Roshterian: Difference between revisions
m →History |
m →History |
||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
This sentence was likely written by a non-native speaker of Roshterian, seeing by the fact that he/she omitted evidentials, which would be required in the second clause. | This sentence was likely written by a non-native speaker of Roshterian, seeing by the fact that he/she omitted evidentials, which would be required in the second clause. | ||
The significance of Roshterian for Talmic linguistics was first noted by the | The significance of Roshterian for Talmic linguistics was first noted by the Xaetjva linguist Sjameu Panzux. He proposed that it reflected all four dorsal series of Proto-Talmic differently, unlike the (in western Cuadhlabh) hitherto known Thensaric languages: | ||
*{{recon|''k, g''}} > Roshterian ''c, g''; Thensarian ''c, g'' | *{{recon|''k, g''}} > Roshterian ''c, g''; Thensarian ''c, g'' | ||