Verse:Irta (Old)/Judeo-Mandarin: Difference between revisions

IlL (talk | contribs)
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
IlL (talk | contribs)
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 482: Line 482:
Ăn Yidiș has innovated the tense-aspect system (pres, past/conditional, fut, jussive‚ imperative) x (imperfective, perfective) using the form of בּי ''bi'' and the preverbal aspect marker. The auxiliary marks tense and the preposition marks perfectivity:
Ăn Yidiș has innovated the tense-aspect system (pres, past/conditional, fut, jussive‚ imperative) x (imperfective, perfective) using the form of בּי ''bi'' and the preverbal aspect marker. The auxiliary marks tense and the preposition marks perfectivity:


* to ș' ă(g) = present (to becomes t' before a vowel)
* to e ă(g) = present (to becomes t' before a vowel)
* to șe ņey = past perfective
* to e ņey = past perfective
* vă ș' ă(g) = past imperfective
* vă e ă(g) = past imperfective
* vă șe ņey = pluperfect
* vă e ņey = pluperfect
* bey ș' ă(g) = future imperfective
* bey e ă(g) = future imperfective
* bey șe ney = future perfective
* bey e ney = future perfective
* răv ș' ă(g)  = jussive impfv. ('may he.../let him...')
* răv e ă(g)  = jussive impfv. ('may he.../let him...')
* răv șe ney = jussive pfv.
* răv e ney = jussive pfv.
* ă(g) = imperative impfv.
* ney = imperative pfv.


*''to ș' ăg ith'' = he eats; he is eating
*Present: ''to e ăg ith'' = he eats; he is eating
**''vel șe...'' = does he...?
**''vel șe...'' = does he...?
**''chan el șe...'' = he does not...
**''chan el șe...'' = he does not...
**''nach el șe...'' = doesn't he...?/that he does not
**''nach el șe...'' = doesn't he...?/that he does not
**''gu vel șe...'' = COMP
**''gu vel e...'' = COMP
**''ă to șe...'' = REL
**''a h-e...'' = REL (אַ ''a'' triggers h-prothesis, it's from ''*āh'' < ''a tha'')
**''afílu mo to/mă nach'' = even if
**''afílu mo to/mă nach'' = even if
*''to șe ney ith'' = he ate/has eaten
*''to șe ney ith'' = he ate/has eaten
*''bey ș' ăg ith'' = he will eat
*Future: ''bey ș' ăg ith'' = he will eat
**''ă bey șe...'' = will he...?
**''ă bey șe...'' = will he...?
**''cha bhey șe...'' = he will not...
**''cha bhey șe...'' = he will not...
**''nach bhey șe...'' = won't he...?
**''nach bhey șe...'' = won't he...?
**''ă/gu bis șe...'' = REL/COMP he will...
**''ă/gu bis șe...'' = REL/COMP he will...
*''vă ș' ăg ith'' = he was eating/he would eat
*Past: ''vă ș' ăg ith'' = he was eating/he would eat
**''ă răv șe...'' = was he...?/would he?
**''ă răv șe...'' = was he...?/would he?
**''cha răv șe...'' = he was not.../he would not...
**''cha răv șe...'' = he was not.../he would not...
Line 516: Line 514:
*''no h-ith(ăv)!'' = Don't eat!
*''no h-ith(ăv)!'' = Don't eat!
Hebrew verbs are usually borrowed in their verbal noun or participle forms.
Hebrew verbs are usually borrowed in their verbal noun or participle forms.
===Copula===
===Copula===
Due to Hebrew influence, Ăn Yidiș is closer to being zero-copula than Irish is; the copula *iš was fused, dropped or reanalyzed as part of the pronoun in some cases. Unlike in Irish, the copula is just syntactic; it's used for nominal sentences whereas adjunct, adjective and verb predicates use the auxiliary בּי ''bi''.
Due to Hebrew influence, Ăn Yidiș is closer to being zero-copula than Irish is; the copula *iš was fused, dropped or reanalyzed as part of the pronoun in some cases. Unlike in Irish, the copula is just syntactic; it's used for nominal sentences whereas adjunct, adjective and verb predicates use the auxiliary בּי ''bi''.