Verse:Hmøøh/Ngedhraism: Difference between revisions

Line 14:

The "Second Mover" concept began as a goddess of mathematics and the arts, called Ȝronaeā (Old Eevo Ŋronae; modern Eevo ''Ŋrone'') in Old Eevo texts. Ancient Thensarian pagans saw a duality (i.e. an opposite but complementary relationship) between nature and human endeavors such as science, mathematics and the arts. The creator god Ħembānom, First Mover, created nature; Ȝronaeā, the Second Mover, then helps humans analyze and create. Man was mostly meant to "stay in his lane", with 3ronaeā (+ a few other gods) as their only mediator between him and nature.

After the [[Verse:Tricin/~~Cyséean~~ Dark Ages|~~Cyséean~~ Dark Ages]], this gave way to a more adversarial understanding of the relationship between the First and the Second Movers, which now pitted Ȝrosnaeā as the embodiment of "the true, the good, the beautiful" against the capricious forces of nature and the First Mover. At this point, Ȝronaeā had become identified with the Netagin goddess of justice. The progress of scientific understanding encouraged the further abstraction the Second Mover concept, as it was recognized as an impersonal and significant force as opposed to the First Mover (Eevo: ''sett ŋaðrar''), the principle responsible for the creation of the world and its natural laws.

After the [[Verse:Tricin/Talman Dark Ages|Talman Dark Ages]], this gave way to a more adversarial understanding of the relationship between the First and the Second Movers, which now pitted Ȝrosnaeā as the embodiment of "the true, the good, the beautiful" against the capricious forces of nature and the First Mover. At this point, Ȝronaeā had become identified with the Netagin goddess of justice. The progress of scientific understanding encouraged the further abstraction the Second Mover concept, as it was recognized as an impersonal and significant force as opposed to the First Mover (Eevo: ''sett ŋaðrar''), the principle responsible for the creation of the world and its natural laws.

The Second Mover was not always a universalist idea that it is commonly thought of as today. Quasi-Calvinist interpretations of the Second Mover prevailed among the ruling elite, where only the select few had the essence of the Second Mover which granted them the right to rule.

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 The "Second Mover" concept began as a goddess of mathematics and the arts, called Ȝronaeā (Old Eevo Ŋronae; modern Eevo ''Ŋrone'') in Old Eevo texts. Ancient Thensarian pagans saw a duality (i.e. an opposite but complementary relationship) between nature and human endeavors such as science, mathematics and the arts. The creator god Ħembānom, First Mover, created nature; Ȝronaeā, the Second Mover, then helps humans analyze and create. Man was mostly meant to "stay in his lane", with 3ronaeā (+ a few other gods) as their only mediator between him and nature.
-After the [[Verse:Tricin/Cyséean Dark Ages|Cyséean Dark Ages]], this gave way to a more adversarial understanding of the relationship between the First and the Second Movers, which now pitted Ȝrosnaeā as the embodiment of "the true, the good, the beautiful" against the capricious forces of nature and the First Mover. At this point, Ȝronaeā had become identified with the Netagin goddess of justice. The progress of scientific understanding encouraged the further abstraction the Second Mover concept, as it was recognized as an impersonal and significant force as opposed to the First Mover (Eevo: ''sett ŋaðrar''), the principle responsible for the creation of the world and its natural laws.
+After the [[Verse:Tricin/Talman Dark Ages|Talman Dark Ages]], this gave way to a more adversarial understanding of the relationship between the First and the Second Movers, which now pitted Ȝrosnaeā as the embodiment of "the true, the good, the beautiful" against the capricious forces of nature and the First Mover. At this point, Ȝronaeā had become identified with the Netagin goddess of justice. The progress of scientific understanding encouraged the further abstraction the Second Mover concept, as it was recognized as an impersonal and significant force as opposed to the First Mover (Eevo: ''sett ŋaðrar''), the principle responsible for the creation of the world and its natural laws.
 The Second Mover was not always a universalist idea that it is commonly thought of as today. Quasi-Calvinist interpretations of the Second Mover prevailed among the ruling elite, where only the select few had the essence of the Second Mover which granted them the right to rule.