Roshterian: Difference between revisions

IlL (talk | contribs)
IlL (talk | contribs)
Line 129: Line 129:
! |<small>voiced</small>
! |<small>voiced</small>
| '''v''' /v/
| '''v''' /v/
| '''r''' /ɾ/
| '''r''' /ɾ/
| '''l''' /l/
| '''l''' /l/
| '''ṟ''' /ɻ/ || '''ḻ''' /ɭ/
| '''ṟ''' /ɻ/ || '''ḻ''' /ɭ/
Line 144: Line 144:
*The voiceless stops /p t̪ ʈ k q/ are normally aspirated to the same degree as Japanese voiceless stops; however, they are unaspirated after fricatives. (In this article /t̪/ will be transcribed /t/ for sake of convenience.)
*The voiceless stops /p t̪ ʈ k q/ are normally aspirated to the same degree as Japanese voiceless stops; however, they are unaspirated after fricatives. (In this article /t̪/ will be transcribed /t/ for sake of convenience.)
*[ŋ] and [ɴ] are allophones of /n̪/ before velar and uvular consonants, respectively.
*[ŋ] and [ɴ] are allophones of /n̪/ before velar and uvular consonants, respectively.
*/ɾ/ can be an alveolar flap [ɾ], a retroflex flap [ɽ], or trilled [r].
*/ɳ ʈ ɖ ɭ ɬʵ/ can be realized as apical (like Hindi retroflexes) or subapical (like Tamil retroflexes). The apical realization dominates in casual speech, while the subapical realization occurs more in careful speech. After /ʂ/, /ʈ/ is always apical.
*/ɳ ʈ ɖ ɭ ɬʵ/ can be realized as apical (like Hindi retroflexes) or subapical (like Tamil retroflexes). The apical realization dominates in casual speech, while the subapical realization occurs more in careful speech. After /ʂ/, /ʈ/ is always apical.
*/ʂ/ is [s̠].
*/ʂ/ is [s̠].