Verse:Irta (Old)/Judeo-Mandarin/Filichdiș: Difference between revisions

← Older edit Newer edit →

VisualWikitext

Revision as of 14:19, 4 December 2021 view source IlL (talk \| contribs) 143,668 edits m →From the Song of the Sea (Yăhuaș): Screw it just do the Yiddish thing with he and heth Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit ← Older edit		Revision as of 14:21, 4 December 2021 view source IlL (talk \| contribs) 143,668 edits mNo edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Learăgüsiș ~~forms are extremely marked: they're considered archaic and poetic at best, and deliberately "overusing" them~~ is ~~used for evoking certain~~ Ăn Yidiș ~~literary works, or e.g. in neopagan/new-religious-movement material~~. These forms, including case forms and synthetic verb forms, are best preserved in Munster Irish, but in Ăn Yidiș they were almost completely lost by Proto-Ăn Yidiș times. Ăn Yidiș writers during the Learăgüs 'Awakening' period recreated these forms by cognatizing older Irish or Munster Irish forms. Sometimes Old Irish morphology is directly borrowed, e.g. the unreduced ending in כּאַנףאַ ''canfa'' 'I will sing'.		Learăgüsiș is a special register of Ăn Yidiș using older Irish inflectional morphology. These forms, including case forms and synthetic verb forms, are best preserved in Munster Irish, but in Ăn Yidiș they were almost completely lost by Proto-Ăn Yidiș times. Ăn Yidiș writers during the Learăgüs 'Awakening' period recreated these forms by cognatizing older Irish or Munster Irish forms. Sometimes Old Irish morphology is directly borrowed, e.g. the unreduced ending in כּאַנףאַ ''canfa'' 'I will sing'.

	The Yăhuaș translation of the Tanakh (which was made post-Learăgüs), in a somewhat controversial move, uses Learăgüsiș for the poetic passages that use archaic/archaizing language in Biblical Hebrew (such as Ha'azinu and the Song of the Sea). The translation made the Learăgüsiș register somewhat less marked (and more like a standard suite of archaisms) for the speakers that came after it, however.		The Yăhuaș translation of the Tanakh (which was made post-Learăgüs), in a somewhat controversial move, uses Learăgüsiș for the poetic passages that use archaic/archaizing language in Biblical Hebrew (such as Ha'azinu and the Song of the Sea). The translation made the Learăgüsiș register somewhat less marked (and more like a standard suite of archaisms) for the speakers that came after it, however.