Verse:Irta/Judeo-Mandarin/Proto-Ăn Yidiș: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In Apple PIE, Middle Irish spread across the entire British Isles, also gaining a foothold on Brittany by the | In Apple PIE, Middle Irish spread across the entire British Isles, also gaining a foothold on Brittany by the 10th century. '''Proto-Ăn Yidiș''' was the form of this 10th-century Breton Middle Irish dialect adopted by the local Jews and is the common ancestor of all present-day Ăn Yidiș dialects. Being a spoken language, the Pre-Proto-Ăn Yidiș stage of Middle Irish was already much simpler than the more Old-Irish-influenced Literary Middle Irish, particularly in the verbal system. It was phonologically close to the Cîzon (before vowel length was lost) and grammatically (morphologically) volatile; the nominative, genitive and vocative are still in use but the dative and the accusative have disappeared. The auxiliary system has been stabilized but with some slightly different forms or prepositions depending on the Ăn Yidiș dialect. | ||
==Todo== | ==Todo== |
Revision as of 17:15, 14 December 2021
In Apple PIE, Middle Irish spread across the entire British Isles, also gaining a foothold on Brittany by the 10th century. Proto-Ăn Yidiș was the form of this 10th-century Breton Middle Irish dialect adopted by the local Jews and is the common ancestor of all present-day Ăn Yidiș dialects. Being a spoken language, the Pre-Proto-Ăn Yidiș stage of Middle Irish was already much simpler than the more Old-Irish-influenced Literary Middle Irish, particularly in the verbal system. It was phonologically close to the Cîzon (before vowel length was lost) and grammatically (morphologically) volatile; the nominative, genitive and vocative are still in use but the dative and the accusative have disappeared. The auxiliary system has been stabilized but with some slightly different forms or prepositions depending on the Ăn Yidiș dialect.
Todo
Todo: Reconstruct Proto-Tsarfati Hebrew before and after filtering through Proto-Ăn Yidiș phonology. Before they used TibH but with an o /o(:)/ vs ů /u(:)/ distinction in cholam; TibH /u/ was /ü(:)/. TibH style allophonic vowel length should go through the filter, hence leading to QG o vs QQ ă (בתים is still botim since it was a qamatz gadol)
Proto-Ăn Yidiș still had unstressed /ɔː/ (/ɔː/ comes from Middle Irish á and Proto-Tsarfati Hebrew allophonically long qamatz [ɔː]): e.g. */'amətɔːn/ 'fool' and */'χanʊ̈kʰɔː/ 'Hanukkah'. Many later dialects including Ăn Căyzon reduce it to /ə/.
הדג החי שוחה במים [haddO:g ha:Ha:j su:χE: bammO:jim]
é > ej is blocked before ř hence Ireland is Eřă in Modern Standard ĂnY
Phonology
Consonants: p b t d ć dź ķ ģ k g f s š h v j ğ m n ň ł l r ř
Vowels: at least ə a e i u ü o å ea é í oa ů ű aj ej əj oj uj üj au iə uə üə /ə a ɛ ɪ ʊ ʊ̈ ʌ ɔː eə e: i: oə u: ü: aj ej əj oj uj üj aw iə uə/, unstressed short ə i ü /ə ɪ ʊ̈ yə/
Fully devoiced stop system (that's why tet and qoph are d and g)
Depalatalization of slender consonants in similar contexts as in Polish/Czech
Labials partly depalatalize, partle become bj pj mj fj vj
mh > nasal vowel + v
Slender c g = still palatal stops; slender t d = Mandarin q j (This explains why zayin/tsade were mapped to slender d/t); iotated t/d = čh č (merges with slender t d in Ăn Căyzon, but merges with slender c/g in some dialects)
Final slender ch > -h
Broad r/rr = /r/, slender r/rr = Czech ř (which sometimes dissimilates to r)
broad l/ll = dark L, slender l/ll = l like in Polish;
ň for slender nn but everything else becomes n
- a = /a/, [æ] before slender
- ann all arr = /auR/
- à = /ɔː/
- e = /ɛ/
- è, eu = /ɛː/ > /eə/ (before broad C), /ɛː/ (before slender C)
- é = /e:/ > /ej/ in some conditions/dialects
- e before broad mh > /ja/
- eaRR = /jɔː/, /eə/
- eo = /jʌ/ when short, /jo:/ when long
- i = /i/
- ì = /i:/
- ia, iRR = /iə/
- iù = /y:/
- o = /ʌ/
- ò, oRR = /O:/ > /oə/
- ó = /o:/ > /u:/
- u = /u/
- ù = /ü:/
- ua = /uə/
- ao = /əj/
Grammar
Nouns
Proto-Ăn Yidiș lost the neuter gender and the dual number, and had at least the nominative and the genitive. It's unknown whether the vocative survived outside a few words. The accusative and dative were replaced by the nominative; the genitive now marked definite objects of verbal nouns much like Hebrew את. Possessives began to be marked with the an X a(i)g Y construction.
The reason that the genitive case became unstable in Proto-Ăn Yidiș is usually explained as a result of an influx of Hebrew words, which had no obvious separate genitive forms that didn't rely on mutations or articles.
mak 'son' // əm mak // ə viķ // miķ // nə miķ // nəm mak (בן // הבן // את הבן // בנים // הבנים // את הבנים)
levər 'book' // əl levər // əl levəř // levəř // nə levəř // nən levər
knauv 'bone' (cnov in Standard; cnowv or cnav in dialects) // ən knauv // ə xnauvə // knauvənə // nə knauvənə // nən knauvən (broad/slender neutralized)
éd 'witness' // ənt éd (> אן ה-עד in dialectal Ăn Yidiș) // ən éd, ən édə (the -ə is related to irish 3rd declension gen sg) // édím // nə hédím // nən édím
kalůg 'little bride' // ə xalůg // nə kalůģə // kalůgən // nə kalůgən // nən kalůgən
mićvå 'mitzvah' // ə vićvå // nə mićvå // mićvůs // nə mićvůs // nəm mićvůs
saviň (samhain) became taviň
Adjectives
Verbs
*Tå mi nej ih (< *Tá mé i ndiaidh ith 'I am after eating') became the default construction for the past perfective (cf. German).