Weddish: Difference between revisions

825 bytes added ,  22 April 2014
m
tweaks
m (tweaks)
Line 17: Line 17:
|posteriori    = Yiddish
|posteriori    = Yiddish
|script        =  [[w:Hebrew script|Hebrew]]
|script        =  [[w:Hebrew script|Hebrew]]
|image    = Weddish tree.jpg
}}
}}
'''Weddish''' (''Weddish'': '''װעדיש''', ''X"Q'': '''וֶדִש''', ''Romanization'': '''Vediš''') is a constructed, ''a posteriori'', naturalistic [[auxlang]], made from Yiddish with heavy influences from Hebrew, English, German, and some Basque.  It has ergative-absolutive [[Linguistics:Morphosyntactic alignment|morphosyntactic alignment]] and a pervasive yet symbolic use of the dual.  It is meant to promote the institution of marriage, foster better communication between persons, and improve the constructs of Systematic Theological discussions.  It is well-suited as an auxlang for Jewish intermarriage.
'''Weddish''' (''Weddish'': '''װעדיש''', ''X"Q'': '''וֶדִש''', ''Romanization'': '''Vediš''') is a constructed, ''a posteriori'', naturalistic [[auxlang]], made from Yiddish with heavy influences from Hebrew, English, German, and Basque ideas.  It has ergative-absolutive [[Linguistics:Morphosyntactic alignment|morphosyntactic alignment]] and a pervasive yet symbolic use of the dual.  It is meant to promote the institution of marriage, foster better communication between persons, and improve the constructs of Systematic Theological discussions.  It is well-suited as an auxlang for Jewish intermarriage.


The language was created in 2013 by [[User:aquatiki|Robert Murphy]] as part of an assignment at [[w:Covenant Theological Seminary|Covenant Theological Seminary]] for Professor Jerram Barrs.
The language was created in 2013 by [[User:aquatiki|Robert Murphy]] as part of an assignment at [[w:Covenant Theological Seminary|Covenant Theological Seminary]] for Professor Jerram Barrs.


== Philosophy ==
== Philosophy ==
First and foremost, there is the [[w:Monism#Creator-creature_distinction|Creator-Creature distinction]].  That means, God is wholly other than the Universe.  Second, human beings are made in the [[w:Image of God|image of God]].  This means that we are persons -- like God is -- and our ''agency'' is our single-most important feature.  Third, we reflect the image of God as females '''''and''''' males.  The marriage bond is God-created and a fundamental part of our identity in this life.  Hence it is, that we may divide the world into: actors, non-actors, and actions.  Stated grammatically, this list becomes: ergative nouns, absolutive nouns, and verbs.  Furthermore, ergative nouns may be divided up into married and non-married actors, which we will mark with the ''dual'' or not.
First and foremost, there is the [[w:Monism#Creator-creature_distinction|Creator-Creature distinction]].  That means, God is wholly other than the Universe.  Second, human beings are made in the [[w:Image of God|image of God]].  This means that we are persons -- like God is -- and our ''agency'' is our single-most important feature.  Third, we reflect the image of God as females '''''or''''' males.  The marriage bond is God-created and a fundamental part of our identity in this life.  Hence it is, that we may divide the world into: actors, non-actors, and actions.  Stated grammatically, this list becomes: ergative nouns, absolutive nouns, and verbs.  Furthermore, ergative nouns may be divided up into married and non-married actors, which we will mark with the ''dual'' or not.


We have said that ontologically speaking, there are ultimately only two (God and not-God).  However, the 800lb. gorilla in the room -- philosophically speaking -- is [[w:Abstraction|abstraction]].  Since before [[w:Pythagoras|Pythagoras]], abstract nouns (such as numbers, "goodness", etc.) had been held by the Greeks to be [[w:Ontology|ontic]].  Westerners betray their affinity to Greek ideals, classifying humanity as ''homo sapiens'' - "thinking man".  We seek to disenthrall ourselves from this metaphysic and banish abstract nouns from our language.  Numerals are adjectives.  Infinity is that which we cannot see the end of.  Universals are the same as aggregates ("all" is the same as "sum" ... but not "some"!).
We have said that ontologically speaking, there are ultimately only Two (God and not-God).  However, the 800lb. gorilla in the room -- philosophically speaking -- is [[w:Abstraction|abstraction]].  Since before [[w:Pythagoras|Pythagoras]], abstract nouns (such as numbers, "goodness", etc.) had been held by the Greeks to be [[w:Ontology|ontic]].  Westerners betray their affinity to Greek ideals, classifying humanity as ''homo sapiens'' - "thinking man".  We seek to disenthrall ourselves from this metaphysic and therefore ''banish'' abstract nouns from our language.  Numerals are adjectives.  Infinity is that which we cannot see the end of.  Universals are the same as aggregates ("all" is the same as "sum" ... but not "some"!).


The [[w:Language Creation Society|Language Creation Society]] (a fine institution) waves a flag of the [[w:Tower of Babel|Tower of Babel]].  Unlike the hubristic men of the initial chapters ''In the Land of Invented Languages'' ([[w:Arika Okrent|Arika Okrent]]'s chronicle), we do not believe we can undo by human effort what God has done.  Our aim is for Jews and Christians to discuss the truth in better terms.  The status of English as a ''lingua franca'', German as a language of science, and Hebrew as a holy language suggests that an Indo-European language is still the best option for an ''a posteriori'' auxlang, but with Semitic components.  Rather than compete with those vital languages, however, it seems most prudent to build upon a base of all at once, utilizing a language that is already as eclectic as English, similar to German, and utilizing Hebrew.  That language is Yiddish.  Basque serves as an inspiration for new categories and "outside the box" thinking.
The [[w:Language Creation Society|Language Creation Society]] (an excellent institution) waves the flag of the [[w:Tower of Babel|Tower of Babel]].  Unlike the hubristic men of the initial chapters ''In the Land of Invented Languages'' ([[w:Arika Okrent|Arika Okrent]]'s chronicle), we do not believe we can undo what God has done to human speech by intellectual rigor.  Our aim is for Jews and Christians to discuss the truth in ''better'' terms.  The status of English as a ''lingua franca'', German as a language of science, and Hebrew as a holy language suggests that an Indo-European language is still the best option for an ''a posteriori'' auxlang, but with Semitic components.  Rather than compete with those vital languages, however, it seems most prudent to build upon a base of all at once, utilizing a language that is already as eclectic as English, similar to German, and informed by Hebrew.  That language is Yiddish.  Basque serves as an inspiration for new categories and "outside the box" thinking.


== Phonology ==
== Phonology ==
Weddish has 25 consonantal sounds, which is typologically average <ref>http://wals.info/chapter/1</ref>, and common in Europe as well as the Middle East.  English speakers will find it to be common, apart from the lack of <tt>/w/</tt> and the abundance of <tt>/x/</tt> (like the ''ch'' in ''Bach'' or ''loch'').  Weddish has 6 vowels, which is also average<ref>http://wals.info/chapter/2</ref>, as is the resulting consonant-to-vowel ration<ref>http://wals.info/chapter/3</ref>.  This is typologically equivalent to Yiddish and Hebrew, but far less than German or English.
Weddish has 25 consonantal sounds, which is typologically average <ref>http://wals.info/chapter/1</ref>, and common in Europe as well as the Middle East.  English speakers will find it to be common, apart from the lack of <tt>/w/</tt> and the abundance of <tt>/x/</tt> (like the ''ch'' in ''Bach'' or ''loch'').  Weddish has 6 vowels, which is also average<ref>http://wals.info/chapter/2</ref>, as is the resulting consonant-to-vowel ration<ref>http://wals.info/chapter/3</ref>.  This is typologically equivalent to Yiddish and Hebrew, but far less than German or English.


{| {{Table/bluetable}} style="float:left;"
{| {{Table/bluetable}} style="float:left; font-size:large;"
|+ '''Consonants of Weddish'''
|+ '''Consonants of Weddish'''
! colspan="9"|Consonant phonemes
! colspan="9"|Consonant phonemes
Line 101: Line 102:




{| {{Table/bluetable}} style="margin-left:10px; float: right;"
{| {{Table/bluetable}} style="margin-left:10px; float: right; font-size:large;"
|+  '''Vowel phonemes in Weddish'''
|+  '''Vowel phonemes in Weddish'''
!  
!  
Line 116: Line 117:
! Mid
! Mid
| '''ע''' <tt>/e/~/ɛ/</tt>
| '''ע''' <tt>/e/~/ɛ/</tt>
| <tt>/ə/</tt>
| ''' ׳ ''' <tt>/ə/</tt>
| '''אָ''' <tt>/o/~/ɔ/</tt>
| '''''' <tt>/o/~/ɔ/</tt>
|-
|-
! Low
! Low
|
|
| '''אַ''' <tt>/ɐ/~/ä/</tt>
| '''א''' <tt>/ɐ/~/ä/</tt>
|
|
|}
|}
Line 133: Line 134:
! a
! a
| '''ײַ''' = ay
| '''ײַ''' = ay
| '''אַו''' = aw
| <small>'' '''אַו''' = aw'' *</small>
|-
|-
! e
! e
Line 141: Line 142:
! o
! o
| '''ױ''' = oy
| '''ױ''' = oy
| '''אָו''' = ow
| <small> '' '''אָו''' = ow'' * </small>
|}
|}
Voicing is contrastive in both plosives and fricatives, like Yiddish and English<ref>http://wals.info/chapter/4</ref>.  Vowel nasalization and rounding are not phonemic<ref>http://wals.info/chapter/11</ref>
<br clear="both" />
<br clear="both" />
Voicing is contrastive in both plosives and fricatives, like Yiddish and English<ref>http://wals.info/chapter/4</ref>.  Vowel nasalization and rounding are not phonemic<ref>http://wals.info/chapter/11</ref>.


There are several issues in the pronunciation of individual sounds.  The rhotic of Weddish is either alveolar or uvular<ref>As in Hebrew, uvular may be seen as the most prestigious form: http://wals.info/chapter/6</ref> and may be anything from a fricative, to a flap, to a trill, to an approximant.  No R-colors vowels are permitted.  Words that begin with a vowel are separated from a prior open syllable by a glottal stop.  The velar nasal only occurs when an "n" is assimilated in place of articular before or after an "x", "k", or "g", in a syllable coda<ref>http://wals.info/chapter/9</ref>.  '''ng''' is pronounced <tt>/ŋg/</tt>, not just <tt>/ŋ/</tt>.  '''L''' is typically dark (aka "velarized") except before '''i'''.  '''Ayen''' is always romanized '''e''', but signifies the schwa in unaccented syllables.
There are several issues in the pronunciation of individual sounds.  The rhotic of Weddish is either alveolar or uvular<ref>As in Hebrew, uvular may be seen as the most prestigious form: http://wals.info/chapter/6</ref> and may be anything from a fricative, to a flap, to a trill, to an approximant.  No R-colors vowels are permitted.  Words that begin with a vowel are separated from a prior open syllable by a glottal stop.  The velar nasal only occurs when an "n" is assimilated in place of articular before or after an "x", "k", or "g", in a syllable coda<ref>http://wals.info/chapter/9</ref>.  '''ng''' is pronounced <tt>/ŋg/</tt>, not just <tt>/ŋ/</tt>.  '''L''' is typically dark (aka "velarized") except before '''i'''.  '''Ayen''' is always romanized '''e''', but signifies the schwa in unaccented syllables.


In the dialect of the Americas, central vowels retain a color of their original/short form.  Elsewhere, they are all central, except <tt>/a/</tt> before glottals and <tt>/ɪ/</tt> before labials.  Another dialect difference is that '''c''' and '''dž''' are sometimes pronounced <tt>/θ/</tt> and <tt>/ð/</tt><ref>http://wals.info/chapter/19</ref>.  However, the rhotic is still not retroflex!
In the dialect of the Americas, central vowels retain a color of their original/short form.  Elsewhere, they are all central, except <tt>/a/</tt> before glottals and <tt>/ɪ/</tt> before labials.  Another dialect difference is that '''c''' and '''dž''' are sometimes pronounced <tt>/θ/</tt> and <tt>/ð/</tt><ref>http://wals.info/chapter/19</ref>.  However, the rhotic is still not retroflex! Americans also pronounce '''aw''' and '''ow''' as diphthongs, which is completely understandable.


=== Orthography ===
=== Orthography ===
Weddish written in the Hebrew alphabet, following the standard of YIVO Yiddish.  There is a one-to-one correspondence between grapheme and phoneme, except for three digraphs and one trigraph.  Weddish also has its own Romanization scheme, largely Slavic in appearance.  In it, <tt>/ʃ/</tt> is written '''š''', <tt>/ʒ/</tt> is written '''ž''', <tt>/j/</tt> is written '''y''', <tt>/ts/</tt> is written '''c''', <tt>/tʃ/</tt> is written '''č''', <tt>/dʒ/</tt> is written '''dž''', and <tt>/ʁ/</tt> is written '''r'''.
Weddish written in the Hebrew alphabet, mostly following the standard of YIVO Yiddish.  '''A''' and '''O''' are handled differently, as is the šva.  There is a one-to-one correspondence between grapheme and phoneme, except for three digraphs and one trigraph.  Weddish also has its own Romanization scheme, largely Slavic in appearance.  In it, <tt>/ʃ/</tt> is written '''š''', <tt>/ʒ/</tt> is written '''ž''', <tt>/j/</tt> is written '''y''', <tt>/ts/</tt> is written '''c''', <tt>/tʃ/</tt> is written '''č''', <tt>/dʒ/</tt> is written '''dž''', and <tt>/ʁ/</tt> is written '''r'''.


If the syllable after a diphthong begins with a vowel, the off-glide of the diphthong is doubled as the onset of that next syllable, '''''without being written again'''''.  Thus '''zeyer''' is pronounced <tt>/zey.yer/</tt>.
If the syllable after a diphthong begins with a vowel, the off-glide of the diphthong is doubled as the onset of that next syllable, '''''without being written again'''''.  Thus '''zeyer''' is pronounced <tt>/zey.yer/</tt>.


As in Hebrew, five letters have "final" forms, when they occur at the end of a word.  These forms do not affect pronunciation at all.   
As in Hebrew, five letters have "final" forms, when they occur at the end of a word.  These forms do not affect pronunciation at all.   
{| {{Table/bluetable}}
{| {{Table/bluetable}} style="font-size:large;"
! Initial/Medial
! Initial/Medial
| '''מ'''
| '''מ'''
Line 173: Line 173:
|}
|}


Alphabetical order is '''alef''', '''alef pasex''', '''alef komac''', '''beys''', ('''veys''',) '''giml''', '''dalet''', '''dalet zayen''', '''dalet zayen šin''', '''hey''', '''vov''', '''gvovayin''', '''šurek''', '''zayen''', '''zayen šin''', ('''xes''',) '''tes''', '''tes šin''', '''yud''', '''yud xirik''', '''gyudayin''', '''gyudayin pasex''', '''vov yud''', '''xof''', ('''xof dageš''',) '''lamed''', '''mem''', '''nun''', '''samex''', '''ayen''', '''pey''', '''fey''', '''cadek''', '''kuf''', '''reyš''', ('''sin''',)  '''šin''' (, '''tav''', '''sav''').
Alphabetical order is ('''gereš''',) '''alef''', '''alefol''', '''beys''', ('''veys''',) '''giml''', '''dalet''', '''dalet''', '''hey''', '''vov''', '''gvováyin''', '''šurek''', '''zayen''', ('''xes''',) '''tes''', '''yud''', '''yud xirik''', '''gyudayin''', '''gyudayin pasex''', '''vov yud''', '''xof''', ('''xof dageš''',) '''lamed''', '''mem''', '''nun''', '''samex''', '''ayen''', '''pey''', '''fey''', '''cadek''', '''kuf''', '''reyš''', ('''sin''',)  '''šin''' (, '''tav''', '''sav''').


When necessary to avoid confusion, <tt>/u/</tt> can be precisely specified with a '''וּ''', called a '''šurek'''.  <tt>/i/</tt> can be invoked as '''יִ''', that is a '''yud xirek'''.   
When necessary to avoid confusion, <tt>/u/</tt> can be precisely specified with a '''וּ''', called a '''šurek'''.  <tt>/i/</tt> can be invoked as '''יִ''', that is a '''yud xirek'''.   
==== Others ====
==== Others ====
Yiddish has many loanwords from Hebrew and Aramaic which are written using the Hebrew abjad in the Semitic way.  Weddish, however, writes these words out according to its own orthographic conventions.  There are times when it is necessary to use the ancient letters, especially in religious settings.
Yiddish has many loanwords from Hebrew and Aramaic which are written using the Hebrew abjad in the Semitic way.  Weddish, however, writes these words out according to its own orthographic conventions.  There are times when it is necessary to use the ancient letters, especially in religious settings.
{| {{Table/bluetable}}
{| {{Table/bluetable}} style="font-size:large;"
! Lošn Koydeš Letter
! Lošn Koydeš Letter
| '''בֿ'''
| '''בֿ'''
Line 197: Line 197:


There is also a highly ornate style of writing Weddish, called '''xtiv qoydeš''' ("holy writing", abbr. x"q) where letters are used not as an alphabet, but as an abjad.  Vowels may or may not be written in this style.  When written, they are written as diacritical marks ("points") around the consonants.  In this style, '''v''' is written as '''ו''' and '''y''' as '''י'''.  Vowels are as follows, with the '''א''' written in syllables with no onset:
There is also a highly ornate style of writing Weddish, called '''xtiv qoydeš''' ("holy writing", abbr. x"q) where letters are used not as an alphabet, but as an abjad.  Vowels may or may not be written in this style.  When written, they are written as diacritical marks ("points") around the consonants.  In this style, '''v''' is written as '''ו''' and '''y''' as '''י'''.  Vowels are as follows, with the '''א''' written in syllables with no onset:
{| {{Table/bluetable}}
{| {{Table/bluetable}} style="font-size:large;"
! Standard
! Standard
! X"Q
! X"Q
Line 206: Line 206:
| '''a'''
| '''a'''
|-
|-
| '''אָ'''
| ''''''
| '''אָ'''
| '''אָ'''
| '''o'''
| '''o'''
Line 227: Line 227:
|-
|-
| '''ײַ'''
| '''ײַ'''
| '''אֱ'''
| '''אַי'''
| '''ay'''
| '''ay'''
|-
|-
Line 235: Line 235:
|-
|-
| '''אָו'''
| '''אָו'''
| '''אֳ'''
| '''אָי'''
| '''ow'''
| '''ow'''
|-
|-
| '''אַו'''
| '''אַו'''
| '''אֲ'''
| '''אַו'''
| '''aw'''
| '''aw'''
|-
|-
Line 474: Line 474:
|order = SVO
|order = SVO
}}
}}
Weddish aims to appeal to English speakers.  While the verbal-system is somewhat new, the noun-system should be easy.  Nouns are not inflected, but pronouns have unique forms that show part of speech.  Like German, articles inflect.  The "genders" of Weddish are actually noun classes, a system taken from Basque.  People, animals, and things that can move on their own are "animate", while plants and other objects are "inanimate".  Independent third person singular personal pronouns have gender, as system like English's "he/she/it".  Adjectives do not inflect unless substantive, and there are not many adjectives.
Weddish aims to appeal to English speakers.  While the verbal-system is somewhat new, the noun-system should be easy.  Nouns are not inflected, but pronouns have unique forms that show part of speech.  Like German, articles inflect, not the noun.  Weddish (like English) only has gender on the independent third person personal pronouns.  Otherwise there are just noun classes, a system taken from Basque.  People, animals, and things that can move on their own are "animate", while plants and other objects are "inanimate".  Adjectives do not inflect unless substantive, and there are not many adjectives.  Most descriptors are intransitive verbs.


[[File:MorphSyntAlign2.png|left]]Weddish has an ergative-absolutive morphosyntactic alignment.  This was purposefully chosen to stimulate thinking, and done in imitation of Basque.  Most languages in the world treat the actor of transitive verb and the subject of an intransitive verb in the same way.  The object of a transitive verb is special in these systems.  It can be promoted to the subject via the passive voice.  Normally, it must come after the verb.  Weddish treats the ''object'' of a transitive verb and the subject of a transitive verb the same, called the "absolutive case".  Actors of transitive verbs are specially, called the "ergative case".  This is the special case in Weddish.  It must come before the verb and can be demoted by the anti-passive voice.
[[File:MorphSyntAlign2.png|left]]Weddish has an ergative-absolutive morphosyntactic alignment.  This was purposefully chosen to stimulate thinking, and done in imitation of Basque.  Most languages in the world treat the actor of transitive verb and the subject of an intransitive verb in the same way.  The object of a transitive verb is special in these systems.  It can be promoted to the subject via the passive voice.  Normally, it must come after the verb.  Weddish treats the ''object'' of a transitive verb and the subject of a transitive verb the same, called the "absolutive case".  Actors of transitive verbs are specially, called the "ergative case".  This is the special case in Weddish.  It must come before the verb and can be demoted by the anti-passive voice.
Line 480: Line 480:
<br />  
<br />  


It would be tempting to classify Weddish as VSO (subject-veb-object) like Hebrew, but that's not quite right.  It is, in fact, a V2 language, which means the verb always wants to come second.  (Discourse particles and few other things do not count towards calculating where "second" is, and entire phrases are taken as a whole when counting this place.)  Because core cases are marked almost solely by word order, the actor of a transitive verb (the ergative case) must come before the verb, i.e. first in the sentence.
It would be tempting to classify Weddish as VSO (subject-veb-object) like Hebrew, but that's not quite right.  It is, in fact, a V2 language, which means the verb always wants to come second.  (Discourse particles and few other things do not count towards calculating where "second" is, and entire phrases are taken as a whole when counting this place.)  Because core cases are marked almost solely by word order, the actor of a transitive verb (the ergative case) must come before the verb, i.e. first in the sentence.  It could also be said that intransitive sentences are VSO and transitive ones are SVO.


The V2 Principle is carried throughout Weddish, to the point where it might be labeled a "head second" language.  This is not a recognized typology, since languages are either head-initial, head-final, or mixed.  In compound nouns, the head is second.  For auxiliary verbs, the head verb is second.  For nouns with attributive modifiers, the article comes first, but adjectives come after the noun, making it head-second as well.
The V2 Principle is carried throughout Weddish, to the point where it might be labeled a "head second" language.  This is not a recognized typology, since languages are either head-initial, head-final, or mixed.  In compound nouns, the head is second.  For auxiliary verbs, the head verb is second.  For nouns with attributive modifiers, the article comes first, but adjectives come after the noun, making it head-second as well.
Line 507: Line 507:
|}
|}


By default, all nouns are in the ''absolutive'' case.  But, if they are placed '''''before''''' the verb, then they are said to be in the ergative case, though their morphology is unchanged. Linguists call these two case the "core cases" of a language, since they are fundamental.  There are five additional cases --- called "non-core" cases --- in Weddish that are also very important.  Unlike many languages that have ''suffixing'' case marking, Weddish has ''prefixing''.  This is because they are derived from Hebrew Inseparable Prepositions (IP's).  Phrases in the non-core cases either relate to the verb (and are hence, adverbial), or are in a noun phrase.  In relation to nouns, the core cases are all seen as greater specificity ''within'' the genitive case.
By default, all nouns are in the ''absolutive'' case.  But, if they are placed '''''before''''' the verb, then they are said to be in the ergative case, though their morphology is unchanged. Linguists call these two case the "core cases" of a language, since they are fundamental.  There are five additional cases --- called "non-core" cases --- that are also very important.  Unlike many languages that have ''suffixing'' case marking, Weddish has ''prefixing''.  This is because they are derived from Hebrew Inseparable Prepositions.  Phrases in the non-core cases either relate to the verb (and are hence, adverbial), or are in a noun phrase.  In relation to nouns, the core cases are all seen as greater specificity ''within'' the genitive case.


Non-core cases all fall under the umbrella term "genitive".  The generic genitive is not a case ''per se'', but a preposition (meaning, a separable preposition).  An expression like '''דאַס לינע פֿונ געלט/dos line fun gelt'''/''the love of money'' is even more ambiguous in Weddish than in English.  It may mean ''the love belonging to money'' (?), ''the love in/by money'', ''the love from/composed of money'', or ''the love as/according to money''.  After a genitive phrase has been established or is implicitly understood, the phrase may incorporated be into a compound noun using the "head-second" structure.
Non-core cases all fall under the umbrella term "genitive".  The generic genitive is not a case ''per se'', but a preposition (meaning, a separable preposition).  An expression like '''די לינע פֿונ געלט/di line fun gelt'''/''the love of money'' is even more ambiguous in Weddish than in English.  It may mean ''the love [belonging] to money'', ''the love in/by money'', ''the love from/composed of money'', or ''the love as/according to money''.  After a genitive phrase has been established or is implicitly understood, the phrase may incorporated be into a compound noun using the "head-second" structure.
{| {{Table/bluetable}}
{| {{Table/bluetable}}
|+ '''Case, Articles, and IP's'''
|+ '''Case, Articles, and IP's'''
Line 591: Line 591:
| '''געפֿרײַנדינז''' <br /> '''gefrayndinz''' <br /> ''a group of friends and associates''
| '''געפֿרײַנדינז''' <br /> '''gefrayndinz''' <br /> ''a group of friends and associates''
|}
|}
There are a plethora of paradigms for the distributive plural formations, 99% of which time come straight from the Yiddish plural.


The dual ending is unique, in that is shifts the accent pattern of the root to itself.  It may be written '''-áyim''' to indicate that shift.  This shift triggers vowel reduction of of the previous syllable, if it is a diphthong (cutting it down to its first vowel).
The dual ending is unique, in that is shifts the accent pattern of the root to itself.  It may be written '''-áyim''' to indicate that shift.  This shift triggers vowel reduction of of the previous syllable, if it is a diphthong (cutting it down to its first vowel).
Line 768: Line 770:


=== Verbs ===
=== Verbs ===
Weddish verbs do not conjugate for tense, only aspect.
Weddish verbs conjugate first for aspect, then use auxiliaries for tense and mood.


==== Aspect Ablaut ====
==== Aspect Ablaut ====
Aspect is specified by changing the theme vowel of the verb.  The right vowel may not be part of a compound, prefix, or suffix.  As with nounal plurals, these changes fall into patterns, but are somewhat unpredictable.
{| {{Table/bluetable}}
{| {{Table/bluetable}}
! Perfective || Imperfective
! Imperfective || Perfective
|-
|-
| -ei- || -i-  
| -ei- || -a-  
|-
|-
| -au- || -ai-
| -o- || -ow-
|-
|-
| -ou- || -u-
| -oy- || -a-
|-
|-
| -e- || -a-
| -e- || -u-
|-
|-
| -o- || -oi-
| -i- || -a-/-e-/-u-
|}
|}
==== Voices ====
==== Voices ====
1,177

edits