Common (na Xafen): Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 779: Line 779:
Verbs of motion mostly fall into this category, with the destination of the motion as the dative object. If the dative object is omitted, the action is still considered to be purposeful towards an end. To get the sense of no specific end, as in the English expression 'go away', the "disintentive" valence change operation is performed to use the intransitive agreement instead of the semitransitive.
Verbs of motion mostly fall into this category, with the destination of the motion as the dative object. If the dative object is omitted, the action is still considered to be purposeful towards an end. To get the sense of no specific end, as in the English expression 'go away', the "disintentive" valence change operation is performed to use the intransitive agreement instead of the semitransitive.


An important category of verbs that are semitransitive, aside from verbs of motion, are verbs of abstract possession or ownership, where the owner is the absolutive subject and the thing owned is the dative indirect object. Such constructions express relatively alienable possession.
An important category of verbs that are semitransitive, aside from verbs of motion, are verbs of abstract possession or ownership, where the owner is the absolutive subject and the thing owned is the dative indirect object. Such constructions express relatively alienable possession.[https://webconlang.infiniterecursion.ca/article/common/8/]


''Realis Conjugation of '''nox'''''
''Realis Conjugation of '''nox'''''
Line 861: Line 861:
'The woman let her dog eat.'
'The woman let her dog eat.'


The word 'sy' is a term of respect and is actually referring back to the woman in this case, not the dog (if it were referring to the dog it would be last). This is an adposition possessive, referring to the referent in a respectful way.
The word 'sy' is a term of respect and is actually referring back to the woman in this case, not the dog (if it were referring to the dog it would be last). This is an adposition possessive, referring to the referent in a respectful way.[https://webconlang.infiniterecursion.ca/article/common/8/]


====Valence Change Operations====
====Valence Change Operations====
Line 925: Line 925:
A note on number: Common tends not to use mass nouns. If there is an idiomatic way to use the plural, Common tends to choose it. So a word like "mury," "hair," is treated like a singular hair, and to refer to a head of hair one would use the plural, "naz mury," much like French. Mass nouns tend to be things that are not naturally distinguishable as being composed of individual parts, like fluids. If it is necessary to count portions of a mass noun, like drops of water, a word for the portion is counted in the paucal or referred to in the plural, and then the substance is referred to periphrastically using the null preposition.
A note on number: Common tends not to use mass nouns. If there is an idiomatic way to use the plural, Common tends to choose it. So a word like "mury," "hair," is treated like a singular hair, and to refer to a head of hair one would use the plural, "naz mury," much like French. Mass nouns tend to be things that are not naturally distinguishable as being composed of individual parts, like fluids. If it is necessary to count portions of a mass noun, like drops of water, a word for the portion is counted in the paucal or referred to in the plural, and then the substance is referred to periphrastically using the null preposition.


In the following sections, each of the noun determiners/articles/pronouns will be detailed with their declensions and usage. The lemma, or dictionary entry, for each article is its absolutive singular form. Note: it is not an omission that possessive forms of the pronouns are not given. Common genuinely lacks explicitly possessive forms, although one way to indicate possession is using the null preposition, which takes an object in the nominative case, allowing the nominative to sometimes act like a genitive case.
In the following sections, each of the noun determiners/articles/pronouns will be detailed with their declensions and usage. The lemma, or dictionary entry, for each article is its absolutive singular form. Note: it is not an omission that possessive forms of the pronouns are not given. Common genuinely lacks explicitly possessive forms, although one way to indicate possession is using the null preposition, which takes an object in the nominative case, allowing the nominative to sometimes act like a genitive case.[https://webconlang.infiniterecursion.ca/article/common/8/]


===First Person - Ates Palisyn (we)===
====First Person - Ates Palisyn (we)====


The first person pronoun/article is 'we'. It works like any other non-relative determiner in Common in that it is used in a phrase structure with a head term, even though it is very commonly used on its own like the equivalent English words 'I' or 'we'. The most common head terms used with it are a personal name, title or honorific. In this case, it would be the idiomatic way to say what English would set aside with commas, for example, 'I, Tony, see the child' would be 'We Toni nox triju ija pocuk'.
The first person pronoun/article is 'we'. It works like any other non-relative determiner in Common in that it is used in a phrase structure with a head term, even though it is very commonly used on its own like the equivalent English words 'I' or 'we'. The most common head terms used with it are a personal name, title or honorific. In this case, it would be the idiomatic way to say what English would set aside with commas, for example, 'I, Tony, see the child' would be 'We Toni nox triju ija pocuk'.
Line 1,095: Line 1,095:
|}
|}


====Relative Pronouns - Nar Zereu Samorka (su and si)====
===Relative Pronouns and Dependent Clauses - Nar Zereu Samorka (su and si)===


There are two relative pronouns. One is used to modify nouns (su), and the other one is used to modify verbs (si). They inflect for case but not number.
There are two relative pronouns. One is used to modify nouns (su), and the other one is used to modify verbs (si). They inflect for case but not number.
Line 1,122: Line 1,122:
|}
|}


'''Nominal Relative Pronouns'''
====Nominal Relative Pronouns====


The article su (gloss RELN) is used to introduce a subordinate clause that describes a noun, in effect the entire subordinate clause acting as a modifier to a noun phrase. For that reason, su blurs the line between an article and a modifier. Its placement must always be immediately after the head term after any prepositional phrases and in series with any other relative clauses that modify the noun. The referent of su is the entire noun phrase it modifies. The referent noun is always an actor in relation to the verb of the subordinate clause. The case of su is that of the role of the referent in the relative clause. Phrase order in the relative clause is relatively free, with the caveats that the clause must be introduced by a form of su and that the verb phrase must go last in these causes. A simple example:
The article su (gloss RELN) is used to introduce a subordinate clause that describes a noun, in effect the entire subordinate clause acting as a modifier to a noun phrase. For that reason, su blurs the line between an article and a modifier. Its placement must always be immediately after the head term after any prepositional phrases and in series with any other relative clauses that modify the noun. The referent of su is the entire noun phrase it modifies. The referent noun is always an actor in relation to the verb of the subordinate clause. The case of su is that of the role of the referent in the relative clause. Phrase order in the relative clause is relatively free, with the caveats that the clause must be introduced by a form of su and that the verb phrase must go last in these causes. A simple example:
Line 1,133: Line 1,133:
The article su is in the absolutive case because the referent, the child, is the experiencer of the verb "triju," to see, in the subordinate clause. The verb goes to the end of the clause, and that signals to the listener that the clause is over and subsequent speech belongs to the main clause. The nominative form of "su," "sun," would be used when the referent is not a core argument of the dependent clause verb, and in that case may be preceded by a preposition clarifying the role.
The article su is in the absolutive case because the referent, the child, is the experiencer of the verb "triju," to see, in the subordinate clause. The verb goes to the end of the clause, and that signals to the listener that the clause is over and subsequent speech belongs to the main clause. The nominative form of "su," "sun," would be used when the referent is not a core argument of the dependent clause verb, and in that case may be preceded by a preposition clarifying the role.


'''Verbal Relative Pronouns'''
====Verbal Relative Pronouns====


The article si (gloss RELV) is used to introduce a subordinate clause that as a whole fills an actor role centered around the verb in the main clause. The case of si is the case for the role the clause performs in the main verb. The clause introduced by si may appear anywhere in the sentence that as simple noun phrase introduced by 'a' could go. Word order within the clause is the same as for su. The clause must be introduced by si and the verb phrase must be the last element in the clause. A simple example:
The article si (gloss RELV) is used to introduce a subordinate clause that as a whole fills an actor role centered around the verb in the main clause. The case of si is the case for the role the clause performs in the main verb. The clause introduced by si may appear anywhere in the sentence that as simple noun phrase introduced by 'a' could go. Word order within the clause is the same as for su. The clause must be introduced by si and the verb phrase must be the last element in the clause. A simple example:
Line 1,148: Line 1,148:
===Modifiers===
===Modifiers===


====Noun Modifiers====[https://webconlang.infiniterecursion.ca/article/common/7/]
====Noun Modifiers====


As in English, Common has a natural, preferred order of modifiers in a noun phrase. This order is very similar to that of English, which is unsurprising given the common head-final word building of both languages, the prevalence of this approximate order in many of the world's languages, and the direct influence of English on Common. The most general order of elements in the noun phrase is as follows, from beginning to end. Mandatory elements are in bold italic. Elements which have a strict position that never deviates when present are in bold. Elements which are generally found in this position but which may have exceptions in order to convey a special meaning or for literary effect are undecorated. The head term, which is mandatory if any modifiers are present, is in italic.
Noun modifiers in Common equate to adjectives, prepositions that refer to noun phrases, and nominal relativisers.[https://webconlang.infiniterecursion.ca/article/common/7/]
 
As in English, Common has a natural, preferred order of modifiers in a noun phrase. This order is very similar to that of English, which is unsurprising given the common head-final word building of both languages, the prevalence of this approximate order in many of the world's languages, and the direct influence of English on Common. The most general order of elements in the noun phrase is as follows, from beginning to end. Mandatory elements are in '''''bold italic'''''. Elements which have a strict position that never deviates when present are in '''bold'''. Elements which are generally found in this position but which may have exceptions in order to convey a special meaning or for literary effect are undecorated. The head term, which is mandatory if any modifiers are present, is in ''italic''.


#'''''Article'''''
#'''''Article'''''
Line 1,204: Line 1,206:
According to this analysis, the reason why the "yn" is mandatory and you can't say "na su se an citit" is because of the trace left behind triggering the "head term required with a modifier" rule.
According to this analysis, the reason why the "yn" is mandatory and you can't say "na su se an citit" is because of the trace left behind triggering the "head term required with a modifier" rule.


====Verb Modifiers (Adverbials)====[https://webconlang.infiniterecursion.ca/article/common/9/]
====Verb Modifiers (Adverbials)====
 
Verb modifiers in Common equate to adjectives, prepositions that refer to verb phrases or entire sentences, and verbal relativisers.[https://webconlang.infiniterecursion.ca/article/common/9/]
 
Common considers noun and verb modifiers to be the same part of speech and allows them to be freely zero derived from each other, but there are differences in practice. Here are some of the major differences between modifiers on verbs as opposed to nouns:
 
*There is a standard order, but it's not the same as for nouns. See below.
*Adverbial expressions can freely leave the auxiliary-head term bracket and move around the sentence to certain locations.
**Before or after the verb phrase. However prepositional phrases cannot go right in front of the auxiliary is the verb phrase isn't the first element in the sentence but must go after the head term or to the begining of the sentence.
**To the beginning of the sentence. Many adverbials can do this, whether they have an object or not.
**To precede the article for one of the arguments to the verb to modify the argument in relation to the verb. A particular verb might mandate such modifiers as required or as optional.
*Modifying terms are more likely to be interpreted as chained verbs with a modal meaning than as part of a compound meaning, although the latter occurs as well.
 
Adverbials inside a relative clause have similar freedom of movement but cannot leave the relative clause.
 
Common considers every modifier in a sentence to "belong" to a specific noun or verb phrase in the sentence. Noun modifiers belong to their noun phrases via very strict positioning requirements. Verb modifiers have some positioning requirements but are much freer to move around. Their exact interpretation can vary by position in the sentence. Nevertheless, in terms of the concepts of formal Common grammar, any modifier you encounter in a clause that does not clearly belong to one of the noun phrases in that clause is considered to belong to the clause's verb phrase, and to modify it in some way, even if somewhat peripherally.
 
Because of the idea in Common that any adverbial "belongs" to the verb phrase of the clause, if such a word encountered anywhere in the sentence it is considered to leave a "trace" between the auxiliary and the head term in the verb phrase as if it had been moved out of the bracket. As such, in the case of head term dropping, in grammatical Common, you are supposed to use the dummy head term "yn" if you want to drop the head term and still use any adverbials, even such as one applying some attitude to the entire sentence (like introducing a sentence with "Unfortunately").
 
With the equivalent "yn" rule with nouns, native speakers are mostly very good about obeying it. The rule is generally obeyed but more likely to be flouted with adverbs, suggesting that the trace theory may not be as applicable with all kinds of adverbs. It is important to understand and follow this rule for good formal style, however.
 
Adverbials (modifiers of verbs) can do the following kinds of things:
 
*Directly modify the verb, clarifying something about frequency, manner, time, etc. In this case they are usually found in close proximity to the verb phrase, either in the bracket, directly before the auxiliary, or directly after the head term.
*Apply to the whole sentence or statement. In this case they are often found at the beginning of the sentence or clause.
*Modify the interpretation of one of the core verbal arguments, in which case they will always directly precede the article.
*Introduce some additional special argument a verb uses that is not covered as part of its paradigm verb, typically with a nominative noun phrase object.
 
The following is the basic order of where adverbials theoretically appear inside a verb phrase. As with nouns, trace theory is considered to apply if any are moved out of the bracket, driving the appearance of "yn" if modifiers are used and the head term is dropped. As with nouns, modifiers with objects that are not also modifiers cannot stay in the bracket and must move out. Unlike with nouns, adverbials tend to preserve the same order in any position where more than one is found and to not reverse order like noun modifiers to maintain the same closeness to the head term.
 
Mandatory elements are in '''''bold italic'''''. Elements which have a strict position that never deviates when present are in '''bold'''. Elements which are generally found in this position but which may have exceptions in order to convey a special meaning or for literary effect are undecorated. The head term, which is mandatory if any modifiers are present, is in ''italic''.
 
#'''''Auxiliary Determiner'''''
#Time
#Duration
#Frequency
#Place
#Manner
#Instrument
#Purpose
#'''Polarity'''
#'''Chained Verbs'''
#'''Modifying Terms'''
#''Head Term''
 
This order is somewhat different than the manner-place-frequency-time-purpose 'royal order of adverbs' in English. As in English, the order reflects a tendency and real-world counter-examples can easily be found, particularly for the undecorated elements in the list. As with modifiers of nouns, Davidson specified some of the order explicitly, certainly all the bold elements, but there was little explicit direction on the remaining elements. Common was evidently created with a different order of adverbials than English, however, because examples where time preceded place and manner are attested in the earliest writings.
 
In the late early and middle periods, order in adverbs showed considerable variation in attested writings, often influenced by the speakers' native languages. Chinese and English speakers, for example, tended to use orders closer to their native languages, which are quite different. The order in Common is a little closer to that of Chinese than English in some ways, and how the system ended up may actually be more of an influence from Mandarin than from English. In the late middle period, the order started to settle down towards the modern style, and by the time the language was codified in the early modern period, grammarians were recommending a style very close to the modern style above.
 
Items 9-11 will be looked at in more depth.
 
=====Polarity (Negation and Answering Yes/No Questions)=====
 
Note for making negative statements that Common is a negative concord language. See Trafalgar for details.[https://webconlang.infiniterecursion.ca/article/common/42/]
 
Polarity refers to whether the verb is positive or negative. Common has particles to indicate both - the positive particle is less often required, but is used to emphasize the positiveness of a verb, such as to contradict a negative assertion about the action. The negative particle does the name thing as "not" in English, and is required to express a negative. If another adverbial indicates a negative meaning to the verb somehow, the negative particle is still required - Common demands a double negative in these circumstances, and a double negative is still a negative, or a more intense negative.
 
Positive: ''la''<br>
Negative: ''ikky''
 
Polarity particles are also used as the epithets for yes and no. They may be used on their own in answer to a yes-no question. When used to introduce a sentence as the answer to a yes/no question, grammatical Common requires a polarity particle to be repeated in the verb phrase, not necessarily the same particle, though. For example the following are all valid:
 
''La, a costo se la an uzre''<br>
Yes, the house is green.
 
''Ikky, a costo se ikky an uzre.''<br>
No, the house is not green.
 
''La, a costo se ikky an uzre.''<br>
Yes, the house is not green.
 
''Ikky, a costo se la an uzre.''<br>
No, the house is green.
 
The positive particle may sometimes be omitted from the verb phrase by some speakers when answering a yes/no question with a positive sentence, but this is actually considered ungrammatical. Speakers are careful to use a negative particle in the verb phrase when answering a yes/no question with a negative sentence, however.
 
=====Chained Verbs=====
 
Modifying terms can be applied to the head term main verb to introduce more information about time or mood than is contained in the verbal auxiliary. They are considered to apply in series, with each one applying to the next in sequence until the last applies to the head term. For example, the verbs "noxaj," "go' and "jusal," "want" can be used in the fashion.
 
When used as a chained verb, "noxaj" connotes a future sense, just like in English. Using noxaj this way connotes that the speaker considers the future action very definite and probably not a very long time in the future. Example:
 
''Ja pocuk te noxaj zeul a paluh.''<br>
3.SG.DEF.ERG child STRN.NPST.NPRF.REAL go eye 3.SG.DEF.ABS dog.
 
"The child is going to look at the dog."
 
Contrasting "jusal," jusal can also indicate a future sense. The implication is that the referent desires to complete the action and will if not prevented. The attitude towards the likelihood of the action coming to fruition is less definite and the timeframe may be longer or less definite.
 
''Ja pocuk te jusal zeul a paluh.''<br>
3.SG.DEF.ERG child TRN.NPST.NPRF.REAL want eye 3.SG.DEF.ABS dog.
 
"The child will look at the dog," or, "The child wants to look at the dog."
 
If the speaker wanted to emphasize the child's desire to look at the dog rather than the action that this desire unleashes, a non-chained relative construction might be selected:
 
''A pocuk nox jusal ixi a paluh te zeul.''<br>
3.SG.DEF.ABS child STRN.NPST.NPRF.REAL want RELV.DAT 3.SG.DEF.ABS dog TRN.NPST.NPRF.REAL eye.
 
These constructions and others produce similar shades of meaning about future actions. You could also say:
 
Ja pocuk te zeul a paluh
3.SG.DEF.ERG child TRN.NPST.NPRF.REAL eye 3.SG.DEF.ABS dog.
 
'The child is going to look at the dog.'
 
This is because 'te' is in the non-past, and that means it can just as easily be interpreted to have a future meaning as a present meaning without any other indicator of future time.
 
Note that auxiliary agreement and verbal arguments are usually based on the head term. Noxaj and jusal are both semitransitive noxaj verbs, but in all these chained verb examples, the verb was conjugated with te, because the head term zeul is a transitive skurun verb.
 
However, there are exceptions where the expression acts more like an orthographically unjoined compound word, and the valence agreement of the compound can be completely unexpected relative to its components. An example of this would be with 'eru', 'water', which used as a verb is a skurun verb and means something like to water something, but when used in a compound with 'wero', 'cause or make', as 'wero eru', which is a euphemistic or polite way of saying urinate, the compound acts as a pali verb.
 
=====Modifying Terms=====
 
Verb phrases can have modifying terms on the verb much as noun phrases can, and like with nouns, these shade into being parts of compound words rather than independent words. Unlike with nouns, which tolerate the ambiguity between possessing terms and modifying terms well, verbs do not like this ambiguity, and Common tends to avoid modifying terms for verbs, instead preferring to use compounding or other forms of derivation and word building to try to get to a single-word head term. However, modifying terms are grammatical and do exist.
 
====Modifiers of Modifiers====
 
Common has a concept of "tight" or "loose binding" in modifiers.[https://webconlang.infiniterecursion.ca/article/common/10/] All modifiers inherently have this binding property. Loose binding modifiers are as we have discussed - they apply to the overall noun or verb phrase. Tight binding modifiers are a smaller class of modifiers that bind "tightly" to whatever follows them - in essence, they are modifiers of modifiers.
 
Tight binding modifiers can be irregular, or else regular and derived from loose binding modifiers by adding the suffix "-no." Irregular tight binding modifiers like "faj," "very," can never be derived into loose binding modifiers, and may or may not have an irregular loose binding partner.


====Prepositions====
====Prepositions====
Common exclusively has prepositions as opposed to postpositions.[https://webconlang.infiniterecursion.ca/article/common/17/] Prepositions are seen as a kind of modifier. Modifiers fall into grades - the first grade is a closed class of weak modifiers that all require objects. They are all prepositions. The second grade that generally also take an object but that can sometimes function without one, and so are sometimes prepositions. The third grade is an open class and can never take an object, so never function as prepositions.[https://webconlang.infiniterecursion.ca/article/common/82/]
The object of a preposition can be a noun phrase or a dependent clause. If a noun phrase, the article must be in the nominative case. If a dependent clause, it must be introduced with "sin," the verbal relativizer "si" in the nominative case, and the verb is required to be the last element in order to comply with formal High Common grammar.


===Conjunctions===
===Conjunctions===


===Dependent Clauses===
Conjunctions in Common are a closed class and typically are used for rhetorical flow. They come in two varieties, "edge" and "internal."[https://webconlang.infiniterecursion.ca/article/common/12/] Edge conjunctions are used to join phrases or sentences, whereas internal conjunctions are used to join elements inside a phrase. Edge and internal conjunctions often come in pairs with similar meaning and sometimes are identical. An example where there is a difference is "pi" (internal) and "epis" (edge) which both mean "and."
 
Examples:
 
''A pantera na Kanata se an eotil '''pi''' zilus.''<br>
The flag of Canada is red and white.
 
''A pikki '''epis''' a paluh se an citit.''<br>
The cat and the dog are happy.
 
In the first example, "pi" is joining two modifiers. In the second example, "epis" is joining two noun phrases collectively as the subject of the verb "se an."
 
Note that "epis" is exclusively used to connect noun phrases into a single argument of a verb - to run sentences together into a sequence of events, Common uses a different conjunction, "hanja."
 
===Derivational Morphology===
 
Common has a wide range of suffixes and prefixes that can be used derive new words with different meanings.[https://webconlang.infiniterecursion.ca/article/common/13/] The most significant and useful are:
 
*-(y)n: Derives a modifier into a term.
*-(y)s: Derives a term into a modifer.
*-(y)syn: A combination of -(y)s and -(y)n, derives an abstractified term from a term.
*-no: Derives a loose binding modifier into a tight binding modifier.
*-ka: Applied to a term, forces a verb interpretation and derives a new term with a base interpretation as a noun that is the typical absolutive argument of the verb.
*-ca: Applied to a term, forces a verb interpretation and derives a new term with a base interpretation as a noun that is the typical ergative argument of the verb.
*-kija: Applied to a term, forces a verb interpretation and derives a new term with a base interpretation as a noun that is the typical dative argument of the verb.
 
There are also a few extremely productive but also extremely idiomatic prefixes derived from prepositions that are used to perform radial derivations from base roots, such as "u-" which implies becoming, "e-" which implies sustained effort, and "ro-" which intensifies or implied completion.
 
As well, it is possible in Common to create compound words.[https://webconlang.infiniterecursion.ca/article/common/94/] Compounds are usually of terms, with the head being the rightmost term.


==Example Text==
==Example Text==


Trafalgar provides a series of example texts along with some contextual background on [https://webconlang.infiniterecursion.ca/article/common/list/literature/ the literature section of their blog]. Here we will give one, specific example with a full IPA pronunciation and gloss, which Trafalgar doesn't always provide.
This text is a paragraph from the [https://webconlang.infiniterecursion.ca/article/common/110/ Globalist Manifesto], a founding document of the New World Order. The link goes to a larger except, which has the IPA and a sound file but not a full gloss.
===Common Original===
'''Na Onpafisas Affe Lawt'''
''Na Ates Hiet - na Pali na Onpafisa''
A atenys Onpa xu wez te speos arte tene faj can xeppe, hanja a spet yn nox hufep ija ejálys etríjusyn u sin ti mawa. Jaz kiles Onpafisaka hanne cet a spet Affe Lawt u sin hyp tol ija awke atuinot a kaje na exúlyn, itin wez nox riske til a spet lawt speos u sin wez si jal e na ate zra kaje. Itin a spet Affe Lawt se an na efo zra happat na atuinysyn, hanja ceo na Hyl na Lufis Sufetysyn na Onpa az awken su ija affe trit si ehóro te riske xi jaz te rowétera a lis na spet Lawt.
=== IPA ===
na 'om.ba.va.zas 'af.fe lawt
na 'a.des 'hi.et - na 'pa.li na 'om.ba.vi.za
a 'a.den.əs 'om.ba ʃu weθ te 'spe.os 'ar.de 'te.ne faj t͡ʃan 'ʃep.pe, 'haɲja a spet ən noʃ 'hu.vep 'i.ja e'jal.əs e'tri.ju.zən u sin ti 'ma.wa. jaθ 'ki.les 'om.ba.vi.za.ga 'han.ne t͡ʃet a spet 'af.fe lawt u sin həp tol 'i.ja 'aw.ge 'a.du.in.ot a 'ka.je na e'ʒu.lən, 'i.din weθ noʃ 'ris.ke til a spet lawt 'spe.os u sin weθ si jal e na 'a.de θra 'ka.je. 'i.din a spet 'af.fe lawt se an na 'e.vo θra 'hap.pat na 'a.du.in.əz.ən, 'haɲ.ja t͡ʃeo na həl na 'lu.vis 'su.ved.əz.ən na 'om.ba aθ 'aw.gen su 'i.ja 'af.fe trit si e'ço.ro te 'ris ke ʃi jaθ te ro'we.de.ra a lis na spet lawt.
=== Gloss ===
''Na Onpa-fisa-s Affe Lawt''
3.SG.DEF.NOM globe-belief-MOD public word
''Na Ate-s Hiet - na Pali na Onpa-fisa''
3.SG.DEF.NOM one-ORD tranche - 3.SG.DEF.NOM stand 3.SG.DEF.NOM globe-belief
''A ate-n-ys Onpa xu wez te speos arte tene faj can xeppe, hanja a spet yn nox hufep ija e-jál-ys e-tríju-s-yn u sin ti mawa.''
3.SG.DEF.ABS one-TERM-MOD globe RELN.ERG 1.PL.INCL.ABS TRN.NPST.NPRF.REAL today benefit TRN.NPST.PRF.REAL very hard win and.then 3.SG.DEF.ABS this one STRN.NPST.NPRF.REAL need 3.SG.DEF.DAT sustain-stay-MOD sustain-see-MOD-TERM to RELV.NOM TRN.NPST.PRF.IRREAL cover
''Jaz kile-s Onpa-fisa-ka hanne cet a spet Affe Lawt u sin hyp tol ija awke atuin-ot a kaje ∅ na e-xúl-yn, itin wez nox riske til a spet lawt speos u sin wez si jal e na ate zra kaje.''
3.PL.DEF.ERG back-MOD globe-belief-EXP DTRN.NPST.PRF.REAL write 3.SG.DEF.ABS this public word to RELV.NOM DTRN.NPST.NPRF.IRREAL show 3.SG.DEF.DAT all person-kind 3.SG.DEF.ABS road NULL 3.SG.DEF.NOM sustain-alive-TERM, therefore 1.PL.INCL.ABS STRN.NPST.NPRF.REAL oblige study 3.SG.DEF.ABS this word today to RELV.NOM 1.PL.INCL.ABS NTRN.NPST.NPRF.IRREAL rest at 3.SG.DEF.NOM one good road.
''Itin a spet Affe Lawt se an na efo zra happat ∅ na atuin-ys-yn, hanja ceo na Hyl ∅ na Lufi-s Sufet-ys-yn ∅ na Onpa az awke-n su ija affe trit si e-hóro te riske xi jaz te ro-wétera a lis ∅ na spet Lawt.''
Therefore 3.SG.DEF.ABS this public word NTRN.NPST.NPRF.REAL be 3.SG.DEF.NOM SUPERLATIVE good give NULL 3.SG.DEF.NOM person-MOD-TERM and.then through 3.SG.DEF.NOM law NULL 3.SG.DEF.NOM birth-MOD arrangement-MOD-TERM NULL globe 3.PL.DEF.ABS all-TERM RELN.ABS 3.SG.DEF.DAT public rule NTRN.NPST.NPRF.IRREAL sustain-gather TRN.NPST.NPRF.REAL oblige RELV.ERG 3.PL.DEF.ERG TRN.NPST.NPRF.REAL complete-fulfill 3.SG.DEF.ABS meaning NULL 3.SG.DEF.NOM this word.
===Literal English Translation===
This translation isn't literally word-for-word, because that would be unreadable, but tries to capture something of the flavor of the original.
'''The Globalist Public Word'''
''The First Tranche - the Stand of the Globalism''
The united globe that we today profit from has been very hard won and needs constant vigilance so that would protect. The past Globalists have written this Public Word so that would show to all humankind the way of survival, therefore we must study this word today so that we would stay on the good way. Therefore this Public Word is the most good gift of humanity and through the Law of the New Order of the Globe all that to public rule would participate are obliged that they fulfill the meaning of this Word.
===Fluent English Translation===
'''The Globalist Manifesto'''
''Section One - The Base of Globalism''
The unified world that we enjoy today has been very hard-won, and constant vigilance is required to maintain it. The Globalist visionaries of the past wrote this Manifesto in order to show humanity the path to survival, and we continue to honor it today in order to stay on that path. For this reason, the Manifesto is humanity's greatest gift, and by New World Order law, everyone who participates in public life must adhere to the principles of the Manifesto.




86

edits