Verse:Mwail/Ryooteq: Difference between revisions

@@ Line 45: / Line 45: @@
 *Some dialects have Meeussen's rule to turn some instances of HH to HL
 *páañgy = person
+<poem>
+i loved you = alisjhegy
+i will love you = lóosjhezyañ
+-in shd also be an affix
+i fall in love with you (active counterpart) = shelisjhaágy
+do you want reduplication?
+sounds ok
+how is -in for an attributive clause
+or relative clause
+verb+in
+so it's a nominalizer
+clofab intensifies
+yeah
+shiilyohookh+in = that piles up
+😍1
+and that could ablaut to -iin or -iín?
+in some forms like intransitive attributive
+most C(C)oC verbs should inflect like sjhogy
+maybe
+sjowaazh should be non-config
+noun phrases are head-final and they use relational nouns
+shiilyohookh would inflect like
+khashiilyohookh
+akheshiiñlyohookh
+khóoshigyoñhookh?
+inceptive should use t
+yeah
+or d
+because of quame future
+quihumists would relate that to thensarian -tē-
+yeah
+that "let us soar party" 😀
+and for the fun of it...
+the t should be an infix!
+sjhodagy-
+😍1
+should mean to fall in love
+</poem>
 ==Phonology==