757
edits
Harākti: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Infobox language | {{Infobox language | ||
|name = Harākti | |name = Harākti | ||
|nativename = {{cuneiform| | |nativename = {{cuneiform|𒀀𒇉𒁴}} Harākti | ||
|pronunciation = [xaˈɾaːkti] | |pronunciation = [xaˈɾaːkti] | ||
|region = Eurasia | |region = Eurasia | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''Harākti''' (natively written as {{cuneiform|𒄩𒊏𒀀𒀝𒋾}} (''ha-ra-a-ak-ti''), transliterated as ''harākti'', [[w:IPA|IPA]]: [xaˈɾaːkti]) is an [[w:Indo-European_languages|Indo-European language]]. It is part of the [[w:Anatolian languages|Anatolian branch]] of the Indo-European languages, although it differs extensivly from the rest of the Anatolian languages, which is the reason for some speculation regarding its place within the Indo-European family. The strongest argument placed forward in favour of Harākti being an Anatolian language is the fact that, like [[w:Hittite_language|Hittite]], it is a language that reflected some of the [[w:Laryngeal_theory|laryngeal sounds]] as consonants. Its verbal system likewise resembles that of Hittite, and the general symplicity of the declensional and conjugational systems is again a characteristic shared with the Anatolian languages. | '''Harākti''' (natively written as {{cuneiform|𒀀𒇉𒁴}} (ÍD''-ti'') or {{cuneiform|𒄩𒊏𒀀𒀝𒋾}} (''ha-ra-a-ak-ti''), transliterated as ''harākti'', [[w:IPA|IPA]]: [xaˈɾaːkti]) is an [[w:Indo-European_languages|Indo-European language]]. It is part of the [[w:Anatolian languages|Anatolian branch]] of the Indo-European languages, although it differs extensivly from the rest of the Anatolian languages, which is the reason for some speculation regarding its place within the Indo-European family. The strongest argument placed forward in favour of Harākti being an Anatolian language is the fact that, like [[w:Hittite_language|Hittite]], it is a language that reflected some of the [[w:Laryngeal_theory|laryngeal sounds]] as consonants. Its verbal system likewise resembles that of Hittite, and the general symplicity of the declensional and conjugational systems is again a characteristic shared with the Anatolian languages. | ||