Verse:Mwail/Old Gloob: Difference between revisions

Line 23:

{{ClassMeter

|Name = {{PAGENAME}}

|NativeName = ~~gávthā themsárimā~~

|NativeName = gávthār themsárimār

|Type = fusional, agglutinative

|Alignment = nominative-accusative, head-marking

Line 1,364:

======Imperative======

The imperative is used to issue ''~~affirmative~~'' ~~orders~~. The original "future imperative" has been revived/reanalyzed as a more emphatic variant of the imperative, influenced by the use of the future as an emphatic imperative.

The imperative is used to issue orders; it is negated with ''ham''. The original "future imperative" has been revived/reanalyzed as a more emphatic variant of the imperative, influenced by the use of the future as an emphatic imperative.

======Present======

Line 2,622:

===Predicative possession===

"X has Y" is expressed with the construction "''~~[[Themsarian/Verbal subparadigms|~~mór]]'' Y ''vo'' X", or "''mór''-[pronoun affix for pronominal X] Y" ~~if X is animate~~. ~~If X~~ is ~~inanimate,~~ the ~~construction ''~~X ā Y~~'' (~~'X ~~is with~~ Y'~~), or '~~'X ~~ast~~ Y'' ('X is ~~without Y~~') is ~~used~~. ~~(''Mór'' is a suppletive verb.)~~

For alienable possession, 'X has Y' is expressed with the construction ''mór'' Y ''vo'' X", or "''mór''-[pronoun affix for pronominal X] Y".

For inalienable possession, it is unnecessary to indicate the fact that X has Y, hence this existential construction is not used. To say 'X has an [adjective] Y' the topicalizing construction 'X {{sc|predicative adjective}} Y-{{sc|possessive suffix}}' (hence 'X, his/her/its/their Y is [adjective]') is most common.

:'''''Mórvien híltámsach.'''''

@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 {{ClassMeter
 |Name       = {{PAGENAME}}
-|NativeName = gávthā themsárimā
+|NativeName = gávthār themsárimār
 |Type       = fusional, agglutinative
 |Alignment  = nominative-accusative, head-marking
@@ Line 1,364: / Line 1,364: @@
 ======Imperative======
-The imperative is used to issue ''affirmative'' orders. The original "future imperative" has been revived/reanalyzed as a more emphatic variant of the imperative, influenced by the use of the future as an emphatic imperative.
+The imperative is used to issue orders; it is negated with ''ham''. The original "future imperative" has been revived/reanalyzed as a more emphatic variant of the imperative, influenced by the use of the future as an emphatic imperative.
 ======Present======
@@ Line 2,622: / Line 2,622: @@
 ===Predicative possession===
-"X has Y" is expressed with the construction "''[[Themsarian/Verbal subparadigms|mór]]''  Y ''vo'' X", or "''mór''-[pronoun affix for pronominal X] Y" if X is animate. If X is inanimate, the construction ''X ā Y'' ('X is with Y'), or ''X ast Y'' ('X is without Y') is used. (''Mór'' is a suppletive verb.)
+For alienable possession, 'X has Y' is expressed with the construction ''mór''  Y ''vo'' X", or "''mór''-[pronoun affix for pronominal X] Y".
+For inalienable possession, it is unnecessary to indicate the fact that X has Y, hence this existential construction is not used. To say 'X has an [adjective] Y' the topicalizing construction 'X {{sc|predicative adjective}} Y-{{sc|possessive suffix}}' (hence 'X, his/her/its/their Y is [adjective]') is most common.
 :'''''Mórvien híltámsach.'''''