Difference between revisions of "Ash"
(→Conjunct and disjunct verbs)
(→Indirect involvement and grammatical ambiguities)
|Line 508:||Line 508:|
====Indirect involvement and grammatical ambiguities====
====Indirect involvement and grammatical ambiguities====
Despite this elaborate system there are still instances where first and second person
Despite this elaborate system there are still instances where first and second person . However this is not generally an issue in the affected instances thanks to context. An example where a conjunct form would be used to denote first person involvement as a patient rather than an agent is the following:
Revision as of 09:44, 1 September 2018
|Created by||Ava Skoog|
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Phonology
- 3 Morphology
- 4 Syntax
- 5 Locative verbs
- 6 Pragmatics
Ash (ahgaa, lit. "seaspeak", pronounced [ˈʔɑ̞ħˌqɑ̞ː]) is the anglicised name of a language mostly spoken around coastal areas, notably the town of Appa (ahba). Its speakers are familiar with technological advancements such as nautical vessels and steam locomotives.
The language is mildly synthetic to polysynthetic, largely based around agglutination with fusional elements. There is a great focus on verbs, nominals being mostly uninflected, and significant pro-drop tendencies and a general focus around deixis rather than pronominal distinctions. The word order is heavily SOV.
The underlying sounds of Ash are few enough that a simple listing is preferable to a traditional table:
|Vocalic||/a~Ø i~j~Ø u~w~Ø/|
|Plosive||/p~β t~ð k~ɣ/|
|Nasal||/m~˜ n~˜ ŋ~˜/|
The reasoning for this rather unusual classification is down to phonotactic patterning: these five groups all behave somewhat differently and serve as a more useful distinction than point of articulation when describing the phonology of Ash. The pair or triplet given for each phoneme refers to an alternation between various allophonic realisations despite the relatively low number of underlying sounds, an important feature of the language that makes the variation richer on the surface. For instance, long vowels (romanised by doubling the vowel) and nasal vowels (romanised using a tilde) are not analysed as phonemic.
The romanisation strikes a balance between representing phonemes versus surface realisations and uses the following seventeen letters:
An example of a word with its archiphonemic, phonemic and surface transcriptions as well as romanisation:
|//ˈwat.ha.ku//||→ /ˈwah.taˌku/||→ [ˈʔɔ̯ɑ̞ħ.t̠ɐˌɣʊ]||→ oahdago "during the day"|
A cluster cannot exceed two consonants and must be of one of the following configurations:
|CC||Both consonants are the same|
|FP||Fricative followed by plosive|
|NP||Nasal followed by plosive|
|PN~FN||Plosive or fricative followed by nasal|
Prosody and stress
Prefixes are always unstressed. Following the last stressed syllable an iambic pattern of secondary stress on every other underlyingly light syllable follows unless an underlyingly heavy syllable intervenes, resetting the pattern. In addition, unless at the end of a word, stressed syllables are forced to be heavy either by lengthening of the vowel or reduplication of the next syllable's onset consonant if they are not already underlyingly so.
Depending on the underlying nature of a cluster, various processes take place either on a phonemic (phoneme alternation) or on a phonetic (surface allophony) level. For example, /t/ merges with /t͡s/ on the phonemic level before /i~j/ or a plosive or an affricate, but alternates with [ð] on the phonetic level between vowels.
- A nasal or fricative geminates before a glide, assimilating to and eliding it in the process.
- All plosives alternate phonemically with fricatives or affricates before another plosive or an affricate.
- /h~ʔ/ (and plosives before nasals) is a fricative before vowels/glides and plosives but a glottal stop before nasals and affricates.
- Affricates are fricatives intervocalically, before other plosives or affricates, word-finally and before nasals (which are prestopped).
Ash does not mark words for number, person or case. With regards to syntactic patterning, only three significant word classes can be posited: verbs, nominals and adverbials. Nonetheless there is a degree of mobility between them.
The bulk of all inflection goes on verbs, making them morphemic anchors fundamental to almost any utterance in the language. The general verb template looks as follows:
The nominalisation slot creates a deverbal nominal and the adverbialisation slot creates an adverbial and so these two serve to change the class of the word; the possession slot is only used on deverbal nominals and not on regular verbs.
Each verb has a set of primary stems formed more or less predictably from a combination of affixes. The first stem, the stative indicative, is used as the lemma when citing words, such as oada "to shine":
All of these terms are to an extent ad hoc. For instance the passive stem is only used to form deverbal nominals; there is no true passive construction syntactically. Some verbs are inherently stative or active and do not have two distinct stems. The active or stative stems are the ones that are generally prone to being somewhat unpredictable, whereas the other three are formed productively.
Derivational suffixes can be used to extend the root and create a new set of stems, such as the frequentative -(d)s- and the potential -dãã-.
|baa "hand; arm"||→ badsa "weave; make"|
|oo "consume"||→ odsa "gorge; overeat"|
|doo "smoke"||→ dodso "train; locomotive"|
Sometimes stems appear connected through no longer productive processes, such as ohwa "cook", related to oo "consume".
Nominals are mostly unmarked; the main kind of affixation, while resembling case marking, results in adverbialisation, thus changing the class of the word. Nominals can however be marked for possession (obligatory on inalienably possessed nominal) or be incorporated into a verb (in which case inalienably possessed nominal do lose their possessive marker).
The possessive prefix n- can be preceded by a deictic prefix. Here are the possessed forms of mõõ "head; hair; top", an inalienably possessed nominal:
Adverbials are used to denote a place, time or manner. Their formation sometimes resembles case marking or conjunctions more than traditional adverbs, but serves that role as well.
Some prominent adverbialising suffixes:
|Locative||-da||mehda "by the fire"|
|Durative||-go||oadnago "in the morning"|
|Benefactive||-ba||eaba "in order to see"|
The language lacks true pronouns and due to its pro-drop tendencies commonly avoids alternatives as well. What does get commonly marked is deixis: whether something is close to or far away from the speaker or a previous referent; unspecified deixis is also possible. On nominals deixis is generally spatial while on verbs it is temporal (proximal working roughly as a present tense and distal as a non-present one); adverbial deixis can be either depending on the characteristics of the adverbial in question.
The deictic stems are as follows:
Deixis occurs in the form of isolated nominals ee and oo as well as verbal and possessive prefixes e- and o-. Neutral deixis sometimes surfaces epenthetically as a- due to phonotactic constraints, but is not underlyingly explicitly marked.
The word order is fairly strictly SOV, with adverbials generally preceding the nominals followed by the verb.
Transitivity and inversion
Transitivity is explicitly marked and through an inversion marker on the verb the roles of agent and patient can be swapped without a change in word order, the purpose of which is topicalisation, leaving the topic in the subject position. The subject requires a topical marker, the details of which will be explained in detail in the section on locative verbs.
Inversion is especially important when the subject is being omitted as person markers do not exist.
There is a limit on two unmarked nominal arguments of a verb. There are two ways to introduce more arguments, one of which is to incorporate the third nominal into the verb.
- ao go bahbo odsãmmoyya
ao TOP:ACT dog DIST-TR-water-consume.CAUS.IND
Ao gave the dog water to drink
The other method is to completely remove the valency of the nominal by turning it into an adverbial, which is why this process sometimes resembles case marking.
- ao go bahbo mehda odsãmmoyya
ao TOP:ACT dog fire-LOC DIST-TR-water-consume.CAUS.IND
Ao gave the dog water to drink by the fire
While there is no explicit marking for animacy, an underlying hierarchy ranging roughly from natural forces at the top to people and animals in the middle and inanimates at the bottom governs certain parts of the grammar. The main aspect of this hierarchy is that inanimate referents cannot act as agents which affects how transitive and inverse marking is interpreted in their presence.
|Animate||bahbo go ahhoo "dogs eat it"||bahbo go assoo "dogs are eaten"|
|Inanimate||sãã sa ahhoo "water is drunk"||*sãã sa assoo (ungrammatical)|
New non-verbal information is focused by fronting, i.e. introducing the word or phrase earlier in the sentence. This means that the order of subject and object might shift in order to focus on the object. When the object is inanimate inversion is not possible nor necessary, while for an animate object it is. The nominal in focus will also receive a topic marker, explained in detail in the section on locative verbs.
|Animate||ao go bahbo ohhea "Ao was looking at the dog"||bahbo go ao ossea "it was the dog Ao was looking at"|
|Inanimate||ao go sãã ohhoo "Ao who was drinking water"||sãã sa ao ohhoo "it was water Ao was drinking"|
Conjunct and disjunct verbs
While Ash lacks a set of first, second and third person pronouns, a system of so called conjunct versus disjunct verb forms can be used in combination with transitivity markers and deixis in order to more or less unambiguously cover the same ground. This concept is also known in literature as assertor's involvement marking, which might give the reader a clearer idea of the concept: verbs are marked for whether the one making an assertion is involved in the action (conjunct) or not (disjunct).
In simple statements the assertor defaults to the speaker (i.e. first person) but in questions to the addressee (second person). In reported speech the assertor defaults to the source of the quote and may therefore also take on a third person role. First and second person roles are associated with proximal deixis while third person is associated with distal deixis or an explicit nominal.
Conjunct is marked by the suffix -s and disjunct is unmarked.
In simple statements proximal deixis combined with a conjunct verb denotes a first person while combined with a disjunct verb it denotes a second person whereas in questions this is flipped. Distal deixis or an explicit nominal denotes a third person in both cases. Note that there is no number distinction and so for example first person can imply both "I" and "we" but for the sake of space only one translation is given for each example.
"I am pale"
|-||(ee) oadas no?
"are you pale?"
"you are pale"
"they are pale"
|(ee) oada no?
"am I pale?"
|(oo) oada no?|
"are they pale?"
Simple transitive clauses work much the same way but the choice between a direct transitive or inverse transitive marker affects the meaning as well and is the only way to differentiate between agent and patient roles when the referents are first and second person.
"I look at you"
"you look at me"
"I look at them"
"they look at me"
"you look at them"
"they look at you"
"they1 look at them2"
"they2 look at them1"
The interrogative forms are the same except for inversion of the first and second person. As the last two examples show, the choice of transitivity marker can also serve as a proximate-obviative distinction.
In quotations the conjunct versus disjunct distinction instead focuses on the source of the quote, but only in the subclause. Again this may serve as proximate-obviative distinction. This means that it is possible to mark distal referents as conjunct in such subclauses.
|Conjunct source||Disjunct source||Disjunct source|
|Conjunct target||(ee) oases (ee) ogaas
"I said I am pale"
|(ee) oases (ee) ogaa
"you said you are pale"
|(oo) oases (oo) ogaa|
"they1 said they1 are pale"
|Disjunct target||(ee) oase (ee) ogaas
"I said you are pale"
|(ee) oase (ee) ogaa
"you said I am pale"
|(oo) oase (oo) ogaa|
"they1 said they2 are pale"
When the source is proximal the target can also be distal in which case it is always disjunct and refers to a third person.
Indirect involvement and grammatical ambiguities
Despite this elaborate system there are still instances where first and second person collapse. However this is not generally an issue in the affected instances thanks to context. An example where a conjunct form would be used to denote first person involvement as a patient rather than an agent is the following:
- emmõõ bo ao ehbadsas
PROX-POSS-head TOP:CRESC ao PROX-TR-hand.FREQ.IND-CONJ
Ao is braiding my hair
Despite a third person being the agent of the action, the focus is on the first person (the assertor) and the verb is therefore conjunct. When the agent is proximal this creates a grammatical ambiguity:
- emmõõ bo ee ehbadsas
PROX-POSS-head TOP:CRESC PROX PROX-TR-hand.FREQ.IND-CONJ
I am braiding my hair; you are braiding my hair; I am braiding your hair
However since a first and second person are both proximal and thereby directly present in the context of the action this is not ambiguous in practice: both people are aware of whether they are personally doing the braiding or not and thereby whom is meant.
Relativisation is done simply by chaining phrases one after another, with no special marking. Subclauses go before main clauses, in which the deictic context is centered around the subject of the subclause.
- [oo oahdago bahbo go ossoyya]1 [ee oahdago esseanas]2
[DIST shine.ACT.IND-DUR dog DIST-INV-consume.CAUS.IND]1 [PROX shine.ACT.IND-DUR PROX-INV-see.TRANS.IND-CONJ]2
[today I saw]2 [the dog that you fed yesterday]1
This is also how stative verbs are used to assign qualities to nominals.
- ao ammõõ bo oadna ehheanas no?
ao POSS-head TOP:CRESC shine.TRANS.IND PROX-TR-see.TRANS.IND-CONJ INT
have you seen how bright Ao's hair has gotten? (lit. "have you seen Ao's brightened hair?")
An important part of Ash grammar is an extensive set of so called locative verbs which are used almost like a noun classification system and cover location, motion and related concepts while providing specific information about the referent at hand, such as specifying whether liquid is involved.
These are some of those verbs:
|laa||LOC:STAT||General stative (indefinite or permanent)|
|goo||LOC:ACT||General active (temporary or dynamic)|
|sãã||LOC:LIQ||Water and other liquids|
|see||LOC:AER||Air and weather|
|boo||LOC:CRESC||Growth (hair, plants et c.)|
|doo||LOC:PART||Particles (powder, sand, dust, smoke, spores et c.)|
One function of locative verbs is to resolve potential ambiguities. When used solely for classification in its unmarked form, a locative verb is unstressed and thereby shortened, resembling a particle. It doubles as a grammatically obligatory topic marker.
Further verbs can be serially connected after indicating the nature of a nominal using a locative verb.
- ao ammõõ bo oada
ao POSS-head TOP:CRESC shine.STAT.IND
Ao's hair is fair
Used this way they nonetheless remain verbs with the accompanying syntactic implications. Since they create subclauses, a nominal specified for category with a locative verb cannot be used in object position and so will always precede any agent.
- emmõõ bo ao ehbadsas
PROX-POSS-head TOP:CRESC ao PROX-TR-hand.FREQ.IND-CONJ
Ao is braiding my hair
Since the locative verbs are only necessary when introducing new information, this ties neatly into the established system of topicalisation by fronting and so the net effect is that this limitation does not make much of a difference to normal syntax. Nominals can then be unambiguously reüsed without the classifying verb, as the information is thenceforth known from the previously established context. Note that if the classified nominal had been animate in the above example (mõõ is not) inversion would have been necessary in order to mark it as the patient rather than the agent as usual.
Unstressed locatives are not applied to the pronominal-like nominals ee "this", oo "that", nõõ "what" and maa "none".
In addition to serving as a topical marker, an unstressed locative verb can also be used as a conjunction. As subject and object are never both topically marked, a series of topicalised nominals serves as a single noun phrase in the fronted subject position.
- ao go bahbo go ooda egoo
ao TOP:ACT dog TOP:ACT DIST-LOC DIST-LOC:ACT.IND
Ao and the dog are over there
To denote motion, an andative ("going") or venitive ("coming") prefix is placed into the verbal classifier slot.
The preverb slot can be used to specify manner, location or direction.
Use with adverbials
Adverbial location is generic and locative verbs can be used to specify the meaning.
Being a verb-heavy language, Ash often lacks direct nominal counterparts to nouns in more analytic languages, instead expressing many common (and uncommon) concepts descriptively through its rich morphological and derivational verb system rather than by lexicalising deverbal nominals (although this also happens), one key factor again being the locative verbs.
As this example demonstrates, there is no one lexicalised nominal for the concept of a waterfall, but a fitting verb is used depending on the context. Nonetheless the phrase is possible to nominalise if grammatically necessary and sometimes this does result in lexicalisation.
- dodso go nõŋgo oŋgoone?
smoke.FREQ.ACT.NOM TOP:ACT Q-DUR DIST-VEN-LOC:ACT.TRANS.OPT
when does the train arrive?
In such cases there may be a clear-cut distinction between such lexicalisations and productive formations.
(at the) chimney (lit. "where lots of smoke goes up")