Verse:Hmøøh/Ngedhraism: Difference between revisions

Line 5:

*A period much like the Warring States period, with competing philosophies sponsored by warlords and citystates

*One of these philosophies win out and dominate Talma for a long time

**it happens to be a ~~Windermere~~ philosophy; responsible for ~~Windermere~~ as a classical language

**it happens to be a Lăcoaf philosophy; responsible for Lăcoaf as a classical language

*Then Embisoom Grwid the revolutionary comes along

Line 29:

*(A collectivist/social conservative philosophy which frowns upon nonconformity and failure)

The last philosophy was the one which won out; with the unification of the ~~Windermere~~ Empire it became the state ideology. Various smaller states that were not absorbed by the empire would become tributary states.

The last philosophy was the one which won out; with the unification of the Lăcoaf Empire it became the state ideology. Various smaller states that were not absorbed by the empire would become tributary states.

===Medieval Ngronaism===

Line 39:

==Basic tenets==

===''Zicyreexúr''===

The concept of ''zicyreexúr'' is a principle of nonviolence, similar to ''ahiṃsa'' in Dharmic religions. (The [[Eevo]] word ''zicyreexúr'', from [[~~Windermere~~]] ''și·căreałür'', means 'nonviolence' or 'non-aggression'.) Traditionally, ''zicyreexúr'' allows violence in self-defense or as a punishment for violence - the reasoning was that violence is so serious that it should be discouraged by any means necessary. There has been much debate among Ngronaist thinkers on exactly how much retributive violence is justified.

The concept of ''zicyreexúr'' is a principle of nonviolence, similar to ''ahiṃsa'' in Dharmic religions. (The [[Eevo]] word ''zicyreexúr'', from [[Lăcoaf]] ''și·căreałür'', means 'nonviolence' or 'non-aggression'.) Traditionally, ''zicyreexúr'' allows violence in self-defense or as a punishment for violence - the reasoning was that violence is so serious that it should be discouraged by any means necessary. There has been much debate among Ngronaist thinkers on exactly how much retributive violence is justified.

=="Canon"==

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 *A period much like the Warring States period, with competing philosophies sponsored by warlords and citystates
 *One of these philosophies win out and dominate Talma for a long time
-**it happens to be a Windermere philosophy; responsible for Windermere as a classical language
+**it happens to be a Lăcoaf philosophy; responsible for Lăcoaf as a classical language
 *Then Embisoom Grwid the revolutionary comes along
@@ Line 29: / Line 29: @@
 *(A collectivist/social conservative philosophy which frowns upon nonconformity and failure)
-The last philosophy was the one which won out; with the unification of the Windermere Empire it became the state ideology. Various smaller states that were not absorbed by the empire would become tributary states.
+The last philosophy was the one which won out; with the unification of the Lăcoaf Empire it became the state ideology. Various smaller states that were not absorbed by the empire would become tributary states.
 ===Medieval Ngronaism===
@@ Line 39: / Line 39: @@
 ==Basic tenets==
 ===''Zicyreexúr''===
-The concept of ''zicyreexúr'' is a principle of nonviolence, similar to ''ahiṃsa'' in Dharmic religions. (The [[Eevo]] word ''zicyreexúr'', from [[Windermere]] ''și·căreałür'', means 'nonviolence' or 'non-aggression'.) Traditionally, ''zicyreexúr'' allows violence in self-defense or as a punishment for violence - the reasoning was that violence is so serious that it should be discouraged by any means necessary. There has been much debate among Ngronaist thinkers on exactly how much retributive violence is justified.
+The concept of ''zicyreexúr'' is a principle of nonviolence, similar to ''ahiṃsa'' in Dharmic religions. (The [[Eevo]] word ''zicyreexúr'', from [[Lăcoaf]] ''și·căreałür'', means 'nonviolence' or 'non-aggression'.) Traditionally, ''zicyreexúr'' allows violence in self-defense or as a punishment for violence - the reasoning was that violence is so serious that it should be discouraged by any means necessary. There has been much debate among Ngronaist thinkers on exactly how much retributive violence is justified.
 =="Canon"==