Verse:Irta/Judeo-Mandarin/Proto-Ăn Yidiș: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
mNo edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Todo: Reconstruct Proto-Tsarfati Hebrew before and after filtering through Proto-Ăn Yidiș phonology. Before they used TibH but with an o /o(:)/ vs ů /u(:)/ distinction in cholam; TibH /u/ was /ü(:)/. TibH style allophonic vowel length should go through the filter, hence leading to QG o vs QQ ă | Todo: Reconstruct Proto-Tsarfati Hebrew before and after filtering through Proto-Ăn Yidiș phonology. Before they used TibH but with an o /o(:)/ vs ů /u(:)/ distinction in cholam; TibH /u/ was /ü(:)/. TibH style allophonic vowel length should go through the filter, hence leading to QG o vs QQ ă | ||
Proto-Ăn Yidiș still had unstressed /ɔː/ (/ɔː/ comes from Middle Irish ''á'' and Proto-Tsarfati Hebrew allophonically long qamatz [ɔː]): e.g. */'amətɔːn/ 'fool' and */'χanʊ̈kʰɔː/ 'Hanukkah'. | Proto-Ăn Yidiș still had unstressed /ɔː/ (/ɔː/ comes from Middle Irish ''á'' and Proto-Tsarfati Hebrew allophonically long qamatz [ɔː]): e.g. */'amətɔːn/ 'fool' and */'χanʊ̈kʰɔː/ 'Hanukkah'. Many later dialects including Ăn Căyzon reduce it to /ə/. | ||
[haddO:g ha:Ha:j su:HE: bammO:jim] -> ''Hadàg hachaidh sůchè bamàidhim'' | [haddO:g ha:Ha:j su:HE: bammO:jim] -> ''Hadàg hachaidh sůchè bamàidhim'' | ||