Verse:Mwail/Wyacker/Lexicon: Difference between revisions
m →Nouns |
m →Grammar |
||
| Line 270: | Line 270: | ||
===Phonotactics=== | ===Phonotactics=== | ||
== | ==Morphology== | ||
Proto-Azzanic had Philippine alignment as does Rozzino and ʔAškāsīnių. Verb-initial clauses were the norm as in Semitic and Austronesian languages. [[Primitive Tergetian]] had changed this alignment into a nominative-accusative system. | Proto-Azzanic had Philippine alignment as does Rozzino and ʔAškāsīnių. Verb-initial clauses were the norm as in Semitic and Austronesian languages. [[Primitive Tergetian]] had changed this alignment into a nominative-accusative system. | ||
===Nouns=== | ===Nouns=== | ||
| Line 331: | Line 331: | ||
Verbs had an extensive trigger system marked by various binyanim. Verbs also inflected for the tense and subject (the argument in the direct case). | Verbs had an extensive trigger system marked by various binyanim. Verbs also inflected for the tense and subject (the argument in the direct case). | ||
===Syntax | ===Numerals=== | ||
===Derivational morphology=== | |||
==Syntax== | |||
There was an emphatic clitic ''=is'' added to verbs. | There was an emphatic clitic ''=is'' added to verbs. | ||
[[Category:Hussmauch]][[Category:Azzanic languages|*]][[Category:Root-and-pattern languages]] | [[Category:Hussmauch]][[Category:Azzanic languages|*]][[Category:Root-and-pattern languages]] | ||