Chlesamnic: Difference between revisions
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
****[[Caucasian Polovic]] | ****[[Caucasian Polovic]] | ||
****[[Balkan Thadic]]† | ****[[Balkan Thadic]]† | ||
****[[Sishami]] | |||
**'''East Chlesamnic''' | **'''East Chlesamnic''' | ||
***'''Kolasian''' | ***'''Kolasian''' | ||
| Line 49: | Line 50: | ||
****[[Ancient Tevvic]] (liturgical) | ****[[Ancient Tevvic]] (liturgical) | ||
*****[[Tevvic]] | *****[[Tevvic]] | ||
*****(Unnamed) | *****(Unnamed) | ||
**'''North Chlesamnic''' | **'''North Chlesamnic''' | ||
**'''South Chlesamnic''' | **'''South Chlesamnic''' | ||
***[[Undukusu]] | ***[[Classical Undukusu]] | ||
****[[Undukusu]] | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
===West Chlesamnic=== | ===West Chlesamnic=== | ||
| Line 62: | Line 63: | ||
==History== | ==History== | ||
==Typology== | ==Typology== | ||
Earlier attested languages such as [[Old | Earlier attested languages such as [[Old Thadic]], [[Old Low Polovic]], [[Ancient Tevvic]], and [[Kolasian]] have been instrumental to [[w:Comparative method|comparative linguistics]], as they exhibit many shared characteristics that have been lost or altered in their modern descendants. Using those languages, a number of shared typological features can be identified. | ||
===Grammar=== | ===Grammar=== | ||
*Largely suffix-based fusional morphology | *Largely suffix-based fusional morphology | ||