Yama-pali-auk: Difference between revisions

writing: added information regarding freedom of direction
(writing: added information regarding freedom of direction)
Line 55: Line 55:
<br>
<br>
if the nucleus of a syllable uses the filler character, it is likely being used as a mathematical variable. that's actually a legacy feature from back when i kept a journal for my random thoughts. now i can share them with other people so this feature is obsolete, but cool. however, a fully blank syllable is used as a general "bad word". think your fucks or shits. it, by definition, cannot be romanized or pronounced, but it can be written, which the language is meant to be.
if the nucleus of a syllable uses the filler character, it is likely being used as a mathematical variable. that's actually a legacy feature from back when i kept a journal for my random thoughts. now i can share them with other people so this feature is obsolete, but cool. however, a fully blank syllable is used as a general "bad word". think your fucks or shits. it, by definition, cannot be romanized or pronounced, but it can be written, which the language is meant to be.
<br>
a fun cosmetic feature is that you can write in any direction you want, provided you mirror/rotate the glyphs accordingly and indicate a change in direction with an arrow. if no arrow is present, assume the previous line's reading direction. if there is no arrow or previous line, assume left-to-right.


== grammar ==
== grammar ==
yama-pali-auk has mostly free word order, the only requirement being that the subject is somewhere before the object. this is due to the lack of a subject or object marker. the verb, however, is clear, as it is marked for tense. [SECTION INCOMPLETE FUTURE KATH FIX THIS]
yama-pali-auk has mostly free word order, the only requirement being that the subject is somewhere before the object. this is due to the lack of a subject or object marker. the verb, however, is clear, as it is marked for tense. [SECTION INCOMPLETE FUTURE KATH FIX THIS]
43

edits