Verse:Hmøøh/Suwáábyíq: Difference between revisions

Line 65:

Sóol is nominally a social democracy. However, deep welfare and public service cuts have plagued the country under the current NatDem government.

Sóol is quite nationalist and heavily restricts immigration. Much of the political rhetoric centers around Sowaázh daSóol being the "leader" of Txapoalli ~~which is~~ ironically quite fragile. Its immigration system is similar to Singapore: it allows migrant workers to stay on a temporary basis but becoming a citizen is much more difficult.

Sóol is quite nationalist and heavily restricts immigration. Much of the political rhetoric centers around Sowaázh daSóol being the "leader" of Txapoalli but ironically being quite fragile. Its immigration system is similar to Singapore: it allows migrant workers to stay on a temporary basis but becoming a citizen is much more difficult.

The conservative wing pursue an austerity-focused agenda while the liberal wing of the country tend to be second-wave-style radical feminists. Both conservatives and liberals tend to be anti-immigration; liberals tend to be more pro-gun rights than conservatives.

@@ Line 65: / Line 65: @@
 Sóol is nominally a social democracy. However, deep welfare and public service cuts have plagued the country under the current NatDem government.
-Sóol is quite nationalist and heavily restricts immigration. Much of the political rhetoric centers around Sowaázh daSóol being the "leader" of Txapoalli which is ironically quite fragile. Its immigration system is similar to Singapore: it allows migrant workers to stay on a temporary basis but becoming a citizen is much more difficult.
+Sóol is quite nationalist and heavily restricts immigration. Much of the political rhetoric centers around Sowaázh daSóol being the "leader" of Txapoalli but ironically being quite fragile. Its immigration system is similar to Singapore: it allows migrant workers to stay on a temporary basis but becoming a citizen is much more difficult.
 The conservative wing pursue an austerity-focused agenda while the liberal wing of the country tend to be second-wave-style radical feminists. Both conservatives and liberals tend to be anti-immigration; liberals tend to be more pro-gun rights than conservatives.