138,726
edits
Literature talk:Schleicher's fable: Difference between revisions
m
→Grammar
m (→Grammar) |
|||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
* topic-comment syntax (as in [[Proctorian]]), | * topic-comment syntax (as in [[Proctorian]]), | ||
* no pro-drop, | * no pro-drop, | ||
* three tenses (present, past and future), | * only three tenses (present, past and future), | ||
* generally isolating (modern CW languages are either agglutinating, like Verapamil, or fusional, like [[Clofabosin]]). | * generally isolating (modern CW languages are either agglutinating, like Verapamil, or fusional, like [[Clofabosin]]). | ||