Verse:Irta (Old)/Judeo-Mandarin: Difference between revisions

IlL (talk | contribs)
IlL (talk | contribs)
Line 414: Line 414:
Ăn Yidiș has innovated the tense-aspect system (pres, past/conditional, fut, jussive‚ imperative) x (imperfective, perfective) using the form of בּי ''bi'' and the preverbal aspect marker. The auxiliary marks tense and the preverbal aspect marker marks other aspectual information such as perfectivity.
Ăn Yidiș has innovated the tense-aspect system (pres, past/conditional, fut, jussive‚ imperative) x (imperfective, perfective) using the form of בּי ''bi'' and the preverbal aspect marker. The auxiliary marks tense and the preverbal aspect marker marks other aspectual information such as perfectivity.


Note that ''mă nach'' 'if not' is used whenever Irish would use ''mura''.
Note that ''mă nach'' 'if not' is used whenever Irish would use ''mura''. The two senses of the Irish conjunction ''nach'' (NEG.COMP or NEG.REL) are also distinguished: ''gu nach'' (complementizer) and ''ă nach'' (relativizer).


* t' e ă(g) = present (to becomes t' before a vowel)
* t' e ă(g) = present (to becomes t' before a vowel)
Line 420: Line 420:
* vă e ă(g) = past imperfective or present conditional
* vă e ă(g) = past imperfective or present conditional
* vă e ņey = pluperfect or past conditional
* vă e ņey = pluperfect or past conditional
* bey e ă(g) = future imperfective
* bey e ă(g) = future:
* bey e ney = future perfective
* bey e ney = future perfective
* răv e ă(g)  = jussive impfv. ('may he.../let him...')
* răv e ă(g)  = jussive impfv. ('may he.../let him...')