91
edits
m (→Negation) |
|||
Line 391: | Line 391: | ||
===Negation=== | ===Negation=== | ||
The | The Da word for "no" is ''em''. When it is used with a verb, adjective or noun, it usually loses the initial 'e' and merges with the following word: ''ria'' "want" --> ''m'ria'' "don't want", ''riao'' "needed, necessary" --> ''m'riao'' "unnecessary, extra" etc. The exception to this rule are words beginning with an 'l', 'm' or 'n'; with them, the initial 'e' is retained: ''Du emmissi karnait tunotunix pankoteo!'' "I have not been there for a hundred years!". | ||
Double negation is possible for emphasis: ''Ku | Double negation is possible for emphasis: ''Ku sissa paltou?'' "Have you seen anything?" -- ''Du m'sissa m'tou!'' "I saw nothing at all!" | ||
Along with '' | Along with ''em'', Cha also has a mechanism of forming antonyms, which consists of alternating the last root consonant. To get an antonym, ''-n'' alternates with ''-l'' and ''-r'' alternates with no consonant. For example: | ||
''lua'' "love" <--> ''lura'' "hate" | ''lua'' "love" <--> ''lura'' "hate" | ||
'' | ''de'' "top" <--> ''der'' "bottom" | ||
''kela'' "wrong / break" <--> ''kena'' "right / fix" | ''keli/kela'' "wrong / break" <--> ''keni/kena'' "right / fix" | ||
''on'' "many, plenty" <--> ''ol'' "few, little" | ''on'' "many, plenty" <--> ''ol'' "few, little" | ||
and so forth. Of course, negatives and antonyms have very different semantics: ''lura'' "hate" is not quite the same as '' | and so forth. Of course, negatives and antonyms have very different semantics: ''lura'' "hate" is not quite the same as ''emlua'' "not love". | ||
===Plural and Numbers=== | ===Plural and Numbers=== |
edits