Caryatic
Caryatic was dreamed up by Iustinus in between taking notes for Andrew Sihler's "Comparative Grammar: Indo-European Phonology," in fall of 1997. It was first committed to computer on Dec. 11 of that year. Work continued on and off until late 2003. The language remained largely dormant until 2013, when work resumed, albeit at an absurdly glacial pace.
Inspiration
The original inspiration was to "reverse engineer" the reconstruction of Indo-European from its daughter languages—which felt like an amazing new idea at the time, but which I now know as one of the most common sorts of conlang. I had actually attempted this a couple times before (ðɛ̃ʃwa ɛ̃nɛ̃nõta, "Indo-Tonal), but never with the depth of knowledge I had acquired from my graduate-level Historical Linguistics classes.
Like most of my conlangs, it draws much inspiration from the classical languages, but has broader influence from the rest of the Indo-European family. The three-vowel system was at least partially inspired by Sanskrit's propensity for the phoneme /a/.
Goals
Caryatic is a deliberate break from my previous conlanging work. Seeking to go in the opposite direction, I gave it a small phonetic inventory, few cases, and a name right from the start.
Setting
Caryatic is from a thus-far still unnamed conworld, based loosely on the ancient Mediterranean. The premise is that this world has the same language families as earth, but different daughter languages. The following languages are known to exist:
- Indo-European
- Afro-Asiatic
- Semitic
- Safuntic (named only)
- Timuric (pretty much identical to Ancient Egyptian, since reconstructing the vowels makes it something of a conlang in itself)
- Semitic
In the context of this world, Caryatic roughly takes the place of Greek and Latin, Elerain that of Latin and Germanic. Safuntic takes the place of Phoenician, Timuric that of Egyptian.
Phonology
Orthography
Caryatic is believed to be written in an alphabetical system, which indicates vowel quantities. Two proposals for this system were submitted by David Salo, but both have been lost. There is some hope they might some day be recovered (perhaps with the proposed maps he drew).
The standard transcription works as follows:
Transcription | IPA |
---|---|
a | [a] |
ā, â | [ɑː] |
b | [p] |
d | [t] |
f | [f ~ v] |
g | [k] |
h | [x ~ ɣ] |
i | [i], [j] |
ī, î | [iː] |
k | [kʰ] |
l | [ɫ] |
m | [m] |
n | [n] |
p | [pʰ] |
r | [rʲ], [ʀʲ] |
s | [s ~ z] |
t | [tʰ] |
u | [u], [w] |
ū, û | [uː] |
v, ϕ | [ϕ ~ β] |
y | [j] |
Consonants
Bilabial | Labiodental | Alveolar | Palatal | Velar | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stops | p [pʰ] b [p] |
t [tʰ] d [t] |
k [kʰ] g [k] | ||
Fricatives | v, ϕ [ϕ ~ β] | f [f ~ v] | s [s ~ z] | h [x ~ ɣ] | |
Nasal | m [m] | n [n] | |||
Glide | u [w] | i, y [j] |
Allophonic variation
- Voicing:
- Vowels are always voiced. Stops are always voiceless. Liquids default to voiced, and fricatives to voiceless.
- Liquids lose their voicing when adjacent to stops.
- Fricatives are voiced between voiced sounds.
- S-Assimilation:
- Alveolars and nasals are dropped before an /s/, usually without compensatory lengthening. Note, however, that when an s is removed [see Sigmatization below] these segments normally reappear.
- Sigmatization:
- An aspirate stop preceded by an /s/ deaspirates, and the /s/ drops with compensatory lengthening of the preceding vowel. (The transcription sometimes—albeit inconsistently—marks this by using a circumflex instead of a macron on the lengthened vowel. However, more often than not, circumflex is used ubiquitously)
- While this process does occur across word boundaries, note that if a word begins with /s/ followed immediately by a stop, it is often lexicalized in the asigmatic form, and compensatory lengthening is unlikely to occur. Furthermore, the dropping of the s at the end of a word often allows elements which had dropped [i.e. alveolars and nasals] to reassert themselves.
- Nasal assimilation: [Note that these sound laws are, for the most part, not reflected in the standard orthography]
- Nasals drop before homoörganic sounds, with nasalization of the previous vowel. (For the purpose of this rule, /n/ counts as homoörganic to both alveolar and velar sounds)
- Nasals assimilate to the place of the following sound.
Vowels
Front | Central | Back | |
---|---|---|---|
High | ī, î [iː] i [i] |
ū, û [uː] u [u] | |
Low | ā, â [ɑː] a [a] |
Allophonic variation
- Hiatus
- Two vowels in hiatus (i.e. ones that are adjacent, but do not form a diphthong) are separated by an epenthetic [ɦ]. This is not reflected in the standard orthography.
Accent
The accent is probably pitch-based, rather than stress-based, but this is uncertain.[1] It is assigned as follows:
- Accent falls on the long vowel nearest the beginning of the word.
- If there are no long vowels, accent falls on the first syllable.
Morphophonology
Morphology
Nouns
Adectives
Pronouns
Verbs
Enclitic Verbs
A couple verbs have enclitic forms, which are used in subordinate clauses.
Syntax
Constituent order
Caryatic is strongly, nearly relentlessly, head-final. Basic word order is, therefor, SOV.
Noun phrase
Noun phrases go in the following order:
- ({Article}) ({Adective Phrase} or {genitive Noun Phrase}) Noun
Verb phrase
Verb phrases go in the following order
- ({indirect object} or {Prepositional Phrase}) ({direct object} or {dependent clause}) Verb
Sentence phrase
Main clauses end in sentence determiner, of which the following are known:
ga declarative ra interrogative ya imparative dā exclamative
Dependent clauses
Dependent clauses do not use sentence determiners, and are marked by the clitic form of the verb, if it has one.
Example texts
Letter to The Salos
A slightly modified version[2] of a letter originally written for Andrew Sihler. Both versions were likely sent in early January 1998.
- Yūdīs Masfīus tās Salūnas-ad
- Ti taisam Kaimānam Pirâda-an āsmi. Sas vaiks anāï “Hell” nāma-sānt ādi-ga. Au sī pirâdā a “upānā” au kavānā âdi-ga. Ti mama dimba-sa garfu-ga. Tād āh nāma “Kāriātikā” âdi-ga. Igu tua ī-sa, tāssānt ī “Indaurupayā” âdi, garfu-ga. Tū pid hāsi-ra? Tū tī dimba gankasi-ra?
- Justin to the Salos
- I am in the Cayman Islands. There is a town here named "Hell." But this island is not infernal but heavenly. I write you in my language. Its name is "Caryatic." I write you in it, because it is Indo-European. What do you think? Do you understand this language?
Pronunciation:
- Yūdīs Masfīus tās Salūnas-ad
- [ˈjuːtiːz masˈfiːws tʰɑːssaˈluːnazat]
- Ti taisam Kaimānam Pirâda-an āsmi.
- [tʰitʰajzãŋ̊kʰajˈmɑːnã pʰiˈrʲɑːtahan ˈazmika]
- Sas vaiks anāï “Hell" nāma-sānt âdi-ga.
- [sas ϕajkʰs aˈnɑːɦi] “Hell” [ˈnɑːmazɑ̃ːt ˈɑːtika]
- Au sī pirâdā a “upānā” au kavānā âdi-ga.
- [aw ˈziː pʰiˈrʲɑːta ɦa ɦuˈpʰɑːnaː ɦaw kʰaˈβɑːnɑː ˈɦɑːtika]
- Ti mama dimba-sa garfu-ga.
- [tʰiˈmama ˈtĩpaza ˈkarʲvuka]
- Tād āh nāma “Kāriātikā” âdi-ga.
- [tʰɑːˈtɑːɣ ˈnɑːma ˈkʰɑːrʲjɑːtʰiˌkʰɑː ˈɦɑːtika]
- Igu tua ī-sa, tāssānt ī “Indaurupayā” âdi, garfu-ga.
- [ˈiku tʰwa ˈɦiːza tʰɑːssɑ̃t iː ɦĩtawrʲupʰaˈjɑːhaːti ˈkarʲvuka]
- Tū pid hāsi-ra?
- [tʰuː pʰit ˈxɑːzirʲa]
- Tū tī dimba gankasi-ra?
- [tʰuː tʰiː ˈtĩpa ˈkãkʰazirʲa]
The above text, read by David Salo]: File:David Salo reads the Epistle to Sihler.wav
On Dragons
The original file notes that this is "[f]rom a manuscript found in the Dîvakunis Archives at Bâtavaiks," which implies that this is an elementary text for Bataic speakers learning Caryatic. This may explain the inconsistent marking of sigmatization.
- Ti taisâm tâmasram dikântam gânâsâ pâmpâ isânti-ga.
[tʰitʰajznɑːn̥tʰɑːmazrʲan̥ tʰiˈkʰɑːn̥tʰɑŋ̊ ˈkɑːnɑːzɑː ˈpʰɑ̃ːpʰɑː ɦiˈzɑ̃ːtʰika] - Sâ âh anitus[SIC] pâtâkâ praûs âdi-ga.
[sɑːˈɦɑːɣ ˈanitʰuː ˈpɑːtʰɑːkʰɑː pʰr̥ʲaˈɦuːz ˈɑːtika] - Sâ âlfs dikâs[SIC] ti snaiva-a dâmâî-ga.
[sɑːˈɦɑːɫfs tiˈkʰɑ̃ː tiˈznajβaɦa ˈtɑːmɑːɦiːka] - Sâ nâks dikâs[SIC] tis guarkan bântias-a raudî-ga,
[sɑːˈnɑːkʰs tiˈkʰɑ̃ː tisˈkwar̥ʲkam ˈpɑːn̥tʰjaza rʲawˈtiːka] - Is sama siyinkâ akuarin âghârfî-pâ, [............] pâpi-ga.
[is samasĩkʰɑː ɦakʰwarʲin ˈakʰwarʲin ˈɑːkxɑːrʲviːpɑː] ...... [ˈpʰɑːpʰika] - Â, Tâ dârva-ân dâmâî dikânta, tâ hâl dikânta pîrîbâkyu-ya!
[ɑː tʰɑːˈtɑːrʲvaɦɑ̃ː ˈtɑːmɑːɦiː tiˈkʰɑ̃ːtʰa tʰɑːˈɣɑːɫ̥ tiˈkʰɑ̃ːtʰa ˈpʰiːrʲiːpɑːkʰjuja] - Sâ âh anitû di-ta numanâ, tân-da âpa bâaisî.
[sɑːˈɦaːɣ aniˈtʰuː titʰa numaˈnɑː tɑ̃ːta 'ɦɑːpʰa 'pɑːɦajziː] - Au sâ flaus dikâs[SIC] tis savas sinktuas[SIC] tâtikas-ân dâmâî-ga.
[aw zɑː'vlaws tikɑ̃ː tisˈsaβas 'sĩkʰtʰwɑː 'tʰɑːtʰikʰazɑ̃ː 'tɑːmɑːɦiːka] - ...............................
- There are five kinds of evil dragons.
- The white dragon lives in the snow
- Its breath is deadly frost.
- The black dragon lurks in muddy swamps.
- It spits out a slick black acid, and eats [............].
- Beware the dragon that lives in the forest, the green dragon!
- Its breath burns the eyes and the lungs.
- But the blue dragon dwells in the hot sandy deserts.
- [It shoots a bolt of lightning from its mouth.]
Other resources
External Links
- Caryatic on CALS
Notes
- ^ In fact, this idea is very recent, and is based mainly on the fact that when David Salo attempted to read Caryatic outloud (December 2013—January 2014) he sounded much more convincing using a pitch accent than a stress accent.
- ^ In fact, they vary only in their salutation: the original reads Yūdīs Masfīus Andrayā Sīlir-ad.