Phonological history of Carnian: Difference between revisions

(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)

Line 26:

Proto-Slavic *ToRT and *TeRT sequences underwent metathesis without compensatory lengthening, producing TRoT and TReT respectively. The subsequent loss of liquid syllabicity triggered insertion of an epenthetic vowel preceding the liquid consonant: TRoT > TəRoT, TReT > TəReT. This development resembles East Slavic pleophony, though without consistent vowel assimilation.

Epenthetic ''ə'' merged later with one of the existing vowel phonemes, most commonly with ''e'', ''o'', or ''a''. Merger with ''e'' and ''o'' reflects assimilation to the following vowel and is most consistent in TəreT, TəleT and TəloT sequences. In TəroT sequences, ə was often colored by the rhotic, resulting in a (cf. *''gordъ'' > ''gərod'' > ''~~garod''; modern ''~~gard'').

Epenthetic ''ə'' merged later with one of the existing vowel phonemes, most commonly with ''e'', ''o'', or ''a''. Merger with ''e'' and ''o'' reflects assimilation to the following vowel and is most consistent in TəreT, TəleT and TəloT sequences. In TəroT sequences, ə was often colored by the rhotic, resulting in a (cf. *''gordъ'' > ''gərod'' > ''[[Contionary:gard#Carnian|gard]]'').

'''TьRT and TъRT Sequences'''

The *TьRT and *TъRT sequences likewise underwent metathesis. After the loss of weak yers, they first produced syllabic liquids (Tr̥T, Tl̥T, Tł̥T), which later resolved into TərT, TəlT, and TəłT. The epenthetic ''ə'' generally merged with ''e'', most regularly in TəlT sequences. In TərT sequences, the rhotic exerted a strong a-coloring influence, though reflexes in ''e'' also appear. The TəłT pattern shows the usual merger with ''e'', but rare cases of merger with ''o'' occur as well (cf. *''sъlnьce'' > ''~~sł̥nce~~'' > ''~~sołnce~~'' > ''~~sonce~~'').

The *TьRT and *TъRT sequences likewise underwent metathesis. After the loss of weak yers, they first produced syllabic liquids (Tr̥T, Tl̥T, Tł̥T), which later resolved into TərT, TəlT, and TəłT. The epenthetic ''ə'' generally merged with ''e'', most regularly in TəlT sequences. In TərT sequences, the rhotic exerted a strong a-coloring influence, though reflexes in ''e'' also appear. The TəłT pattern shows the usual merger with ''e'', but rare cases of merger with ''o'' occur as well (cf. *''sъlnьce'' > ''sł̥nse'' > ''sołnse'' > ''sonse'').

The distinctive character of Carnian liquid reflexes stems from the subsequent operation of posttonic syncope (see the section on [[#Vowel Reduction and Syncope|syncope]]), which eliminated many of the unstressed vowels directly following the accented syllable, yielding forms that superficially resemble the original Proto-Slavic sequences while differing in vowel quality and liquid syllabicity. Traces of the pleophonic stage remain visible in lexical items where posttonic vowels escaped elision, as in *''~~porxъ~~'' > ~~Nom.~~ ''~~paroch~~''~~, Gen.~~ ''~~parcha~~''.

The distinctive character of Carnian liquid reflexes stems from the subsequent operation of posttonic syncope (see the section on [[#Vowel Reduction and Syncope|syncope]]), which eliminated many of the unstressed vowels directly following the accented syllable, yielding forms that superficially resemble the original Proto-Slavic sequences while differing in vowel quality and liquid syllabicity. Traces of the pleophonic stage remain visible in lexical items where posttonic vowels escaped elision, as in *''serdьnъjь'' > ''srednij'' > ''sərednij'' > ''serenny'' 'middle'.

=== Yer Developments ===

Line 38:

'''Weak Yer Loss'''

Following Havlík's Law, weak yers underwent gradual elision while strong yers vocalized to full mid vowels. Carnian resembles neighboring South Slavic languages in frequent preservation of word-initial yers, similar to Slovene and Chakavian. The degree of initial yer retention varies between words, sometimes yielding doublets regionally (*''pъtica'' > ''petisa'' / ''petza'', ''tisa'').

Following Havlík's Law, weak yers underwent gradual elision while strong yers vocalized to full mid vowels. Carnian resembles neighboring South Slavic languages in frequent preservation of word-initial yers, similar to Slovene and Chakavian. The degree of initial yer retention varies between words, sometimes yielding doublets regionally (*''pъtica'' > ''petisa'' / ''petza'', ''[[Contionary:tisa#Carnian|tisa]]'').

Crucially, Carnian maintained the original front/back distinction among vocalized yers. Front yer *ь vocalized to ''ẹ'', subsequently breaking to ''ie'' (except following palatal consonants, where it remained ''e''). Back yer *ъ developed to ''ə'', with subsequent evolution varying by phonetic environment and geographic region. Common outcomes include merger with ''e'' or ''a'', though occasional merger with ''o'' also occurs.

Line 44:

'''Tense Yers'''

Tense yer sequences *ьj and *ъj received special treatment with lexically conditioned outcomes. While some items follow regular vocalization patterns (*''kъjь'' > ''kei'' 'what'), others exhibit merger to ''ïj'' [ɪj] (modern ''y''), particularly in adjectival morphology. This development appears to result from j-induced assimilation combined with analogical leveling, with presumed intermediate stages *ьj > ''ẹj'' and *ъj > ''əj'' before phonemic merger.

Tense yer sequences *ьj and *ъj received special treatment with lexically conditioned outcomes. While some items follow regular vocalization patterns (*''kъjь'' > ''[[Contionary:kei#Carnian|kei]]'' 'what'), others exhibit merger to ''ïj'' [ɪj] (modern ''y''), particularly in adjectival morphology. This development appears to result from j-induced assimilation combined with analogical leveling, with presumed intermediate stages *ьj > ''ẹj'' and *ъj > ''əj'' before phonemic merger.

This process preceded the general contraction of *VjV > V̄, which operated concurrently across the Carnian speech territory.

Line 70:

* Regular /b, d, g/ with lenited /β, ð, ɣ/ intervocalically only

* Lenited /β, ð, ɣ/ in all positions (with allophones [ɸ, θ, x] in dialects with word-final devoicing)

=== Postalveolar iotation ===

The breaking of ''ẹ'' to ''ie'' triggered iotation of preceding postalveolar consonants, which became palatal: *čь > ''će'', *šь > ''śe'', *žь > ''źe'', *džь > ''dźe''. Any *čj, *šj, *žj, *džj clusters arising from yer loss likewise participated in this development.

The voiced palatal fricatives ''ź'' and ''dź'' merged before leniting to ''j'' at an early stage, joining the existing palatal approximant. The voiceless palatal affricate ''ć'' merged with the fricative ''ś'', yielding a single palatal fricative. This phoneme remained distinct through the Old Carnian period, during which it developed a more retracted articulation [ç], a change that originated in Carinthian dialects under strong German influence and subsequently spread across the Carnian speaking territory.

=== Regional Shared Innovations ===

Line 78:

Line 84:

* Preservation of long falling syllables

* Development of prothetic *v before word-initial *u

* *ď > j in lexically restricted contexts, creating doublets (*meďu > ''mei'', ''medio'')

* *ď > j in lexically restricted contexts, creating doublets (*meďu > ''mei'', ''[[Contionary:medio#Carnian|medio]]'')

* Rhotacization *ž > ''r'' before vowels (*može da > ''morda''), extended beyond medial positions in Carnian, yielding doublets (*možete > ''mogiete'', ''morete''; *žena > ''giena'', ''rena'')

== Old Carnian Period ==

The Old Carnian period witnessed fundamental phonological restructuring that established the foundation of the modern language. External influences together with internal innovations produced the characteristic features that distinguish contemporary Carnian.

The early stage of Old Carnian had the following vowels:

{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;"

|-

|+ '''Vowel phonemes of the early Old Carnian'''

|-

!rowspan="2"|

!colspan="3"|[[w:Front vowel|Front]]

!colspan="2"|[[w:Central vowel|Central]]

!colspan="3"|[[w:Back vowel|Back]]

|-

!short

!long

!nasal

!short

!long

!short

!long

!nasal

|-

![[w:Close vowel|Close]]

|[[w:Close front unrounded vowel|i]]

|[[w:Close front unrounded vowel|iː]]

|

|[[w:Close-mid central unrounded vowel|ɘ]]

|[[w:Close-mid central unrounded vowel|ɘː]]

|[[w:Close back rounded vowel|u]]

|[[w:Close back rounded vowel|uː]]

|

|-

![[w:Mid vowel|Mid]]

|[[w:Open-mid front unrounded vowel|ɛ]]

|[[w:Open-mid front unrounded vowel|ɛː]]

|[[w:Open-mid front unrounded vowel|ɛ̃]]

|[[w:Mid central vowel|ə]]

|

|rowspan="2"|[[w:Open-mid back rounded vowel|ɔ]]

|rowspan="2"|[[w:Open-mid back rounded vowel|ɔː]]

|rowspan="2"|[[w:Open-mid back unrounded vowel|ʌ̃]]

|-

![[w:Open vowel|Open]]

|[[w:Near-open front unrounded vowel|æ]]

|[[w:Near-open front unrounded vowel|æː]]

|

|[[w:Open central unrounded vowel|a]]

|[[w:Open central unrounded vowel|aː]]

|-

![[w:Diphthong|Diphthong]]

|colspan="8"|ɪi̯

|}

The language also had the following consonants:

{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;"

|-

|+ Consonant phonemes of the early Old Carnian

! colspan=2 rowspan=2|

! rowspan=2| [[w:Labial consonant|Labial]]

! colspan=2| [[w:Dental consonant|Dental]] / [[w:Alveolar consonant|Alveolar]]

! rowspan=2| [[w:Postalveolar consonant|Postalveolar]]

! rowspan=2| [[w:Palatal consonant|Palatal]]

! rowspan=2| [[w:Dorsal consonant|Dorsal]]

|-

!hard

!soft

|-

!colspan=2| [[w:Nasal consonant|Nasal]]

| [[w:Voiced bilabial nasal|m]]

| [[w:Voiced dental, alveolar and postalveolar nasals|n]]

| [[w:Voiced dental, alveolar and postalveolar nasals|nʲ]]

|

|-

!rowspan=2| [[w:Stop consonant|Plosive]]

! {{small|[[w:voicelessness|voiceless]]}}

| [[w:Voiceless bilabial plosive|p]]

| [[w:Voiceless dental plosive|t]]

| [[w:Voiceless dental plosive|tʲ]]

|

| [[w:Voiceless velar plosive|k]]

|-

! {{small|[[w:voice (phonetics)|voiced]]}}

| [[w:Voiced bilabial plosive|b]]

| [[w:Voiced dental plosive|d]]

| [[w:Voiced dental plosive|dʲ]]

|

| [[w:Voiced velar plosive|ɡ]]

|-

!rowspan=2| [[w:Affricate|Affricate]]

! {{small|[[w:voicelessness|voiceless]]}}

|

| [[w:Voiceless postalveolar affricate|tʃ]]

|

|-

! {{small|[[w:voice (phonetics)|voiced]]}}

|

| ([[w:Voiced postalveolar affricate|dʒ]])

|

|-

!rowspan=2| [[w:Fricative consonant|Fricative]]

! {{small|[[w:voicelessness|voiceless]]}}

|

| [[w:Voiceless alveolar fricative|s]]

|

| [[w:Voiceless postalveolar fricative|ʃ]]

| [[w:Voiceless alveolo-palatal fricative|ɕ]]

| [[w:Voiceless velar fricative|x]]

|-

! {{small|[[w:voice (phonetics)|voiced]]}}

|

| [[w:Voiced alveolar fricative|z]]

|

| [[w:Voiced postalveolar fricative|ʒ]]

| ([[w:Voiced alveolo-palatal fricative|ʑ]])

|

|-

!colspan=2| [[w:Approximant consonant|Approximant]]

| [[w:Voiced labiodental approximant|ʋ]]

| [[w:Voiced dental, alveolar and postalveolar lateral approximants|l]]

| [[w:Voiced dental, alveolar and postalveolar lateral approximants|lʲ]]

|

| [[w:Voiced palatal approximant|j]]

|-

!colspan=2| [[w: Tap and flap consonants|Flap]]

|

| [[w:Voiced dental and alveolar taps and flaps|ɾ]]

| [[w:Voiced dental and alveolar taps and flaps|ɾʲ]]

|

|}

=== Accent System Restructuring ===

Line 127:

Line 275:

* '''/f/ development''': Coalescence of [xʋ] clusters (*''xvaliti'' > ''falit'') introduced /f/, absent in Proto-Slavic. Phonemicization became evident when /f/ appeared unaltered in loanwords.

* '''/t͡s/ restoration''': ''ts'' and ''ds'' clusters coalesced to [t͡s:] (''jagodisa'' > ''jagotza''), restoring this affricate eliminated during earlier spirantization. Initially predominantly geminate, word-final occurrence as a singleton developed (*''noťьcejǫ'' > ''notzoi'' [nɔ̂t͡s:ɔɪ̯], *''noťьsь'' > ''notz'' [nɔ̂t͡s]). This development, combined with dž loss, reestablished symmetry between alveolar and postalveolar sibilant series.

* '''/t͡s/ restoration''': ''ts'' and ''ds'' clusters coalesced to [t͡s:] (''jagodisa'' > ''jagotza''), restoring this affricate eliminated during earlier spirantization. Initially predominantly geminate, word-final occurrence as a singleton developed (*''noťьcejǫ'' > ''[[Contionary:notzoi#Carnian|notzoi]]'' [nɔ̂t͡s:ɔɪ̯], *''noťьsь'' > ''[[Contionary:notz#Carnian|notz]]'' [nɔ̂t͡s]). This development, combined with dž loss, reestablished symmetry between alveolar and postalveolar sibilant series.

=== Depalatalization ===

Proto-Slavic palatalized ~~consonants~~ (''ň'', ''ť'', ''ď'', ''ĺ'', ''ř'') underwent systematic depalatalization with varying outcomes:

Proto-Slavic palatalized coronals (''ň'', ''ť'', ''ď'', ''ĺ'', ''ř'') underwent systematic depalatalization with varying outcomes:

* Liquids ''ĺ'', ''ř'': Early depalatalization to plain /l/, /r/, with temporary contrast between ''l'' and ''ł'' before merger

Line 142:

Line 290:

Importantly, most /Cj/ sequences resulting from yer loss remained distinct from depalatalized consonants, except liquid sequences ''lj'', ''rj'', which merged with ''ĺ'', ''ř'' reflexes (*''veselьje'' > ''vesele'').

Depalatalization occurred only for palatalized counterparts of dental/alveolar consonants; thus the true palatal ''ś'' (which became ''ch'' [ç] by this stage) did not participate in this process.

=== L-vocalization ===

Following ''ĺ'' depalatalization, Carnian maintained two lateral phonemes: plain ''l'' [l] (continuing *l before front vowels and lost front yers, plus *ĺ) and velarized ''ł'' [ɫ] (continuing *l before non-front vowels). Syllable-coda ''ł'' vocalized to ''u̯'', excluding word-final nominal positions (*''palъka'' > ''pauca'', *''davalъ'' > ''davau'', *''stolъ'' > ''stoł''). This parallels developments in Belarusian, Ukrainian, Slovak, and Slovene dialects.

=== H-Loss ===

The velar fricative ''x'' underwent backing to glottal /h/ during the Old Carnian period. Word-initial /h/ remained stable and is preserved in modern Carnian. However, in all other positions (intervocalic, word-final, and adjacent to consonants) it was lost during the Old Carnian period. The resulting hiatus was resolved when following a high vowel according to one of the following strategies:

* Phonetic resolution via glide insertion: /j/ after /i/, /ʋ/ after /u/.

* Morphological resolution in nominal and adjectival paradigms where Proto-Slavic second regressive palatalization had created *x/*ś alternations (''*duxъ''/''*duśi''). In such paradigms, the sibilant /s/ was generalized throughout, eliminating hiatus entirely (''*duxъ'' > ''du'' > ''dus'', Gen. ''*duxa'' > ''dùa'' > ''dusa'').

After non-high vowels, hiatus was generally preserved.

Analogical restoration of medial /h/ occurred in stem-initial positions following prefixes, but only in formations where the connection to the root remained close. Thus ''*naxoditi'' yields ''nahodit'' (with restored /h/ by analogy with ''hodit'' 'to walk'), while lexicalized compounds like ''*zaxodъ'' produced ''zaod'' 'west' without restoration.

=== Yat Evolution ===

The yat vowel ''ě'' maintained its open character [æ] well beyond Common Slavic disintegration. During Old Carnian, it developed to the centering diphthong [ɛɐ̯] preserved in modern Carnian, as indicated by digraph spelling ⟨ea⟩ already in Late Medieval writings. This evolution parallels Slovak ''ä'' development (< *ę).

The yat vowel ''ě'' maintained its open character [æ] well beyond Common Slavic disintegration. During Old Carnian, it developed to the centering diphthong [ɛɐ̯] preserved in modern Carnian, as indicated by digraph spelling ⟨ea⟩ already in Late Medieval writings. This evolution parallels Slovak ''ä'' development (< *ę). The breaking was blocked by the following hiatus where instead it merged with ''e'' (''*směxъ'' > ''sme'', Gen. ''*směxa'' > ''smèa'').

Although modern ''ea'' distribution is limited to stem-initial syllables, Carnian remains among the few Slavic languages preserving *ě as a distinct phoneme. The consistent Old Carnian orthography and modern regional variation between [æ] and [ɛ] in closed syllables suggests original development to [ɛɐ̯] in all environments with subsequent monophthongization in closed syllables.

Line 163:

Line 324:

=== u-Fronting ===

During Late Old Carnian, ''u'' fronted to a position between [ɵ̝] and [ʊ], preserved in modern Carnian. Following labial and ~~velar~~ consonants, this process was disrupted through epenthetic ''u̯'' insertion, with subsequent delabialization and fronting of the vowel, yielding ''u̯i''. This development reflects the incompatibility between consonant ~~articulation (labial rounding, velar backing)~~ and vowel fronting.

During Late Old Carnian, ''u'' fronted to a position between [ɵ̝] and [ʊ], preserved in modern Carnian. Following labial and back consonants, this process was disrupted through epenthetic ''u̯'' insertion, with subsequent delabialization and fronting of the vowel, yielding ''u̯i''. This development reflects the incompatibility between these consonant articulations and vowel fronting.

=== High Vowel Diphthong Dissimilation ===

Line 197:

Line 358:

Some dialects exhibit ''ṡuapanie'', where velarized ''ł'' is realized as ''u̯''. These dialects vary in whether the original contrast is preserved (''sol'' vs. ''stou̯'') or lost (''sou̯'', ''stou̯'').

=== Ch-Ṡ Meger ===

The palatal fricative ''ch'' underwent merger with /ʃ/ in most Carnian dialects during the Early Modern period. The merger began in coastal dialects following territorial expansion, as Romance and Chakavian substrate populations approximated the unfamiliar [ç] to the more common [ʃ]. The distinction is still present in the Carinthian dialects.

=== Postalveolar Consonant Developments ===

Line 202:

Line 367:

While Carnian generally preserves postalveolar ''ċ'', ''ġ'', ''ṡ'', leveling occurred in specific environments:

* ''ċ'' lenited to ''ṡ'' in clusters and word-finally (*''covaċ'' > ''~~covaṡ~~'' 'smith'), with analogical extension (Gen. ''~~covaṡa~~'')

* ''ċ'' lenited to ''ṡ'' (spelt ⟨ch⟩) in clusters and word-finally (*''covaċ'' > ''covach'' 'smith'), with analogical extension (Gen. ''covacha'')

* Assimilation to alveolar counterparts in clusters containing alveolar consonants (*''ṡtœri'' > ''stœri'' 'four'), primarily affecting ''ṡ'' and ''ġ'' as ''ċ'' had been eliminated from most clusters

* Assimilation to alveolar counterparts in clusters containing alveolar consonants (*''ṡtœri'' > ''stœri'' 'four'), primarily affecting ''ṡ'' and ''ġ'' as ''ċ'' had been eliminated from most clusters.

=== Loss of V ===

The approximant ''v'' was lost in certain clusters when following a coronal consonant, especially a fricative (''suent'' > ''[[Contionary:sent#Carnian|sent]]''). After a stop, ''v'' is usually preserved (as in ''dua'' 'two'), although is lost in some cases (''tuoi'' > ''toi'' on analogy with ''suoi'' > ''soi'').

=== Nasal â ===

By the late 20th century, a marginal nasal vowel phoneme ''â'' emerged in standard Carnian. It developed from the older emphatic interjection ''ha'', characteristic of the Trestine dialect. The interjection underwent [[w:Rhinoglottophilia|rhinoglottophilia]] and subsequent loss of /h/ as it spread across the [[Carnian dialects#Gorso-Tresten|Gorso-Tresten dialect]] area. During this process, its function shifted from a postpositional interjection to a suffix, accompanying its diffusion to other urban centres through 19th-century working-class migration.

By the early 20th century, the feature had become widespread in [[Carnian dialects#Fyn|Fyn]]. Several lexical items containing the suffix ''-â'' entered the standard language through mass media and popular culture, with the process accelerating in the early 21st century alongside the expansion of Internet communication. The phoneme remains distributionally restricted and is primarily associated with expressive morphology.

[[Category:Carnian]]

@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
 Proto-Slavic *ToRT and *TeRT sequences underwent metathesis without compensatory lengthening, producing TRoT and TReT respectively. The subsequent loss of liquid syllabicity triggered insertion of an epenthetic vowel preceding the liquid consonant: TRoT > TəRoT, TReT > TəReT. This development resembles East Slavic pleophony, though without consistent vowel assimilation.
-Epenthetic ''ə'' merged later with one of the existing vowel phonemes, most commonly with ''e'', ''o'', or ''a''. Merger with ''e'' and ''o'' reflects assimilation to the following vowel and is most consistent in TəreT, TəleT and TəloT sequences. In TəroT sequences, ə was often colored by the rhotic, resulting in a (cf. *''gordъ'' > ''gərod'' > ''garod''; modern ''gard'').
+Epenthetic ''ə'' merged later with one of the existing vowel phonemes, most commonly with ''e'', ''o'', or ''a''. Merger with ''e'' and ''o'' reflects assimilation to the following vowel and is most consistent in TəreT, TəleT and TəloT sequences. In TəroT sequences, ə was often colored by the rhotic, resulting in a (cf. *''gordъ'' > ''gərod'' > ''[[Contionary:gard#Carnian|gard]]'').
 '''TьRT and TъRT Sequences'''
-The *TьRT and *TъRT sequences likewise underwent metathesis. After the loss of weak yers, they first produced syllabic liquids (Tr̥T, Tl̥T, Tł̥T), which later resolved into TərT, TəlT, and TəłT. The epenthetic ''ə'' generally merged with ''e'', most regularly in TəlT sequences. In TərT sequences, the rhotic exerted a strong a-coloring influence, though reflexes in ''e'' also appear. The TəłT pattern shows the usual merger with ''e'', but rare cases of merger with ''o'' occur as well (cf. *''sъlnьce'' > ''sł̥nce'' > ''sołnce'' > ''sonce'').
+The *TьRT and *TъRT sequences likewise underwent metathesis. After the loss of weak yers, they first produced syllabic liquids (Tr̥T, Tl̥T, Tł̥T), which later resolved into TərT, TəlT, and TəłT. The epenthetic ''ə'' generally merged with ''e'', most regularly in TəlT sequences. In TərT sequences, the rhotic exerted a strong a-coloring influence, though reflexes in ''e'' also appear. The TəłT pattern shows the usual merger with ''e'', but rare cases of merger with ''o'' occur as well (cf. *''sъlnьce'' > ''sł̥nse'' > ''sołnse'' > ''sonse'').
-The distinctive character of Carnian liquid reflexes stems from the subsequent operation of posttonic syncope (see the section on [[#Vowel Reduction and Syncope|syncope]]), which eliminated many of the unstressed vowels directly following the accented syllable, yielding forms that superficially resemble the original Proto-Slavic sequences while differing in vowel quality and liquid syllabicity. Traces of the pleophonic stage remain visible in lexical items where posttonic vowels escaped elision, as in *''porxъ'' > Nom. ''paroch'', Gen. ''parcha''.
+The distinctive character of Carnian liquid reflexes stems from the subsequent operation of posttonic syncope (see the section on [[#Vowel Reduction and Syncope|syncope]]), which eliminated many of the unstressed vowels directly following the accented syllable, yielding forms that superficially resemble the original Proto-Slavic sequences while differing in vowel quality and liquid syllabicity. Traces of the pleophonic stage remain visible in lexical items where posttonic vowels escaped elision, as in *''serdьnъjь'' > ''srednij'' > ''sərednij'' > ''serenny'' 'middle'.
 === Yer Developments ===
@@ Line 38: / Line 38: @@
 '''Weak Yer Loss'''
-Following Havlík's Law, weak yers underwent gradual elision while strong yers vocalized to full mid vowels. Carnian resembles neighboring South Slavic languages in frequent preservation of word-initial yers, similar to Slovene and Chakavian. The degree of initial yer retention varies between words, sometimes yielding doublets regionally (*''pъtica'' > ''petisa'' / ''petza'', ''tisa'').
+Following Havlík's Law, weak yers underwent gradual elision while strong yers vocalized to full mid vowels. Carnian resembles neighboring South Slavic languages in frequent preservation of word-initial yers, similar to Slovene and Chakavian. The degree of initial yer retention varies between words, sometimes yielding doublets regionally (*''pъtica'' > ''petisa'' / ''petza'', ''[[Contionary:tisa#Carnian|tisa]]'').
 Crucially, Carnian maintained the original front/back distinction among vocalized yers. Front yer *ь vocalized to ''ẹ'', subsequently breaking to ''ie'' (except following palatal consonants, where it remained ''e''). Back yer *ъ developed to ''ə'', with subsequent evolution varying by phonetic environment and geographic region. Common outcomes include merger with ''e'' or ''a'', though occasional merger with ''o'' also occurs.
@@ Line 44: / Line 44: @@
 '''Tense Yers'''
-Tense yer sequences *ьj and *ъj received special treatment with lexically conditioned outcomes. While some items follow regular vocalization patterns (*''kъjь'' > ''kei'' 'what'), others exhibit merger to ''ïj'' [ɪj] (modern ''y''), particularly in adjectival morphology. This development appears to result from j-induced assimilation combined with analogical leveling, with presumed intermediate stages *ьj > ''ẹj'' and *ъj > ''əj'' before phonemic merger.
+Tense yer sequences *ьj and *ъj received special treatment with lexically conditioned outcomes. While some items follow regular vocalization patterns (*''kъjь'' > ''[[Contionary:kei#Carnian|kei]]'' 'what'), others exhibit merger to ''ïj'' [ɪj] (modern ''y''), particularly in adjectival morphology. This development appears to result from j-induced assimilation combined with analogical leveling, with presumed intermediate stages *ьj > ''ẹj'' and *ъj > ''əj'' before phonemic merger.
 This process preceded the general contraction of *VjV > V̄, which operated concurrently across the Carnian speech territory.
@@ Line 70: / Line 70: @@
 * Regular /b, d, g/ with lenited /β, ð, ɣ/ intervocalically only
 * Lenited /β, ð, ɣ/ in all positions (with allophones [ɸ, θ, x] in dialects with word-final devoicing)
+=== Postalveolar iotation ===
+The breaking of ''ẹ'' to ''ie'' triggered iotation of preceding postalveolar consonants, which became palatal: *čь > ''će'', *šь > ''śe'', *žь > ''źe'', *džь > ''dźe''. Any *čj, *šj, *žj, *džj clusters arising from yer loss likewise participated in this development.
+The voiced palatal fricatives ''ź'' and ''dź'' merged before leniting to ''j'' at an early stage, joining the existing palatal approximant. The voiceless palatal affricate ''ć'' merged with the fricative ''ś'', yielding a single palatal fricative. This phoneme remained distinct through the Old Carnian period, during which it developed a more retracted articulation [ç], a change that originated in Carinthian dialects under strong German influence and subsequently spread across the Carnian speaking territory.
 === Regional Shared Innovations ===
@@ Line 78: / Line 84: @@
 * Preservation of long falling syllables
 * Development of prothetic *v before word-initial *u
-* *ď > j in lexically restricted contexts, creating doublets (*meďu > ''mei'', ''medio'')
+* *ď > j in lexically restricted contexts, creating doublets (*meďu > ''mei'', ''[[Contionary:medio#Carnian|medio]]'')
 * Rhotacization *ž > ''r'' before vowels (*može da > ''morda''), extended beyond medial positions in Carnian, yielding doublets (*možete > ''mogiete'', ''morete''; *žena > ''giena'', ''rena'')
 == Old Carnian Period ==
 The Old Carnian period witnessed fundamental phonological restructuring that established the foundation of the modern language. External influences together with internal innovations produced the characteristic features that distinguish contemporary Carnian.
+The early stage of Old Carnian had the following vowels:
+{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;"
+|-
+|+ '''Vowel phonemes of the early Old Carnian'''
+|-
+!rowspan="2"|
+!colspan="3"|[[w:Front vowel|Front]]
+!colspan="2"|[[w:Central vowel|Central]]
+!colspan="3"|[[w:Back vowel|Back]]
+|-
+!<small>short</small>
+!<small>long</small>
+!<small>nasal</small>
+!<small>short</small>
+!<small>long</small>
+!<small>short</small>
+!<small>long</small>
+!<small>nasal</small>
+|-
+![[w:Close vowel|Close]]
+|[[w:Close front unrounded vowel|i]]
+|[[w:Close front unrounded vowel|iː]]
+|
+|[[w:Close-mid central unrounded vowel|ɘ]]
+|[[w:Close-mid central unrounded vowel|ɘː]]
+|[[w:Close back rounded vowel|u]]
+|[[w:Close back rounded vowel|uː]]
+|
+|-
+![[w:Mid vowel|Mid]]
+|[[w:Open-mid front unrounded vowel|ɛ]]
+|[[w:Open-mid front unrounded vowel|ɛː]]
+|[[w:Open-mid front unrounded vowel|ɛ̃]]
+|[[w:Mid central vowel|ə]]
+|
+|rowspan="2"|[[w:Open-mid back rounded vowel|ɔ]]
+|rowspan="2"|[[w:Open-mid back rounded vowel|ɔː]]
+|rowspan="2"|[[w:Open-mid back unrounded vowel|ʌ̃]]
+|-
+![[w:Open vowel|Open]]
+|[[w:Near-open front unrounded vowel|æ]]
+|[[w:Near-open front unrounded vowel|æː]]
+|
+|[[w:Open central unrounded vowel|a]]
+|[[w:Open central unrounded vowel|aː]]
+|-
+![[w:Diphthong|Diphthong]]
+|colspan="8"|ɪi̯
+|}
+The language also had the following consonants:
+{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;"
+|-
+|+ Consonant phonemes of the early Old Carnian
+! colspan=2 rowspan=2|
+! rowspan=2| [[w:Labial consonant|Labial]]
+! colspan=2| [[w:Dental consonant|Dental]] / <br />[[w:Alveolar consonant|Alveolar]]
+! rowspan=2| [[w:Postalveolar consonant|Postalveolar]]
+! rowspan=2| [[w:Palatal consonant|Palatal]]
+! rowspan=2| [[w:Dorsal consonant|Dorsal]]
+|-
+!<small>hard</small>
+!<small>soft</small>
+|-
+!colspan=2| [[w:Nasal consonant|Nasal]]
+| [[w:Voiced bilabial nasal|m]]
+| [[w:Voiced dental, alveolar and postalveolar nasals|n]]
+| [[w:Voiced dental, alveolar and postalveolar nasals|nʲ]]
+|
+|
+|
+|-
+!rowspan=2| [[w:Stop consonant|Plosive]]
+! {{small|[[w:voicelessness|voiceless]]}}
+| [[w:Voiceless bilabial plosive|p]]
+| [[w:Voiceless dental plosive|t]]
+| [[w:Voiceless dental plosive|tʲ]]
+|
+|
+| [[w:Voiceless velar plosive|k]]
+|-
+! {{small|[[w:voice (phonetics)|voiced]]}}
+| [[w:Voiced bilabial plosive|b]]
+| [[w:Voiced dental plosive|d]]
+| [[w:Voiced dental plosive|dʲ]]
+|
+|
+| [[w:Voiced velar plosive|ɡ]]
+|-
+!rowspan=2| [[w:Affricate|Affricate]]
+! {{small|[[w:voicelessness|voiceless]]}}
+|
+|
+|
+| [[w:Voiceless postalveolar affricate|tʃ]]
+|
+|
+|-
+! {{small|[[w:voice (phonetics)|voiced]]}}
+|
+|
+|
+| ([[w:Voiced postalveolar affricate|dʒ]])
+|
+|
+|-
+!rowspan=2| [[w:Fricative consonant|Fricative]]
+! {{small|[[w:voicelessness|voiceless]]}}
+|
+| [[w:Voiceless alveolar fricative|s]]
+|
+| [[w:Voiceless postalveolar fricative|ʃ]]
+| [[w:Voiceless alveolo-palatal fricative|ɕ]]
+| [[w:Voiceless velar fricative|x]]
+|-
+! {{small|[[w:voice (phonetics)|voiced]]}}
+|
+| [[w:Voiced alveolar fricative|z]]
+|
+| [[w:Voiced postalveolar fricative|ʒ]]
+| ([[w:Voiced alveolo-palatal fricative|ʑ]])
+|
+|-
+!colspan=2| [[w:Approximant consonant|Approximant]]
+| [[w:Voiced labiodental approximant|ʋ]]
+| [[w:Voiced dental, alveolar and postalveolar lateral approximants|l]]
+| [[w:Voiced dental, alveolar and postalveolar lateral approximants|lʲ]]
+|
+| [[w:Voiced palatal approximant|j]]
+|-
+!colspan=2| [[w: Tap and flap consonants|Flap]]
+|
+| [[w:Voiced dental and alveolar taps and flaps|ɾ]]
+| [[w:Voiced dental and alveolar taps and flaps|ɾʲ]]
+|
+|
+|
+|}
 === Accent System Restructuring ===
@@ Line 127: / Line 275: @@
 * '''/f/ development''': Coalescence of [xʋ] clusters (*''xvaliti'' > ''falit'') introduced /f/, absent in Proto-Slavic. Phonemicization became evident when /f/ appeared unaltered in loanwords.
-* '''/t͡s/ restoration''': ''ts'' and ''ds'' clusters coalesced to [t͡s:] (''jagodisa'' > ''jagotza''), restoring this affricate eliminated during earlier spirantization. Initially predominantly geminate, word-final occurrence as a singleton developed (*''noťьcejǫ'' > ''notzoi'' [nɔ̂t͡s:ɔɪ̯], *''noťьsь'' > ''notz'' [nɔ̂t͡s]). This development, combined with dž loss, reestablished symmetry between alveolar and postalveolar sibilant series.
+* '''/t͡s/ restoration''': ''ts'' and ''ds'' clusters coalesced to [t͡s:] (''jagodisa'' > ''jagotza''), restoring this affricate eliminated during earlier spirantization. Initially predominantly geminate, word-final occurrence as a singleton developed (*''noťьcejǫ'' > ''[[Contionary:notzoi#Carnian|notzoi]]'' [nɔ̂t͡s:ɔɪ̯], *''noťьsь'' > ''[[Contionary:notz#Carnian|notz]]'' [nɔ̂t͡s]). This development, combined with dž loss, reestablished symmetry between alveolar and postalveolar sibilant series.
 === Depalatalization ===
-Proto-Slavic palatalized consonants (''ň'', ''ť'', ''ď'', ''ĺ'', ''ř'') underwent systematic depalatalization with varying outcomes:
+Proto-Slavic palatalized coronals (''ň'', ''ť'', ''ď'', ''ĺ'', ''ř'') underwent systematic depalatalization with varying outcomes:
 * Liquids ''ĺ'', ''ř'': Early depalatalization to plain /l/, /r/, with temporary contrast between ''l'' and ''ł'' before merger
@@ Line 142: / Line 290: @@
 Importantly, most /Cj/ sequences resulting from yer loss remained distinct from depalatalized consonants, except liquid sequences ''lj'', ''rj'', which merged with ''ĺ'', ''ř'' reflexes (*''veselьje'' > ''vesele'').
+Depalatalization occurred only for palatalized counterparts of dental/alveolar consonants; thus the true palatal ''ś'' (which became ''ch'' [ç] by this stage) did not participate in this process.
 === L-vocalization ===
 Following ''ĺ'' depalatalization, Carnian maintained two lateral phonemes: plain ''l'' [l] (continuing *l before front vowels and lost front yers, plus *ĺ) and velarized ''ł'' [ɫ] (continuing *l before non-front vowels). Syllable-coda ''ł'' vocalized to ''u̯'', excluding word-final nominal positions (*''palъka'' > ''pauca'', *''davalъ'' > ''davau'', *''stolъ'' > ''stoł''). This parallels developments in Belarusian, Ukrainian, Slovak, and Slovene dialects.
+=== H-Loss ===
+The velar fricative ''x'' underwent backing to glottal /h/ during the Old Carnian period. Word-initial /h/ remained stable and is preserved in modern Carnian. However, in all other positions (intervocalic, word-final, and adjacent to consonants) it was lost during the Old Carnian period. The resulting hiatus was resolved when following a high vowel according to one of the following strategies:
+* Phonetic resolution via glide insertion: /j/ after /i/, /ʋ/ after /u/.
+* Morphological resolution in nominal and adjectival paradigms where Proto-Slavic second regressive palatalization had created *x/*ś alternations (''*duxъ''/''*duśi''). In such paradigms, the sibilant /s/ was generalized throughout, eliminating hiatus entirely (''*duxъ'' > ''du'' > ''dus'', Gen. ''*duxa'' > ''dùa'' > ''dusa'').
+After non-high vowels, hiatus was generally preserved.
+Analogical restoration of medial /h/ occurred in stem-initial positions following prefixes, but only in formations where the connection to the root remained close. Thus ''*naxoditi'' yields ''nahodit'' (with restored /h/ by analogy with ''hodit'' 'to walk'), while lexicalized compounds like ''*zaxodъ'' produced ''zaod'' 'west' without restoration.
 === Yat Evolution ===
-The yat vowel ''ě'' maintained its open character [æ] well beyond Common Slavic disintegration. During Old Carnian, it developed to the centering diphthong [ɛɐ̯] preserved in modern Carnian, as indicated by digraph spelling ⟨ea⟩ already in Late Medieval writings. This evolution parallels Slovak ''ä'' development (< *ę).
+The yat vowel ''ě'' maintained its open character [æ] well beyond Common Slavic disintegration. During Old Carnian, it developed to the centering diphthong [ɛɐ̯] preserved in modern Carnian, as indicated by digraph spelling ⟨ea⟩ already in Late Medieval writings. This evolution parallels Slovak ''ä'' development (< *ę). The breaking was blocked by the following hiatus where instead it merged with ''e'' (''*směxъ'' > ''sme'', Gen. ''*směxa'' > ''smèa'').
 Although modern ''ea'' distribution is limited to stem-initial syllables, Carnian remains among the few Slavic languages preserving *ě as a distinct phoneme. The consistent Old Carnian orthography and modern regional variation between [æ] and [ɛ] in closed syllables suggests original development to [ɛɐ̯] in all environments with subsequent monophthongization in closed syllables.
@@ Line 163: / Line 324: @@
 === u-Fronting ===
-During Late Old Carnian, ''u'' fronted to a position between [ɵ̝] and [ʊ], preserved in modern Carnian. Following labial and velar consonants, this process was disrupted through epenthetic ''u̯'' insertion, with subsequent delabialization and fronting of the vowel, yielding ''u̯i''. This development reflects the incompatibility between consonant articulation (labial rounding, velar backing) and vowel fronting.
+During Late Old Carnian, ''u'' fronted to a position between [ɵ̝] and [ʊ], preserved in modern Carnian. Following labial and back consonants, this process was disrupted through epenthetic ''u̯'' insertion, with subsequent delabialization and fronting of the vowel, yielding ''u̯i''. This development reflects the incompatibility between these consonant articulations and vowel fronting.
 === High Vowel Diphthong Dissimilation ===
@@ Line 197: / Line 358: @@
 Some dialects exhibit ''ṡuapanie'', where velarized ''ł'' is realized as ''u̯''. These dialects vary in whether the original contrast is preserved (''sol'' vs. ''stou̯'') or lost (''sou̯'', ''stou̯'').
+=== Ch-Ṡ Meger ===
+The palatal fricative ''ch'' underwent merger with /ʃ/ in most Carnian dialects during the Early Modern period. The merger began in coastal dialects following territorial expansion, as Romance and Chakavian substrate populations approximated the unfamiliar [ç] to the more common [ʃ]. The distinction is still present in the Carinthian dialects.
 === Postalveolar Consonant Developments ===
@@ Line 202: / Line 367: @@
 While Carnian generally preserves postalveolar ''ċ'', ''ġ'', ''ṡ'', leveling occurred in specific environments:
-* ''ċ'' lenited to ''ṡ'' in clusters and word-finally (*''covaċ'' > ''covaṡ'' 'smith'), with analogical extension (Gen. ''covaṡa'')
+* ''ċ'' lenited to ''ṡ'' (spelt ⟨ch⟩) in clusters and word-finally (*''covaċ'' > ''covach'' 'smith'), with analogical extension (Gen. ''covacha'')
-* Assimilation to alveolar counterparts in clusters containing alveolar consonants (*''ṡtœri'' > ''stœri'' 'four'), primarily affecting ''ṡ'' and ''ġ'' as ''ċ'' had been eliminated from most clusters
+* Assimilation to alveolar counterparts in clusters containing alveolar consonants (*''ṡtœri'' > ''stœri'' 'four'), primarily affecting ''ṡ'' and ''ġ'' as ''ċ'' had been eliminated from most clusters.
+=== Loss of V ===
+The approximant ''v'' was lost in certain clusters when following a coronal consonant, especially a fricative (''suent'' > ''[[Contionary:sent#Carnian|sent]]''). After a stop, ''v'' is usually preserved (as in ''dua'' 'two'), although is lost in some cases (''tuoi'' > ''toi'' on analogy with ''suoi'' > ''soi'').
+=== Nasal â ===
+By the late 20th century, a marginal nasal vowel phoneme ''â'' emerged in standard Carnian. It developed from the older emphatic interjection ''ha'', characteristic of the Trestine dialect. The interjection underwent [[w:Rhinoglottophilia|rhinoglottophilia]] and subsequent loss of /h/ as it spread across the [[Carnian dialects#Gorso-Tresten|Gorso-Tresten dialect]] area. During this process, its function shifted from a postpositional interjection to a suffix, accompanying its diffusion to other urban centres through 19th-century working-class migration.
+By the early 20th century, the feature had become widespread in [[Carnian dialects#Fyn|Fyn]]. Several lexical items containing the suffix ''-â'' entered the standard language through mass media and popular culture, with the process accelerating in the early 21st century alongside the expansion of Internet communication. The phoneme remains distributionally restricted and is primarily associated with expressive morphology.
 [[Category:Carnian]]