Verse:Hmøøh/Mărotłism: Difference between revisions

IlL (talk | contribs)
IlL (talk | contribs)
Line 28: Line 28:
*[A set of religious laws and rituals.]
*[A set of religious laws and rituals.]


There is a set of religious statutes (CWdm: ''hàyma'', sg. ''hăyma''; this is different from the overall system which is called ''łin'', or literally, what is right or just.) partially determined by the Avoranloeδūn, and partially determined by the Pidas' writings. As such there is very much a concept of sin (''frăcing'').
There is a set of religious statutes (CWdm: ''hàyma'', sg. ''hăyma''; this is different from the overall system which is called ''łin'', or literally, what is right or just.) partially determined by the Avoranloestūn, and partially determined by the Pidas' writings. As such there is very much a concept of sin (''frăcing'').
 
===''Hăldifăreatü''===
===''Hăldifăreatü''===
The originally Mărotłian concept of ''hăldifăreatü'' is a principle of nonviolence, analogous to ''ahiṃsa'' in Dharmic religions. (The [[Windermere]] word ''hăldifăreatü'' means 'non-violence' or 'non-aggression'.) Mărotłian ''hăldifăreatü'' allows violence in retaliation or self-defense, or as a punishment for violence - the reasoning was that aggression is so serious that it should be discouraged by any means necessary. There has been much debate among Talman thinkers on exactly how much retributive violence is justified.
The originally Mărotłian concept of ''hăldifăreatü'' is a principle of nonviolence, analogous to ''ahiṃsa'' in Dharmic religions. (The [[Windermere]] word ''hăldifăreatü'' means 'non-violence' or 'non-aggression'.) Mărotłian ''hăldifăreatü'' allows violence in retaliation or self-defense, or as a punishment for violence - the reasoning was that aggression is so serious that it should be discouraged by any means necessary. There has been much debate among Talman thinkers on exactly how much retributive violence is justified.