Verse:Hmøøh/Ngedhraism: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The '''Second Mover''' ([[Eevo]]: ''Sett Arn''; [[Clofabosin]]: ''ribilzavudan'') is a central [[Verse:Tricin|Trician]] spiritual concept representing creativity, agency and moral good within humans. The belief states that we humans are responsible for "creation" and formulating rules, where "God has left off", even when no one is telling us what to do. | The '''Second Mover''' ([[Eevo]]: ''Sett Arn''; [[Clofabosin]]: ''ribilzavudan'') is a central [[Verse:Tricin|Trician]] spiritual concept representing creativity, agency and moral good within humans. The belief states that we humans are responsible for "creation" and formulating rules, where "God has left off", even when no one is telling us what to do. | ||
==History== | ==History== | ||
The concept of the Second Mover admits multiple different interpretations. Some people think it says too much, some people think it says nothing at all. Generally, the Second Mover is seen as the force of progress - be it scientific or social/moral progress. | The concept of the Second Mover admits multiple different interpretations. Some people think it says too much, some people think it says nothing at all. Generally, the Second Mover is seen as the force of progress - be it scientific or social/moral progress. | ||
In one sense, historical beliefs about the Second Mover resembled henotheism - there were many gods but only one god, namely the Second Mover, was worthy of worship. | |||
===Origin=== | ===Origin=== | ||
{{quote box | {{quote box | ||
| Line 16: | Line 17: | ||
===Society and politics=== | ===Society and politics=== | ||
The Second Mover was not always a universalist idea that it is commonly thought of as today. Quasi-Calvinist interpretations of the Second Mover prevailed among the ruling elite, where only the select few had the essence of the Second Mover which granted them the right to rule. | The Second Mover was not always a universalist idea that it is commonly thought of as today. Quasi-Calvinist interpretations of the Second Mover prevailed among the ruling elite, where only the select few had the essence of the Second Mover which granted them the right to rule. | ||
==Important texts== | |||