Kämpya: Difference between revisions

Line 1,677: Line 1,677:
Kämpya has no word meaning "whose". Instead it is necessary to ask "Who has ...?", combined with a relative clause e.g.
Kämpya has no word meaning "whose". Instead it is necessary to ask "Who has ...?", combined with a relative clause e.g.


/dô̰k=zù ˈbíʔ ˈlḭ̂zàd zwé=ˈhḛ̂b/
/dô̰k=zù ˈbíʔ ˈlḭ̂zàd hwéi=ˈhḛ̂b/


dog=ERG bite lizard Q.ERG=have
dog=ERG bite lizard Q.ERG=have
Line 1,686: Line 1,686:
or
or


/θú=ˈbíʔ dô̰k ˈlḭ̂zàd=àuŋ zwé=ˈhḛ̂b/
/θú=ˈbíʔ dô̰k ˈlḭ̂zàd=àuŋ hwéi=ˈhḛ̂b/


ANTIP=bite dog lizard=DAT Q.ERG=have
ANTIP=bite dog lizard=DAT Q.ERG=have


Whose dog bit the lizard? (literally "Who has the dog that bit the lizard?")
Whose dog bit the lizard? (literally "Who has the dog that bit the lizard?")


===Other Interrogatives that modify noun phrases===
===Other Interrogatives that modify noun phrases===