Verse:Tdūrzů/Knench/Ancient: Difference between revisions

Line 69:

The definite article was ''ʔaC-'' (from Biblical Hebrew ''*haC-''). It caused gemination of the following consonant; if the following consonant was a guttural and thus could not geminate, it was lengthened to ''ʔā-''.

The Biblical feminine singular ending ''*-ā́'' became unstressed ''-a'', and the stress in feminine singular nouns in ''-a'' shifted to penultimate (by analogy with masculine singular adjectives and 3fs perfect verbs). Other possible feminine endings are ''-t'' or ''-δ''. The feminine plural ~~ending was stressed~~ ''-óδ'', from Biblical Hebrew ''*-ṓt''. Sometimes ''-a'' is found where Standard Jewish Hebrew has ''-t'', and vice versa.)

The Biblical feminine singular ending ''*-ā́'' became unstressed ''-a'', and the stress in feminine singular nouns in ''-a'' shifted to penultimate (by analogy with masculine singular adjectives and 3fs perfect verbs). Other possible feminine endings are ''-t'' or ''-δ''. Eventually stress shifted away from gender/number suffixes across the board: The regular masculine and feminine plural endings were unstressed ''-im'' and unstressed ''-oδ'', from Biblical Hebrew ''*-ī́m'' and ''*-ṓt''.

Sometimes ''-a'' is found where Standard Jewish Hebrew has ''-t'', and vice versa.

The construct state was not entirely predictable but not as "hard" as Tiberian Hebrew. Feminine singular nouns in ''-a'' had a construct state in ''-aδ''.

Line 85:

Line 87:

|-

! indef.

| ''sus ~~ᴛob~~'' /sus ~~tʰob~~/

| ''sus'' /sus/

| ''~~súsa ᴛóba~~'' /ˈsusa ~~ˈtʰoba~~/

| ''susa'' /ˈsusa/

| ''~~susím ᴛobím~~'' /~~suˈsim tʰoˈbim~~/

| ''susim'' /ˈsusim/

| ''~~susóδ ᴛobóδ~~'' /~~suˈsoð tʰoˈboð~~/

| ''susoδ'' /ˈsusoð/

|-

! def.

| ''~~ʔassus ʔaᴛᴛob~~''

| ''ʔas-sus'' /ʔassus/

| ''~~ʔassúsa ʔaᴛᴛóba~~''

| ''ʔas-susa'' /ʔasˈsusa/

| ''~~ʔassusím ʔaᴛᴛobím~~''

| ''ʔas-susim'' /ʔasˈsusim/

| ''~~ʔassusóδ ʔaᴛᴛobóδ~~''

| ''ʔas-susoδ'' /ʔasˈsusoð/

|}

@@ Line 69: / Line 69: @@
 The definite article was ''ʔaC-'' (from Biblical Hebrew ''*haC-''). It caused gemination of the following consonant; if the following consonant was a guttural and thus could not geminate, it was lengthened to ''ʔā-''.
-The Biblical feminine singular ending ''*-ā́'' became unstressed ''-a'', and the stress in feminine singular nouns in ''-a'' shifted to penultimate (by analogy with masculine singular adjectives and 3fs perfect verbs). Other possible feminine endings are ''-t'' or ''-δ''. The feminine plural ending was stressed ''-óδ'', from Biblical Hebrew ''*-ṓt''. Sometimes ''-a'' is found where Standard Jewish Hebrew has ''-t'', and vice versa.)
+The Biblical feminine singular ending ''*-ā́'' became unstressed ''-a'', and the stress in feminine singular nouns in ''-a'' shifted to penultimate (by analogy with masculine singular adjectives and 3fs perfect verbs). Other possible feminine endings are ''-t'' or ''-δ''. Eventually stress shifted away from gender/number suffixes across the board: The regular masculine and feminine plural endings were unstressed ''-im'' and unstressed ''-oδ'', from Biblical Hebrew ''*-ī́m'' and ''*-ṓt''.
+Sometimes ''-a'' is found where Standard Jewish Hebrew has ''-t'', and vice versa.
 The construct state was not entirely predictable but not as "hard" as Tiberian Hebrew. Feminine singular nouns in ''-a'' had a construct state in ''-aδ''.
@@ Line 85: / Line 87: @@
 |-
 ! indef.
-| ''sus ᴛob'' <br/> /sus tʰob/
+| ''sus'' <br/> /sus/
-| ''súsa ᴛóba'' <br/> /ˈsusa ˈtʰoba/
+| ''susa'' <br/> /ˈsusa/
-| ''susím ᴛobím'' <br/> /suˈsim tʰoˈbim/
+| ''susim'' <br/> /ˈsusim/
-| ''susóδ ᴛobóδ''  <br/> /suˈsoð tʰoˈboð/
+| ''susoδ''  <br/> /ˈsusoð/
 |-
 ! def.
-| ''ʔassus ʔaᴛᴛob''
+| ''ʔas-sus'' <br/> /ʔassus/
-| ''ʔassúsa ʔaᴛᴛóba''
+| ''ʔas-susa'' <br/> /ʔasˈsusa/
-| ''ʔassusím ʔaᴛᴛobím''
+| ''ʔas-susim'' <br/> /ʔasˈsusim/
-| ''ʔassusóδ ʔaᴛᴛobóδ''
+| ''ʔas-susoδ''  <br/> /ʔasˈsusoð/
 |}