined, giving a ''common-gender'' form.
<span class="c15 c16">3rd plural neuter</span>
<span class="c12">î</span>
<span class="c12"></span>
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!
!
!
!
!
|-
|
| Cmn. sg.
| Neut. sg.
| Cmn. pl.
| Neut. pl.
|-
| Nominative
| (é)-ēs
| (é)-es
| (é)-eses
| (é)-ēs
|-
| Genitive
| (é)-esos
| (é)-esōm
|
|
|}
<span class="c15 c16">3rd plural feminine</span>
<span class="c12">îes</span>
<span class="c12">îm̥s</span>
<span class="c12">în̥s</span>
==== 4.6.3 Pertinence to a quality: -wénts ====
<span class="c12">îsōm</span>
-wénts creates adjectives which indicate possession of a certain noun as a quality, or pertinence to that noun as a salient description, like '''Hn̥twént''' "limited".
<span class="c12">éjsom</span>
<span class="c12">Hésom</span>
<span class="c12">îmos</span>
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
|-
|
| Masc. sg.
| Neut. sg.
| Fem. sg.
| Masc. pl.
| Neut. pl.
| Fem. pl.
|-
| Nominative
| (∅)-wénts
| (∅)-wént
| (∅)-wéntī
| (∅)-wéntes
| (∅)-wéntH
| (∅)-wéntīs
|-
| Genitive
| (∅)-wn̥tés
| (∅)-wn̥tjâs
| (∅)-wn̥tôm
| (∅)-wn̥tjâōm
|
|
|}
<span class="c12">(H)éjmos</span>
<span class="c12">éjbhos</span>
<span class="c12">îsu</span>
<span class="c12">(H)éjsu</span>
==== 4.6.4 Characteristic or typical of: -ískos, -ānos ====
<span class="c12"></span>
These suffixes are cognate with the English -ish and -(i)an, and fulfil the same function: they create adjectives meaning something that is characteristic or typical of a certain noun.
<span class="c12"></span>
<span>In addition to the above possessive adjectives </span><span class="c27">mós</span><span>, </span><span class="c27">tós</span><span>, etc. alternative forms from daughter languages can be used, including </span><span class="c27">(H)méjnos ~ -ā ~ -om</span><span> (as in Proto-Germanic </span><span class="c20">*mīnaz</span><span>), </span><span class="c27">mójos ~ -ā ~ -om</span><span> (as Proto-Slavic </span><span class="c20">*mojь</span><span>), and </span><span class="c27">méjos ~ -ā ~ -om</span><span> (assuming potentially that the Latin form </span><span class="c20">meus</span><span> represents the dative </span><span class="c27">méj</span><span> with adjectival ending). Internally constructed forms include </span><span class="c27">méwos ~ -ā ~ -om</span><span>, formed using the oblique stem with adjectival ending, or the indeclinable genitive </span><span class="c27">(H)méne</span><span>. </span>
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
|-
|
| Masc. sg.
| Neut. sg.
| Fem. sg.
| Masc. pl.
| Neut. pl.
| Fem. pl.
|-
| Nominative
| (∅)-iskós
| (∅)-iskóm
| (∅)-iskâ
| (∅)-iskôs
| (∅)-iskâ
| (∅)-iskâs
|-
| Genitive
| (∅)-iskósjo
| (∅)-iskâs
| (∅)-iskôm
| (∅)-iskâōm
|
|
|}
-----
<span id="h.i1ldaces8rl6"></span>
== <span class="c41 c16">4.2 Personal correlative and relative</span> ==
<span class="c12"></span>
'''-ānós''' conjugates as '''-nós''' does, in '''4.6.7'''.
-īnos creates adjectives generally related to a material of which something is made. Stress falls on the suffix at all times, but the root does not need to be zero-grade.
The contrastive adjective produces the slightly complex meaning of "something which is X rather than anything else".
<span>The above can be used as an independent pronoun, as in </span><span class="c27">qís cémt? </span><span class="c12">"Who came?"</span>
<span>In other contexts it can be used as a relative pronoun, such as in </span><span class="c27">kápmi Hábōl qim bhrûghō </span><span class="c12">"I have an apple which I like".</span>
<span>The difference between the two is that the pronoun form is stressed, but the relative form is not.</span>
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
|-
|
| Masc. sg.
| Neut. sg.
| Fem. sg.
| Masc. pl.
| Neut. pl.
| Fem. pl.
|-
| Nominative
| (é)-teros
| (é)-terom
| (é)-terā
| (é)-terōs
| (é)-terā
| (é)-terās
|-
| Genitive
| (é)-terosjo
| (é)-terās
| (é)-terōm
| (é)-terāōm
|
|
|}
-----
==== 4.6.9 Elative adjective ====
<span id="h.rufo2immy9w"></span>
The elative adjectives is one which describes the greatness of something, meaning "very X".
== <span class="c41 c16">4.3 Proximal pronoun and determiner, and article</span> ==
The present participle uses the form '''(é)-onts ~ (∅)-n̥tés''' in thematic verbs, as does the '''-onts''' form in the Caland system above, and '''(∅)-ónts ~ (∅)-n̥tés''' in athematic verbs. It is directly equivalent to the English "-ing". It is used with '''Héses''' in any tense to indicate continuous tenses, such as '''Hésmi Hdónts '''"I am eating".
The past participle uses the form '''(∅)-tós ~ (∅)-tósjo'''. As a verbal adjective it essentially means "X-ed". Although it can be used as an independent adjective, it is perhaps most commonly used in its neuter form with '''kápes''' "to have, get" in the perfect-tense construction, such as '''kápmi Hdtóm '''"I have eaten".
Unlike '''-tós''', which is active in meaning, the passive participle indicates something which "has been X-ed". Its form is '''(é)-om(H)nos ~ (∅)-óm(H)nosjo''' in thematic verbs, an '''(∅)-m̥(H)nós ~ (∅)-m̥(H)nósjo''' in athematic verbs. It is also used with '''Héses''' to construct passive verb forms, such as '''Hésmi Hdm̥Hnós''' "I am eaten, I have been eaten".
This participle is a special type with optional initial reduplication: masculine '''(é)-(∅)-wōs ~ (é)-(∅)-usos''', feminine '''(é)-(∅)-usī ~ (e)-(∅)-usjâs''', neuter '''(é)-(∅)-wos ~ (é)-(∅)-usos'''.
Although Ancient Greek and Sanskrit had a perfect participle, such a formation would be against the spirit of SAE, which specifies a perfect-tense formation using the "have" verb. As such, there is no dedicated perfect participle; rather, a perfect participial formation involves the present participle of '''kápes''' and a past participle of another verb, such as '''kapónts wl̥tóm''' "having seen".
Adjectives can be further declined in two degrees: the comparative and the superlative. The comparative produces adjectives meaning "more X", while the superlative produces "the most X".
The comparative adjective degree can be expressed either with the contrastive '''-teros''' or elative '''-yōs''' ending. The comparative element translating to "than" is expressed with '''Hánti''' "against", and the noun being compared against is placed in the dative, for example '''ís Hésti Hl̥tóteros ~ Hl̥tójōs Hánti méǵhjo''' "he is taller than me".
The superlative degree expresses "the most X". As such, it is always used with the article '''só'''.
| class="c42 c46"| <span class="c12">tâmos</span>
For ease, I have opted to reduce the potential superlative adjective endings to two, discounting those reconstructions with a laryngeal. The adjective is formed in one of two ways: '''(∅)-otm̥mós''' or '''(∅)-istós'''. The former is used for thematic adjectives, whereas the latter is used for athematic adjectives.
<span class="c12">tâbhos</span>
| class="c42 c46"| <span class="c12">tâsu</span>
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
|-
|
| Masc. sg.
| Neut. sg.
| Fem. sg.
| Masc. pl.
| Neut. pl.
| Fem. pl.
|-
| Nominative
| (∅)-otm̥mós
| (∅)-otm̥móm
| (∅)-otm̥mâ
| (∅)-otm̥môs
| (∅)-otm̥mâ
| (∅)-otm̥mâs
|-
| Genitive
| (∅)-otm̥mósjo
| (∅)-otm̥mâs
| (∅)-otm̥môm
| (∅)-otm̥mâōm
|
|
|-
| Nominative
| (∅)-istós
| (∅)-istóm
| (∅)-istâ
| (∅)-istôs
| (∅)-istâ
| (∅)-istâs
|-
| Genitive
| (∅)-istósjo
| (∅)-istâs
| (∅)-istôm
| (∅)-istâōm
|
|
|}
|}
<span class="c12"></span>
<span>The above are used as both determiners for other nouns; when in need of a pronoun the form </span><span class="c27">ḱíd</span><span> is used instead: </span><span class="c27">ḱíd Hésti Hwésu</span><span> "this is good", and </span><span class="c27">só Hnêr Hésti Hwésus</span><span> "this man is good". </span><span class="c27">só</span><span> can also be used as an article, and so the latter sentence can be translated as "</span><span class="c20">the</span><span> man is good".</span>
Although this table describes each form as using a zero-grade root because the stress shifts to the ending, the root can also be made e-grade in all cases.
-----
<span id="h.bf0thym6spy6"></span>
==== 4.7.3 Absolute superlative adjective ====
== <span class="c41 c16">4.4 Distal pronoun and determiner</span> ==
<span class="c12"></span>
The superlative can be augmented further, in order to create the absolute superlative, which holds even more force than the superlative. It is a combination of both superlative adjective forms, giving '''(∅)-istm̥mós'''. It declines exactly as '''-otm̥mós''' does.
SAvIE verbs are complex, but with fewer irregularities than Proto-Indo-European's daughter languages. SAvIE in particular takes the feature of the "have"-perfect tense and expands the concept to include multiple periphrastic tenses and verb forms, including all continuous tenses, and all passive forms.
<span class="c12">Hónos</span>
SAvIE verbs are divided into two kinds: ''conjugated'' and ''periphrastic''. Conjugated forms are ones to which a suffix is attached to form a directly usable tense. Periphrastic forms involve a conjugated form of one of a limited selection of verbs, along with a ''particle''. Particles themselves are one of four non-finite forms which indicate tense and aspect.
It should not be necessary to revise non-finite forms, as they are all described in '''4.6.8'''. Two forms not described there are the ''infinitive'', which is used simply to name the verb, the ''supine'', used only in special verb constructions, and the ''purportative'', used with verbs of wanting, owing, or intending.
The infinitive takes the form '''(é)-es''', and is a shortened locative form of the purportative '''(é)-os''' and '''(é)-esos''', which creates result or action nouns. This makes it cognate with the Ancient Greek (-ειν) and Latin (-ere) infinitives.
For deponents, the infinitive is formed with '''(∅)-és''', and the purportatives '''(é)-osm̥''' and '''(∅)-sés'''.
|- class="c17"
The supine takes the form '''(∅)-ént''', also a locative form, of the present participle '''-onts'''. For deponents, it is '''(∅)-tój'''. It is used in combination with verbs of motion in order to indicate purpose, such as '''ís cémt Had wl̥ént mé''' "he came to see me".
Verbs each conjugate in multiple tenses, each of which has three persons (1st, 2nd, and 3rd), two numbers (singular and plural) and two moods (indicative and optative). In total there are four tenses: the ''nonpast'' (which encompasses the present and, optionally, future), the ''imperfect'' (semantically identical to the past continuous, but used especially in certain constructions), the ''aorist'' (or ''preterite'', or ''simple past''), and the ''habitual'' (which is technically tenseless).
| class="c42 c50"| <span class="c12">Hénām</span>
All conjugated forms use one of two sets of endings, called the ''primary'' and ''secondary''. Primary endings indicate the nonpast tense, and secondary endings most others. Each set of endings can be either ''thematic'' or ''athematic''.
The nonpast combines both the present and future tenses. The simple future has an additional periphrastic tense, but the simple present does not. It is indicated by the primary endings.
<span class="c12">There are multiple forms given in the first cell because the root can be reconstructed in each of those forms, all of which can be used as the basis for this demonstrative.</span>
<span>As with </span><span class="c27">so</span><span>, </span><span class="c27">Hénos</span><span> is used as a determiner, with its independent pronominal form being </span><span class="c27">ḱênos</span><span>: </span><span class="c27">ḱênod Hésti Hwésu </span><span>"that is good", and </span><span class="c27">Hénos Hnêr Hésti Hwésus</span><span> "that man is good".</span>
Since they can be used as a future tense too, a nonpast form '''bhérō''' can mean both "I bear" and "I will bear", though for clarity the latter can be expressed with the periphrastic future tense, described later.
-----
==== 5.2.2 Imperfect ====
<span id="h.m4gvyxozl951"></span>
The imperfect is indicated by the usage of secondary endings in place of primary ones. It signals a past continuous tense.
== <span class="c41 c16">4.5 Nouns and noun declension</span> ==
<span class="c12">Proto-Indo-European had somewhat complex noun declensions, which are carried over to SAvIE. As with pronouns, common nouns decline in the singular and plural, but also in the vocative to give six cases.</span>
<span class="c12">The pattern which is seen in many noun declensions is given below.</span>
The aorist forms a simple past. It also uses the secondary endings, but can be one of two further formations. The '''derived aorist''' is given for '''root present''' verbs, that is, ones which are not formed with secondary derivation such as the nasal infix. This forms as below.
The second formation is the '''root aorist''', given for '''derived verbs''' that do not fit into the above category. It uses the secondary endings attached to a root with no intervening secondary derivations, and can be either thematic or athematic. As such, it is completely identical with the imperfect tense of root present verbs. It differs from the imperfect of derived verbs by dropping secondary derivation. For example, for '''léjqes''' "to leave" has the (derived) present '''linéqti''', (derived) imperfect '''linéqt''', and root aorist '''léjqt'''.
The habitual has no explicit tense – the position in time of the relevant action depends solely on the context of the sentence. The form of this is a thematic verb with secondary endings.
For very few verbs the present is formed using the Proto-Indo-European stative formation. These have no imperfect or aorist, and have special past participle forms built on '''-wōs ~ -usī ~ -wos'''.
A very small number of verbs is a deponent: one which looks like an old mediopassive form, but acts as though it were active. This is not counted as a passive form. Deponent verbs have special forms in all tenses.
The imperative is its own mood, and conjugates only in the second and third person. It is tenseless, so there is only one set of imperative forms for each verb. Their forms differ only slightly based on thematicity.
<span class="c12">ī-type nouns retain a fixed stress-ablaut pattern, whereas ā-type nouns are much more flexible; these can be o-grade with stress on the ending, e-grade with shifting stress, or zero-grade with stress on the ending.</span>
<span class="c12"></span>
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!
!
!
|-
| Stative-type imperative
| Model
| Example
|-
| 2nd person singular
| (e)-(ó)-∅
<span class="c12">Many noun declensions are a variation on the above patterns. Some common variations are as follows.</span>
<span>These endings all look very similar to each other, and fulfil relatively similar functions. </span><span class="c27">-mn̥</span><span> creates neuter result nouns, while </span><span class="c27">-mō</span><span> and </span><span class="c27">-mên</span><span> create masculine agent nouns. There is no appreciable difference in meaning between </span><span class="c27">-mō</span><span> and </span><span class="c27">-mên</span><span class="c12">; they are both included to use freely when they appear in cognates among daughter languages.</span>
Some verb forms include affixes which attach to a verb root to form a stem, onto which certain endings are added. In this document, ''primary'' indicates verbs whose suffixes do not add significant special meaning, which form a root present and sigmatic aorist (including on suffixes '''-ê-''', '''-ā-''', etc.); ''secondary'' indicates verbs which use special derivational suffixes for the present and form a root aorist; ''tertiary'' indicates verbs which use meaningful derivational suffixes but do not form an aorist because the meaning of the derived verb contrasts the meaning of its non-derived counterpart.
There is a special form of nonpast and imperfect formed with the ''nasal infix'' '''-né- ~ -n- '''on the zero-grade stem. This infix ablauts from the singular to the plural in the indicative, remains '''-né-''' in the subjunctive, and is conjugated with athematic endings. The infix is only seen in these two tenses.
The infix '''-sḱ-''' attaches to some verb roots to form verbs which occasionally, but not always, have an inchoative meaning. These verbs are thematic.
Some verbs can be formed with '''(é)-jeti''' or '''(∅)-jéti'''. The former will always form transitive verbs, and the latter intransitive verbs. The intransitive in particular implies an ongoing action, and as such has no aorist tense. Verb roots can be combined with each of these to produce a pair of transitive and intransitive verbs, but this need not be the case. In case it does, conjugated verb forms differ in all forms except the aorist, where both forms are identical.
-----
===== 5.2.8.4 -néw- infix verbs (tertiary) =====
<span class="c12"></span>
As with the nasal infix, some verbs will form their present, imperfect, and habitual tenses with '''-néw-'''. This is placed after a zero-grade verb root, and is athematic in the present and imperfect. It ablauts to '''-nu-''' when unstressed, including in all persons of the habitual.
The verb form '''(o)-éjeti ~ (o)-éjonti''' forms causative verbs, such as '''Hédmi''' "to eat" becoming '''Hodéjeti''' "to feed". This forms verbs meaning "to cause to do X". This makes explicitly transitive verbs, often from existing verb roots or from adjective roots.
The affix '''-sj-''' is added to very few verb roots to form desiderative "want to X" verbs. It is thematic, attaches to the zero-grade root, and is accented on the thematic vowel, as '''Hdsjéti''' "to want to eat, to be hungry".
The suffix '''(∅)-êti ~ (∅)-ên̥ti '''(athematic) or '''(∅)-êjeti ~ (∅)-êjonti '''(thematic) form stative "to be X" verbs specifically from adjective roots, such as '''Hrudhêti''' "to be red". These verbs can expand slightly in meaning from a stative "to be X" to a dynamic "to go X, to become X". In either case they are explicitly intransitive verbs, and must be made causative to become transitive.
Very few verbs will form their nonpast and imperfect with '''(í)-(∅)-eti ~ (í)-(∅)-onti'''; they have a reduplicated element with '''-i-''' as the vowel which retains the stress, such as '''sísdeti''' "to sit". These have no special meaning, and are simply formations of the tense.
Similarlty to the above, some verbs will form with '''(í/é)-(e)-ti ~ (í/é)-(∅)-nti''', such as '''stístāti''' "to stand up". These verbs also have no particular nuance, and are formed arbitrarily.
The factitive verb form '''(é)-āti ~ (é)-ān̥ti '''creates verbs that imply "to make X", such as '''néwāti''' "to renew, to make new".
|}
<span class="c12"></span>
===== 5.2.8.12 Denominative verbs (primary) =====
<span id="h.usekf6fkb02b"></span>
Despite their similarity with the -j- infix verbs described in '''5.2.7.3''', the verb forms '''(∅)-ejéti ~ (∅)-ejónti''' and '''(∅)-ājéti ~ (∅)-ājónti''' are denominative (and occasionally deadjectival) suffixes; they are derived from (mainly) noun stems to indicate a performance of that noun.
<span>This is a variation of 4.5.2, all of which produce neuter nouns of tools or instruments. There is no difference between forms with </span><span class="c27">-r-</span><span> and forms with </span><span class="c27">-l-</span><span>; however, the forms beginning </span><span class="c27">-dh-</span><span> are used after roots ending in a laryngeal, whether deleted or not, and </span><span class="c27">-t-</span><span> is used otherwise. They are all conjugated in the exact same way, so only the conjugation for </span><span class="c27">-trom</span><span class="c12"> is given below.</span>
These verbs are marked by the thematic suffix '''-ājéti ~ -ājónti''', and may appear as o-grade among others. This suffix forms verbs with iterative (repetition of an action, but only during one distinct occasion), frequentative (occasional repetition of an action on several undefined occasions), or intensive meaning.
The resultative formation '''(é)-dhHeti ~ (é)-dhHonti''' generally expresses “to become X”. As a result it is most commonly formed from adjective roots.
Although the nonpast tense can be used as an implicit future, a periphrastic future can be expressed with the verb '''Héjes''' "to go", with the supine form, such as '''éǵ''' '''Héjmi Hdént''' "I am going to eat, I will eat".
The perfect tense is handled by the verb '''kápes''', which is only used to form this particular tense. It carries the meaning of "have X-ed". The nonpast tense is used with the past participle, such as '''éǵ kápmi Hdtóm''' "I have eaten".
<span id="h.y636ufvfv3ya"></span>
If there is no direct object, the neuter form '''-tóm''' of the participle should be used. However, if there is a direct object, the past participle should match the gender of the object, such as '''íd kápti Hdtâ îm̥''' "it has eaten her".
=== <span class="c63">4.5.4 -ō, -Hₒō</span> ===
<span>These are called </span><span class="c20">nasal</span><span> suffixes, because in each case but the nominative, ⟨n⟩ appears in the suffix. </span><span class="c27">-ō</span><span> creates masculine </span><span class="c20">participant</span><span> nouns; these are ones which indicate a person or thing which does something, or exists as the result of an action, such as </span><span class="c27">skérō </span><span>"meat" from </span><span class="c20">*(s)kér-</span><span> "to cut", with the resulting meaning being "something cut". A derivative of those, </span><span class="c27">-Honos / -ā / -om</span><span>, is used to create augmentative nouns.</span>
==== 5.3.3 Pluperfect tense ====
-----
The pluperfect "had X-ed" can be formed by changing the conjugated from of '''kápes''' from the nonpast to the aorist, such as '''éǵ kâpsm̥ Hdtóm '''"I had eaten". The participle must also agree as in the perfect tense.
<span>-Hō is similar; it produces nouns and adjectives of all genders to create words which indicate possession of a certain quality, or a responsibility for carrying out or responsibility to carry out a certain action, like </span><span class="c27">pl̥tHús</span><span> "wide, broad" becoming </span><span class="c27">Pĺ̥tHō </span><span>"Plato", originally meaning "wide/broad one". It is assumed to be formed from Proto-Indo-European </span><span class="c20">*-h₃en(h₂)-</span><span>, and colours vowels accordingly (by -h₃-).</span>
<span class="c12"></span>
==== 5.3.4 Future perfect tense ====
{| class="wikitable c11"
Instead of using '''kápes''', the future formation of '''Héjes''' must be used with the supine form '''kapént''' and a past participle, such as '''éǵ Héjmi kapént Hdtóm''' "I will have eaten". Once again, that the participle must agree with the object's gender is retained.
Continuous tenses can be formed with the nonpast and imperfect conjugations of '''Héses''' along with a present participle, such as '''Hésmi Hdónts''' "I am eating", or '''Hésm̥ Hdónts''' "I was eating".
|- class="c17"
In addition, the future tense can form a continuous: '''Héjmi Hsént Hdónts''' "I will be eating", and '''Héjmi kapént Hstóm Hdónts''' "I will have been eating".
This construction translates as "was going to X". It can either take the imperfect or the aorist form of '''Héses''', with the present participle of '''Héjes''' and the supine. The aorist form is usually used as a simple description of events: '''bhéwHsm̥ Hjónts Hdént''' "I was going to eat". The imperfect form, on the contrary, is usually used to introduce the context before another action, with the second action being placed in the aorist: '''Hésm̥ Hjónts Hdént, qomóḱs ís cémt''' "I was going to eat when he came".
SAvIE makes no distinction between the middle and the passive, preferring only to use a passive. This is formed with any conjugated form of '''Héses''' with the passive participle, such as '''bhéwHsm̥ Hdm̥Hnós''' "I was eaten".
|- class="c17"
Periphrastic tenses can also be made passive: '''Hésm̥ Hjónts Hsént Hdm̥Hnós, qomóḱs ís cémt '''"I was going to be eaten when he came".
The subjunctive of root thematic nonpast verbs simply lengthens the theme vowel, with '''-ō''' gaining '''-H'''; given the proto-form is ''*-ōh₂'', no change is expected, but '''-H''' is added to distinguish the subjunctive form from the indicative.
<span>These all belong to and are declined exactly as the basic ending </span><span class="c27">-r̥</span><span class="c12">, which is rare and unproductive. It produces very few basic neuter nouns.</span>
There is no imperfect subjunctive in SAvIE; the habitual subjunctive should be used instead.
<span class="c12"></span>
{| class="wikitable c11"
==== 5.4.3 Aorist subjunctive ====
|- class="c17"
| class="c44"| <span class="c12"></span>
| class="c44"| <span class="c15 c16">-r̥</span>
Since the aorist uses athematic secondary endings, the subjunctive changes these to thematic primary endings, and keeps a lengthened e-grade root with acrostatic stress.
<span>This ending is exceptional in having a collective number, which is grammatically plural. So, </span><span class="c27">tâ wédōr </span><span>means “the collective of all waters”, whereas </span><span class="c27">tâ wódr̥H</span><span> means “the (particular, definite, definable, countable) waters”.</span>
-----
==== 5.4.4 Habitual subjunctive ====
In the habitual subjunctive of dynamic verbs, the theme vowel is lengthened and used with primary endings, against a zero-grade root, with accent always falling on the endings as in the indicative.
<span id="h.g25ex65959t4"></span>
{| class="wikitable"
=== <span class="c63">4.5.6 -tus</span> ===
|-
!
!
!
|-
| Dynamic habitual verb
| Model
| Example
|-
| 1st person singular
| (∅)-ôH
| '''HdôH '''''(that) I used to eat''
|-
| 2nd person singular
| (∅)-êsi
| '''Hdêsi '''''(that) you used to eat''
|-
| 3rd person singular
| (∅)-êti
| '''Hdêti '''''(that) he/she/it used to eat''
|-
| 1st person plural
| (∅)-ômos
| '''Hdômos '''''(that) we used to eat''
|-
| 2nd person plural
| (∅)-ête
| '''Hdête '''''(that) you used to eat''
|-
| 3rd person plural
| (∅)-ônti
| '''Hdônti '''''(that) they used to eat''
|}
<span class="c12">This suffix produces masculine action nouns from verb roots.</span>
<span class="c12"></span>
{| class="wikitable c11"
|- class="c17"
| class="c44"| <span class="c12"></span>
| class="c44"| <span class="c15 c16">-tus</span>
|- class="c14"
The habitual subjunctive of stative verbs, by contrast, takes an e-grade root with acrostatic stress, and thematic primary endings, identical to root thematic verbs.
As is the case with active verbs, there is no form for the imperfect, and the habitual must be used to cover both tenses.
<span class="c27">-is</span><span> produces </span><span class="c20">common gender</span><span> nouns, that is, those which can be either masculine or feminine. It is not shown with an ablaut pattern because it can be used with multiple, including </span><span class="c27">(é)-is</span><span> or </span><span class="c27">(ó)-is</span><span>. It also has the neuter form </span><span class="c27">-i</span><span>. </span><span class="c27">-tis</span><span class="c12"> produces exclusively feminine action or abstract nouns.</span>
'''Héses''' "to be" is an irregular verb; it is suppletive in the aorist indicative and aorist and habitual subjunctive tense, where it takes from the stem '''bhū-''', from ''*bʰuH-''. It is important to note that the lengthened grade (seen in the aorist) is '''bhéwH-''', filling in an '''-e-''' by analogy, treating '''bhū-''' as the zero-grade and '''bhéwH-''' as the full-grade form.
<span id="h.pfkak8xwqg4q"></span>
=== <span class="c63">4.5.8 Agentive and resultative -os</span> ===
<span>Nouns with the pattern (o)-ós create masculine agent nouns denoting someone or something which performs a related action, such as </span><span class="c27">tomHós </span><span>"cutter, slicer", from the verb </span><span class="c27">tm̥nês</span><span> (← </span><span class="c20">tm̥-né-h₁-es</span><span>) "to slice, to section, to cut up". When the stress shifts on to the root vowel, this produces a related result noun, </span><span class="c27">tómHos </span><span>"a cut, a slice". Both of these noun patterns do not shift stress or ablaut within their own paradigm (giving </span><span class="c27">tomHósjo</span><span> "of a/the cutter" and </span><span class="c27">tómHosjo</span><span> "of a/the slice").</span>
This is the complete conjugation of '''Héses'''.
-----
<span id="h.a6amanyla0wf"></span>
=== <span class="c63">4.5.9 -snā</span> ===
<span>The ending </span><span class="c27">-snā</span><span> is attached usually to verb stems to indicate either a result noun or a noun indicating the a summary of a category, for example converting </span><span class="c27">tétḱes</span><span> "to create, produce" into </span><span class="c27">tétḱsnā</span><span class="c12"> "art, craft".</span>
In SAvIE, there exists a newly-developed gender-neutral form which encompasses a pronoun and large selection of adjectival endings corresponding with each of the adjectives above that has explicitly gendered forms, meaning that common-gender forms are not covered by this paradigm.
|- class="c14"
The basis of the gender-neutral paradigm is the sound /a/, spelt as ⟨a⟩.
<span class="c27">-sōr</span><span> is similar to </span><span class="c27">-trī</span><span class="c12"> in that it produces feminine gender agentive nouns.</span>
<span>The pattern </span><span class="c27">(o)-â</span><span> creates collective or mass nouns, or abstract or action nouns. This conjugates exactly as the thematic </span><span class="c20">ā</span><span>-type is expected to. This can also appear as </span><span class="c27">(∅)-â</span><span class="c12">, with the exact same meaning.</span>
<span>A slight extension of this is the pattern </span><span class="c27">(o)-nâ</span><span> also creating a deverbal abstract noun.</span>
Adjectives, consequently, all decline with '''a'''.
-----
<span id="h.g69ot0h3y8lj"></span>
{| class="wikitable"
=== <span class="c63">4.5.12 -iā</span> ===
|-
!
!
!
!
!
!
|-
|
| -onts → -éntas
| -us → -was
| -wénts → -wéntas
| -os → -oas → -ōs
| -s → -as
|-
| Nominative sg.
| (∅)-éntas
| (é)-was
| (∅)-wéntas
| -o-as '''→ '''-ōs
| (é)-as
|-
| Genitive sg.
| (∅)-n̥tás
| (∅)-éwas
| (∅)-wn̥tás
| -o-as-jo '''→ '''-ōsjo
| (∅)-ás
|-
| Nominative pl.
| (∅)-éntajes
| (é)-ewajes
| (∅)-wéntajes
| -o-ajes '''→ '''-ōjes
| (é)-ajes
|-
| Genitive pl.
| (∅)-n̥tájōm
| (∅)-éwajōm
| (∅)-wn̥tájōm
| -o-ajōm '''→ '''-ōjōm
| (∅)-ájōm
|}
<span>This is a variation of the feminine ending -ā augmented with -i-, used to create feminine abstract nouns.</span>
<span id="h.yt759dav5697"></span>
=== <span class="c63">4.5.A Combination of suffixes</span> ===
<span>Evidence suggests that some of the above suffixes were combined for various purposes. One example is 4.5.7 with 4.5.4: where </span><span class="c27">-tis</span><span> could be combined with </span><span class="c27">-Hō</span><span> to give </span><span class="c27">-tīō</span><span>, giving Latin </span><span class="c20">-tiō</span><span> and Proto-Celtic </span><span class="c20">-tiyū</span><span>; </span><span class="c27">-tīō </span><span>for example can be used to produce nouns of action or result.</span>
An example of this is '''éǵ wéjdō qid jás Hésti Hwéswas''' "I know that they (sg.) are good".
-----
== 7 Pro-forms ==
<span id="h.uflljs82he9x"></span>
SAvIE pro-forms include pronouns and demonstratives, and question forms known as ''wh-words''. They are outlined in the table below.
== <span class="c41 c16">4.6 Adjectives</span> ==
<span>Adjectives decline in all three genders, two numbers, and six cases. Their deeclensions follow many of the same patterns that nouns do. In particular, they follow athematic (</span><span class="c27">méǵHs ~ m̥ǵHés</span><span>, </span><span class="c27">méǵHī ~ méǵHīs</span><span>, </span><span class="c27">méǵH ~ méǵH</span><span> "great, large") or thematic (</span><span class="c27">néwos ~ néwes</span><span>, </span><span class="c27">néwā ~ néwās</span><span>,</span><span class="c27"> néwom ~ néwā</span><span class="c12"> "new") paradigms using a mixture of the basic masculine-, feminine- and neuter-gender endings given above.</span>
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
|-
|
| interr.
<span class="c12">Other adjectival formations are as follows.</span>
<span class="c12">The Caland system defines reproducible adjectival paradigms and their root forms for creating basic adjectives. Two common endings are -onts and -us, which ablaut as follows.</span>
<span>Although displaying somewhat idiosyncratic ablaut, these declensions are identical to the athematic endings given in </span><span class="c27">4.5</span><span>.</span>
<span>A </span><span class="c20">bahuvrihi</span><span> is a compound word formation indicating possession of a certain quality, or execution of a certain action. These can either be adjectives or nouns in all genders. Its underlying form is </span><span class="c20">*-es-s</span><span class="c12">, due to which it also follows the athematic pattern.</span>
sl̥Hwóm ~
<span>The gendered forms are combined, giving a </span><span class="c20">common-gender</span><span class="c12"> form.</span>
=== <span class="c63">4.6.3 Pertinence to a quality: -wénts</span> ===
| human
| qís?
<span>-wénts creates adjectives which indicate possession of a certain noun as a quality, or pertinence to that noun as a salient description, like </span><span class="c27">Hn̥twént</span><span class="c12"> "limited".</span>
=== <span class="c63">4.6.4 Characteristic or typical of: -ískos, -ānos</span> ===
| qíterosqe
<span class="c12">These suffixes are cognate with the English -ish and -(i)an, and fulfil the same function: they create adjectives meaning something that is characteristic or typical of a certain noun. </span>
~ qó-
<span class="c12"></span>
etc.
{| class="wikitable c11"
| Hm̥bhô
|- class="c14"
| class="c81"| <span class="c32"></span>
| class="c81"| <span class="c9">Masc. sg.</span>
Hm̥bhâH
| class="c81"| <span class="c9">Neut. sg.</span>
Hm̥bhój<sup><ref>These forms are indeclinable.</ref></sup>
<span class="c27">-ānós</span><span> conjugates as </span><span class="c27">-nós</span><span> does, in </span><span class="c27">4.6.7</span><span>.</span>
tâonts
| ← ⸻
| ← ⸻
| qótjosqe
-----
qîontsqe
<span id="h.lkjbvuluvxy5"></span>
| ⸻
=== <span class="c63">4.6.5 Possession of a thing or quality, or having undergone an action: -ātos</span> ===
| ⸻
| ⸻
|
|-
| number
| qóti?
| tóti
| ← ⸻
| ← ⸻
| qótiqe
| ⸻
| ⸻
| ⸻
|
|-
| manner
<span class="c12">The stress pattern is more similar to regular nouns, with the zero or unstressed full grade throughout.</span>
(instr.)
<span class="c12"></span>
| qéj?
| tónō
| ⸻ →
| Hl̥nô
| qéjqe
| ⸻
| ⸻
| ⸻
|
|-
| reason
{| class="wikitable c11"
(abl.)
|- class="c14"
| class="c81"| <span class="c32"></span>
| class="c81"| <span class="c9">Masc. sg.</span>
| qô?
| tósmōd
| ⸻ →
| Hl̥nôd
| qôqe
| ⸻
| ⸻
| ⸻
|
|}
| class="c81"| <span class="c9">Neut. sg.</span>
| class="c81"| <span class="c9">Fem. sg.</span>
| class="c81"| <span class="c9">Masc. pl.</span>
These forms will be explained below.
| class="c81"| <span class="c9">Neut. pl.</span>
| class="c81"| <span class="c9">Fem. pl.</span>
=== 7.1 Determiner and pronoun ===
|- class="c14"
There are differences between determiner forms and pronoun forms. Determiner forms are bound morphemes, and can only be used in conjunction with a nominal. So, '''qós?''' cannot be used independently, but must always be used as '''qós ǵhmô?''' "which person?".
In addition, the dual forms '''qóteros?'''''''' '''''and '''qíteros?''' also display this distinction: '''qóteros ǵhmô cémt?''' "which of the two people came?" as opposed to '''qíteros cémt?''' "which (of the two) came?".
As mentioned in '''2.2''', there is absolute syncretism between the interrogative (question) forms, and relative forms, so the same word will be used for '''qís cémt?''' "who came?" as in '''só ǵhmô qis cémt '''"the person who came". The difference between the words, as seen in the examples, is that the interrogative forms must be stressed, but the relative forms do not need to be.
There are three levels of deixis in SAvIE. If one imagines two people speaking to each other, deixis works like this: the ''proximal'' indicates something which is closest to the speaker, the ''medial'' indicates something close to the listener, and the ''distal'' far from both.
There is a small difference between these forms. Since ''source'' and ''goal'' are fairly self explanatory (indicating respectively where something comes from and what something goes to), location indicates where something exists statically, and lacks any implication of movement. As such, it tends to be used with '''Héses''' often: '''kúr Hésti ís?''' "where is he?", whereas the source/goal forms tend to be used often with verbs of motion: '''qôdhe cémt ís? '''"where did he come from?", and '''qómde Hêjst ís?''' "where did he go to?".
|}
However, colloquially, the location form can be used for both of these: '''kúr cémt ís?''' and '''kúr Hêjst ís?''', especially when the context is clear.
<span class="c12"></span>
<span>Any zero-grade adjective extended with </span><span class="c27">-ā-</span><span> or </span><span class="c27">-ī- </span><span class="c12">are declined identically.</span>
<span id="h.gphom0lkqp9c"></span>
=== <span class="c63">4.6.6 Material or consistency: -īnós</span> ===
<span class="c12">-īnos creates adjectives generally related to a material of which something is made. Stress falls on the suffix at all times, but the root does not need to be zero-grade.</span>
== 8 Numerals ==
<span class="c12"></span>
There are two major classes of numerals, the cardinal and the ordinal. Cardinal numerals indicate plain numbers, and ordinal numerals indicate the order of a number in a series.
{| class="wikitable c11"
|- class="c14"
| class="c81"| <span class="c32"></span>
| class="c81"| <span class="c9">Masc. sg.</span>
| class="c81"| <span class="c9">Neut. sg.</span>
| class="c81"| <span class="c9">Fem. sg.</span>
=== 8.1 "one" ===
| class="c81"| <span class="c9">Masc. pl.</span>
The number 1 conjugates as a regular adjective. Its base form is '''Hójnos''', which is related to the indefinite article '''Hójwos''', with a suppletive ordinal form '''pr̥Hwós'''.
The number 2 does not decline for case, its form is '''dwô''', '''dwâH''', '''dwój(H)''' in cardinal form. Its ordinal form is either '''Hánteros''', '''Hánterā''', '''Hánterom''' (noting the contrastive ending), or '''séqonts''', '''séqontī''', '''séqont''' (from a participial form of the verb '''séqeti''' "to follow"). It also has the special prefix form '''dwi-'''.
Beginning with''' tréjes''' "three", the ordinal numbers become more regularised. Despite being slightly irregular, these forms do in fact decline as though their nominative singular ended in '''-s''', with the oblique stem '''trí-''' or '''tr̥j-'''. The feminine stem, exceptionally, is '''tisr-''', and also declines as a noun in '''-s'''. It also has the special prefix form '''tri-'''.
Similarly to "three", the number 4 has a feminine stem '''qétesr- '''(oblique '''qetesr-''') and a stem for all other genders '''qetwór-''' (oblique '''qetur-''' and '''qetwr̥-''').
<span class="c12">These essentially function as adjectives. They use several special forms of the adjective endings listed above in limited functions.</span>
<span>The present participle uses the form </span><span class="c27">(é)-onts ~ (∅)-n̥tés</span><span> in thematic verbs, as does the </span><span class="c27">-onts</span><span> form in the Caland system above, and </span><span class="c27">(∅)-ónts ~ (∅)-n̥tés</span><span> in athematic verbs. It is directly equivalent to the English "-ing". It is used with </span><span class="c27">Héses</span><span> in any tense to indicate continuous tenses, such as </span><span class="c27">Hésmi Hdónts </span><span class="c12">"I am eating".</span>
<span id="h.gln7jdw6n0ou"></span>
==== <span class="c77">4.6.10.2 Past participle</span> ====
<span>The past participle uses the form </span><span class="c27">(∅)-tós ~ (∅)-tósjo</span><span>. As a verbal adjective it essentially means "X-ed". Although it can be used as an independent adjective, it is perhaps most commonly used in its neuter form with </span><span class="c27">kápes</span><span> "to have, get" in the perfect-tense construction, such as </span><span class="c27">kápmi Hdtóm </span><span class="c12">"I have eaten".</span>
<span>Unlike </span><span class="c27">-tós</span><span>, which is active in meaning, the passive participle indicates something which "has been X-ed". Its form is </span><span class="c27">(é)-om(H)nos ~ (∅)-óm(H)nosjo</span><span> in thematic verbs, an </span><span class="c27">(∅)-m̥(H)nós ~ (∅)-m̥(H)nósjo</span><span> in athematic verbs. It is also used with </span><span class="c27">Héses</span><span> to construct passive verb forms, such as </span><span class="c27">Hésmi Hdm̥Hnós</span><span class="c12"> "I am eaten, I have been eaten".</span>
<span id="h.clo55dyd91vu"></span>
==== <span class="c77">4.6.10.4 Stative-type past participle</span> ====
<span>This participle is a special type with optional initial reduplication: masculine </span><span class="c27">(é)-(∅)-wōs ~ (é)-(∅)-usos</span><span>, feminine </span><span class="c27">(é)-(∅)-usī ~ (e)-(∅)-usjâs</span><span>, neuter </span><span class="c27">(é)-(∅)-wos ~ (é)-(∅)-usos</span><span>.</span>
=== 8.5 11 to 19 ===
<span id="h.xayuwfusyyym"></span>
These numbers do not seem to have reconstructible proto-language forms. As such, I am assigning them values with internal morphology: the number '''déḱm̥''', followed by the augment particle '''Hé''', and a number between 1 and 9, such as '''déḱm̥ He Hójnos''' "eleven", to '''déḱm̥ He Hnéwn̥''' "nineteen". Alternatively, the numbers can be prefixed unstressed to '''déḱm̥''' as below.
<span>Although Ancient Greek and Sanskrit had a perfect participle, such a formation would be against the spirit of SAE, which specifies a perfect-tense formation using the "have" verb. As such, there is no dedicated perfect participle; rather, a perfect participial formation involves the present participle of </span><span class="c27">kápes</span><span> and a past participle of another verb, such as </span><span class="c27">kapónts wl̥tóm</span><span> "having seen".</span>
In counting without referring to any specific object, the neuter forms of the numbers 1-4 should be used. When the numbers are used attributively, they should match the gender and number of the following numeral.
<span class="c12">Adjectives can be further declined in two degrees: the comparative and the superlative. The comparative produces adjectives meaning "more X", while the superlative produces "the most X".</span>
<span>The comparative adjective degree can be expressed either with the contrastive </span><span class="c27">-teros</span><span> or elative </span><span class="c27">-yōs</span><span> ending. The comparative element translating to "than" is expressed with </span><span class="c27">Hánti</span><span> "against", and the noun being compared against is placed in the dative, for example </span><span class="c27">ís Hésti Hl̥tóteros ~ Hl̥tójōs Hánti méǵhjo</span><span class="c12"> "he is taller than me".</span>
<span>The superlative degree expresses "the most X". As such, it is always used with the article </span><span class="c27">só</span><span class="c12">.</span>
dwidéḱm̥
<span>For ease, I have opted to reduce the potential superlative adjective endings to two, discounting those reconstructions with a laryngeal. The adjective is formed in one of two ways: </span><span class="c27">(∅)-otm̥mós</span><span> or </span><span class="c27">(∅)-istós</span><span class="c12">. The former is used for thematic adjectives, whereas the latter is used for athematic adjectives.</span>
The numbers 100 and 1,000 are '''ḱm̥tóm''' and '''(sm̥)ǵhéslom''' '''~''' '''tûsonts'''. '''ḱm̥tóm''' and '''(sm̥)ǵhéslom''' are invariable, whereas '''tûsonts''' declines as a regular '''-onts''' noun or adjective. Their ordinal forms are '''ḱm̥tontós '''"hundredth" and '''(sm̥)ǵheslontós''' '''~''' '''tūsontós '''"thousandth".
|- class="c17"
A derivative of '''(sm̥)ǵhéslom''', combined with the augmentative suffix, giving '''(sm̥)ǵhéslHonom '''(from ''*(sm̥)ǵhéslHonom'') is used to mean "million" with the ordinal form '''(sm̥)ǵheslHontós'''; further derivation gives '''disǵhéslHonom '''(ordinal form '''disǵheslHontós'''), meaning "billion" and '''trisǵhéslHonom''' (ordinal form '''trisǵheslHontós''') for "trillion". Prefix forms can be used even further, giving simple prefixes up to '''deḱm̥ǵhéslHonom''' "decillion", and much greater numbers up to '''Hnéwn̥dḱomtHnéwn̥ǵhéslHonom''' for "novemnonagintillion".
The connector '''He''' should only be used between tens and units of each group of three numbers. So, the number '''987,654,321''' would be represented as '''Hnéwn̥ ḱm̥tóm Hoḱtodḱómt ''''''''He'''''''' septḿ̥ ǵhéslHonā, swéḱs ḱm̥tóm penqedḱómt ''''''''He'''''''' qetwôr túsontH, trî ḱm̥tóm (d)wídḱm̥ti ''''''''He'''''''' Hójnom'''.
Each number can be given a special multiplicative form, producing an adjective meaning "X times". Multiplicatives are formed by affixing the special prefix of the numbers 1-10 to the word '''-pléḱs '''"-fold".
|}
For example, 1-4 produce the forms '''sm̥pléḱs''' "single, onefold", '''dwipléḱs''' "double, twofold", '''tripléḱs '''"triple, threefold", and '''qetwr̥pléḱs''' "quadruple, fourfold".
<span class="c12"></span>
<span>Although this table describes each form as using a zero-grade root because the stress shifts to the ending, the root can also be made e-grade in all cases.</span>
=== 8.10 Exceptional "times" forms ===
The numbers 2 and 3 have the special forms '''dís''' and '''trís''', meaning "twice" and "thrice" respectively.
<span>The superlative can be augmented further, in order to create the absolute superlative, which holds even more force than the superlative. It is a combination of both superlative adjective forms, giving </span><span class="c27">(∅)-istm̥mós</span><span>. It declines exactly as </span><span class="c27">-otm̥mós</span><span class="c12"> does.</span>
A collective numeral is one which specifies "a group of X". The first form is '''dwôdwō''', meaning "pair". The rest are formed by suffixing '''-ō''' to the prefix form of a number, with an intervening '''-l-''' (as if from '''-lós''') to prevent hiatus. The stress falls on the prefix in the nominative-vocative-accusative, and the ending in the oblique, as expected for '''-ō'''. This gives '''tríō''' "trio, threesome", '''qetwŕ̥ō''' "quartet, foursome", '''qénqelō''' "quintet, fivesome", '''swéḱsō''' "sextet", '''septḿ̥ō''' "septet", '''(H)oḱtólō''' "octet", '''Hnéwnō''' "nonet", and '''déḱmō''' "dectet". Using prefixed numbers makes forms such as '''dwidéḱmō''' "dozen". The larger numbers give '''ḱm̥tolō''' "group of a hundred", '''(sm̥)ǵhéslō ~ tûsontō''' "group of a thousand", and '''(sm̥)ǵhéslōnō''' "group of a million" with derivatives thereof.
<span class="c12"></span>
{| class="wikitable c11"
=== 8.12 Case agreement ===
|- class="c14"
| class="c84"| <span class="c32"></span>
| class="c84"| <span class="c9">Masc. sg.</span>
The numbers 1,3, and 4, given that they decline, are used attributively as though they were adjectives, meaning the noun which they count can be in any case, and the case of the number and noun must agree: '''Hójnos wīrós''' "one man", '''tr̥jôm wīrôm''' "of three men", '''qetwr̥mós wīrómos''' "(for/to) four men". Since other numbers do not decline, only the noun which they modify declines according to the function of the main noun: '''éǵ wélō pénqe wīróms '''"I see five men".
| class="c126"| <span class="c9">Neut. sg.</span>
| class="c83"| <span class="c9">Fem. sg.</span>
== 9 Prepositions ==
| class="c84"| <span class="c9">Masc. pl.</span>
Prepositions in SAvIE always precede the nominal which they modify; they will always be placed before nouns and adjectives. They govern only one of two cases: the locative for prepositions which imply location at, near, or in relation to something, and the accusative for motion to or from, and everything else. So, prepositions such as '''Hén''' "in" can be used with different cases to modify their meaning, as in '''Hén dém''' "in a house" and '''Hén dôm''' "into a house".
| class="c84"| <span class="c9">Neut. pl.</span>
Positional adverbs, such as '''déḱs '''"(on the) right", can also be used, requiring the genitive: '''déḱs tosjo déms''' "to/on the right of the house".
| class="c137"| <span class="c9">Fem. pl.</span>
Below is a list of prepositions and positional adverbs and their meanings with the cases they govern.
<span class="c12">SAvIE verbs are complex, but with fewer irregularities than Proto-Indo-European's daughter languages. SAvIE in particular takes the feature of the "have"-perfect tense and expands the concept to include multiple periphrastic tenses and verb forms, including all continuous tenses, and all passive forms.</span>
|-
| Hn̥dó
| into
| ~ swéd
| without
|-
| Hn̥dóm
| inside of, within
| tr̥Hás
| across, along, through
|-
| Hn̥dhér
| beneath, underneath
| úd
| upwards
<span>SAvIE verbs are divided into two kinds: </span><span class="c20">conjugated</span><span> and </span><span class="c20">periphrastic</span><span>. Conjugated forms are ones to which a suffix is attached to form a directly usable tense. Periphrastic forms involve a conjugated form of one of a limited selection of verbs, along with a </span><span class="c20">particle</span><span class="c12">. Particles themselves are one of four non-finite forms which indicate tense and aspect.</span>
above
<span id="h.k7owlq7ru627"></span>
+ ''Hád ''going up to
== <span class="c41 c16">5.1 Non-finite forms, and infinitive</span> ==
<span>It should not be necessary to revise non-finite forms, as they are all described in </span><span class="c27">4.6.8</span><span>. Two forms not described there are the </span><span class="c20">infinitive</span><span>, which is used simply to name the verb, the </span><span class="c20">supine</span><span>, used only in special verb constructions, and the </span><span class="c20">purportative</span><span class="c12">, used with verbs of wanting, owing, or intending.</span>
|-
| Hn̥dhí
| under
<span>The infinitive takes the form </span><span class="c27">(é)-es</span><span>, and is a shortened locative form of the purportative </span><span class="c27">(é)-os</span><span> and </span><span class="c27">(é)-esos</span><span class="c12">, which creates result or action nouns. This makes it cognate with the Ancient Greek (-ειν) and Latin (-ere) infinitives.</span>
to the bottom of
<span>For deponents, the infinitive is formed with </span><span class="c27">(∅)-és</span><span>, and the purportatives </span><span class="c27">(é)-osm̥</span><span> and </span><span class="c27">(∅)-sés</span><span class="c12">.</span>
| upér(i)
| above, over
|-
| Hád
| at
<span>The supine takes the form </span><span class="c27">(∅)-ént</span><span>, also a locative form, of the present participle </span><span class="c27">-onts</span><span>. For deponents, it is </span><span class="c27">(∅)-tój</span><span>. It is used in combination with verbs of motion in order to indicate purpose, such as </span><span class="c27">ís cémt Had wl̥ént mé</span><span class="c12"> "he came to see me".</span>
<span>Verbs each conjugate in multiple tenses, each of which has three persons (1st, 2nd, and 3rd), two numbers (singular and plural) and two moods (indicative and optative). In total there are four tenses: the </span><span class="c20">nonpast</span><span> (which encompasses the present and, optionally, future), the </span><span class="c20">imperfect</span><span> (semantically identical to the past continuous, but used especially in certain constructions), the </span><span class="c20">aorist</span><span> (or </span><span class="c20">preterite</span><span>, or </span><span class="c20">simple past</span><span>), and the </span><span class="c20">habitual</span><span class="c12"> (which is technically tenseless).</span>
against
<span>All conjugated forms use one of two sets of endings, called the </span><span class="c20">primary</span><span> and </span><span class="c20">secondary</span><span>. Primary endings indicate the nonpast tense, and secondary endings most others. Each set of endings can be either </span><span class="c20">thematic</span><span> or </span><span class="c20">athematic</span><span>.</span>
Ordinarily, questions in SAvIE need not be marked either at the start or the end of the sentence. As per '''3.1''', questions are indicated by inverting the subject and verb: '''ís cémt''' "he came" becomes '''cémt is?''' "did he come?". When using pro-forms, these start the sentence: '''qís Hésti ís?''' "who is he?".
However, the word '''Hár ~ Hr̥''', meaning "so" or "thus" in positive sentences, can be used to introduce a sentence: '''Hár qís Hésti ís?''' "so who is he?".
|- class="c148"
In addition, the phrase '''né Hésti…?''' "isn't it…?" can be used with the regular statement to form a yes/no question in one of two ways: firstly, it can be used to introduce a subordinate clause, as in '''né Hésti, qid ís cémt?''' "isn't it [the case] that he came?"; the second is that it can be used as a tag question at the end of a sentence, as in '''ís cémt, né Hésti?''' "he came, isn't it?".
| class="c92"| <span class="c15 c16">1st person singular</span>
| class="c92 c50"| <span class="c12">-ō</span>
The simple responses to yes/no questions is '''nójnom''', '''né tód''', or '''Hóju qíd''' "no", and the positive is '''já ~ sejḱe ~ tód ~ dô'''. There is no fundamental difference between any of these words; they have different origins and can be used depending on the speaker's preference for their source. For example, '''nójnom''' is a shortening of '''né (H)ójnom''', from Latin ''nōn'', whereas '''Hóju qíd '''is the form of Greek ''οὐ(κ) ~ οὐ(χ)'' and Armenian ''ոչ''; meanwhile, '''já''' is ubiquitous in Germanic, '''séjḱe''' also from Latin ''sīc, '''''(né) tód''''' ''as seen in Celtic languages, such as Welsh ''do ~ naddo'', or '''dô''' as in Slavic ''да''.
| class="c92 c50"| <span class="c12">-mi</span>
In addition to the simple answers, SAvIE can produce yes/no answers to polar questions by repeating the verb either in a positive or negative polarity. If the question were '''cémt ís?''' "did he come?", a positive response would be '''cémt''' "he came (yes)", and a negative response would be '''né(ghe) cémt''' "he didn't come (no)". Note that the negative particle here can either be '''né''' or '''néghe'''; the '''-ghe''' suffix intensifies the previous particle.
| class="c92 c50"| <span class="c12">-om</span>
| class="c92 c50"| <span class="c12">-m̥</span>
=== 10.2 Subordinate clauses ===
|- class="c14"
These can be introduced in one of two ways.
| class="c92"| <span class="c15 c16">2nd person singular</span>
| class="c92 c50"| <span class="c12">-esi</span>
The first is introducing an entirely independent subordinate clause with the word '''qid''', such as in '''éǵ wéjdō, qid ís cémt''' "I know that he came".
| class="c92 c50"| <span class="c12">-si</span>
Clauses that are more semantically linked to the antecedent use interrogative-relative pronouns: '''só wīrós, qésjo cên cémt… '''"the man, whose wife came…", literally "the man, of whom [the] wife came…".
| class="c92 c50"| <span class="c12">-es</span>
| class="c92 c50"| <span class="c12">-s</span>
=== 10.3 Hypothetical sentences ===
|- class="c14"
Hypothetical sentences are introduced by '''sô ~ séj '''"if", which is an innovated and fossilized thematicisation of '''só''' in the instrumental and locative cases, respectively, meaning "with this" or "in this". This is modelled on the etymology of the Latin ''sī''. '''mā''' can be used as in Celtic, '''jéj''' as in Baltic, or '''qéj''' as in some Slavic. None of these words differs in meaning.
| class="c92"| <span class="c15 c16">3rd person singular</span>
| class="c92 c50"| <span class="c12">-eti</span>
The consequence can be introduced without any particle, but can also optionally be introduced with the particle '''tómḱe''' "then, in that case", or '''tóqe''' "then".
| class="c92 c50"| <span class="c12">-ti</span>
| class="c92 c50"| <span class="c12">-et</span>
==== 10.3.1 Conditionals ====
| class="c92 c50"| <span class="c12">-t</span>
The verb '''skéles '''"to owe" should be used in the deponent aorist subjunctive to form a periphrastic conditional tense with the purportative, thus giving '''séj ís cémt, éǵ skêlsōr kápos wl̥Htóm welos ím''' "If he came, I would have wanted to see him". When there are two verbs that require the purportative in a row, one is in the accusative '''(é)-os''' form, and the second is in the genitive '''(é)-esos '''form: '''séj ís cémti, éǵ skêlsōr wélHos wélesos ím '''"If he comes, I would want to see him". Literally this means something like "...that I owe wanting of seeing".
|- class="c14"
| class="c92"| <span class="c15 c16">1st person plural</span>
| class="c92 c46"| <span class="c12">-omos</span>
=== 10.4 Negation of nominals ===
| class="c92 c46"| <span class="c12">-mós</span>
Nominals must be negated by the particle '''néghe''' "not"; this can be attached directly to nominals, such as '''néghe méǵHs''' "not great", or '''néghe wīrós''' "not a man". Determiners can also precede the nominal: '''néghe só wīrós''' "not the/this man".
| class="c92 c46"| <span class="c12">-ome</span>
| class="c92 c46"| <span class="c12">-mé</span>
=== 10.5 Either/or ===
|- class="c14"
"Either" and "or" are both expressed by the word '''Háwti''': '''Háwti cm̥dhí ḱóm mé, Háwti méne '''"either come with me, or stay".
| class="c92"| <span class="c15 c16">2nd person plural</span>
| class="c92 c46"| <span class="c12">-ete</span>
| class="c92 c46"| <span class="c12">-té</span>
=== 10.6 Prohibition ===
| class="c92 c46"| <span class="c12">-ete</span>
In conjunction with the imperative verb form, the particle '''mê''' "do not…!" (from ''*meh₁'' as seen in Greek ''μή'') is used to express prohibition: '''Hidhí!''' "go!" becomes '''mê Hidhí!''' "do not go!"
| class="c92 c46"| <span class="c12">-té</span>
|- class="c14"
=== 10.7 Conjunctions ===
| class="c92"| <span class="c15 c16">3rd person plural</span>
| class="c92 c46"| <span class="c12">-onti</span>
| class="c92 c46"| <span class="c12">-énti</span>
==== 10.7.1 Addition ====
| class="c92 c46"| <span class="c12">-ont</span>
Following the presence of ''A and B'' constructions in SAE, this is the preferred structure for the ''and'' construction. Rather than using the Proto-Indo-European ''*-kʷe'' suffix, alternative strategies are preferred. These are '''Hé''' (the augment ''*h₁é''), '''ḱḿ̥ti '''(modelled on the Greek ''καί''), '''Héti''' (modelled on the Latin ''et''), '''Hánti''' (synonymous with the preposition, modelled on Proto-Germanic ''*andi''), '''Héj''' (modelled on Proto-Slavic ''*i''), or '''Hṓd '''(modelled on Proto-Balto-Slavic ''*ō'', based on a hypothetical ablative PIE form ''*h₁ōd'').
| class="c92 c46"| <span class="c12">-ént</span>
"Also" can be expressed with '''qōdqe''', a fossilised ablative of a thematicisation of '''qís''', meaning approximately "and from which", or '''Háwghe''' (modelled on Proto-Germanic ''*auk'').
|}
<span class="c12"></span>
==== 10.7.2 Consequence ====
<span class="c12">Whether a verb is thematic or not is unpredictable, and must be learnt on a case-by-case basis.</span>
Consequence in the form of "then" or "so" is expressed with '''tôd''', yet another fossilised ablative of a thematicised '''só ~ sâ ~ tód''', such as '''éǵ cêm, tôd ís léjqt '''"I came, then he left".
<span id="h.dd8hl0z6ldf8"></span>
=== <span class="c63">5.2.1 Nonpast</span> ===
<span>The nonpast combines both the present and future tenses. The simple future has an additional periphrastic tense, but the simple present does not. It is indicated by the primary endings.</span>
==== 10.7.3 Purpose, intent ====
An intended consequence, expressing "so that" or "in order to", is expressed with a similar form to the above, '''téj''', a thematicised dative meaning "to this", and a subordinate clause introduced by '''qid''' with the verb in the subjunctive, such as '''éǵ qrêjHsm̥ tód, téj qid tû Hédesi íd '''"I bought this so you could eat it".
-----
<span>The first model is of </span><span class="c27">bhéres</span><span class="c12"> "to bear, carry". It is a root thematic verb.</span>
==== 10.7.4 Alternatives ====
<span class="c12"></span>
The basic words "or" and "nor" are expressed by '''íwe ~ íwē''' or '''éjwe ~ éjwē''' (based on ''*i-'' and ''*ey-'' as pronominal bases) in the positive polarity ('''éǵ íwe tû''' "I or you") and '''néwe''' in the negative ('''néghe éǵ néwe tû''' "not I nor you, not me and not you").
{| class="wikitable c11"
'''-we ~ -wē''' can also be suffixed to any words meaning "if" to produce "but if" or "if, on the other hand": '''séjwe né cémti ís, qíd tôd?''' "but if he doesn't come, what then?".
The word "but" can be expressed either as '''íde ~ éjde''' (using the Proto-Indo-European ''*de'' contrastive particle) or '''Heǵhstós''' (modelled on the Greek ''εχτός'' and Proto-Celtic ''*extos'') at the beginning of a phrase, and the postclitic '''de''' otherwise to indicate a break in a sentence. Since it breaks a sentence apart, the part of the sentence ending '''de''' is considered disjunct, and can refer either to a subject or an object. The case of the preceding nominal can match its function in the following sentence.
| class="c34"| <span class="c12">1st person singular</span>
| class="c34 c50"| <span class="c12">(é)-ō</span>
So, in '''só Háljos/tóm Háljom de, né wêlsm̥ éǵ ím''' "the other one, however, I didn't see it", note the presence of both '''Háljos''' and '''Háljom''', both of which are treated slightly differently. In the nominative, the phrase ending '''de''' is treated more as a topic and the antecedent as a comment; in the accusative, it is treated as a disjunct object rather than a topic, and matches its expected function in the antecedent.
Several strategies can be employed to introduce formality to SAvIE. The majority of these should be limited to forms of address, but some others exist.
| class="c34"| <span class="c12">3rd person singular</span>
Although many modern Indo-European languages employ a T-V distinction, it is best avoided in SAvIE. However, usage thereof should not be considered entirely incorrect. If a speaker chooses to use a T-V distinction, the expected follows: the 2nd person plural forms take the place of the singular forms in polite speech. So, one person is referred to politely as '''jû''' rather than '''tû''', and verbs and adjectives are inflected in the plural rather than the singular. This turns the informal '''tû Hési méǵHs''' “you are tall” into '''jû Hsté méǵHas'''.
| class="c34"| <span class="c12">1st person plural</span>
Rather than using the second-person plural for a more classically Indo-European T-V distinction, the third person can be used as it is employed in various modern languages. This category includes some formations innovated by SAvIE.
|- class="c18"
| class="c34"| <span class="c12">3rd person plural</span>
This follows the pattern of the Spanish ''usted'', which is derived from ''vuestra merced'' “your mercy”. As the etymology of ''merced'' is so opaque, it has been discarded entirely. Instead, many synonymous constructions can be built from '''cérHtis''' “praise, grace”, whose root '''cérH-''' gives the Latin ''grātia''.
|}
This can optionally be supplemented with a second-person possessive adjective '''tós''' (or any of its variants, if avoiding T-V) or '''usós '''(if using T-V), giving '''tâ cérHtis''' or '''usâ cérHtis'''. The resulting phrase then inflects in its entirety. This is then used with a third-person verb.
<span class="c12"></span>
<span>This model is </span><span class="c27">Hédes</span><span class="c12"> "to eat". It is a root athematic verb.</span>
The pronoun '''ḱénos / -ā / -as''', declined according to both case and number depending on the number of referents, can be used with the corresponding verbal number of the third person in polite speech. In addition to the above established pronoun, the neologism '''(H)irós / -â / -ás''', an adjectival form modelled on the third-person pronouns '''ís / î / jás''' can be used as a polite second-person pronoun. This also declines as expected, giving '''(H)irôs / -âs / -ájes''' for multiple referents.
| class="c34"| <span class="c12">1st person singular</span>
People can be referred to with titles attached to their names, in addition to the formal verb constructions given above. The title ''Mister'' and its cognates can be given as '''méǵHisteros / -ā / -as''', while common Romance terms ''señor, signore, monsieur'' are given as '''sénjōs / sn̥jésī / -josas'''.
| class="c34"| <span class="c12">2nd person singular</span>
Due to a close proximity to the meanings of their individual stems, the former should be reserved for distinguished persons with some form of appointed title, and the latter for older people. A much more neutral but familiar term would be '''soqHjós / -â / -ás''', cognate with Latin ''socius''. A less familiar form would be '''Hwésus / Huséwī / Huséwy'''.
The default writing system in this document has been the Latin script, but this need not necessarily be the case. In '''Appendix D''' there is a full alphabet shown with the Latin, Greek, Cyrillic, Armenian, and Devanagari scripts, all of which can be used effectively to write SAvIE. For ease and universality, the Latin alphabet may be preferred, but this Appendix allows for a wider range of writing.
| class="c34"| <span class="c12">2nd person plural</span>
SAvIE should be written entirely unicase. This means that there should be no distinction made between lowercase and uppercase letters. Although the letters ⟨h⟩ and ⟨H⟩ both exist in the Latin alphabet, it should be noted that these are two different letters with two different functions, not merely variants of one another. Common usages of capital letters in some languages, such as indicating proper nouns, are not treated specially in SAvIE, and should all be written lowercase.
| class="c34"| <span class="c12">3rd person plural</span>
This being said, this might be a difficult habit to break for some users. The practice should be avoided as per the standards of this document, but should not be seen as incorrect otherwise.
=== 11.3 Clause- and sentence-final punctuation ===
<span class="c12"></span>
In all alphabets, natively-used punctuation should be employed. Where applicable, the comma ⟨,⟩ and period ⟨.⟩ should be used to indicate a break in and termination of a sentence, respectively. The relevant question and exclamation marks should also serve their respective purposes.
<span>Since they can be used as a future tense too, a nonpast form </span><span class="c27">bhérō</span><span> can mean both "I bear" and "I will bear", though for clarity the latter can be expressed with the periphrastic future tense, described later.</span>
=== 11.4 Quotation ===
-----
For block quotation, such as lines of dialogue, an em-dash ⟨—⟩ should be used for each line of dialogue, followed either by a double space, or a tab stop.
<span id="h.r64r7fhv60sx"></span>
For inline quotation, a double guillemet ⟨« »⟩ should wrapped around a quotation, and a nested quotation within that should be marked with a single guillemet ⟨‹ ›⟩.
=== <span class="c63">5.2.2 Imperfect</span> ===
<span class="c12">The imperfect is indicated by the usage of secondary endings in place of primary ones. It signals a past continuous tense.</span>
This usage can be mirrored with quotation marks, directional or otherwise. Double quotation marks ⟨" "⟩ ⟨“ ”⟩ enclose the main quotation, with single marks ⟨' '⟩ ⟨‘ ’⟩ enclosing a nested quotation.
<span class="c12"></span>
In addition, lowered quotation marks can be used as in German and Slavic languages, either both low ⟨„ „⟩, or high and low ⟨„ ”⟩, with single marks ⟨‚ ‚⟩ and ⟨‚ ’⟩ for nested quotes. It is strongly preferred that the direction of punctuation marks conform to the above examples, but inverting one or both (such as ⟨» «⟩ or ⟨„ “⟩) should not be considered incorrect.
Any piece of text above a sentence can be broken up with special typographical conventions.
| class="c64"| <span class="c27">bhérom </span><span class="c24 c20">I was bearing</span>
Paragraphs are broken by a single newline character, with new paragraphs optionally beginning with a tab stop. Collections of paragraphs can be broken up into logical groups by beginning the paragraph of a new logical group with the section symbol '''§''' followed by a tab stop. Groups of sections can be divided by placing an asterism symbol '''⁂''' on its own line, and beginning a new paragraph on a new line afterwards as expected. The asterism can optionally be padded with an extra empty line on either side of it.
|- class="c18"
| class="c64"| <span class="c12">2nd person singular</span>
| class="c64"| <span class="c27">bhéres </span><span class="c24 c20">you were bearing</span>
Borrowing from other languages forms an integral part of the function of all Indo-European languages; whether through language contact, colonial or imperial superstrata or adstrata, archaism, or scientific and technical vocabulary, borrowing is crucial in the formation of a wider vocabulary.
|- class="c18"
The strategies for borrowing words into SAvIE is that they must preferably be nativised, using known etymologies to convert words into SAvIE as though they had originated their to begin with. Where this cannot be done, or where it would not be appropriate to do so, words can be borrowed in directly, using SAvIE phonology where possible, and several additions to the alphabet where not possible.
| class="c64"| <span class="c12">3rd person singular</span>
| class="c64"| <span class="c27">bhéret </span><span class="c24 c20">he/she/it was bearing</span>
=== 12.1 Sounds foreign to SAvIE ===
|- class="c18"
All sounds native to the language have been listed at the very start of this document. However, these do not encompass all possible sounds that could be represented in SAvIE for borrowings. Extra consonant sounds and their corresponding graphs are as follows.
| class="c64"| <span class="c12">1st person plural</span>
| class="c64"| <span class="c27">Hédm̥ </span><span class="c24 c20">I was eating</span>
Non-native sounds should only be spelled using the above alternative characters where it is necessary or especially desirable to represent non-native pronunciation. This really need only be the case in words which are nativised, or for educational purposes. When writing the names of people, places, and things, and when those are not integrated into SAvIE, their official spelling or transliteration should be used instead.
|- class="c18"
Equally, words which are grammaticalised can be spelt with nativised phonology. This is often a simple matter of finding the closest representative sounds which exist in SAvIE, but can present some difficulties. In particular, given the lack of fricative sounds /f v h/, the sounds ⟨bh gh⟩ can be used instead.
| class="c64"| <span class="c12">2nd person singular</span>
| class="c66 c50"| <span class="c12">(é)-s</span>
| class="c64"| <span class="c27">Héds </span><span class="c24 c20">you were eating</span>
|- class="c18"
So, for example, the French word ''bureau'' could be borrowed in as any of the following:
| class="c64"| <span class="c12">3rd person singular</span>
| class="c66 c50"| <span class="c12">(é)-t</span>
| class="c64"| <span class="c27">Hédt </span><span class="c24 c20">he/she/it was eating</span>
|- class="c18"
<ul>
| class="c64"| <span class="c12">1st person plural</span>
<li><blockquote><p>'''bűro, büró''': indeclinable, with foreign phonology</p></blockquote></li>
<li><blockquote><p>'''bűrō, bürô''': declinable as a masculine '''-ō''' noun, with foreign phonology</p></blockquote></li></ul>
Note also how the non-native stress pattern is subject to interpretation in how it is represented in SAvIE.
| class="c64"| <span class="c27">Hdénti </span><span class="c24 c20">they were eating</span>
In addition, the grammatical pattern that this word has been made to fit is purely representative. It could just as easily be '''bűros ~ bűrosjo''', '''bűrom ~ bűrosjo''', or even '''bűros ~ bűresos'''. Ideally, the chosen form should represent the original word and, if applicable, its declension pattern as best as possible.
|}
<span class="c12"></span>
=== 12.2 Borrowed morphology ===
<span>The main difference of the imperfect conjugated form from the past continuous periphrastic form is the usage in formulaic constructions, shown later.</span>
Some morphology, such as affixes in particular, is so commonly shared between languages as to be worth borrowing into SAvIE. Affixes in particular can form large quantities of vocabulary and can, with some modification and filling in by analogy, be nativised into SAvIE for use in new vocabulary.
-----
<span id="h.z1p6x7b89sr9"></span>
{| class="wikitable"
=== <span class="c63">5.2.3 Aorist</span> ===
|-
!
!
!
|-
| Original suffix
| Cognates
| Form in SAvIE
|-
| A.Gr. ''-άζω''
|
| ( ́)-adjeti ''v.''
|-
| A.Gr. ''-(ο)-ειδής''
| Eng. ''-oid''
| (e)-wéjdēs ~ (é)-wéjdesos ''adj.''
|-
| A.Gr. ''-ίζω''
| Eng. ''-ize / -ise''
| ( ́)-idjeti ''v.''
|-
| A.Gr ''-ισμός''
| Eng. ''-ism''
| (∅)-ismós ''n.m''
|-
| A.Gr. ''-ιστής''
| Eng. ''-ist''
| (é)-idtās ''n.m/n.f''
|-
| A.Gr. ''-λογία''
| Eng. ''-logy''
| =lògiā (close compound) ''n.f''
<span>The aorist forms a simple past. It also uses the secondary endings, but can be one of two further formations. The </span><span class="c27">derived aorist</span><span> is given for </span><span class="c27">root present</span><span class="c12"> verbs, that is, ones which are not formed with secondary derivation such as the nasal infix. This forms as below.</span>
<span>The second formation is the </span><span class="c27">root aorist</span><span>, given for </span><span class="c27">derived verbs</span><span> that do not fit into the above category. It uses the secondary endings attached to a root with no intervening secondary derivations, and can be either thematic or athematic. As such, it is completely identical with the imperfect tense of root present verbs. It differs from the imperfect of derived verbs by dropping secondary derivation. For example, for </span><span class="c27">léjqes</span><span> "to leave" has the (derived) present </span><span class="c27">linéqti</span><span>, (derived) imperfect </span><span class="c27">linéqt</span><span>, and root aorist </span><span class="c27">léjqt</span><span class="c12">.</span>
Law 1: *''Vwm'' > *''Vːm'' and *''VHm'' > *''Vːm'' (Stang's law)
<span id="h.75osiclkn7r1"></span>
Law 2: ''/-VRs/, */-VRH/ > *-VːR''
=== <span class="c63">5.2.4 Habitual</span> ===
<span class="c12">The habitual has no explicit tense – the position in time of the relevant action depends solely on the context of the sentence. The form of this is a thematic verb with secondary endings.</span>
<span>For very few verbs the present is formed using the Proto-Indo-European stative formation. These have no imperfect or aorist, and have special past participle forms built on </span><span class="c27">-wōs ~ -usī ~ -wos</span><span class="c12">.</span>
<span class="c12">A very small number of verbs is a deponent: one which looks like an old mediopassive form, but acts as though it were active. This is not counted as a passive form. Deponent verbs have special forms in all tenses.</span>
<span class="c12">The imperative is its own mood, and conjugates only in the second and third person. It is tenseless, so there is only one set of imperative forms for each verb. Their forms differ only slightly based on thematicity.</span>
| class="c34"| <span class="c27">wésn̥to!</span><span class="c24 c20"> let them wear!</span>
|}
-----
<span class="c12"></span>
<span id="h.myl62re64mvb"></span>
=== <span class="c63">5.2.8 Special formation types</span> ===
<span>Some verb forms include affixes which attach to a verb root to form a stem, onto which certain endings are added. In this document, </span><span class="c20">primary</span><span> indicates verbs whose suffixes do not add significant special meaning, which form a root present and sigmatic aorist (including on suffixes </span><span class="c27">-ê-</span><span>, </span><span class="c27">-ā-</span><span>, etc.); </span><span class="c20">secondary</span><span> indicates verbs which use special derivational suffixes for the present and form a root aorist; </span><span class="c20">tertiary</span><span class="c12"> indicates verbs which use meaningful derivational suffixes but do not form an aorist because the meaning of the derived verb contrasts the meaning of its non-derived counterpart.</span>
<span>There is a special form of nonpast and imperfect formed with the </span><span class="c20">nasal infix</span><span> </span><span class="c27">-né- ~ -n- </span><span>on the zero-grade stem. This infix ablauts from the singular to the plural in the indicative, remains </span><span class="c27">-né-</span><span class="c12"> in the subjunctive, and is conjugated with athematic endings. The infix is only seen in these two tenses.</span>
<span>The infix </span><span class="c27">-sḱ-</span><span class="c12"> attaches to some verb roots to form verbs which occasionally, but not always, have an inchoative meaning. These verbs are thematic.</span>
<span>Some verbs can be formed with </span><span class="c27">(é)-jeti</span><span> or </span><span class="c27">(∅)-jéti</span><span class="c12">. The former will always form transitive verbs, and the latter intransitive verbs. The intransitive in particular implies an ongoing action, and as such has no aorist tense. Verb roots can be combined with each of these to produce a pair of transitive and intransitive verbs, but this need not be the case. In case it does, conjugated verb forms differ in all forms except the aorist, where both forms are identical.</span>
<span>As with the nasal infix, some verbs will form their present, imperfect, and habitual tenses with </span><span class="c27">-néw-</span><span>. This is placed after a zero-grade verb root, and is athematic in the present and imperfect. It ablauts to </span><span class="c27">-nu-</span><span class="c12"> when unstressed, including in all persons of the habitual.</span>
<span>The verb form </span><span class="c27">(o)-éjeti ~ (o)-éjonti</span><span> forms causative verbs, such as </span><span class="c27">Hédmi</span><span> "to eat" becoming </span><span class="c27">Hodéjeti</span><span class="c12"> "to feed". This forms verbs meaning "to cause to do X". This makes explicitly transitive verbs, often from existing verb roots or from adjective roots.</span>
<span>The affix </span><span class="c27">-sj-</span><span> is added to very few verb roots to form desiderative "want to X" verbs. It is thematic, attaches to the zero-grade root, and is accented on the thematic vowel, as </span><span class="c27">Hdsjéti</span><span class="c12"> "to want to eat, to be hungry".</span>
<span>The suffix </span><span class="c27">(∅)-êti ~ (∅)-ên̥ti </span><span>(athematic) or </span><span class="c27">(∅)-êjeti ~ (∅)-êjonti </span><span>(thematic) form stative "to be X" verbs specifically from adjective roots, such as </span><span class="c27">Hrudhêti</span><span class="c12"> "to be red". These verbs can expand slightly in meaning from a stative "to be X" to a dynamic "to go X, to become X". In either case they are explicitly intransitive verbs, and must be made causative to become transitive.</span>
<span>Very few verbs will form their nonpast and imperfect with </span><span class="c27">(í)-(∅)-eti ~ (í)-(∅)-onti</span><span>; they have a reduplicated element with </span><span class="c27">-i-</span><span> as the vowel which retains the stress, such as </span><span class="c27">sísdeti</span><span class="c12"> "to sit". These have no special meaning, and are simply formations of the tense.</span>
<span>Similarlty to the above, some verbs will form with </span><span class="c27">(í/é)-(e)-ti ~ (í/é)-(∅)-nti</span><span>, such as </span><span class="c27">stístāti</span><span class="c12"> "to stand up". These verbs also have no particular nuance, and are formed arbitrarily.</span>
<span>The so-called </span><span class="c20">tudati</span><span> type verb forms all tenses from </span><span class="c27">(∅)-éti ~ (∅)-ónti</span><span class="c12">, in which case its habitual and imperfect are identical.</span>
<span>The factitive verb form </span><span class="c27">(é)-āti ~ (é)-ān̥ti </span><span>creates verbs that imply "to make X", such as </span><span class="c27">néwāti</span><span class="c12"> "to renew, to make new".</span>
<span>Despite their similarity with the -j- infix verbs described in </span><span class="c27">5.2.7.3</span><span>, the verb forms </span><span class="c27">(∅)-ejéti ~ (∅)-ejónti</span><span> and </span><span class="c27">(∅)-ājéti ~ (∅)-ājónti</span><span> are denominative (and occasionally deadjectival) suffixes; they are derived from (mainly) noun stems to indicate a performance of that noun.</span>
<span>These verbs are marked by the thematic suffix </span><span class="c27">-ājéti ~ -ājónti</span><span class="c12">, and may appear as o-grade among others. This suffix forms verbs with iterative (repetition of an action, but only during one distinct occasion), frequentative (occasional repetition of an action on several undefined occasions), or intensive meaning.</span>
<span>The resultative formation </span><span class="c27">(é)-dhHeti ~ (é)-dhHonti</span><span> generally expresses “to become X”. As a result it is most commonly formed from adjective roots.</span>
<span>Although the nonpast tense can be used as an implicit future, a periphrastic future can be expressed with the verb </span><span class="c27">Héjes</span><span> "to go", with the supine form, such as </span><span class="c27">éǵ</span><span> </span><span class="c27">Héjmi Hdént</span><span class="c12"> "I am going to eat, I will eat".</span>
<span>The perfect tense is handled by the verb </span><span class="c27">kápes</span><span>, which is only used to form this particular tense. It carries the meaning of "have X-ed". The nonpast tense is used with the past participle, such as </span><span class="c27">éǵ kápmi Hdtóm</span><span class="c12"> "I have eaten".</span>
<span>If there is no direct object, the neuter form </span><span class="c27">-tóm</span><span> of the participle should be used. However, if there is a direct object, the past participle should match the gender of the object, such as </span><span class="c27">íd kápti Hdtâ îm̥</span><span class="c12"> "it has eaten her".</span>
<span>The pluperfect "had X-ed" can be formed by changing the conjugated from of </span><span class="c27">kápes</span><span> from the nonpast to the aorist, such as </span><span class="c27">éǵ kâpsm̥ Hdtóm </span><span class="c12">"I had eaten". The participle must also agree as in the perfect tense.</span>
<span>Instead of using </span><span class="c27">kápes</span><span>, the future formation of </span><span class="c27">Héjes</span><span> must be used with the supine form </span><span class="c27">kapént</span><span> and a past participle, such as </span><span class="c27">éǵ Héjmi kapént Hdtóm</span><span> "I will have eaten". Once again, that the participle must agree with the object's gender is retained.</span>
<span class="c12">A continuous tense indicates an explicitly imperfective tense, showing that an action is underway and incomplete.</span>
<span>Continuous tenses can be formed with the nonpast and imperfect conjugations of </span><span class="c27">Héses</span><span> along with a present participle, such as </span><span class="c27">Hésmi Hdónts</span><span> "I am eating", or </span><span class="c27">Hésm̥ Hdónts</span><span class="c12"> "I was eating".</span>
<span>In addition, the future tense can form a continuous: </span><span class="c27">Héjmi Hsént Hdónts</span><span> "I will be eating", and </span><span class="c27">Héjmi kapént Hstóm Hdónts</span><span class="c12"> "I will have been eating".</span>
<span>This construction translates as "was going to X". It can either take the imperfect or the aorist form of </span><span class="c27">Héses</span><span>, with the present participle of </span><span class="c27">Héjes</span><span> and the supine. The aorist form is usually used as a simple description of events: </span><span class="c27">bhéwHsm̥ Hjónts Hdént</span><span> "I was going to eat". The imperfect form, on the contrary, is usually used to introduce the context before another action, with the second action being placed in the aorist: </span><span class="c27">Hésm̥ Hjónts Hdént, </span><span class="c27">qomóḱs </span><sup>[[#cmnt9|[i]]]</sup><span class="c27">ís cémt</span><span class="c12"> "I was going to eat when he came".</span>
<span>SAvIE makes no distinction between the middle and the passive, preferring only to use a passive. This is formed with any conjugated form of </span><span class="c27">Héses</span><span> with the passive participle, such as </span><span class="c27">bhéwHsm̥ Hdm̥Hnós</span><span class="c12"> "I was eaten".</span>
<span>Periphrastic tenses can also be made passive: </span><span class="c27">Hésm̥ Hjónts Hsént Hdm̥Hnós, qomóḱs ís cémt </span><span>"I was going to be eaten when he came".</span>
<span>The subjunctive of root thematic nonpast verbs simply lengthens the theme vowel, with </span><span class="c27">-ō</span><span> gaining </span><span class="c27">-H</span><span>; given the proto-form is </span><span class="c20">*-ōh₂</span><span>, no change is expected, but </span><span class="c27">-H</span><span> is added to distinguish the subjunctive form from the indicative.</span>
<span class="c12">Since the aorist uses athematic secondary endings, the subjunctive changes these to thematic primary endings, and keeps a lengthened e-grade root with acrostatic stress.</span>
<span class="c12">In the habitual subjunctive of dynamic verbs, the theme vowel is lengthened and used with primary endings, against a zero-grade root, with accent always falling on the endings as in the indicative.</span>
| class="c64"| <span class="c27">Hdônti </span><span class="c20">(that) </span><span class="c24 c20">they used to eat</span>
|}
<span class="c12"></span>
-----
<span class="c12"></span>
<span class="c12">The habitual subjunctive of stative verbs, by contrast, takes an e-grade root with acrostatic stress, and thematic primary endings, identical to root thematic verbs.</span>
== <span class="c41 c16">5.5 The irregular verb Héses</span> ==
<span class="c27">Héses</span><span> "to be" is an irregular verb; it is suppletive in the aorist indicative and aorist and habitual subjunctive tense, where it takes from the stem </span><span class="c27">bhū-</span><span>, from </span><span class="c20">*bʰuH-</span><span>. It is important to note that the lengthened grade (seen in the aorist) is </span><span class="c27">bhéwH-</span><span>, filling in an </span><span class="c27">-e-</span><span> by analogy, treating </span><span class="c27">bhū-</span><span> as the zero-grade and </span><span class="c27">bhéwH-</span><span class="c12"> as the full-grade form.</span>
<span class="c12"></span>
<span>This is the complete conjugation of </span><span class="c27">Héses</span><span class="c12">.</span>
<span class="c12">In SAvIE, there exists a newly-developed gender-neutral form which encompasses a pronoun and large selection of adjectival endings corresponding with each of the adjectives above that has explicitly gendered forms, meaning that common-gender forms are not covered by this paradigm.</span>
<span class="c12">The basis of the gender-neutral paradigm is the sound /a/, spelt as ⟨a⟩.</span>
<span class="c12"></span>
<span class="c12">Its pronominal form is as follows:</span>
<span class="c12"></span>
<span class="c12"></span>
<span class="c12">Nominative</span>
<span class="c122 c120">Accusative</span>
<span class="c22 c120">Genitive</span>
<span class="c102 c120">Dative</span>
<span class="c119 c142">Locative</span>
<span class="c123 c120 c99 c142">Adjective</span>
<span class="c15 c16">3rd singular neutral</span>
<span class="c12">jás</span>
<span class="c12">jám</span>
<span class="c12">jás</span>
<span class="c12">jâj</span>
<span class="c12">jaj</span>
<span class="c12">(</span>
<span class="c12">swós</span>
<span class="c12">/-â</span>
<span class="c12">/-ás</span>
<span class="c12">/-óm</span>
<span class="c12">)</span>
<span class="c15 c16">3rd plural neutral</span>
<span class="c12">jâs</span>
<span class="c12">jáms</span>
<span class="c12">jáōm</span>
<span class="c12">jámos</span>
<span class="c12">jásu</span>
<span class="c12">(</span>
<span class="c12">swós</span>
<span class="c12">/-â</span>
<span class="c12">/-ás</span>
<span class="c12">/-óm</span>
<span class="c12">)</span>
<span class="c12"></span>
<span>Adjectives, consequently, all decline with </span><span class="c27">a</span><span class="c12">.</span>
<span>An example of this is </span><span class="c27">éǵ wéjdō qid jás Hésti Hwéswas</span><span> "I know that they (sg.) are good".</span>
-----
<span id="h.2rhlublgw4u4"></span>
= <span class="c89 c109">7 Pro-forms</span> =
<span>SAvIE pro-forms include pronouns and demonstratives, and question forms known as </span><span class="c20">wh-words</span><span class="c12">. They are outlined in the table below.</span>
== <span class="c41 c16">7.1 Determiner and pronoun</span> ==
<span>There are differences between determiner forms and pronoun forms. Determiner forms are bound morphemes, and can only be used in conjunction with a nominal. So, </span><span class="c27">qós?</span><span> cannot be used independently, but must always be used as </span><span class="c27">qós ǵhmô?</span><span class="c12"> "which person?".</span>
<span>Similarly, the pronoun form can only be used independently, and not to qualify a nominal, such as </span><span class="c27">qís cémt?</span><span class="c12"> "who came?".</span>
<span>In addition, the dual forms </span><span class="c27">qóteros?</span><span class="c20 c27"> </span><span>and </span><span class="c27">qíteros?</span><span> also display this distinction: </span><span class="c27">qóteros ǵhmô cémt?</span><span> "which of the two people came?" as opposed to </span><span class="c27">qíteros cémt?</span><span class="c12"> "which (of the two) came?".</span>
<span id="h.ttzo0n6qwmyg"></span>
== <span class="c41 c16">7.2 Interrogative and relative forms</span> ==
<span>As mentioned in </span><span class="c27">2.2</span><span>, there is absolute syncretism between the interrogative (question) forms, and relative forms, so the same word will be used for </span><span class="c27">qís cémt?</span><span> "who came?" as in </span><span class="c27">só ǵhmô qis cémt </span><span class="c12">"the person who came". The difference between the words, as seen in the examples, is that the interrogative forms must be stressed, but the relative forms do not need to be.</span>
<span>There are three levels of deixis in SAvIE. If one imagines two people speaking to each other, deixis works like this: the </span><span class="c20">proximal</span><span> indicates something which is closest to the speaker, the </span><span class="c20">medial</span><span> indicates something close to the listener, and the </span><span class="c20">distal</span><span class="c12"> far from both.</span>
<span>There is a small difference between these forms. Since </span><span class="c20">source</span><span> and </span><span class="c20">goal</span><span> are fairly self explanatory (indicating respectively where something comes from and what something goes to), location indicates where something exists statically, and lacks any implication of movement. As such, it tends to be used with </span><span class="c27">Héses</span><span> often: </span><span class="c27">kúr Hésti ís?</span><span> "where is he?", whereas the source/goal forms tend to be used often with verbs of motion: </span><span class="c27">qôdhe cémt ís? </span><span>"where did he come from?", and </span><span class="c27">qómde Hêjst ís?</span><span class="c12"> "where did he go to?".</span>
<span>However, colloquially, the location form can be used for both of these: </span><span class="c27">kúr cémt ís?</span><span> and </span><span class="c27">kúr Hêjst ís?</span><span class="c12">, especially when the context is clear.</span>
-----
<span class="c12"></span>
<span id="h.aqq5b0es5vz3"></span>
= <span class="c89 c109">8 Numerals</span> =
<span class="c12">There are two major classes of numerals, the cardinal and the ordinal. Cardinal numerals indicate plain numbers, and ordinal numerals indicate the order of a number in a series.</span>
<span>The number 1 conjugates as a regular adjective. Its base form is </span><span class="c27">Hójnos</span><span>, which is related to the indefinite article </span><span class="c27">Hójwos</span><span>, with a suppletive ordinal form </span><span class="c27">pr̥Hwós</span><span class="c12">.</span>
<span>The number 2 does not decline for case, its form is </span><span class="c27">dwô</span><span>, </span><span class="c27">dwâH</span><span>, </span><span class="c27">dwój(H)</span><span> in cardinal form. Its ordinal form is either </span><span class="c27">Hánteros</span><span>, </span><span class="c27">Hánterā</span><span>, </span><span class="c27">Hánterom</span><span> (noting the contrastive ending), or </span><span class="c27">séqonts</span><span>, </span><span class="c27">séqontī</span><span>, </span><span class="c27">séqont</span><span> (from a participial form of the verb </span><span class="c27">séqeti</span><span> "to follow"). It also has the special prefix form </span><span class="c27">dwi-</span><span>.</span>
<span>Beginning with</span><span class="c27"> tréjes</span><span> "three", the ordinal numbers become more regularised. Despite being slightly irregular, these forms do in fact decline as though their nominative singular ended in </span><span class="c27">-s</span><span>, with the oblique stem </span><span class="c27">trí-</span><span> or </span><span class="c27">tr̥j-</span><span>. The feminine stem, exceptionally, is </span><span class="c27">tisr-</span><span>, and also declines as a noun in </span><span class="c27">-s</span><span>. It also has the special prefix form </span><span class="c27">tri-</span><span class="c12">.</span>
<span>Similarly to "three", the number 4 has a feminine stem </span><span class="c27">qétesr- </span><span>(oblique </span><span class="c27">qetesr-</span><span>) and a stem for all other genders </span><span class="c27">qetwór-</span><span> (oblique </span><span class="c27">qetur-</span><span> and </span><span class="c27">qetwr̥-</span><span class="c12">).</span>
<span>These numbers do not seem to have reconstructible proto-language forms. As such, I am assigning them values with internal morphology: the number </span><span class="c27">déḱm̥</span><span>, followed by the augment particle </span><span class="c27">Hé</span><span>, and a number between 1 and 9, such as </span><span class="c27">déḱm̥ He Hójnos</span><span> "eleven", to </span><span class="c27">déḱm̥ He Hnéwn̥</span><span> "nineteen". Alternatively, the numbers can be prefixed unstressed to </span><span class="c27">déḱm̥</span><span class="c12"> as below.</span>
<span class="c12">In counting without referring to any specific object, the neuter forms of the numbers 1-4 should be used. When the numbers are used attributively, they should match the gender and number of the following numeral.</span>
<span>The numbers 100 and 1,000 are </span><span class="c27">ḱm̥tóm</span><span> and </span><span class="c27">(sm̥)ǵhéslom</span><span> </span><span class="c27">~</span><span> </span><span class="c27">tûsonts</span><span>. </span><span class="c27">ḱm̥tóm</span><span> and </span><span class="c27">(sm̥)ǵhéslom</span><span> are invariable, whereas </span><span class="c27">tûsonts</span><span> declines as a regular </span><span class="c27">-onts</span><span> noun or adjective. Their ordinal forms are </span><span class="c27">ḱm̥tontós </span><span>"hundredth" and </span><span class="c27">(sm̥)ǵhelsontós</span><span> </span><span class="c27">~</span><span> </span><span class="c27">tūsontós </span><span class="c12">"thousandth". </span>
<span>A derivative of </span><span class="c27">(sm̥)ǵhéslom</span><span>, combined with the augmentative suffix, giving </span><span class="c27">(sm̥)ǵhéslōnom </span><span>(shortened from </span><span class="c20">*(sm̥)ǵhésloHonom</span><span>) is used to mean "million" with the ordinal form </span><span class="c27">(sm̥)ǵheslōntós</span><span>; further derivation gives </span><span class="c27">disǵhéslōnom </span><span>(ordinal form </span><span class="c27">disǵheslōntós</span><span>), meaning "billion" and </span><span class="c27">trisǵhéslōnom</span><span> (ordinal form </span><span class="c27">trisǵheslōntós</span><span>) for "trillion". Prefix forms can be used even further, giving simple prefixes up to </span><span class="c27">deḱm̥ǵhéslōnom</span><span> "decillion", and much greater numbers up to </span><span class="c27">Hnéwn̥dḱomtHnéwn̥ǵhéslōnom</span><span class="c12"> for "novemnonagintillion".</span>
<span>The connector </span><span class="c27">He</span><span> should only be used between tens and units of each group of three numbers. So, the number </span><span class="c27">987,654,321</span><span> would be represented as </span><span class="c27">Hnéwn̥ ḱm̥tóm Hoḱtodḱómt </span><span class="c141 c27">He</span><span class="c27"> </span><span class="c27">septḿ̥ ǵhéslōnā, swéḱs ḱm̥tóm penqedḱómt </span><span class="c27 c141">He</span><span class="c27"> qetwôr túsontH, trî ḱm̥tóm (d)wídḱm̥ti </span><span class="c141 c27">He</span><span class="c27"> Hójnom</span><span class="c12">.</span>
<span>Each number can be given a special multiplicative form, producing an adjective meaning "X times". Multiplicatives are formed by affixing the special prefix of the numbers 1-10 to the word </span><span class="c27">-pléḱs </span><span>"-fold".</span>
<span>For example, 1-4 produce the forms </span><span class="c27">sm̥pléḱs</span><span> "single, onefold", </span><span class="c27">dwipléḱs</span><span> "double, twofold", </span><span class="c27">tripléḱs </span><span>"triple, threefold", and </span><span class="c27">qetwr̥pléḱs</span><span class="c12"> "quadruple, fourfold".</span>
<span>The numbers 2 and 3 have the special forms </span><span class="c27">dís</span><span> and </span><span class="c27">trís</span><span>, meaning "twice" and "thrice" respectively.</span>
<span>A collective numeral is one which specifies "a group of X". The first form is </span><span class="c27">dwôdwō</span><span>, meaning "pair". The rest are formed by suffixing </span><span class="c27">-ō</span><span> to the prefix form of a number, with an intervening </span><span class="c27">-l-</span><span> (as if from </span><span class="c27">-lós</span><span>) to prevent hiatus. The stress falls on the prefix in the nominative-vocative-accusative, and the ending in the oblique, as expected for </span><span class="c27">-ō</span><span>. This gives </span><span class="c27">tríō</span><span> "trio, threesome", </span><span class="c27">qetwŕ̥ō</span><span> "quartet, foursome", </span><span class="c27">qénqelō</span><span> "quintet, fivesome", </span><span class="c27">swéḱsō</span><span> "sextet", </span><span class="c27">septḿ̥ō</span><span> "septet", </span><span class="c27">(H)oḱtólō</span><span> "octet", </span><span class="c27">Hnéwnō</span><span> "nonet", and </span><span class="c27">déḱmō</span><span> "dectet". Using prefixed numbers makes forms such as </span><span class="c27">dwidéḱmō</span><span> "dozen". The larger numbers give </span><span class="c27">ḱm̥tolō</span><span> "group of a hundred", </span><span class="c27">(sm̥)ǵhéslō ~ tûsontō</span><span> "group of a thousand", and </span><span class="c27">(sm̥)ǵhéslōnō</span><span> "group of a million" with derivatives thereof.</span>
<span id="h.u7ca51bkqqmd"></span>
== <span class="c41 c16">8.12 Case agreement</span> ==
<span>The numbers 1,3, and 4, given that they decline, are used attributively as though they were adjectives, meaning the noun which they count can be in any case, and the case of the number and noun must agree: </span><span class="c27">Hójnos wīrós</span><span> "one man", </span><span class="c59 c27">tr̥jôm wīrôm</span><span> "of three men", </span><span class="c27 c125">qetwr̥mós wīrómos</span><span> "(for/to) four men". Since other numbers do not decline, only the noun which they modify declines according to the function of the main noun: </span><span class="c27">éǵ wélō pénqe </span><span class="c129 c27">wīróms</span><span class="c27"> </span><span class="c12">"I see five men".</span>
<span id="h.d37ig9pwu7yu"></span>
= <span class="c89 c109">9 Prepositions</span> =
<span>Prepositions in SAvIE always precede the nominal which they modify; they will always be placed before nouns and adjectives. They govern only one of two cases: the </span><span class="c152">locative </span><span>for prepositions which imply location at, near, or in relation to something, and the </span><span class="c129">accusative </span><span>for motion to or from, and everything else. So, prepositions such as </span><span class="c27">Hén</span><span> "in" can be used with different cases to modify their meaning, as in </span><span class="c27">Hén dém</span><span> "in a house" and </span><span class="c27">Hén dôm</span><span class="c12"> "into a house".</span>
<span>Positional adverbs, such as </span><span class="c27">déḱs </span><span>"(on the) right", can also be used, requiring the </span><span class="c59">genitive</span><span>: </span><span class="c27">déḱs tosjo déms</span><span class="c12"> "to/on the right of the house".</span>
<span>Below is a list of prepositions and positional adverbs and their meanings with the cases they govern.</span>
<span class="c12">The most important addition to this basic overview of grammar is discursive words; those which can be used to carry and shape conversations.</span>
<span id="h.yjujlbc00mj"></span>
== <span class="c41 c16">10.1 Questions and particles</span> ==
<span>Ordinarily, questions in SAvIE need not be marked either at the start or the end of the sentence. As per </span><span class="c27">3.1</span><span>, questions are indicated by inverting the subject and verb: </span><span class="c27">ís cémt</span><span> "he came" becomes </span><span class="c27">cémt is?</span><span> "did he come?". When using pro-forms, these start the sentence: </span><span class="c27">qís Hésti ís?</span><span class="c12"> "who is he?".</span>
<span>However, the word </span><span class="c27">Hár ~ Hr̥</span><span>, meaning "so" or "thus" in positive sentences, can be used to introduce a sentence: </span><span class="c27">Hár qís Hésti ís?</span><span class="c12"> "so who is he?".</span>
<span>In addition, the phrase </span><span class="c27">né Hésti…?</span><span> "isn't it…?" can be used with the regular statement to form a yes/no question in one of two ways: firstly, it can be used to introduce a subordinate clause, as in </span><span class="c27">né Hésti, qid ís cémt?</span><span> "isn't it [the case] that he came?"; the second is that it can be used as a tag question at the end of a sentence, as in </span><span class="c27">ís cémt, né Hésti?</span><span class="c12"> "he came, isn't it?".</span>
<span>The simple responses to yes/no questions is </span><span class="c27">nójnom</span><span>, </span><span class="c27">né tód</span><span>, or </span><span class="c27">Hóju qíd</span><span> "no", and the positive is </span><span class="c27">já ~ sejḱe ~ tód</span><span>. There is no fundamental difference between any of these words; they have different origins and can be used depending on the speaker's preference for their source. For example, </span><span class="c27">nójnom</span><span> is a shortening of </span><span class="c27">né (H)ójnom</span><span>, from Latin </span><span class="c20">nōn</span><span>, whereas </span><span class="c27">Hóju qíd </span><span>is the form of Greek </span><span class="c20">οὐ(κ) ~ οὐ(χ)</span><span> and Armenian </span><span class="c20">ոչ</span><span>; meanwhile, </span><span class="c27">já</span><span> is ubiquitous in Germanic, </span><span class="c27">séjḱe</span><span> also from Latin </span><span class="c20">sīc</span><span>, and </span><span class="c27">(né)</span><span> </span><span class="c27">tód </span><span>as seen in Celtic languages, such as Welsh </span><span class="c20">do ~ naddo</span><span class="c12">.</span>
<span>In addition to the simple answers, SAvIE can produce yes/no answers to polar questions by repeating the verb either in a positive or negative polarity. If the question were </span><span class="c27">cémt ís?</span><span> "did he come?", a positive response would be </span><span class="c27">cémt</span><span> "he came (yes)", and a negative response would be </span><span class="c27">né(ghe) cémt</span><span> "he didn't come (no)". Note that the negative particle here can either be </span><span class="c27">né</span><span> or </span><span class="c27">néghe</span><span>; the </span><span class="c27">-ghe</span><span> suffix intensifies the previous particle.</span>
<span class="c12">These can be introduced in one of two ways.</span>
<span>The first is introducing an entirely independent subordinate clause with the word </span><span class="c27">qid</span><span>, such as in </span><span class="c27">éǵ wéjdō, qid ís cémt</span><span class="c12"> "I know that he came".</span>
<span>Clauses that are more semantically linked to the antecedent use interrogative-relative pronouns: </span><span class="c27">só wīrós, qésjo cên cémt… </span><span class="c12">"the man, whose wife came…", literally "the man, of whom [the] wife came…".</span>
<span>Hypothetical sentences are introduced by </span><span class="c27">sô ~ séj </span><span>"if", which is an innovated and fossilized thematicisation of </span><span class="c27">só</span><span> in the instrumental and locative cases, respectively, meaning "with this" or "in this". This is modelled on the etymology of the Latin </span><span class="c20">sī</span><span>. </span><span class="c27">mā</span><span> can be used as in Celtic, </span><span class="c27">jéj</span><span> as in Baltic, or </span><span class="c27">qéj</span><span class="c12"> as in some Slavic. None of these words differs in meaning.</span>
<span>The consequence can be introduced without any particle, but can also optionally be introduced with the particle </span><span class="c27">tómḱe</span><span> "then, in that case", or </span><span class="c27">tóqe</span><span class="c12"> "then".</span>
<span>The verb </span><span class="c27">skéles </span><span>"to owe" should be used in the deponent aorist subjunctive to form a periphrastic conditional tense with the purportative, thus giving </span><span class="c27">séj ís cémt, éǵ skêlsōr kápos wl̥Htóm welos ím</span><span> "If he came, I would have wanted to see him". When there are two verbs that require the purportative in a row, one is in the accusative </span><span class="c27">(é)-os</span><span> form, and the second is in the genitive </span><span class="c27">(é)-esos </span><span>form: </span><span class="c27">séj ís cémti, éǵ skêlsōr wélHos wélesos ím </span><span>"If he comes, I would want to see him". Literally this means something like "...that I owe wanting of seeing".</span>
<span id="h.7oxqmpco3bmf"></span>
== <span class="c41 c16">10.4 Negation of nominals</span> ==
<span>Nominals must be negated by the particle </span><span class="c27">néghe</span><span> "not"; this can be attached directly to nominals, such as </span><span class="c27">néghe méǵHs</span><span> "not great", or </span><span class="c27">néghe wīrós</span><span> "not a man". Determiners can also precede the nominal: </span><span class="c27">néghe só wīrós</span><span class="c12"> "not the/this man".</span>
<span id="h.q60qfvys4zhp"></span>
== <span class="c41 c16">10.5 Either/or</span> ==
<span>"Either" and "or" are both expressed by the word </span><span class="c27">Háwti</span><span>: </span><span class="c27">Háwti cm̥dhí ḱóm mé, Háwti méne </span><span>"either come with me, or stay".</span>
<span>In conjunction with the imperative verb form, the particle </span><span class="c27">mê</span><span> "do not…!" (from </span><span class="c20">*meh₁</span><span> as seen in Greek </span><span class="c20">μή</span><span>) is used to express prohibition: </span><span class="c27">Hidhí!</span><span> "go!" becomes </span><span class="c27">mê Hidhí!</span><span> "do not go!"</span>
<span>Following the presence of </span><span class="c20">A and B</span><span> constructions in SAE, this is the preferred structure for the </span><span class="c20">and</span><span> construction. Rather than using the Proto-Indo-European </span><span class="c20">*-kʷe</span><span> suffix, alternative strategies are preferred. These are </span><span class="c27">Hé</span><span> (the augment </span><span class="c20">*h₁é</span><span>), </span><span class="c27">ḱḿ̥ti </span><span>(modelled on the Greek </span><span class="c20">καί</span><span>), </span><span class="c27">Héti</span><span> (modelled on the Latin </span><span class="c20">et</span><span>), </span><span class="c27">Hánti</span><span> (synonymous with the preposition, modelled on Proto-Germanic </span><span class="c20">*andi</span><span>), </span><span class="c27">Héj</span><span> (modelled on Proto-Slavic </span><span class="c20">*i</span><span>), or </span><span class="c27">Hṓd </span><span>(modelled on Proto-Balto-Slavic </span><span class="c20">*ō</span><span>, based on a hypothetical ablative PIE form </span><span class="c20">*h₁ōd</span><span class="c12">).</span>
<span>"Also" can be expressed with </span><span class="c27">qōdqe</span><span>, a fossilised ablative of a thematicisation of </span><span class="c27">qís</span><span>, meaning approximately "and from which", or </span><span class="c27">Héwghe</span><span> (modelled on Proto-Germanic </span><span class="c20">*auk</span><span class="c12">).</span>
<span>Consequence in the form of "then" or "so" is expressed with </span><span class="c27">tôd</span><span>, yet another fossilised ablative of a thematicised </span><span class="c27">só ~ sâ ~ tód</span><span>, such as </span><span class="c27">éǵ cêm, tôd ís lêjqst </span><span class="c12">"I came, then he left".</span>
<span>An intended consequence, expressing "so that" or "in order to", is expressed with a similar form to the above, </span><span class="c27">téj</span><span>, a thematicised dative meaning "to this", and a subordinate clause introduced by </span><span class="c27">qid</span><span> with the verb in the subjunctive, such as </span><span class="c27">éǵ qrêjHsm̥ tód, téj qid tû Hédesi íd </span><span class="c12">"I bought this so you could eat it".</span>
<span>The basic words "or" and "nor" are expressed by </span><span class="c27">íwe ~ íwē</span><span> or </span><span class="c27">éjwe ~ éjwē</span><span> (based on </span><span class="c20">*i-</span><span> and </span><span class="c20">*ey-</span><span> as pronominal bases) in the positive polarity (</span><span class="c27">éǵ íwe tû</span><span> "I or you") and </span><span class="c27">néwe</span><span> in the negative (</span><span class="c27">néghe éǵ néwe tû</span><span class="c12"> "not I nor you, not me and not you").</span>
<span class="c27">-we ~ -wē</span><span> can also be suffixed to any words meaning "if" to produce "but if" or "if, on the other hand": </span><span class="c27">séjwe né cémti ís, qíd tôd?</span><span class="c12"> "but if he doesn't come, what then?".</span>
<span>The word "but" can be expressed either as </span><span class="c27">íde ~ éjde</span><span> (using the Proto-Indo-European </span><span class="c20">*de</span><span> contrastive particle) or </span><span class="c27">Heǵhstós</span><span> (modelled on the Greek </span><span class="c20">εχτός</span><span> and Proto-Celtic </span><span class="c20">*extos</span><span>) at the beginning of a phrase, and the postclitic </span><span class="c27">de</span><span> otherwise to indicate a break in a sentence. Since it breaks a sentence apart, the part of the sentence ending </span><span class="c27">de</span><span class="c12"> is considered disjunct, and can refer either to a subject or an object. The case of the preceding nominal can match its function in the following sentence.</span>
<span>So, in </span><span class="c27">só Háljos/tóm Háljom de, né wêlsm̥ éǵ ím</span><span> "the other one, however, I didn't see it", note the presence of both </span><span class="c27">Háljos</span><span> and </span><span class="c27">Háljom</span><span>, both of which are treated slightly differently. In the nominative, the phrase ending </span><span class="c27">de</span><span class="c12"> is treated more as a topic and the antecedent as a comment; in the accusative, it is treated as a disjunct object rather than a topic, and matches its expected function in the antecedent.</span>
<span class="c12"></span>
<span id="h.rda484yssqri"></span>
== <span class="c41 c16">10.8 Politeness and formality</span> ==
<span class="c12">Several strategies can be employed to introduce formality to SAvIE. The majority of these should be limited to forms of address, but some others exist.</span>
<span>Although many modern Indo-European languages employ a T-V distinction, it is best avoided in SAvIE. However, usage thereof should not be considered entirely incorrect. If a speaker chooses to use a T-V distinction, the expected follows: the 2nd person plural forms take the place of the singular forms in polite speech. So, one person is referred to politely as </span><span class="c27">jû</span><span> rather than </span><span class="c27">tû</span><span>, and verbs and adjectives are inflected in the plural rather than the singular. This turns the informal </span><span class="c27">tû Hési méǵHs</span><span> “you are tall” into </span><span class="c27">jû Hsté méǵHas</span><span class="c12">.</span>
-----
<span class="c12"></span>
<span id="h.b8ig8p3udeax"></span>
=== <span class="c63">10.8.2 Third person verb constructions</span> ===
<span class="c12">Rather than using the second-person plural for a more classically Indo-European T-V distinction, the third person can be used as it is employed in various modern languages. This category includes some formations innovated by SAvIE.</span>
<span id="h.beetq9fphejx"></span>
==== <span class="c77">10.8.2.1 Praising the listener</span> ====
<span>This follows the pattern of the Spanish </span><span class="c20">usted</span><span>, which is derived from </span><span class="c20">vuestra merced</span><span> “your mercy”. As the etymology of </span><span class="c20">merced</span><span> is so opaque, it has been discarded entirely. Instead, many synonymous constructions can be built from </span><span class="c27">cérHtis</span><span> “praise, grace”, whose root </span><span class="c27">cérH-</span><span> gives the Latin </span><span class="c20">grātia</span><span class="c12">.</span>
<span>This can optionally be supplemented with a second-person possessive adjective </span><span class="c27">tós</span><span> (or any of its variants, if avoiding T-V) or </span><span class="c27">usós </span><span>(if using T-V), giving </span><span class="c27">tâ cérHtis</span><span> or </span><span class="c27">usâ cérHtis</span><span class="c12">. The resulting phrase then inflects in its entirety. This is then used with a third-person verb.</span>
<span>The pronoun </span><span class="c27">î</span><span>, along with the third-person plural verbal forms, can be used to refer to a single person politely.</span>
<span id="h.ooc5ly1xhnmv"></span>
==== <span class="c77">10.8.2.3 Alternative pronominal forms</span> ====
<span>The pronoun </span><span class="c27">ḱénos / -ā / -as</span><span>, declined according to both case and number depending on the number of referents, can be used with the corresponding verbal number of the third person in polite speech. In addition to the above established pronoun, the neologism </span><span class="c27">(H)irós / -â / -ás</span><span>, an adjectival form modelled on the third-person pronouns </span><span class="c27">ís / î / jás</span><span> can be used as a polite second-person pronoun. This also declines as expected, giving </span><span class="c27">(H)irôs / -âs / -ájes</span><span class="c12"> for multiple referents.</span>
<span id="h.m4674hse1xy8"></span>
=== <span class="c63">10.8.3 Titles and forms of address</span> ===
<span>People can be referred to with titles attached to their names, in addition to the formal verb constructions given above. The title </span><span class="c20">Mister</span><span> and its cognates can be given as </span><span class="c27">méǵHisteros / -ā / -as</span><span>, while common Romance terms </span><span class="c20">señor, signore, monsieur</span><span> are given as </span><span class="c27">sénjōs / sn̥jésī / -josas</span><span class="c12">.</span>
<span>Due to a close proximity to the meanings of their individual stems, the former should be reserved for distinguished persons with some form of appointed title, and the latter for older people. A much more neutral but familiar term would be </span><span class="c27">soqHjós / -â / -ás</span><span>, cognate with Latin </span><span class="c20">socius</span><span>. A less familiar form would be </span><span class="c27">Hwésus / Huséwī / Huséwy</span><span class="c12">.</span>
<span>Each of these titles is abbreviated, respectively, </span><span class="c27">m.</span><span>, </span><span class="c27">s.</span><span>, </span><span class="c27">so.</span><span>, and </span><span class="c27">u.</span>
-----
<span class="c12"></span>
<span id="h.728eorgqqhso"></span>
= <span class="c89 c109">11 Further rules and conventions of writing</span> =
<span>The default writing system in this document has been the Latin script, but this need not necessarily be the case. In </span><span class="c27">Appendix D</span><span class="c12"> there is a full alphabet shown with the Latin, Greek, Cyrillic, Armenian, and Devanagari scripts, all of which can be used effectively to write SAvIE. For ease and universality, the Latin alphabet may be preferred, but this Appendix allows for a wider range of writing.</span>
<span id="h.sagni0rfa6rv"></span>
== <span class="c41 c16">11.2 Case</span> ==
<span class="c12">SAvIE should be written entirely unicase. This means that there should be no distinction made between lowercase and uppercase letters. Although the letters ⟨h⟩ and ⟨H⟩ both exist in the Latin alphabet, it should be noted that these are two different letters with two different functions, not merely variants of one another. Common usages of capital letters in some languages, such as indicating proper nouns, are not treated specially in SAvIE, and should all be written lowercase.</span>
<span class="c12">This being said, this might be a difficult habit to break for some users. The practice should be avoided as per the standards of this document, but should not be seen as incorrect otherwise.</span>
<span id="h.244lgf7etpk4"></span>
== <span class="c41 c16">11.3 Clause- and sentence-final punctuation</span> ==
<span>In all alphabets, natively-used punctuation should be employed. Where applicable, the comma ⟨,⟩ and period ⟨.⟩ should be used to indicate a break in and termination of a sentence, respectively. The relevant question and exclamation marks should also serve their respective purposes.</span>
-----
<span id="h.cfzdoygsleak"></span>
== <span class="c41 c16">11.4 Quotation</span> ==
<span class="c12">For block quotation, such as lines of dialogue, an em-dash ⟨—⟩ should be used for each line of dialogue, followed either by a double space, or a tab stop.</span>
<span class="c12">For inline quotation, a double guillemet ⟨« »⟩ should wrapped around a quotation, and a nested quotation within that should be marked with a single guillemet ⟨‹ ›⟩.</span>
<span class="c12">This usage can be mirrored with quotation marks, directional or otherwise. Double quotation marks ⟨" "⟩ ⟨“ ”⟩ enclose the main quotation, with single marks ⟨' '⟩ ⟨‘ ’⟩ enclosing a nested quotation.</span>
<span class="c12">In addition, lowered quotation marks can be used as in German and Slavic languages, either both low ⟨„ „⟩, or high and low ⟨„ ”⟩, with single marks ⟨‚ ‚⟩ and ⟨‚ ’⟩ for nested quotes. It is strongly preferred that the direction of punctuation marks conform to the above examples, but inverting one or both (such as ⟨» «⟩ or ⟨„ “⟩) should not be considered incorrect.</span>
<span class="c12">Any piece of text above a sentence can be broken up with special typographical conventions.</span>
<span>Paragraphs are broken by a single newline character, with new paragraphs optionally beginning with a tab stop. Collections of paragraphs can be broken up into logical groups by beginning the paragraph of a new logical group with the section symbol </span><span class="c27">§</span><span> followed by a tab stop. Groups of sections can be divided by placing an asterism symbol </span><span class="c27">⁂</span><span> on its own line, and beginning a new paragraph on a new line afterwards as expected. The asterism can optionally be padded with an extra empty line on either side of it.</span>
-----
<span id="h.k44d5itcf1eq"></span>
= <span class="c89 c109">12 Borrowing and conversion to SAvIE</span> =
<span class="c12">Borrowing from other languages forms an integral part of the function of all Indo-European languages; whether through language contact, colonial or imperial superstrata or adstrata, archaism, or scientific and technical vocabulary, borrowing is crucial in the formation of a wider vocabulary.</span>
<span class="c12">The strategies for borrowing words into SAvIE is that they must preferably be nativised, using known etymologies to convert words into SAvIE as though they had originated their to begin with. Where this cannot be done, or where it would not be appropriate to do so, words can be borrowed in directly, using SAvIE phonology where possible, and several additions to the alphabet where not possible.</span>
<span id="h.v6ds8kofsll6"></span>
== <span class="c41 c16">12.1 Sounds foreign to SAvIE</span> ==
<span class="c12">All sounds native to the language have been listed at the very start of this document. However, these do not encompass all possible sounds that could be represented in SAvIE for borrowings. Extra consonant sounds and their corresponding graphs are as follows.</span>
<span class="c12">Non-native sounds should only be spelled using the above alternative characters where it is necessary or especially desirable to represent non-native pronunciation. This really need only be the case in words which are nativised, or for educational purposes. When writing the names of people, places, and things, and when those are not integrated into SAvIE, their official spelling or transliteration should be used instead.</span>
<span class="c12">Equally, words which are grammaticalised can be spelt with nativised phonology. This is often a simple matter of finding the closest representative sounds which exist in SAvIE, but can present some difficulties. In particular, given the lack of fricative sounds /f v h/, the sounds ⟨bh gh⟩ can be used instead.</span>
<span class="c12"></span>
<span>So, for example, the French word </span><span class="c20">bureau</span><span class="c12"> could be borrowed in as any of the following:</span>
<span class="c12"></span>
* <span class="c27">bűro, büró</span><span class="c12">: indeclinable, with foreign phonology</span>
* <span class="c27">bűrō, bürô</span><span>: declinable as a masculine </span><span class="c27">-ō</span><span class="c12"> noun, with foreign phonology</span>
* <span class="c27">bjúro, bjuró</span><span class="c12">: indeclinable, with native phonology</span>
* <span class="c27">bjúrō, bjurô</span><span>: declinable as a masculine </span><span class="c27">-ō</span><span class="c12"> noun, with native phonology</span>
<span class="c12"></span>
<span>in addition to the borrowed spelling and pronunciation </span><span class="c27">bureau</span><span class="c12">.</span>
<span class="c12"></span>
<span>Note also how the non-native stress pattern is subject to interpretation in how it is represented in SAvIE.</span>
-----
<span>In addition, the grammatical pattern that this word has been made to fit is purely representative. It could just as easily be </span><span class="c27">bűros ~ bűrosjo</span><span>, </span><span class="c27">bűrom ~ bűrosjo</span><span>, or even </span><span class="c27">bűros ~ bűresos</span><span class="c12">. Ideally, the chosen form should represent the original word and, if applicable, its declension pattern as best as possible.</span>
<span class="c12">Some morphology, such as affixes in particular, is so commonly shared between languages as to be worth borrowing into SAvIE. Affixes in particular can form large quantities of vocabulary and can, with some modification and filling in by analogy, be nativised into SAvIE for use in new vocabulary.</span>
Thank you very much for your interest in Standard Average Indo-European. I began this project on June 10th, 2024, without the intention of taking it particularly seriously. A few months and much research later have transformed the project into something that has exceeded my expectations at every stage. So, it is with great pleasure that I present the following document for public viewing.
The major principle of SAvIE is its adherence to the features of Standard Average European as set out by Martin Haspelmath (2001). This essentially projects a set of features shared by many modern Indo-European languages onto Proto-Indo-European. The result is a language which appears and sounds as though it were a proto-language, but operates with much more modern features, especially those confined to western Indo-European.
Given my choice to use Proto-Indo-European as the basis for this language, I have both had to make specific choices in reconstruction based on preexisting academic work (chiefly Leiden etymological dictionaries), and ensure a wide range of vocabulary within the language in order to be representative of vocabulary in modern languages. This becomes very clear with the examples above, which are remodeled from Latin, Greek, Sanskrit, and multiple Slavic and Germanic varieties, as well as examples of internally-constructed vocabulary.
The result is an extraordinary and rich language with features and words that should fundamentally be instinctive or familiar to speakers of many families outlined in Haspelmath (2001). Ultimately, however, this was an artistic project above all, and has given me so much more pleasure than I ever expected.
I would like to recognise the important work of Indo-Europeanists in making this project possible, and the contributions made by individuals in the Celtic Tearooms and IE Conlangs Discord servers.
Hsubhrūgéte! Enjoy!
1 Phonology
1.1 Consonants
1.1.1 *m, *n
These appear as ⟨m⟩ [m] and ⟨n⟩ [n].
⟨n⟩ before velar consonants can be pronounced as [ŋ].
Both consonants can be syllabic resonants, written ⟨m̥⟩ and ⟨n̥⟩ or ⟨ṃ⟩ and ⟨ṇ⟩.
1.1.2 *r, *l
⟨r⟩ can be pronounced as any rhotic sound, including but not limited to [ɾ], [r] and [ɹ].
⟨l⟩ is pronounced as [l].
Both consonants can be syllabic resonants, written ⟨l̥⟩ and ⟨r̥⟩ or ⟨ḷ⟩ and ⟨ṛ⟩. When ⟨r⟩ appears as the syllabic resonant ⟨r̥⟩ or ⟨ṛ⟩, it should avoid being pronounced as [ɾ], and a sonorant sound should be used instead.
1.1.3 *s
This appears as ⟨s⟩ [s], but following the evidence of daughter languages, it can be pronounced [z] in the cluster /sd/ or /sdʰ/, in which case it can optionally be written as ⟨z⟩ [z], such as nizdós "nest" for nisdós'''or sízdō "I am sitting" for sísdō. In addition to [s] it can be pronounced [s̱], [θ], or even [ɕ], [ʃ] when adjacent to the sounds ⟨y⟩ [j] or ⟨i⟩ [i].
The s-mobile is written ⟨S⟩, such as in the word Stégos "roof", and may be pronounced [s] or be entirely silent.
1.1.4 *j, *w
These appear as ⟨j⟩ [j] and ⟨w⟩ [w].
1.1.5 Dorsals
The realisation of dorsal consonants is very complex and hotly debated by Indo-Europeanists. This document will present the traditional reconstruction of these sounds, but the reader should feel free to apply any other realisations with which they agree more, if that should be the case.
1.1.5.1 *k, *g, *gʰ
These appear as plain consonants, not labialised or palatalised, as ⟨k⟩ [k], ⟨g⟩ [g], and ⟨gh⟩ [gʰ]. In alternative reconstructions they may be pronounced as [q], [ɢ], and [ɢʰ] (per Kümmel); [k], [ˀk], and [kʰ] (per Beekes); and [kː], [k'], and [k] (per Kortlandt), among others.
1.1.5.2 *ḱ, *ǵ, *ǵʰ
These are palatalised consonants, and appear as ⟨ḱ⟩ [kʲ], ⟨ǵ⟩ [gʲ], and ⟨ǵh⟩ [gʲʰ]. The alternative reconstructions above have corresponding palatalised forms.
1.1.5.3 *kʷ, *gʷ, *gʷʰ
These are labialised versions of the plain velars. They appear as ⟨q⟩ [kʷ], ⟨c⟩ [gʷ], and ⟨ch⟩ [gʷʰ]. The alternative reconstructions above have corresponding labialised forms.
1.1.6 *t, *d, *dʰ
These appear as ⟨t⟩ [t], ⟨d⟩ [d], and ⟨dh⟩ [dʰ], or as the alternatives with pre-glottalisation, or ejectives.
1.1.7 *p, *b, *bʰ
These appear as ⟨p⟩ [p], ⟨b⟩ [b], and ⟨bh⟩ [bʰ], or as the alternatives with pre-glottalisation, or ejectives.
1.1.8 *h₁, *h₂, *h₃
Since the pronunciation of laryngeals is so uncertain, they either colour vowels or disappear entirely. /*eh₁/ becomes [eː], /*eh₂/ becomes [aː], and /*eh₃/ becomes [oː]. Similarly, /*h₁e/ becomes [e], /*h₂e/ becomes [a], and /*h₃e/ becomes [o]. Laryngeals do colour inherently long vowels as though they were short.
When any laryngeal begins a word before another consonant, it can become [a] or [ə]. Any laryngeal between consonants can also become [a ~ ə].
An alternative and fanciful pronunciation collapses all three laryngeals into one to allow them to be pronounced, as in Anatolian and Persian languages, in addition to being deleted entirely. This can be written as ⟨H⟩ and pronounced [h], [ħ], or similar. This pronunciation must shorten long vowels.
For the laryngeal which does not colour a vowel, it can also be pronounced as a syllabic consonant, and be written as ⟨H⟩ as expected, or as ⟨H̥⟩ or ⟨Ḥ⟩ to make it absolutely clear that it is a syllabic consonant.
1.1.9 *h₄, *hₐ, *H/*hₓ
*h₄ and *hₐ are not frequently included in this document as they appear only within certain analyses of Proto-Indo-European. However, if they should appear, or if speakers should choose to project words on to SAvIE using analyses where these laryngeal values are present, they should be treated exactly the same as *h₂, including all the same vowel colouring of that laryngeal value.
*H, also notated *hₓ, indicates an unknown laryngeal. Often this is done because the actual value is contested, or possibly unknowable. SAvIE treats such a laryngeal as though it were /*h₁/. /*eH/ gives ⟨ē⟩, lengthening the vowel without colouring it, while /*oH/ and /*uH/ also lengthen the previous vowel giving ⟨ō⟩ and ⟨ū⟩. /*He/ does not colour /e/ at all, giving ⟨He⟩.
1.1.10 Laryngeals at morpheme boundaries
Using the rules defined above for the levelling of Proto-Indo-European laryngeals, the same phonological processes are expected to apply to laryngeals when they could colour vowels at morpheme boundaries. For example, given the root céjHₒ- (from *gʷeyh₃-) and its thematic suffix -eti, the original -h₃-e- crossing a morpheme boundary colours as expected, with the resulting verb being céjHoti “he/she/it lives”.
1.1.11 Alteration of aspirated stops
The aspirated stops ⟨bh⟩ ⟨dh⟩ ⟨gh⟩ ⟨ǵh⟩ ⟨ch⟩ can be devoiced to [pʰ] [tʰ] [kʰ] [kʲʰ] [kʷʰ] for one of two reasons.
Firstly a speaker may choose to pronounce unvoiced stops in order to match a neighbouring unvoiced stop, such as producing the opposite of Bartholomae's law: *bʰewdʰ → *bʰudʰ-tós → (with application of Grassmann's law) *bʰud-dʰós → SAvIE ⟨bhuddhós⟩ [pʰuˈtʰːos].
Otherwise, a speaker (such as an avid student of Ancient Greek, or perhaps Sanskrit) can choose to pronounce unvoiced stops throughout their speech simply because they wish to match pronunciations of their respective daughter languages of interest.
1.2 Vowels
1.2.1 *e, *ē, *o, *ō
The basic short vowels of Proto-Indo-European appear as ⟨e⟩ and ⟨o⟩, and can be pronounced in a variety of ways, such as [e] and [o] or [ɛ] and [ɔ]. Their long counterparts appear as ⟨ē⟩ and ⟨ō⟩, and are pronounced as before, but audibly longer.
There is no real restriction on how they should be pronounced, but my personal preference is ⟨e⟩ as [ɛ], ⟨ē⟩ as [eː], ⟨o⟩ as [ɔ], and ⟨ō⟩ as [oː].
1.2.2 *a, *ā
These vowels appear as ⟨a⟩ [a] and ⟨ā⟩ [aː]. They are not basic vowels of Proto-Indo-European; ⟨a⟩ appears most often as a realisation of laryngeals between medial or before initial consonants, and ⟨ā⟩ appears as a contraction of /*eh₂/. Rarely /*a/ can appear in root words, but these reconstructions are often debated.
1.2.3 *i, ⟨ī⟩, *u, ⟨ū⟩
Only ⟨i⟩ [i] and ⟨u⟩ [u] are inherited from Proto-Indo-European. ⟨ī⟩ [iː] and ⟨ū⟩ [uː] appear as contractions of /*iH/ and /*uH/.
1.2.4 [ə]
A final vowel [ə], the schwa, can be pronounced in SAvIE but ought not to be written. In cases where syllabic sonorants (l̥ r̥ m̥ n̥ H̥) form a cluster with another consonant (such as in the word wl̥qós which is expected to be pronounced [wl̩ˈkʷos]), an epenthetic schwa can be added before the syllabic consonant to aid in pronunciation, thus giving [wəlˈkʷos] for wl̥qós.
If somebody wants to write the pronounced schwa explicitly, they should use the letters ⟨y⟩, ⟨ə⟩, or the symbol ⟨°⟩, giving ⟨wylqós⟩, ⟨wəlqós⟩, or ⟨w°lqós⟩.
1.3 Stress
SAvIE follows Proto-Indo-European stress rules and it is mandatory to mark stress with an acute accent (á é í ó ú ĺ̥ ŕ̥ ḿ̥ ń̥ H̥́) at all times. When writing using ⟨ə⟩, that letter receives the acute instead, giving ⟨ý ~ ə́⟩.
Long vowels, indicated with a macron, are instead written with a circumflex ⟨â ê î ô û⟩ when stressed.
In addition, SAvIE has rules relating to the stress of compounds. These can be either close or loose. Close compounds are written as one word, using a stem form of one word and a full form of another. Loose compounds are written as two separate words with the first word in the genitive case without displaying declension, and the second word being fully declinable.
In close compounds, often the first element is stressed, but the second may receive stress in some words, and receives the only stress in the word. In loose compounds, the second element is stressed, and the first can optionally be written without stress marking. Often, words can be written as either type of compound, but they usually appear as only one; for example, ghóstipotis “lord” is a close compound, and can be written, following the correct conventions of stress, as a loose compound ghostejs pótis, specifically avoiding stress marking on the first element.
Optionally, rather than refraining from marking stress entirely, a grave accent ⟨ ̀⟩ can be used on the first word to indicate secondary stress, such as ghostèjs pótis.
2 Major features of SAE
2.1 Definite and indefinite articles
The definite article is so. The indefinite article is Hójwos, a variant of Hójnos "one" (from *h₁óynos).
2.2 Relative clauses with relative pronouns
The pronoun jos can be used to introduce relative clauses, but alternatively any correlative word can be used in a relative sense.
2.3 "Have"-perfect
SAvIE can use the word kápes, a derivative of*kap- "to seize, hold" (which gives Latin capiō and English have), to form a perfect tense with the participle -tós/-tâ/-tóm of a verb.
2.4 Nominative experiencers
Instead of using dative constructions, there can either be a nominative-active-accusative or nominative-deponent-ablative use of the word bhrūgéti to enjoy, to like (from *bʰruHg-e-ti) with a semantic patient.
2.5 Participial passive
Instead of using a conjugated passive, the periphrastic passive is formed with the verb Hésti "to be" and a passive participle ending in -(o)mHnos/-(o)mHnā/-(o)mHnom.
2.6 Anticausative prominence
Verbs can be implicitly anticausative if a transitive verb is used in anF intransitive sense, with its patient as its subject; for example éǵ bhrêgsm̥ íd "I broke it", but íd bhrêgst "it broke". Optionally the reflexive particle can be used on either side of the salient verb, giving íd bhrêgst s(w)é or íd s(w)é bhrêgst.
2.7 Dative external possessors
The dative can be used to indicate the possessor of the object of an action instead of using a genitive phrase: î léwHeti ésyās sūnéwej tód ǵónu "she washes her son's knee", though literally "she washes to her son the knee".
2.8 Negative pronouns and lack of negation
In phrasing e.g. "nobody comes", English-like phraseology should be used: there should be a negative pronoun with no negation of the verb, giving neqís cémt "nobody came".
2.9 Particles in comparative constructions
Either of the particles Hapó or Hánti should be used to compare against a referent in the accusative: ís Hesti mājoteros Hapó/Hánti (H)mé "he is bigger than me".
2.10 Relative-based equative constructions
The adjective sokós/sokâ/tokóm is used for "as" or "such" (giving sokós méǵHs "so large"). The comparative element is introduced with ḱom "with" with the predicate in the accusative, resulting in ís ésti sokós méǵHs ḱom îm̥ "he is as large as her".
2.11 Subject person affixes as strict agreement markers
This feature refers to obligatory subject-pronoun agreement with a conjugated verb. It is not widespread so it is unclear why this is included as a SAE feature. So, in SAvIE, this is an optional feature; both Hésmi and éǵH Hésmi are equivalent terms for "I am".
2.12 Intensifier-reflexive differentiation
SAvIE distinguishes between an intensifying adjectives somHós/-â/-óm or sélbhos/-â/-óm, and the true reflexive particle s(w)é; the former does not necessarily indicate reflexive action, but intensifies a previous nominal, while the latter is explicitly reflexive or reciprocal.
3 Further SAE-aligned features
The features below appear in some members of SAE, so can be used optionally in SAvIE too.
3.1 Verb fronting in polar interrogatives
SAvIE polar yes/no questions can front the questioning verb, so éǵH Hésmi can become Hésmi éǵH?
3.2 Comparative marking of adjectives
As seen above in the comparative adjective māyóteros/-ā/-om, the suffix -teros/-ā/-om is the comparative (as well as contrastive) adjectival suffix.
3.3 Comitative-instrumental syncretism
In this feature there is no difference between "with" in the comitative ("in the company of") sense, and in the instrumental ("using, by means of") sense. Both of the words me and ḱóm can be used to mean "with" in either sense.
4 Nominals
This category includes nouns and pronouns, both of which are declined in much the same way.
They are declined in two numbers, the singular and plural; six cases, the nominative, vocative, accusative, genitive, dative, and locative; and in one of three genders, masculine, feminine, or neuter.
4.1 Personal pronouns
These decline in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd persons singular and plural in all cases except the locative. They also have dedicated adjectival forms, which are used for the possessive.
1st singular
éǵ
eǵóm
éǵō
mé
méne
mój
méǵhjo
mój
(H)mós
/-â
/-óm
2nd singular
tû
twé
téwe
tój
tébhi
tébhjo
tój
twós
/-â
/-óm
3rd singular
masculine
ís
éj
Hé
ím
ésjo
Héso
ésmej
Hésmōj
(H)ésmi
(
swós
/-â
/-óm
)
3rd singular neuter
íd
3rd singular feminine
î
îm̥
ésjās
(H)ésjāi
(H)ésjā(i)
1st plural
wéj
n̥smé
nos
n̥sméj
n̥s
n̥smi
n̥sós
/-â
/-óm
2nd plural
jû
usmé
wôs
wos
usméj
usmi
usós
/-â
/-óm
3rd plural masculine
éjes
íns
éjsom
éjsōm
Hésom
(H)éjmos
éjbhos
(H)éjsu
3rd plural neuter
î
3rd plural feminine
îes
îm̥s
în̥s
îsōm
éjsom
Hésom
îmos
(H)éjmos
éjbhos
îsu
(H)éjsu
In addition to the above possessive adjectives mós, tós, etc. alternative forms from daughter languages can be used, including (H)méjnos ~ -ā ~ -om (as in Proto-Germanic *mīnaz), mójos ~ -ā ~ -om (as Proto-Slavic *mojь), and méjos ~ -ā ~ -om (assuming potentially that the Latin form meus represents the dative méj with adjectival ending). Internally constructed forms include méwos ~ -ā ~ -om, formed using the oblique stem with adjectival ending, or the indeclinable genitive (H)méne.
4.2 Personal correlative and relative
Nominative
Accusative
Genitive
Dative
Locative
masc. sg.
qís
qím
qés(j)o
qésmej
qésmi
fem. sg.
qís
qé
neut. sg.
qíd
masc. pl.
qéjes
qíms
qéjsom
qéjmos
qéjbhos
qéjsu
fem. pl.
neut. pl.
qî
The above can be used as an independent pronoun, as in qís cémt? "Who came?"
In other contexts it can be used as a relative pronoun, such as in kápmi Hábōl qim bhrûghō "I have an apple which I like".
The difference between the two is that the pronoun form is stressed, but the relative form is not.
4.3 Proximal pronoun and determiner, and article
Nominative
Accusative
Genitive
Dative
Locative
masc. sg.
só
tóm
tósjo
tósmej
tósmi
neut. sg.
tód
fem. sg.
sā
tâm
tósjās
tósjāj
tósjā
masc. pl.
tój
tóms
tójsōm
tójmos
tójbhos
tójsu
neut. pl.
tâ
fem. pl.
tâs
tâm̥s
tâsōm
tâmos
tâbhos
tâsu
The above are used as both determiners for other nouns; when in need of a pronoun the form ḱíd is used instead: ḱíd Hésti Hwésu "this is good", and só Hnêr Hésti Hwésus "this man is good". só can also be used as an article, and so the latter sentence can be translated as "the man is good".
4.4 Distal pronoun and determiner
Nominative
Accusative
Genitive
Dative
Locative
masc. sg.
Hénos
Hónos
Hnós
Hénom
Hénosjo
Hénosmej
Hénosmi
neut. sg.
Hénod
fem. sg.
Hénā
Hénām
Hénosjās
Hénosjāej
Hénosjā
masc. pl.
Hénoj
Hénoms
Hénojsōm
Hénojmos
/-bhos
Hénojsu
neut. pl.
Hénā
fem. pl.
Hénās
Hénām̥s
Hénāsōm
Hénāmos
/-bhos
Hénāsu
There are multiple forms given in the first cell because the root can be reconstructed in each of those forms, all of which can be used as the basis for this demonstrative.
As with so, Hénos is used as a determiner, with its independent pronominal form being ḱênos: ḱênod Hésti Hwésu "that is good", and Hénos Hnêr Hésti Hwésus "that man is good".
4.5 Nouns and noun declension
Proto-Indo-European had somewhat complex noun declensions, which are carried over to SAvIE. As with pronouns, common nouns decline in the singular and plural, but also in the vocative to give six cases.
The pattern which is seen in many noun declensions is given below.
This only applies to masculine and neuter nouns, as noted in the tables above. Feminine nouns usually conform to the following:
Thematic
-ā type
-ī type
Feminine sg.
Feminine pl.
Feminine sg.
Feminine pl.
Nominative
-ā
-ās (← -āes)
(é)-ī
(é)-īs (← -īes)
Vocative
Accusative
-ām
-ām̥s
(é)-īm̥
(é)-īm̥s
Genitive
-ās
-āōm
(∅)-jâs
(∅)-jâōm
Dative
-āj (← -āej)
-ābhos
-āmos
(∅)-jâj (← -jâej)
(∅)-jâbhos
(∅)-jâmos
Locative
-ā(i)
-āsu
(∅)-jâ(i)
(∅)-jâsu
ī-type nouns retain a fixed stress-ablaut pattern, whereas ā-type nouns are much more flexible; these can be o-grade with stress on the ending, e-grade with shifting stress, or zero-grade with stress on the ending.
Many noun declensions are a variation on the above patterns. Some common variations are as follows.
4.5.1 -mn̥, -mō, -mên
These endings all look very similar to each other, and fulfil relatively similar functions. -mn̥ creates neuter result nouns, while -mō and -mên create masculine agent nouns. There is no appreciable difference in meaning between -mō and -mên; they are both included to use freely when they appear in cognates among daughter languages.
-mn̥
-mō
-mên
Nominative sg.
(é)-mn̥
(é)-mō
(∅)-mên
Genitive sg.
(∅)-méns
(∅)-m̥nés
Nominative pl.
(é)-mō
(é)-mones
(∅)-ménes
Genitive pl.
(∅)-m̥nés
(∅)-m̥nôm
4.5.2 -tōr, -têr, -trī
These endings derived masculine, masculine, and feminine agent noun endings.
-tōr
-têr
-trī
Nominative sg.
(é)-tōr
(∅)-têr
(é)-trī
Genitive sg.
(∅)-trés
(∅)-tr̥jâs
Nominative pl.
(é)-tores
(∅)-téres
(é)-trīs
Genitive pl.
(∅)-trôm
(∅)-tr̥jâōm
4.5.3 -trom, -tlom, -dhrom, -dhlom
This is a variation of 4.5.2, all of which produce neuter nouns of tools or instruments. There is no difference between forms with -r- and forms with -l-; however, the forms beginning -dh- are used after roots ending in a laryngeal, whether deleted or not, and -t- is used otherwise. They are all conjugated in the exact same way, so only the conjugation for -trom is given below.
-trom
Nominative sg.
(é)-trom
Genitive sg.
(é)-trosyo
(é)-trī
Nominative pl.
(é)-trā
Genitive pl.
(é)-trōm
4.5.4 -ō, -Hₒō
These are called nasal suffixes, because in each case but the nominative, ⟨n⟩ appears in the suffix. -ō creates masculine participant nouns; these are ones which indicate a person or thing which does something, or exists as the result of an action, such as skérō "meat" from *(s)kér- "to cut", with the resulting meaning being "something cut". A derivative of those, -Honos / -ā / -om, is used to create augmentative nouns.
-Hō is similar; it produces nouns and adjectives of all genders to create words which indicate possession of a certain quality, or a responsibility for carrying out or responsibility to carry out a certain action, like pl̥tHús "wide, broad" becoming Pĺ̥tHō "Plato", originally meaning "wide/broad one". It is assumed to be formed from Proto-Indo-European *-h₃en(h₂)-, and colours vowels accordingly (by -h₃-).
ō masculine
Hₒō masculine
Hₒō neuter
Hₒō feminine
-ō
-Hₒō
-Hₒon
-Hₒónī
Nominative sg.
(é)-ō
( ́)-Hō
( ́)-Hon
(∅)-Hónī
Genitive sg.
(∅)-nés
(∅)-Hnés
(∅)-Honjâs
Nominative pl.
(é)-ones
( ́)-Hones
( ́)-Hō
(∅)-Hónīs
Genitive pl.
(∅)-nôm
(∅)-Hnôm
(∅)-Hn̥jâōm
4.5.5 -r̥, -mr̥, -sr̥, -tr̥, -wr̥
These all belong to and are declined exactly as the basic ending -r̥, which is rare and unproductive. It produces very few basic neuter nouns.
-r̥
Nominative sg.
(ó)-r̥
Genitive sg.
(é)-n̥s
Nominative pl.
(ó)-r̥H
Genitive pl.
(é)-nōm
Nominative coll.
(é)-ōr
Genitive coll.
(∅)-nés
This ending is exceptional in having a collective number, which is grammatically plural. So, tâ wédōr means “the collective of all waters”, whereas tâ wódr̥H means “the (particular, definite, definable, countable) waters”.
4.5.6 -tus
This suffix produces masculine action nouns from verb roots.
-tus
Nominative sg.
(é)-tus
Genitive sg.
(∅)-téws
Nominative pl.
(é)-tewes
Genitive pl.
(∅)-téwōm
4.5.7 -is, -tis
-is produces common gender nouns, that is, those which can be either masculine or feminine. It is not shown with an ablaut pattern because it can be used with multiple, including (é)-is or (ó)-is. It also has the neuter form -i. -tis produces exclusively feminine action or abstract nouns.
-is
-tis
Nominative sg.
-is, -i
(é)-tis
Genitive sg.
-ejs
(∅)-téjs
Nominative pl.
-ejes, -ejH
(é)-tejes
Genitive pl.
-ejōm
(∅)-téjōm
4.5.8 Agentive and resultative -os
Nouns with the pattern (o)-ós create masculine agent nouns denoting someone or something which performs a related action, such as tomHós "cutter, slicer", from the verb tm̥nês (← tm̥-né-h₁-es) "to slice, to section, to cut up". When the stress shifts on to the root vowel, this produces a related result noun, tómHos "a cut, a slice". Both of these noun patterns do not shift stress or ablaut within their own paradigm (giving tomHósjo "of a/the cutter" and tómHosjo "of a/the slice").
4.5.9 -snā
The ending -snā is attached usually to verb stems to indicate either a result noun or a noun indicating the a summary of a category, for example converting tétḱes "to create, produce" into tétḱsnā "art, craft".
-snā
Nominative sg.
(é)-snā
Genitive sg.
(é)-snās
Nominative pl.
(é)-snās
Genitive pl.
(é)-snāōm
4.5.10 -sōr
-sōr is similar to -trī in that it produces feminine gender agentive nouns.
-sōr
Nominative sg.
(é)-sōr
Genitive sg.
(∅)-srés
Nominative pl.
(é)-sores
Genitive pl.
(∅)-srôm
4.5.11 -(n)â
The pattern (o)-â creates collective or mass nouns, or abstract or action nouns. This conjugates exactly as the thematic ā-type is expected to. This can also appear as (∅)-â, with the exact same meaning.
A slight extension of this is the pattern (o)-nâ also creating a deverbal abstract noun.
4.5.12 -iā
This is a variation of the feminine ending -ā augmented with -i-, used to create feminine abstract nouns.
4.5.A Combination of suffixes
Evidence suggests that some of the above suffixes were combined for various purposes. One example is 4.5.7 with 4.5.4: where -tis could be combined with -Hō to give -tīō, giving Latin -tiō and Proto-Celtic -tiyū; -tīō for example can be used to produce nouns of action or result.
4.6 Adjectives
Adjectives decline in all three genders, two numbers, and six cases. Their deeclensions follow many of the same patterns that nouns do. In particular, they follow athematic (méǵHs ~ m̥ǵHés, méǵHī ~ méǵHīs, méǵH ~ méǵH "great, large") or thematic (néwos ~ néwes, néwā ~ néwās, néwom ~ néwā "new") paradigms using a mixture of the basic masculine-, feminine- and neuter-gender endings given above.
Other adjectival formations are as follows.
4.6.1 Caland system: -onts, -us
The Caland system defines reproducible adjectival paradigms and their root forms for creating basic adjectives. Two common endings are -onts and -us, which ablaut as follows.
Masc. sg.
Neut. sg.
Fem. sg.
Masc. pl.
Neut. pl.
Fem. pl.
-onts
Nominative
(é)-onts
(é)-ont
(∅)-éntī
(é)-ontes
(é)-ontH
(∅)-éntīs
-onts
Genitive
(∅)-n̥tés
(∅)-n̥tjâs
(∅)-n̥tôm
(∅)-n̥tjâōm
-us
Nominative
(é)-us
(é)-u
(∅)-éwī
(é)-ewes
(é)-ū
(∅)-éwīs
-us
Genitive
(∅)-éws
(∅)-ujâs
(∅)-éwōm
(∅)-ujâōm
Although displaying somewhat idiosyncratic ablaut, these declensions are identical to the athematic endings given in 4.5.
4.6.2 Bahuvrihis: -ēs
A bahuvrihi is a compound word formation indicating possession of a certain quality, or execution of a certain action. These can either be adjectives or nouns in all genders. Its underlying form is *-es-s, due to which it also follows the athematic pattern.
The gendered forms are combined, giving a common-gender form.
Cmn. sg.
Neut. sg.
Cmn. pl.
Neut. pl.
Nominative
(é)-ēs
(é)-es
(é)-eses
(é)-ēs
Genitive
(é)-esos
(é)-esōm
4.6.3 Pertinence to a quality: -wénts
-wénts creates adjectives which indicate possession of a certain noun as a quality, or pertinence to that noun as a salient description, like Hn̥twént "limited".
Masc. sg.
Neut. sg.
Fem. sg.
Masc. pl.
Neut. pl.
Fem. pl.
Nominative
(∅)-wénts
(∅)-wént
(∅)-wéntī
(∅)-wéntes
(∅)-wéntH
(∅)-wéntīs
Genitive
(∅)-wn̥tés
(∅)-wn̥tjâs
(∅)-wn̥tôm
(∅)-wn̥tjâōm
4.6.4 Characteristic or typical of: -ískos, -ānos
These suffixes are cognate with the English -ish and -(i)an, and fulfil the same function: they create adjectives meaning something that is characteristic or typical of a certain noun.
Masc. sg.
Neut. sg.
Fem. sg.
Masc. pl.
Neut. pl.
Fem. pl.
Nominative
(∅)-iskós
(∅)-iskóm
(∅)-iskâ
(∅)-iskôs
(∅)-iskâ
(∅)-iskâs
Genitive
(∅)-iskósjo
(∅)-iskâs
(∅)-iskôm
(∅)-iskâōm
-ānós conjugates as -nós does, in 4.6.7.
4.6.5 Possession of a thing or quality, or having undergone an action: -ātos
The stress pattern is more similar to regular nouns, with the zero or unstressed full grade throughout.
Masc. sg.
Neut. sg.
Fem. sg.
Masc. pl.
Neut. pl.
Fem. pl.
Nominative
(∅)-ātós
(∅)-ātóm
(∅)-ātâ
(∅)-ātôs
(∅)-ātâ
(∅)-ātâs
Genitive
(∅)-ātósjo
(∅)-ātâs
(∅)-ātôm
(∅)-ātâōm
Any zero-grade adjective extended with -ā- or -ī- are declined identically.
4.6.6 Material or consistency: -īnós
-īnos creates adjectives generally related to a material of which something is made. Stress falls on the suffix at all times, but the root does not need to be zero-grade.
Masc. sg.
Neut. sg.
Fem. sg.
Masc. pl.
Neut. pl.
Fem. pl.
Nominative
-īnós
-īnóm
-īnâ
-īnôs
-īnâ
-īnâs
Genitive
-īnósjo
-īnâs
-īnôm
-īnâōm
4.6.7 Zero-grade adjectives
All the adjectives of this class require a zero-grade root. They are all declined with the following pattern:
Masc. sg.
Neut. sg.
Fem. sg.
Masc. pl.
Neut. pl.
Fem. pl.
Nominative
(∅)-Cós
(∅)-Cóm
(∅)-Câ
(∅)-Côs
(∅)-Câ
(∅)-Câs
Genitive
(∅)-Cósjo
(∅)-Câs
(∅)-Côm
(∅)-Câōm
(∅)-kós of or pertaining to something
(∅)-lós diminutive adjective or noun
(∅)-nós capable of (a verb), tending to (verb)
(∅)-rós basic adjectives in the Caland system
(∅)-tós past participles
(∅)-wós basic adjectives from verbs
(∅)-jós (athematic) basic adjectives from nouns
this appears as (é)-jos ~ (é)-josjo if the noun is thematic
4.6.8 Contrastive adjective
The contrastive adjective produces the slightly complex meaning of "something which is X rather than anything else".
Masc. sg.
Neut. sg.
Fem. sg.
Masc. pl.
Neut. pl.
Fem. pl.
Nominative
(é)-teros
(é)-terom
(é)-terā
(é)-terōs
(é)-terā
(é)-terās
Genitive
(é)-terosjo
(é)-terās
(é)-terōm
(é)-terāōm
4.6.9 Elative adjective
The elative adjectives is one which describes the greatness of something, meaning "very X".
Masc. sg.
Neut. sg.
Fem. sg.
Masc. pl.
Neut. pl.
Fem. pl.
Nominative
(é)-jōs
(é)-jos
(∅)-jésī
(é)-joses
(é)-jōs
(∅)-jésīs
Genitive
(∅)-isés
(∅)-isjā́s
(∅)-isôm
(∅)-isjâōm
4.6.10 Verbal participles
These essentially function as adjectives. They use several special forms of the adjective endings listed above in limited functions.
4.6.10.1 Present participle
The present participle uses the form (é)-onts ~ (∅)-n̥tés in thematic verbs, as does the -onts form in the Caland system above, and (∅)-ónts ~ (∅)-n̥tés in athematic verbs. It is directly equivalent to the English "-ing". It is used with Héses in any tense to indicate continuous tenses, such as Hésmi Hdónts "I am eating".
4.6.10.2 Past participle
The past participle uses the form (∅)-tós ~ (∅)-tósjo. As a verbal adjective it essentially means "X-ed". Although it can be used as an independent adjective, it is perhaps most commonly used in its neuter form with kápes "to have, get" in the perfect-tense construction, such as kápmi Hdtóm "I have eaten".
4.6.10.3 Passive participle
Unlike -tós, which is active in meaning, the passive participle indicates something which "has been X-ed". Its form is (é)-om(H)nos ~ (∅)-óm(H)nosjo in thematic verbs, an (∅)-m̥(H)nós ~ (∅)-m̥(H)nósjo in athematic verbs. It is also used with Héses to construct passive verb forms, such as Hésmi Hdm̥Hnós "I am eaten, I have been eaten".
4.6.10.4 Stative-type past participle
This participle is a special type with optional initial reduplication: masculine (é)-(∅)-wōs ~ (é)-(∅)-usos, feminine (é)-(∅)-usī ~ (e)-(∅)-usjâs, neuter (é)-(∅)-wos ~ (é)-(∅)-usos.
4.6.10.5 Perfect participle
Although Ancient Greek and Sanskrit had a perfect participle, such a formation would be against the spirit of SAE, which specifies a perfect-tense formation using the "have" verb. As such, there is no dedicated perfect participle; rather, a perfect participial formation involves the present participle of kápes and a past participle of another verb, such as kapónts wl̥tóm "having seen".
4.7 Adjective comparison
Adjectives can be further declined in two degrees: the comparative and the superlative. The comparative produces adjectives meaning "more X", while the superlative produces "the most X".
4.7.1 Comparative adjective
The comparative adjective degree can be expressed either with the contrastive -teros or elative -yōs ending. The comparative element translating to "than" is expressed with Hánti "against", and the noun being compared against is placed in the dative, for example ís Hésti Hl̥tóteros ~ Hl̥tójōs Hánti méǵhjo "he is taller than me".
4.7.2 Superlative adjective
The superlative degree expresses "the most X". As such, it is always used with the article só.
For ease, I have opted to reduce the potential superlative adjective endings to two, discounting those reconstructions with a laryngeal. The adjective is formed in one of two ways: (∅)-otm̥mós or (∅)-istós. The former is used for thematic adjectives, whereas the latter is used for athematic adjectives.
Masc. sg.
Neut. sg.
Fem. sg.
Masc. pl.
Neut. pl.
Fem. pl.
Nominative
(∅)-otm̥mós
(∅)-otm̥móm
(∅)-otm̥mâ
(∅)-otm̥môs
(∅)-otm̥mâ
(∅)-otm̥mâs
Genitive
(∅)-otm̥mósjo
(∅)-otm̥mâs
(∅)-otm̥môm
(∅)-otm̥mâōm
Nominative
(∅)-istós
(∅)-istóm
(∅)-istâ
(∅)-istôs
(∅)-istâ
(∅)-istâs
Genitive
(∅)-istósjo
(∅)-istâs
(∅)-istôm
(∅)-istâōm
Although this table describes each form as using a zero-grade root because the stress shifts to the ending, the root can also be made e-grade in all cases.
4.7.3 Absolute superlative adjective
The superlative can be augmented further, in order to create the absolute superlative, which holds even more force than the superlative. It is a combination of both superlative adjective forms, giving (∅)-istm̥mós. It declines exactly as -otm̥mós does.
Masc. sg.
Neut. sg.
Fem. sg.
Masc. pl.
Neut. pl.
Fem. pl.
Nominative
(∅)-istm̥mós
(∅)-istm̥móm
(∅)-istm̥mâ
(∅)-istm̥môs
(∅)-istm̥mâ
(∅)-istm̥mâs
Genitive
(∅)-istm̥mósjo
(∅)-istm̥mâs
(∅)-istm̥môm
(∅)-istm̥mâōm
5 Verbs
SAvIE verbs are complex, but with fewer irregularities than Proto-Indo-European's daughter languages. SAvIE in particular takes the feature of the "have"-perfect tense and expands the concept to include multiple periphrastic tenses and verb forms, including all continuous tenses, and all passive forms.
SAvIE verbs are divided into two kinds: conjugated and periphrastic. Conjugated forms are ones to which a suffix is attached to form a directly usable tense. Periphrastic forms involve a conjugated form of one of a limited selection of verbs, along with a particle. Particles themselves are one of four non-finite forms which indicate tense and aspect.
5.1 Non-finite forms, and infinitive
It should not be necessary to revise non-finite forms, as they are all described in 4.6.8. Two forms not described there are the infinitive, which is used simply to name the verb, the supine, used only in special verb constructions, and the purportative, used with verbs of wanting, owing, or intending.
The infinitive takes the form (é)-es, and is a shortened locative form of the purportative (é)-os and (é)-esos, which creates result or action nouns. This makes it cognate with the Ancient Greek (-ειν) and Latin (-ere) infinitives.
For deponents, the infinitive is formed with (∅)-és, and the purportatives (é)-osm̥ and (∅)-sés.
The supine takes the form (∅)-ént, also a locative form, of the present participle -onts. For deponents, it is (∅)-tój. It is used in combination with verbs of motion in order to indicate purpose, such as ís cémt Had wl̥ént mé "he came to see me".
5.2 Conjugated forms
Verbs each conjugate in multiple tenses, each of which has three persons (1st, 2nd, and 3rd), two numbers (singular and plural) and two moods (indicative and optative). In total there are four tenses: the nonpast (which encompasses the present and, optionally, future), the imperfect (semantically identical to the past continuous, but used especially in certain constructions), the aorist (or preterite, or simple past), and the habitual (which is technically tenseless).
All conjugated forms use one of two sets of endings, called the primary and secondary. Primary endings indicate the nonpast tense, and secondary endings most others. Each set of endings can be either thematic or athematic.
Primary
Secondary
Thematic
Athematic
Thematic
Athematic
1st person singular
-ō
-mi
-om
-m̥
2nd person singular
-esi
-si
-es
-s
3rd person singular
-eti
-ti
-et
-t
1st person plural
-omos
-mós
-ome
-mé
2nd person plural
-ete
-té
-ete
-té
3rd person plural
-onti
-énti
-ont
-ént
Whether a verb is thematic or not is unpredictable, and must be learnt on a case-by-case basis.
5.2.1 Nonpast
The nonpast combines both the present and future tenses. The simple future has an additional periphrastic tense, but the simple present does not. It is indicated by the primary endings.
The first model is of bhéres "to bear, carry". It is a root thematic verb.
Thematic nonpast verb
Model
Example
1st person singular
(é)-ō
bhérō I bear
2nd person singular
(é)-esi
bhéresi you bear
3rd person singular
(é)-eti
bhéreti he/she/it bears
1st person plural
(é)-omos
bhéromos we bear
2nd person plural
(é)-ete
bhérete you (pl.) bear
3rd person plural
(é)-onti
bhéronti they bear
This model is Hédes "to eat". It is a root athematic verb.
Athematic nonpast verb
Model
Example
1st person singular
(é)-mi
Hédmi I eat
2nd person singular
(é)-si
Hédsi you eat
3rd person singular
(é)-ti
Hédti he/she/it eats
1st person plural
(∅)-mós
Hdmós'''we eat
2nd person plural
(∅)-té
Hdté you (pl.) eat
3rd person plural
(∅)-énti
Hdénti they eat
Since they can be used as a future tense too, a nonpast form bhérō can mean both "I bear" and "I will bear", though for clarity the latter can be expressed with the periphrastic future tense, described later.
5.2.2 Imperfect
The imperfect is indicated by the usage of secondary endings in place of primary ones. It signals a past continuous tense.
Thematic imperfect verb
Model
Example
1st person singular
(é)-om
bhérom I was bearing
2nd person singular
(é)-es
bhéres you were bearing
3rd person singular
(é)-et
bhéret he/she/it was bearing
1st person plural
(é)-ome
bhérome we were bearing
2nd person plural
(é)-ete
bhérete you (pl.) were bearing
3rd person plural
(é)-onti
bhéronti they were bearing
Athematic imperfect verb
Model
Example
1st person singular
(é)-m̥
Hédm̥ I was eating
2nd person singular
(é)-s
Héds you were eating
3rd person singular
(é)-t
Hédt he/she/it was eating
1st person plural
(∅)-mé
Hdmé we were eating
2nd person plural
(∅)-té
Hdté you (pl.) were eating
3rd person plural
(∅)-énti
Hdénti they were eating
The main difference of the imperfect conjugated form from the past continuous periphrastic form is the usage in formulaic constructions, shown later.
5.2.3 Aorist
The aorist forms a simple past. It also uses the secondary endings, but can be one of two further formations. The derived aorist is given for root present verbs, that is, ones which are not formed with secondary derivation such as the nasal infix. This forms as below.
Aorist verb
Model
Example
1st person singular
(ê)-sm̥
bhêrsm̥ I bore
Hêdsm̥ I ate
2nd person singular
(ê)-s
bhêrs you bore
Hêds you ate
3rd person singular
(ê)-st
bhêrst he/she/it bore
Hêdst he/she/it ate
1st person plural
(é)-sme
bhérsme we bore
Hédsme we ate
2nd person plural
(é)-ste
bhérste you (pl.) bore
Hédste you (pl.) ate
3rd person plural
(é)-sn̥t
bhérsn̥t they bore
Hédsn̥t they ate
The second formation is the root aorist, given for derived verbs that do not fit into the above category. It uses the secondary endings attached to a root with no intervening secondary derivations, and can be either thematic or athematic. As such, it is completely identical with the imperfect tense of root present verbs. It differs from the imperfect of derived verbs by dropping secondary derivation. For example, for léjqes "to leave" has the (derived) present linéqti, (derived) imperfect linéqt, and root aorist léjqt.
5.2.4 Habitual
The habitual has no explicit tense – the position in time of the relevant action depends solely on the context of the sentence. The form of this is a thematic verb with secondary endings.
Dynamic habitual verb
Model
Example
1st person singular
(∅)-óm
Hdóm I used to eat
2nd person singular
(∅)-és
Hdés you used to eat
3rd person singular
(∅)-ét
Hdét he/she/it used to eat
1st person plural
(∅)-óme
Hdóme we used to eat
2nd person plural
(∅)-éte
Hdéte you used to eat
3rd person plural
(∅)-ónt
Hdónt they used to eat
5.2.5 Stative-type present
For very few verbs the present is formed using the Proto-Indo-European stative formation. These have no imperfect or aorist, and have special past participle forms built on -wōs ~ -usī ~ -wos.
Stative habitual verb
Model
Example
1st person singular
(ó)-Ha
móghHa I can
2nd person singular
(ó)-tHa
móghtHa you can
3rd person singular
(ó)-e
móghe he/she/it knows
1st person plural
(∅)-mé
m̥ghmé we can
2nd person plural
(∅)-é
m̥ghé you (pl.) know
3rd person plural
(∅)-êr
m̥ghêr they know
5.2.6 Deponent
A very small number of verbs is a deponent: one which looks like an old mediopassive form, but acts as though it were active. This is not counted as a passive form. Deponent verbs have special forms in all tenses.
Deponent verbs
Nonpast
Imperfect
Aorist
Habitual
1st person singular
athematic(∅)-Hár
thematic(é)-ōr
(∅)-Há
(é)-ōa
(é)-sHa
(∅)-ôr
2nd person singular
(∅)-tHár
(é)-etHar
(∅)-tHá
(é)-etHa
(é)-stHa
(∅)-étHar
3rd person singular
(∅)-(t)ór
(é)-etor
(∅)-(t)ó
(é)-eto
(é)-s(t)o
(∅)-étor
1st person plural
(∅)-mósdhH
(é)-omosdhH
(∅)-médhH
(é)-omedhH
(é)-smedhH
(∅)-ómosdhH
2nd person plural
(∅)-dhHwé
(é)-edhHwe
(∅)-dhHwé
(é)-edhHwe
(é)-sdhHwe
(∅)-édhHwe
3rd person plural
(∅)-rór ~ (∅)-ntór
(é)-oror ~ (é)-ontor
(∅)-ró ~ (∅)-ntó
(é)-oro ~ (é)-ento
(é)-sro ~ -sn̥to
(∅)-óror ~ (∅)-óntor
5.2.7 Imperative
The imperative is its own mood, and conjugates only in the second and third person. It is tenseless, so there is only one set of imperative forms for each verb. Their forms differ only slightly based on thematicity.
Thematic imperative
Model
Example
2nd person singular
(é)-e
bhére bear!
3rd person singular
(é)-etu
bhéretu let him/her/it bear!
2nd person plural
(é)-ete
bhérete bear (pl.)!
3rd person plural
(é)-ontu
bhérontu let them bear!
Athematic imperative
Model
Example
2nd person singular
(é)-∅
(∅)-dhí
Héd
Hddhí eat!
3rd person singular
(é)-tu
Hédtu let him/her/it eat!
2nd person plural
(∅)-té
Hdté eat (pl.)!
3rd person plural
(∅)-éntu
Hdéntu let them eat!
Stative-type imperative
Model
Example
2nd person singular
(e)-(ó)-∅
(e)-(∅)-dhí
memón remember!
memn̥dhíremember!
3rd person singular
(e)-(ó)-tu
memóntu let him/her/it remember!
2nd person plural
(e)-(∅)-té
memn̥té remember (pl.)!
3rd person plural
(e)-(∅)-éntu
memnéntu let them remember!
Deponent imperative
Model
Example
2nd person singular
(é)-o
wéso! wear (it)!
3rd person singular
(é)-(e)to
wésto! let him/her/it wear!
2nd person plural
(é)-(e)dh(H)we
wésdh(H)we! wear (pl.) (it)!
3rd person plural
(é)-(o)nto
wésn̥to! let them wear!
5.2.8 Special formation types
Some verb forms include affixes which attach to a verb root to form a stem, onto which certain endings are added. In this document, primary indicates verbs whose suffixes do not add significant special meaning, which form a root present and sigmatic aorist (including on suffixes -ê-, -ā-, etc.); secondary indicates verbs which use special derivational suffixes for the present and form a root aorist; tertiary indicates verbs which use meaningful derivational suffixes but do not form an aorist because the meaning of the derived verb contrasts the meaning of its non-derived counterpart.
5.2.8.1 Nasal infix (secondary)
There is a special form of nonpast and imperfect formed with the nasal infix-né- ~ -n- on the zero-grade stem. This infix ablauts from the singular to the plural in the indicative, remains -né- in the subjunctive, and is conjugated with athematic endings. The infix is only seen in these two tenses.
5.2.8.2 sḱ-inchoative verbs (primary)
The infix -sḱ- attaches to some verb roots to form verbs which occasionally, but not always, have an inchoative meaning. These verbs are thematic.
Some verbs can be formed with (é)-jeti or (∅)-jéti. The former will always form transitive verbs, and the latter intransitive verbs. The intransitive in particular implies an ongoing action, and as such has no aorist tense. Verb roots can be combined with each of these to produce a pair of transitive and intransitive verbs, but this need not be the case. In case it does, conjugated verb forms differ in all forms except the aorist, where both forms are identical.
5.2.8.4 -néw- infix verbs (tertiary)
As with the nasal infix, some verbs will form their present, imperfect, and habitual tenses with -néw-. This is placed after a zero-grade verb root, and is athematic in the present and imperfect. It ablauts to -nu- when unstressed, including in all persons of the habitual.
5.2.8.5 Causative formations (primary)
The verb form (o)-éjeti ~ (o)-éjonti forms causative verbs, such as Hédmi "to eat" becoming Hodéjeti "to feed". This forms verbs meaning "to cause to do X". This makes explicitly transitive verbs, often from existing verb roots or from adjective roots.
5.2.8.6 Desiderative formations (primary)
The affix -sj- is added to very few verb roots to form desiderative "want to X" verbs. It is thematic, attaches to the zero-grade root, and is accented on the thematic vowel, as Hdsjéti "to want to eat, to be hungry".
5.2.8.7 Adjectival stative formations (primary)
The suffix (∅)-êti ~ (∅)-ên̥ti (athematic) or (∅)-êjeti ~ (∅)-êjonti (thematic) form stative "to be X" verbs specifically from adjective roots, such as Hrudhêti "to be red". These verbs can expand slightly in meaning from a stative "to be X" to a dynamic "to go X, to become X". In either case they are explicitly intransitive verbs, and must be made causative to become transitive.
5.2.8.8 Reduplicated thematic verbs (secondary)
Very few verbs will form their nonpast and imperfect with (í)-(∅)-eti ~ (í)-(∅)-onti; they have a reduplicated element with -i- as the vowel which retains the stress, such as sísdeti "to sit". These have no special meaning, and are simply formations of the tense.
5.2.8.9 Reduplicated athematic verbs (secondary)
Similarlty to the above, some verbs will form with (í/é)-(e)-ti ~ (í/é)-(∅)-nti, such as stístāti "to stand up". These verbs also have no particular nuance, and are formed arbitrarily.
5.2.8.10 Zero-grade thematic formation (primary)
The so-called tudati type verb forms all tenses from (∅)-éti ~ (∅)-ónti, in which case its habitual and imperfect are identical.
5.2.8.11 Factitive (deadjectival) verbs (primary)
The factitive verb form (é)-āti ~ (é)-ān̥ti creates verbs that imply "to make X", such as néwāti "to renew, to make new".
5.2.8.12 Denominative verbs (primary)
Despite their similarity with the -j- infix verbs described in 5.2.7.3, the verb forms (∅)-ejéti ~ (∅)-ejónti and (∅)-ājéti ~ (∅)-ājónti are denominative (and occasionally deadjectival) suffixes; they are derived from (mainly) noun stems to indicate a performance of that noun.
These verbs are marked by the thematic suffix -ājéti ~ -ājónti, and may appear as o-grade among others. This suffix forms verbs with iterative (repetition of an action, but only during one distinct occasion), frequentative (occasional repetition of an action on several undefined occasions), or intensive meaning.
5.2.8.14 -dhHéti resultative formation (primary)
The resultative formation (é)-dhHeti ~ (é)-dhHonti generally expresses “to become X”. As a result it is most commonly formed from adjective roots.
5.3 Periphrastic forms
These verb forms are a combination of a conjugated form and a non-finite form: a conjugated verb and a participle.
5.3.1 Explicit future tense
Although the nonpast tense can be used as an implicit future, a periphrastic future can be expressed with the verb Héjes "to go", with the supine form, such as éǵHéjmi Hdént "I am going to eat, I will eat".
5.3.2 Perfect tense
The perfect tense is handled by the verb kápes, which is only used to form this particular tense. It carries the meaning of "have X-ed". The nonpast tense is used with the past participle, such as éǵ kápmi Hdtóm "I have eaten".
If there is no direct object, the neuter form -tóm of the participle should be used. However, if there is a direct object, the past participle should match the gender of the object, such as íd kápti Hdtâ îm̥ "it has eaten her".
5.3.3 Pluperfect tense
The pluperfect "had X-ed" can be formed by changing the conjugated from of kápes from the nonpast to the aorist, such as éǵ kâpsm̥ Hdtóm "I had eaten". The participle must also agree as in the perfect tense.
5.3.4 Future perfect tense
Instead of using kápes, the future formation of Héjes must be used with the supine form kapént and a past participle, such as éǵ Héjmi kapént Hdtóm "I will have eaten". Once again, that the participle must agree with the object's gender is retained.
5.3.5 Continuous tenses
A continuous tense indicates an explicitly imperfective tense, showing that an action is underway and incomplete.
Continuous tenses can be formed with the nonpast and imperfect conjugations of Héses along with a present participle, such as Hésmi Hdónts "I am eating", or Hésm̥ Hdónts "I was eating".
In addition, the future tense can form a continuous: Héjmi Hsént Hdónts "I will be eating", and Héjmi kapént Hstóm Hdónts "I will have been eating".
5.3.6 Imperfective anterior
This construction translates as "was going to X". It can either take the imperfect or the aorist form of Héses, with the present participle of Héjes and the supine. The aorist form is usually used as a simple description of events: bhéwHsm̥ Hjónts Hdént "I was going to eat". The imperfect form, on the contrary, is usually used to introduce the context before another action, with the second action being placed in the aorist: Hésm̥ Hjónts Hdént, qomóḱs ís cémt "I was going to eat when he came".
5.3.7 Passive forms
SAvIE makes no distinction between the middle and the passive, preferring only to use a passive. This is formed with any conjugated form of Héses with the passive participle, such as bhéwHsm̥ Hdm̥Hnós "I was eaten".
Periphrastic tenses can also be made passive: Hésm̥ Hjónts Hsént Hdm̥Hnós, qomóḱs ís cémt "I was going to be eaten when he came".
5.4 Subjunctive
The subjunctive is a conjugated verb form used either to express uncertainty semantically, or to express a relative clause.
5.4.1 Nonpast subjunctive
The subjunctive of root thematic nonpast verbs simply lengthens the theme vowel, with -ō gaining -H; given the proto-form is *-ōh₂, no change is expected, but -H is added to distinguish the subjunctive form from the indicative.
Thematic nonpast verb
Model
Example
1st person singular
(é)-ō
bhérōH (that) I bear
2nd person singular
(é)-ēsi
bhérēsi (that) you bear
3rd person singular
(é)-ēti
bhérēti (that) he/she/it bear
1st person plural
(é)-ōmos
bhérōmos (that) we bear
2nd person plural
(é)-ēte
bhérēte (that) you (pl.) bear
3rd person plural
(é)-ōnti
bhérōnti (that) they bear
The athematic nonpast verbs, meanwhile, are converted to thematic verbs with acrostatic stress.
Athematic nonpast verb
Model
Example
1st person singular
(é)-ō
Hédō'''(that) I eat
2nd person singular
(é)-esi
Hédesi (that) you eat
3rd person singular
(é)-eti
Hédeti (that) he/she/it eat
1st person plural
(é)-omos
Hédomos (that) we eat
2nd person plural
(é)-ete
Hédete (that) you (pl.) eat
3rd person plural
(é)-onti
Hédonti (that) they eat
5.4.2 Imperfect subjunctive
There is no imperfect subjunctive in SAvIE; the habitual subjunctive should be used instead.
5.4.3 Aorist subjunctive
Since the aorist uses athematic secondary endings, the subjunctive changes these to thematic primary endings, and keeps a lengthened e-grade root with acrostatic stress.
Aorist verb
Model
Example
1st person singular
(ê)-sō
bhêrsō (that) I bore
Hêdsō (that) I ate
2nd person singular
(ê)-sesi
bhêrsesi (that) you bore
Hêdsesi (that) you ate
3rd person singular
(ê)-seti
bhêrseti (that) he/she/it bore
Hêdseti (that) he/she/it ate
1st person plural
(ê)-somos
bhêrsomos (that) we bore
Hêdsomos (that) we ate
2nd person plural
(ê)-sete
bhêrsete (that) you (pl.) bore
Hêdsete (that) you (pl.) ate
3rd person plural
(ê)-sonti
bhêrsonti (that) they bore
Hêdsonti (that) they ate
5.4.4 Habitual subjunctive
In the habitual subjunctive of dynamic verbs, the theme vowel is lengthened and used with primary endings, against a zero-grade root, with accent always falling on the endings as in the indicative.
Dynamic habitual verb
Model
Example
1st person singular
(∅)-ôH
HdôH (that) I used to eat
2nd person singular
(∅)-êsi
Hdêsi (that) you used to eat
3rd person singular
(∅)-êti
Hdêti (that) he/she/it used to eat
1st person plural
(∅)-ômos
Hdômos (that) we used to eat
2nd person plural
(∅)-ête
Hdête (that) you used to eat
3rd person plural
(∅)-ônti
Hdônti (that) they used to eat
The habitual subjunctive of stative verbs, by contrast, takes an e-grade root with acrostatic stress, and thematic primary endings, identical to root thematic verbs.
Stative habitual verb
Model
Example
1st person singular
(é)-ō
wéjdō (that) I used to know
2nd person singular
(é)-esi
wéjdesi (that) you used to know
3rd person singular
(é)-eti
wéjdeti (that) he/she/it used to know
1st person plural
(é)-omos
wéjdomos (that) we used to know
2nd person plural
(é)-ete
wéjdete (that) you (pl.) used to know
3rd person plural
(é)-onti
wéjdonti (that) they used to know
5.4.5 Stative-type subjunctives
Stative habitual verb
Model
Example
1st person singular
(é)-ō
wéjdō (that) I used to know
2nd person singular
(é)-esi
wéjdesi (that) you used to know
3rd person singular
(é)-eti
wéjdeti (that) he/she/it used to know
1st person plural
(é)-omos
wéjdomos (that) we used to know
2nd person plural
(é)-ete
wéjdete (that) you (pl.) used to know
3rd person plural
(é)-onti
wéjdonti (that) they used to know
5.4.6 Deponent subjunctives
As is the case with active verbs, there is no form for the imperfect, and the habitual must be used to cover both tenses.
Deponent subjunctive
Nonpast
Aorist
Habitual
1st person singular
athematic(é)-ōr
thematic(é)-ōHar
(ê)-sōr
(∅)-ôHar
2nd person singular
(é)-etHar
(é)-ētHar
(ê)-setHar
(∅)-êtHar
3rd person singular
(é)-etor
(é)-ētor
(ê)-setor
(∅)-êtor
1st person plural
(é)-omosdhH
(é)-ōmosdhH
(ê)-somosdhH
(∅)-ômosdhH
2nd person plural
(é)-edhHwe
(é)-ēdhHwe
(ê)-sedhHwe
(∅)-êdhHwe
3rd person plural
(é)-oror ~ (é)-ontor
(é)-ōror ~ (é)-ōntor
(ê)-sontor ~ (ê)-soror
(∅)-ôror ~ (∅)-ôntor
5.5 The irregular verb Héses
Héses "to be" is an irregular verb; it is suppletive in the aorist indicative and aorist and habitual subjunctive tense, where it takes from the stem bhū-, from *bʰuH-. It is important to note that the lengthened grade (seen in the aorist) is bhéwH-, filling in an -e- by analogy, treating bhū- as the zero-grade and bhéwH- as the full-grade form.
This is the complete conjugation of Héses.
Héses
"to be"
Indicative
Subjunctive
Imp.
Nonp.
Impf.
Aor.
Hab.
Nonp.
Aor.
Hab.
1st sg.
Hésmi
Hésm̥
bhéwHsm̥
Hsóm
Hésō
bhéwHsō
bhūôH
'''⸻
2nd sg.
Hési
Hés
bhéwHs
Hsés
Hésesi
bhéwHesi
bhūêsi
Hsdhí
3rd sg.
Hésti
Hést
bhéwHst
Hsét
Héseti
bhéwHseti
bhūêti
Héstu
1st pl.
Hsmós
Hsmé
bhûsme
Hsóme
Hésomos
bhéwHsomos
bhūômos
⸻
2nd pl.
Hsté
bhûste
Hséte
Hésete
bhéwHsete
bhūête
Hsté
3rd pl.
Hsénti
Hsént
bhûsn̥t
Hsónt
Hésonti
bhéwHsonti
bhūônti
Hséntu
Prs. p.
Hsónts ~ Hséntī ~ Hsóntas ~ Hsónt
Pst. p.
Hstós ~ Hstâ ~ Hstás ~ Hstóm
Pass. p.
none
Purp.
Hésos
Supine
Hsént
6 Gender-neutral paradigm
In SAvIE, there exists a newly-developed gender-neutral form which encompasses a pronoun and large selection of adjectival endings corresponding with each of the adjectives above that has explicitly gendered forms, meaning that common-gender forms are not covered by this paradigm.
The basis of the gender-neutral paradigm is the sound /a/, spelt as ⟨a⟩.
Its pronominal form is as follows:
3rd singular neutral
jás
jám
jás
jâj
jaj
(
swós
/-â
/-ás
/-óm
)
3rd plural neutral
jâs
jáms
jáōm
jámos
jásu
(
swós
/-â
/-ás
/-óm
)
Adjectives, consequently, all decline with a.
-onts → -éntas
-us → -was
-wénts → -wéntas
-os → -oas → -ōs
-s → -as
Nominative sg.
(∅)-éntas
(é)-was
(∅)-wéntas
-o-as → -ōs
(é)-as
Genitive sg.
(∅)-n̥tás
(∅)-éwas
(∅)-wn̥tás
-o-as-jo → -ōsjo
(∅)-ás
Nominative pl.
(∅)-éntajes
(é)-ewajes
(∅)-wéntajes
-o-ajes → -ōjes
(é)-ajes
Genitive pl.
(∅)-n̥tájōm
(∅)-éwajōm
(∅)-wn̥tájōm
-o-ajōm → -ōjōm
(∅)-ájōm
An example of this is éǵ wéjdō qid jás Hésti Hwéswas "I know that they (sg.) are good".
7 Pro-forms
SAvIE pro-forms include pronouns and demonstratives, and question forms known as wh-words. They are outlined in the table below.
There are differences between determiner forms and pronoun forms. Determiner forms are bound morphemes, and can only be used in conjunction with a nominal. So, qós? cannot be used independently, but must always be used as qós ǵhmô? "which person?".
Similarly, the pronoun form can only be used independently, and not to qualify a nominal, such as qís cémt? "who came?".
In addition, the dual forms qóteros?'''and qíteros? also display this distinction: qóteros ǵhmô cémt? "which of the two people came?" as opposed to qíteros cémt? "which (of the two) came?".
7.2 Interrogative and relative forms
As mentioned in 2.2, there is absolute syncretism between the interrogative (question) forms, and relative forms, so the same word will be used for qís cémt? "who came?" as in só ǵhmô qis cémt "the person who came". The difference between the words, as seen in the examples, is that the interrogative forms must be stressed, but the relative forms do not need to be.
7.3 Proximal, medial, distal
There are three levels of deixis in SAvIE. If one imagines two people speaking to each other, deixis works like this: the proximal indicates something which is closest to the speaker, the medial indicates something close to the listener, and the distal far from both.
7.4 Location, source, goal
There is a small difference between these forms. Since source and goal are fairly self explanatory (indicating respectively where something comes from and what something goes to), location indicates where something exists statically, and lacks any implication of movement. As such, it tends to be used with Héses often: kúr Hésti ís? "where is he?", whereas the source/goal forms tend to be used often with verbs of motion: qôdhe cémt ís? "where did he come from?", and qómde Hêjst ís? "where did he go to?".
However, colloquially, the location form can be used for both of these: kúr cémt ís? and kúr Hêjst ís?, especially when the context is clear.
8 Numerals
There are two major classes of numerals, the cardinal and the ordinal. Cardinal numerals indicate plain numbers, and ordinal numerals indicate the order of a number in a series.
8.1 "one"
The number 1 conjugates as a regular adjective. Its base form is Hójnos, which is related to the indefinite article Hójwos, with a suppletive ordinal form pr̥Hwós.
Cardinal
Ordinal
Nominative sg.
Hójnos
Hójnā
Hójnōs
Hójnom
pr̥Hwós ~ pr̥Hmós
pr̥Hwâ
pr̥Hwôs
pr̥Hwóm
Genitive sg.
Hójnosjo
Hójnās
Hójnôsjo
pr̥Hwósjo
pr̥Hwâs
pr̥Hwôsjo
Nominative pl.
⸻
pr̥Hwôs
pr̥Hwâs
pr̥Hwôjes
pr̥Hwâ
Genitive pl.
pr̥Hwôm
pr̥Hwâōm
pr̥Hwôjōm
There is no plural form for the cardinal, since you cannot express one of multiple things.
8.2 "two"
The number 2 does not decline for case, its form is dwô, dwâH, dwój(H) in cardinal form. Its ordinal form is either Hánteros, Hánterā, Hánterom (noting the contrastive ending), or séqonts, séqontī, séqont (from a participial form of the verb séqeti "to follow"). It also has the special prefix form dwi-.
8.3 "three"
Beginning with tréjes "three", the ordinal numbers become more regularised. Despite being slightly irregular, these forms do in fact decline as though their nominative singular ended in -s, with the oblique stem trí- or tr̥j-. The feminine stem, exceptionally, is tisr-, and also declines as a noun in -s. It also has the special prefix form tri-.
Cardinal
Ordinal
Nominative sg.
⸻
tritós
tritâ
tritôs
tritóm
Genitive sg.
tritósjo
tritâs
tritôsjo
Nominative pl.
tréjes
tísres
trôjes
trî
tritôs
tritâs
tritôjes
tritâ
Genitive pl.
tr̥jôm
tisrôm
tr̥jôjōm
tritôm
tritâōm
tritôjōm
8.3 "four"
Similarly to "three", the number 4 has a feminine stem qétesr- (oblique qetesr-) and a stem for all other genders qetwór- (oblique qetur- and qetwr̥-).
Cardinal
Ordinal
Nominative sg.
⸻
qetwr̥tós
qetwr̥tâ
qetwr̥tôs
qetwr̥tóm
Genitive sg.
qetwr̥tósjo
qetwr̥tâs
qetwr̥tôsjo
Nominative pl.
qetwóres
qétesres
qetwórajes
qetwôr
qetwr̥tôs
qetwr̥tâs
qetwr̥tôsjo
qetwr̥tâ
Genitive pl.
qeturôm
qetesrôm
qeturájōm
qetwr̥tôm
qetwr̥tâōm
qetwr̥tôjōm
8.4 5 to 10
These numbers do not decline for gender or case.
Cardinal
Ordinal
5
pénqe
penqetós / -â / -óm
6
swéḱs
sweḱstós / -â / -óm
7
septḿ̥
septm̥mós / -â / -óm
8
(H)oḱtôw
(H)oḱtowós / -â / -óm
9
Hnéwn̥
Hnewn̥nós / -â / -óm
10
déḱm̥
deḱm̥tós / -â / -óm
8.5 11 to 19
These numbers do not seem to have reconstructible proto-language forms. As such, I am assigning them values with internal morphology: the number déḱm̥, followed by the augment particle Hé, and a number between 1 and 9, such as déḱm̥ He Hójnos "eleven", to déḱm̥ He Hnéwn̥ "nineteen". Alternatively, the numbers can be prefixed unstressed to déḱm̥ as below.
In counting without referring to any specific object, the neuter forms of the numbers 1-4 should be used. When the numbers are used attributively, they should match the gender and number of the following numeral.
Cardinal
Ordinal
11
déḱm̥ He Hójnom
Hojnodéḱm̥
deḱm̥tós / -â / -ôs / -óm
+
corresponding cardinal numbers
12
déḱm̥ He dwójH
dwidéḱm̥
13
déḱm̥ He trî
tridéḱm̥
14
déḱm̥ He qetwôr
qeturdéḱm̥
15
déḱm̥ He pénqe
penqedéḱm̥
16
déḱm̥ He swéḱs
sweḱsdéḱm̥
17
déḱm̥ He septḿ̥
septm̥déḱm̥
18
déḱm̥ He (H)oḱtôw
(H)oḱtōwdéḱm̥
19
déḱm̥ He Hnéwn̥
Hnewn̥déḱm̥
8.6 20 to 90
Each multiple of 10 has a unique term, and combines with numbers exactly as déḱm̥ does.
Cardinal
Ordinal
20
(d)wídḱm̥ti
(d)widḱm̥tós
30
tridḱómt
tridḱm̥tós
40
qétwr̥dḱómt
qétwr̥dkm̥tós
50
penqedḱómt
penqedḱm̥tós
60
sweḱsdḱómt
sweḱsdḱm̥tós
70
septm̥dḱómt
septm̥dkm̥tós
80
(H)oḱtódḱomt
(H)oḱtodḱm̥tós
90
Hnéwn̥dḱomt
Hnewn̥dkm̥tós
8.7 Prefix forms
There are special forms used for prefixing numbers to nominals.
Cardinal
1
sm̥-
2
dwi-
3
tri-
4
qetwr̥-
5
penqe-
6
sweḱs-
7
septm̥-
8
(H)oḱto-
9
Hnewn̥-
10, and multiples
dekm̥-, -dkm̥t-
8.8 Larger numbers
The numbers 100 and 1,000 are ḱm̥tóm and (sm̥)ǵhéslom~tûsonts. ḱm̥tóm and (sm̥)ǵhéslom are invariable, whereas tûsonts declines as a regular -onts noun or adjective. Their ordinal forms are ḱm̥tontós "hundredth" and (sm̥)ǵheslontós~tūsontós "thousandth".
A derivative of (sm̥)ǵhéslom, combined with the augmentative suffix, giving (sm̥)ǵhéslHonom (from *(sm̥)ǵhéslHonom) is used to mean "million" with the ordinal form (sm̥)ǵheslHontós; further derivation gives disǵhéslHonom (ordinal form disǵheslHontós), meaning "billion" and trisǵhéslHonom (ordinal form trisǵheslHontós) for "trillion". Prefix forms can be used even further, giving simple prefixes up to deḱm̥ǵhéslHonom "decillion", and much greater numbers up to Hnéwn̥dḱomtHnéwn̥ǵhéslHonom for "novemnonagintillion".
The connector He should only be used between tens and units of each group of three numbers. So, the number 987,654,321 would be represented as Hnéwn̥ ḱm̥tóm Hoḱtodḱómt '''He''' septḿ̥ ǵhéslHonā, swéḱs ḱm̥tóm penqedḱómt '''He''' qetwôr túsontH, trî ḱm̥tóm (d)wídḱm̥ti '''He''' Hójnom.
8.9 Multiplicative forms
Each number can be given a special multiplicative form, producing an adjective meaning "X times". Multiplicatives are formed by affixing the special prefix of the numbers 1-10 to the word -pléḱs "-fold".
For example, 1-4 produce the forms sm̥pléḱs "single, onefold", dwipléḱs "double, twofold", tripléḱs "triple, threefold", and qetwr̥pléḱs "quadruple, fourfold".
8.10 Exceptional "times" forms
The numbers 2 and 3 have the special forms dís and trís, meaning "twice" and "thrice" respectively.
8.11 Collective forms
A collective numeral is one which specifies "a group of X". The first form is dwôdwō, meaning "pair". The rest are formed by suffixing -ō to the prefix form of a number, with an intervening -l- (as if from -lós) to prevent hiatus. The stress falls on the prefix in the nominative-vocative-accusative, and the ending in the oblique, as expected for -ō. This gives tríō "trio, threesome", qetwŕ̥ō "quartet, foursome", qénqelō "quintet, fivesome", swéḱsō "sextet", septḿ̥ō "septet", (H)oḱtólō "octet", Hnéwnō "nonet", and déḱmō "dectet". Using prefixed numbers makes forms such as dwidéḱmō "dozen". The larger numbers give ḱm̥tolō "group of a hundred", (sm̥)ǵhéslō ~ tûsontō "group of a thousand", and (sm̥)ǵhéslōnō "group of a million" with derivatives thereof.
8.12 Case agreement
The numbers 1,3, and 4, given that they decline, are used attributively as though they were adjectives, meaning the noun which they count can be in any case, and the case of the number and noun must agree: Hójnos wīrós "one man", tr̥jôm wīrôm "of three men", qetwr̥mós wīrómos "(for/to) four men". Since other numbers do not decline, only the noun which they modify declines according to the function of the main noun: éǵ wélō pénqe wīróms "I see five men".
9 Prepositions
Prepositions in SAvIE always precede the nominal which they modify; they will always be placed before nouns and adjectives. They govern only one of two cases: the locative for prepositions which imply location at, near, or in relation to something, and the accusative for motion to or from, and everything else. So, prepositions such as Hén "in" can be used with different cases to modify their meaning, as in Hén dém "in a house" and Hén dôm "into a house".
Positional adverbs, such as déḱs "(on the) right", can also be used, requiring the genitive: déḱs tosjo déms "to/on the right of the house".
Below is a list of prepositions and positional adverbs and their meanings with the cases they govern.
Preposition
Meaning
Preposition
Meaning
bhêǵhs
without
Hpó
from
dê
from
of
thanks to
Hpós
after
déḱs
on/to the right
ḱóm
with (using, in the company of)
énu
after
along
me
(H)éti
beyond
pér
through, via, by means of
Hén
in
into
péri
about, regarding, because of
Héǵhs
out (of)
out (from)
préti
towards
Heǵhstós
outside of
préj
in front of
Héǵhsteros
besides, other than
pró
before, in front of
to(ward), up to
Hentér
between
r̥ / rô / rôdhi
for
Hépi
on, upon, at (sea etc.), on (animals etc.)
onto
sn̥(H)tér
separate from
without
Hn̥dó
into
~ swéd
without
Hn̥dóm
inside of, within
tr̥Hás
across, along, through
Hn̥dhér
beneath, underneath
úd
upwards
above
+ Hád going up to
Hn̥dhí
under
to the bottom of
upér(i)
above, over
Hád
at
to(wards)
upó
under
Hánt(i)
opposite
wí
away from
against
Hapó
away from
away from
wír
without
Háwti
either / or
Hm̥bhí
around, surrounding
about, regarding
10 Discourse
The most important addition to this basic overview of grammar is discursive words; those which can be used to carry and shape conversations.
10.1 Questions and particles
Ordinarily, questions in SAvIE need not be marked either at the start or the end of the sentence. As per 3.1, questions are indicated by inverting the subject and verb: ís cémt "he came" becomes cémt is? "did he come?". When using pro-forms, these start the sentence: qís Hésti ís? "who is he?".
However, the word Hár ~ Hr̥, meaning "so" or "thus" in positive sentences, can be used to introduce a sentence: Hár qís Hésti ís? "so who is he?".
In addition, the phrase né Hésti…? "isn't it…?" can be used with the regular statement to form a yes/no question in one of two ways: firstly, it can be used to introduce a subordinate clause, as in né Hésti, qid ís cémt? "isn't it [the case] that he came?"; the second is that it can be used as a tag question at the end of a sentence, as in ís cémt, né Hésti? "he came, isn't it?".
The simple responses to yes/no questions is nójnom, né tód, or Hóju qíd "no", and the positive is já ~ sejḱe ~ tód ~ dô. There is no fundamental difference between any of these words; they have different origins and can be used depending on the speaker's preference for their source. For example, nójnom is a shortening of né (H)ójnom, from Latin nōn, whereas Hóju qíd is the form of Greek οὐ(κ) ~ οὐ(χ) and Armenian ոչ; meanwhile, já is ubiquitous in Germanic, séjḱe also from Latin sīc, (né) tódas seen in Celtic languages, such as Welsh do ~ naddo, or dô as in Slavic да.
In addition to the simple answers, SAvIE can produce yes/no answers to polar questions by repeating the verb either in a positive or negative polarity. If the question were cémt ís? "did he come?", a positive response would be cémt "he came (yes)", and a negative response would be né(ghe) cémt "he didn't come (no)". Note that the negative particle here can either be né or néghe; the -ghe suffix intensifies the previous particle.
10.2 Subordinate clauses
These can be introduced in one of two ways.
The first is introducing an entirely independent subordinate clause with the word qid, such as in éǵ wéjdō, qid ís cémt "I know that he came".
Clauses that are more semantically linked to the antecedent use interrogative-relative pronouns: só wīrós, qésjo cên cémt… "the man, whose wife came…", literally "the man, of whom [the] wife came…".
10.3 Hypothetical sentences
Hypothetical sentences are introduced by sô ~ séj "if", which is an innovated and fossilized thematicisation of só in the instrumental and locative cases, respectively, meaning "with this" or "in this". This is modelled on the etymology of the Latin sī. mā can be used as in Celtic, jéj as in Baltic, or qéj as in some Slavic. None of these words differs in meaning.
The consequence can be introduced without any particle, but can also optionally be introduced with the particle tómḱe "then, in that case", or tóqe "then".
10.3.1 Conditionals
The verb skéles "to owe" should be used in the deponent aorist subjunctive to form a periphrastic conditional tense with the purportative, thus giving séj ís cémt, éǵ skêlsōr kápos wl̥Htóm welos ím "If he came, I would have wanted to see him". When there are two verbs that require the purportative in a row, one is in the accusative (é)-os form, and the second is in the genitive (é)-esos form: séj ís cémti, éǵ skêlsōr wélHos wélesos ím "If he comes, I would want to see him". Literally this means something like "...that I owe wanting of seeing".
10.4 Negation of nominals
Nominals must be negated by the particle néghe "not"; this can be attached directly to nominals, such as néghe méǵHs "not great", or néghe wīrós "not a man". Determiners can also precede the nominal: néghe só wīrós "not the/this man".
10.5 Either/or
"Either" and "or" are both expressed by the word Háwti: Háwti cm̥dhí ḱóm mé, Háwti méne "either come with me, or stay".
10.6 Prohibition
In conjunction with the imperative verb form, the particle mê "do not…!" (from *meh₁ as seen in Greek μή) is used to express prohibition: Hidhí! "go!" becomes mê Hidhí! "do not go!"
10.7 Conjunctions
10.7.1 Addition
Following the presence of A and B constructions in SAE, this is the preferred structure for the and construction. Rather than using the Proto-Indo-European *-kʷe suffix, alternative strategies are preferred. These are Hé (the augment *h₁é), ḱḿ̥ti (modelled on the Greek καί), Héti (modelled on the Latin et), Hánti (synonymous with the preposition, modelled on Proto-Germanic *andi), Héj (modelled on Proto-Slavic *i), or Hṓd (modelled on Proto-Balto-Slavic *ō, based on a hypothetical ablative PIE form *h₁ōd).
"Also" can be expressed with qōdqe, a fossilised ablative of a thematicisation of qís, meaning approximately "and from which", or Háwghe (modelled on Proto-Germanic *auk).
10.7.2 Consequence
Consequence in the form of "then" or "so" is expressed with tôd, yet another fossilised ablative of a thematicised só ~ sâ ~ tód, such as éǵ cêm, tôd ís léjqt "I came, then he left".
10.7.3 Purpose, intent
An intended consequence, expressing "so that" or "in order to", is expressed with a similar form to the above, téj, a thematicised dative meaning "to this", and a subordinate clause introduced by qid with the verb in the subjunctive, such as éǵ qrêjHsm̥ tód, téj qid tû Hédesi íd "I bought this so you could eat it".
10.7.4 Alternatives
The basic words "or" and "nor" are expressed by íwe ~ íwē or éjwe ~ éjwē (based on *i- and *ey- as pronominal bases) in the positive polarity (éǵ íwe tû "I or you") and néwe in the negative (néghe éǵ néwe tû "not I nor you, not me and not you").
-we ~ -wē can also be suffixed to any words meaning "if" to produce "but if" or "if, on the other hand": séjwe né cémti ís, qíd tôd? "but if he doesn't come, what then?".
10.7.5 Exceptions
The word "but" can be expressed either as íde ~ éjde (using the Proto-Indo-European *de contrastive particle) or Heǵhstós (modelled on the Greek εχτός and Proto-Celtic *extos) at the beginning of a phrase, and the postclitic de otherwise to indicate a break in a sentence. Since it breaks a sentence apart, the part of the sentence ending de is considered disjunct, and can refer either to a subject or an object. The case of the preceding nominal can match its function in the following sentence.
So, in só Háljos/tóm Háljom de, né wêlsm̥ éǵ ím "the other one, however, I didn't see it", note the presence of both Háljos and Háljom, both of which are treated slightly differently. In the nominative, the phrase ending de is treated more as a topic and the antecedent as a comment; in the accusative, it is treated as a disjunct object rather than a topic, and matches its expected function in the antecedent.
10.8 Politeness and formality
Several strategies can be employed to introduce formality to SAvIE. The majority of these should be limited to forms of address, but some others exist.
10.8.1 T-V distinction
Although many modern Indo-European languages employ a T-V distinction, it is best avoided in SAvIE. However, usage thereof should not be considered entirely incorrect. If a speaker chooses to use a T-V distinction, the expected follows: the 2nd person plural forms take the place of the singular forms in polite speech. So, one person is referred to politely as jû rather than tû, and verbs and adjectives are inflected in the plural rather than the singular. This turns the informal tû Hési méǵHs “you are tall” into jû Hsté méǵHas.
10.8.2 Third person verb constructions
Rather than using the second-person plural for a more classically Indo-European T-V distinction, the third person can be used as it is employed in various modern languages. This category includes some formations innovated by SAvIE.
10.8.2.1 Praising the listener
This follows the pattern of the Spanish usted, which is derived from vuestra merced “your mercy”. As the etymology of merced is so opaque, it has been discarded entirely. Instead, many synonymous constructions can be built from cérHtis “praise, grace”, whose root cérH- gives the Latin grātia.
This can optionally be supplemented with a second-person possessive adjective tós (or any of its variants, if avoiding T-V) or usós (if using T-V), giving tâ cérHtis or usâ cérHtis. The resulting phrase then inflects in its entirety. This is then used with a third-person verb.
10.8.2.2 Invariant third-person plural
The pronoun î, along with the third-person plural verbal forms, can be used to refer to a single person politely.
10.8.2.3 Alternative pronominal forms
The pronoun ḱénos / -ā / -as, declined according to both case and number depending on the number of referents, can be used with the corresponding verbal number of the third person in polite speech. In addition to the above established pronoun, the neologism (H)irós / -â / -ás, an adjectival form modelled on the third-person pronouns ís / î / jás can be used as a polite second-person pronoun. This also declines as expected, giving (H)irôs / -âs / -ájes for multiple referents.
10.8.3 Titles and forms of address
People can be referred to with titles attached to their names, in addition to the formal verb constructions given above. The title Mister and its cognates can be given as méǵHisteros / -ā / -as, while common Romance terms señor, signore, monsieur are given as sénjōs / sn̥jésī / -josas.
Due to a close proximity to the meanings of their individual stems, the former should be reserved for distinguished persons with some form of appointed title, and the latter for older people. A much more neutral but familiar term would be soqHjós / -â / -ás, cognate with Latin socius. A less familiar form would be Hwésus / Huséwī / Huséwy.
Each of these titles is abbreviated, respectively, m., s., so., and u.
11 Further rules and conventions of writing
11.1 Writing system
The default writing system in this document has been the Latin script, but this need not necessarily be the case. In Appendix D there is a full alphabet shown with the Latin, Greek, Cyrillic, Armenian, and Devanagari scripts, all of which can be used effectively to write SAvIE. For ease and universality, the Latin alphabet may be preferred, but this Appendix allows for a wider range of writing.
11.2 Case
SAvIE should be written entirely unicase. This means that there should be no distinction made between lowercase and uppercase letters. Although the letters ⟨h⟩ and ⟨H⟩ both exist in the Latin alphabet, it should be noted that these are two different letters with two different functions, not merely variants of one another. Common usages of capital letters in some languages, such as indicating proper nouns, are not treated specially in SAvIE, and should all be written lowercase.
This being said, this might be a difficult habit to break for some users. The practice should be avoided as per the standards of this document, but should not be seen as incorrect otherwise.
11.3 Clause- and sentence-final punctuation
In all alphabets, natively-used punctuation should be employed. Where applicable, the comma ⟨,⟩ and period ⟨.⟩ should be used to indicate a break in and termination of a sentence, respectively. The relevant question and exclamation marks should also serve their respective purposes.
11.4 Quotation
For block quotation, such as lines of dialogue, an em-dash ⟨—⟩ should be used for each line of dialogue, followed either by a double space, or a tab stop.
For inline quotation, a double guillemet ⟨« »⟩ should wrapped around a quotation, and a nested quotation within that should be marked with a single guillemet ⟨‹ ›⟩.
This usage can be mirrored with quotation marks, directional or otherwise. Double quotation marks ⟨" "⟩ ⟨“ ”⟩ enclose the main quotation, with single marks ⟨' '⟩ ⟨‘ ’⟩ enclosing a nested quotation.
In addition, lowered quotation marks can be used as in German and Slavic languages, either both low ⟨„ „⟩, or high and low ⟨„ ”⟩, with single marks ⟨‚ ‚⟩ and ⟨‚ ’⟩ for nested quotes. It is strongly preferred that the direction of punctuation marks conform to the above examples, but inverting one or both (such as ⟨» «⟩ or ⟨„ “⟩) should not be considered incorrect.
11.5 Larger breaks
Any piece of text above a sentence can be broken up with special typographical conventions.
Paragraphs are broken by a single newline character, with new paragraphs optionally beginning with a tab stop. Collections of paragraphs can be broken up into logical groups by beginning the paragraph of a new logical group with the section symbol § followed by a tab stop. Groups of sections can be divided by placing an asterism symbol ⁂ on its own line, and beginning a new paragraph on a new line afterwards as expected. The asterism can optionally be padded with an extra empty line on either side of it.
12 Borrowing and conversion to SAvIE
Borrowing from other languages forms an integral part of the function of all Indo-European languages; whether through language contact, colonial or imperial superstrata or adstrata, archaism, or scientific and technical vocabulary, borrowing is crucial in the formation of a wider vocabulary.
The strategies for borrowing words into SAvIE is that they must preferably be nativised, using known etymologies to convert words into SAvIE as though they had originated their to begin with. Where this cannot be done, or where it would not be appropriate to do so, words can be borrowed in directly, using SAvIE phonology where possible, and several additions to the alphabet where not possible.
12.1 Sounds foreign to SAvIE
All sounds native to the language have been listed at the very start of this document. However, these do not encompass all possible sounds that could be represented in SAvIE for borrowings. Extra consonant sounds and their corresponding graphs are as follows.
Sound
Graph
/f/
⟨f⟩
/ɣ/
⟨ǥ⟩
/h/
⟨ħ⟩
/x/
⟨x⟩
/ʃ/, /tʃ/
⟨š⟩, ⟨tš⟩
/ʒ/, /dʒ/
⟨ž⟩, ⟨dž⟩, ⟨ǰ⟩
/v/
⟨v⟩
/z/
⟨z⟩
Uvular sounds such as [q], [χ], and [ʁ] can be converted to their non-uvular counterparts [k], [x], [r ~ ɾ ~ ɹ].
In addition, the following vowel sounds can be used:
Sound
Graph
/æ/
⟨ä⟩
⟨ā̈⟩ when long
⟨a̋⟩ when stressed
⟨ä̂⟩ when stressed and long
/ə ~ ɜ/ and similar, when non-native
⟨ë⟩
/ɨ ~ ɯ/
⟨ï⟩
/ø ~ œ/ and similar
⟨ö⟩
/y ~ ʏ/ and similar
⟨ü⟩
Any nasal vowel
⟨ã ẽ ĩ⟩ etc.
Non-native sounds should only be spelled using the above alternative characters where it is necessary or especially desirable to represent non-native pronunciation. This really need only be the case in words which are nativised, or for educational purposes. When writing the names of people, places, and things, and when those are not integrated into SAvIE, their official spelling or transliteration should be used instead.
Equally, words which are grammaticalised can be spelt with nativised phonology. This is often a simple matter of finding the closest representative sounds which exist in SAvIE, but can present some difficulties. In particular, given the lack of fricative sounds /f v h/, the sounds ⟨bh gh⟩ can be used instead.
So, for example, the French word bureau could be borrowed in as any of the following:
bűro, büró: indeclinable, with foreign phonology
bűrō, bürô: declinable as a masculine -ō noun, with foreign phonology
bjúro, bjuró: indeclinable, with native phonology
bjúrō, bjurô: declinable as a masculine -ō noun, with native phonology
in addition to the borrowed spelling and pronunciation bureau.
Note also how the non-native stress pattern is subject to interpretation in how it is represented in SAvIE.
In addition, the grammatical pattern that this word has been made to fit is purely representative. It could just as easily be bűros ~ bűrosjo, bűrom ~ bűrosjo, or even bűros ~ bűresos. Ideally, the chosen form should represent the original word and, if applicable, its declension pattern as best as possible.
12.2 Borrowed morphology
Some morphology, such as affixes in particular, is so commonly shared between languages as to be worth borrowing into SAvIE. Affixes in particular can form large quantities of vocabulary and can, with some modification and filling in by analogy, be nativised into SAvIE for use in new vocabulary.