Verse:Irta/Judeo-Mandarin/Proto-Ăn Yidiș: Difference between revisions

IlL (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
IlL (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 5: Line 5:
Todo: Reconstruct Proto-Ăn Yidiș Hebrew before and after filtering through Proto-Ăn Yidiș phonology. Before they used TibH but with an o /o(:)/ vs ů /u(:)/ distinction in cholam; TibH /u/ was /ü(:)/. TibH style allophonic vowel length should go through the filter, hence leading to QG o vs QQ ă
Todo: Reconstruct Proto-Ăn Yidiș Hebrew before and after filtering through Proto-Ăn Yidiș phonology. Before they used TibH but with an o /o(:)/ vs ů /u(:)/ distinction in cholam; TibH /u/ was /ü(:)/. TibH style allophonic vowel length should go through the filter, hence leading to QG o vs QQ ă


either (1) ''amadàn'' and ''Chanücà'' or (2) ''amadan'' and ''Chanüca''
Proto-Ăn Yidiș still had unstressed à, e.g. ''amadàn'' and ''Chanücà'' at this stage; later dialects including Ăn Căyzon reduce unstressed long vowels.
 
(2) kinda sounds too Yiddish (~~amedn~~) so I'm going with (1) for Căyzon


[haddO:g ha:Ha:j su:HE: bammO:jim] -> ''Hadàg hachaidh sůchè bamàidhim''
[haddO:g ha:Ha:j su:HE: bammO:jim] -> ''Hadàg hachaidh sůchè bamàidhim''