1,073
edits
Liðakuin phonology: Difference between revisions
→Consonants
(→Stress) |
|||
| Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
Additionally, most of the palatal phones occur as a result of palatalization - in Limban Liðakuin, a /i j/ turns preceding [n t d k g x ɣ s z ts dz l] into [ɲ tɕ dʑ c ɟ ç ç ɕ ʑ tɕ dʑ ʎ]. However, not all of the latter group of phones can be considered nonphonemic by this rule - specifically, [ç ɕ ʑ tɕ dʑ] occur in environments where an inserted /j/ does not otherwise occur in Liðakuin, and [ç] in particular is written one of three ways in the native script, one of which corresponds nicely to /xj/ and another to /ɣj/, as both only occur following back vowels (the environments where /j/ is allowed after other phonemes), but one method cannot correspond to either /xj/ or /ɣj/. | Additionally, most of the palatal phones occur as a result of palatalization - in Limban Liðakuin, a /i j/ turns preceding [n t d k g x ɣ s z ts dz l] into [ɲ tɕ dʑ c ɟ ç ç ɕ ʑ tɕ dʑ ʎ]. However, not all of the latter group of phones can be considered nonphonemic by this rule - specifically, [ç ɕ ʑ tɕ dʑ] occur in environments where an inserted /j/ does not otherwise occur in Liðakuin, and [ç] in particular is written one of three ways in the native script, one of which corresponds nicely to /xj/ and another to /ɣj/, as both only occur following back vowels (the environments where /j/ is allowed after other phonemes), but one method cannot correspond to either /xj/ or /ɣj/. | ||
This method of using orthography to help inform phonology can also be used to absorb certain clusters, specifically the pre-aspirated plosives [hp ht hc hk] (also written as a single consonant with a diacritic, [ʰp ʰt ʰc ʰk]) and the lateral affricate [tɬ]. These are always written as if they were [pp tt cc kk ɬɬ], rather than writing them like they were [xp xt xc xk tɬ] in a similar vein to /ɬ ç r̥/, and since all fricatives can also be geminated, these are generally considered to be equivalent. This is another reason why the aspirated plosives are the ones considered non-phonemic, as otherwise the aspirated plosives would lose their post-aspiration to become pre-aspiration, which seems less parsimonious than an originally unaspirated voiceless plosive gaining either pre-aspiration or post-aspiration depending on the environment. | This method of using orthography to help inform phonology can also be used to absorb certain clusters, specifically the pre-aspirated plosives [hp ht hc hk] (also written as a single consonant with a diacritic, [ʰp ʰt ʰc ʰk]) and the lateral affricate [tɬ]. These are always written as if they were [pp tt cc kk ɬɬ], rather than writing them like they were [xp xt xc xk tɬ] in a similar vein to /ɬ ç r̥/, and since all voiced plosives and all fricatives can also be geminated, these are generally considered to be equivalent. This is another reason why the aspirated plosives are the ones considered non-phonemic, as otherwise the aspirated plosives would lose their post-aspiration to become pre-aspiration, which seems less parsimonious than an originally unaspirated voiceless plosive gaining either pre-aspiration or post-aspiration depending on the environment. | ||
In Limban Liðakuin, the velarized alveolar lateral approximant [ɫ] is only found in the coda of syllables, especially when the preceding vowel is front, and the labiovelar approximant [w] is only found after another consonant. Both are therefore in complementary distribution with [l ʋ] respectively. This completes the final phonemic consonant table for Liðakuin: | In Limban Liðakuin, the velarized alveolar lateral approximant [ɫ] is only found in the coda of syllables, especially when the preceding vowel is front, and the labiovelar approximant [w] is only found after another consonant. Both are therefore in complementary distribution with [l ʋ] respectively. This completes the final phonemic consonant table for Liðakuin: | ||
| Line 170: | Line 170: | ||
| colspan="2" | | | colspan="2" | | ||
|} | |} | ||
==Vowels== | ==Vowels== | ||