Roshterian: Difference between revisions

2 bytes removed ,  25 January 2019
m
Line 45: Line 45:
This sentence was likely written by a non-native speaker of Roshterian, seeing by the fact that he/she omitted evidentials, which would be required in the second clause.
This sentence was likely written by a non-native speaker of Roshterian, seeing by the fact that he/she omitted evidentials, which would be required in the second clause.


The significance of Roshterian for Talmic linguistics was first noted by the Skellan linguist Aloð Bolltind. He proposed that it reflected all four dorsal series of Proto-Talmic differently, unlike the (in Talma) hitherto known Thensaric languages:  
The significance of Roshterian for Talmic linguistics was first noted by the Skellan linguist Aloð Bolltind. He proposed that it reflected all four dorsal series of Proto-Talmic differently, unlike the Thensaric languages hitherto known in Talma:  


*{{recon|''k, g''}} > Roshterian ''c, g''; Thensarian ''c, g''
*{{recon|''k, g''}} > Roshterian ''c, g''; Thensarian ''c, g''
143,244

edits