Suwáá/Unknown: Difference between revisions

m
Line 376: Line 376:
{{PAGENAME}} nouns are notable for generalizing the diptotic (two-case) system, with nominative singular ''-''Ø < {{recon|''-ъ''}} < PNSem {{recon|''-u''}} and genitive/accusative singular ''-o'' < PNSem {{recon|''-a''}}, though it is uncertain whether diptotes or triptotes dominated the original Proto-Semitic paradigm. Feminine singular nominative {{recon|''-atu''}} was changed to {{recon|''-ā''}} (modern ''-a''), presumably under Indo-European influence. The oblique case is older than the definite affixes and wasformed by suffixing inflected forms of the preposition {{recon|''bi''}} 'with/by, in': ''běcbi'' < {{recon|''běcъbьjъ''}} < {{recon|''baytu-bihu''}} "house, in it".
{{PAGENAME}} nouns are notable for generalizing the diptotic (two-case) system, with nominative singular ''-''Ø < {{recon|''-ъ''}} < PNSem {{recon|''-u''}} and genitive/accusative singular ''-o'' < PNSem {{recon|''-a''}}, though it is uncertain whether diptotes or triptotes dominated the original Proto-Semitic paradigm. Feminine singular nominative {{recon|''-atu''}} was changed to {{recon|''-ā''}} (modern ''-a''), presumably under Indo-European influence. The oblique case is older than the definite affixes and wasformed by suffixing inflected forms of the preposition {{recon|''bi''}} 'with/by, in': ''běcbi'' < {{recon|''běcъbьjъ''}} < {{recon|''baytu-bihu''}} "house, in it".


The definiteness suffixes arose from cliticized demonstratives: e.g. ''vodov'' 'the child' (nom.) < {{recon|''voldъ-vy''}} < PNSem {{recon|''waldu&nbsp;ðū''}}; ''porosili'' 'the horses' (acc./gen.) < {{recon|''porosi-ъli''}} < PNSem {{recon|''parašī&nbsp;ʔulī''}}.
The definiteness suffixes arose from cliticized demonstratives: e.g. ''vódov'' 'the child' (nom.) < {{recon|''voldъ-vy''}} < PNSem {{recon|''waldu&nbsp;ðū''}}; ''porosili'' 'the horses' (acc./gen.) < {{recon|''porosi-ъli''}} < PNSem {{recon|''parašī&nbsp;ʔulī''}}.


Nouns fall into one of several declension paradigms. Diachronically, the declension paradigm a noun belongs to is a function of the declension class it was analyzed as, as well as the noun's gender.
Nouns fall into one of several declension paradigms. Diachronically, the declension paradigm a noun belongs to is a function of the declension class it was analyzed as, as well as the noun's gender.


The possessor follows the possessor: ''mestajov jumovo'' 'the drink of the day', except when the possessor is a pronoun: ''li hadif bĕcov'' 'my new house'.
The possessor follows the possessor: ''mescajov jumovo'' 'the drink of the day', except when the possessor is a pronoun: ''li hadif bĕcov'' 'my new house'.


===Masculine nouns of type ''júm''===
===Masculine nouns of type ''júm''===
{| class="bluetable lightbluebg" style="width: 700px; text-align: center;"
{| class="bluetable lightbluebg" style="width: 700px; text-align: center;"
! colspan="7" | Masculine noun: ''vod'' 'child, boy'
! colspan="7" | Masculine noun: ''vód'' 'child, boy'
|-
|-
!rowspan="2" style="width: 100px;" | !! colspan="2" | Singular !! colspan="2" | Dual !! colspan="2" | Plural
!rowspan="2" style="width: 100px;" | !! colspan="2" | Singular !! colspan="2" | Dual !! colspan="2" | Plural
Line 391: Line 391:
|-
|-
! Nominative
! Nominative
| ''vod'' || ''vod'''ov''''' || ''vod'''a''''' || ''vod'''ava''''' || ''vod'''y''''' || ''vod'''yly'''''
| ''vód'' || ''vód'''ov''''' || ''vód'''a''''' || ''vód'''ava''''' || ''vód'''y''''' || ''vód'''yly'''''
|-
|-
! Genitive
! Genitive
| ''vod'''o''''' || ''vod'''ovo''''' || ''vod'''ě''''' || ''vod'''ěvě''''' || ''vod'''i''''' || ''vod'''ili'''''
| ''vód'''o''''' || ''vód'''ovo''''' || ''vód'''ě''''' || ''vód'''ěvě''''' || ''vód'''i''''' || ''vód'''ili'''''
|-
|-
! Oblique
! Oblique
| ''vod'''bi''''' || ''vod'''vobi''''' || ''vod'''ěma''''' || ''vod'''ěvěma''''' || ''vod'''ím''''' || ''vod'''ilím'''''
| ''vód'''bi''''' || ''vód'''vobi''''' || ''vód'''ěma''''' || ''vód'''ěvěma''''' || ''vód'''ím''''' || ''vód'''ilím'''''
|}
|}


138,977

edits